In the last five weeks, more than 24 million workers applied for unemployment insurance benefits
In the last five weeks, the number of workers applying for unemployment insurance (UI) benefits has skyrocketed to well over 20 times what it was in the pre-coronavirus period, and over five times the worst five-week stretch of the Great Recession. For comparison, in the period before the coronavirus hit, just over a million workers would apply for UI in a typical five-week span, and in the worst five-week stretch of the Great Recession, it was less than four million. In the last five weeks, it was more than 24 million. That means more than one in seven workers applied for UI. (It should be noted that using seasonally adjusted numbers, the Department of Labor [DOL] reports that 26.5 million workers applied for UI during the last five weeks, and using unadjusted numbers, they report that 24.4 million workers applied for benefits. I focus on the unadjusted numbers because, while seasonal adjustments are typically helpful—they are used to even out seasonal changes in claims that have nothing to do with the underlying strength or weakness of the labor market—the way DOL does seasonal adjustments is somewhat distortionary at a time like this).
Weekly initial unemployment insurance claims: Not seasonally adjusted, 1967–present
| Week ending | Initial claims |
|---|---|
| 1967-01-07 | 346,000 |
| 1967-01-14 | 334,000 |
| 1967-01-21 | 277,000 |
| 1967-01-28 | 252,000 |
| 1967-02-04 | 274,000 |
| 1967-02-11 | 276,000 |
| 1967-02-18 | 247,000 |
| 1967-02-25 | 248,000 |
| 1967-03-04 | 326,000 |
| 1967-03-11 | 240,000 |
| 1967-03-18 | 225,000 |
| 1967-03-25 | 215,000 |
| 1967-04-01 | 223,000 |
| 1967-04-08 | 251,000 |
| 1967-04-15 | 289,000 |
| 1967-04-22 | 218,000 |
| 1967-04-29 | 216,000 |
| 1967-05-06 | 221,000 |
| 1967-05-13 | 188,000 |
| 1967-05-20 | 177,000 |
| 1967-05-27 | 170,000 |
| 1967-06-03 | 175,000 |
| 1967-06-10 | 188,000 |
| 1967-06-17 | 176,000 |
| 1967-06-24 | 178,000 |
| 1967-07-01 | 206,000 |
| 1967-07-08 | 322,000 |
| 1967-07-15 | 309,000 |
| 1967-07-22 | 282,000 |
| 1967-07-29 | 243,000 |
| 1967-08-05 | 250,000 |
| 1967-08-12 | 193,000 |
| 1967-08-19 | 174,000 |
| 1967-08-26 | 160,000 |
| 1967-09-02 | 163,000 |
| 1967-09-09 | 156,000 |
| 1967-09-16 | 165,000 |
| 1967-09-23 | 155,000 |
| 1967-09-30 | 154,000 |
| 1967-10-07 | 195,000 |
| 1967-10-14 | 159,000 |
| 1967-10-21 | 181,000 |
| 1967-10-28 | 174,000 |
| 1967-11-04 | 204,000 |
| 1967-11-11 | 201,000 |
| 1967-11-18 | 209,000 |
| 1967-11-25 | 200,000 |
| 1967-12-02 | 228,000 |
| 1967-12-09 | 258,000 |
| 1967-12-16 | 241,000 |
| 1967-12-23 | 289,000 |
| 1967-12-30 | 332,000 |
| 1968-01-06 | 357,000 |
| 1968-01-13 | 373,000 |
| 1968-01-20 | 293,000 |
| 1968-01-27 | 242,000 |
| 1968-02-03 | 308,000 |
| 1968-02-10 | 257,000 |
| 1968-02-17 | 214,000 |
| 1968-02-24 | 199,000 |
| 1968-03-02 | 198,000 |
| 1968-03-09 | 208,000 |
| 1968-03-16 | 179,000 |
| 1968-03-23 | 175,000 |
| 1968-03-30 | 165,000 |
| 1968-04-06 | 184,000 |
| 1968-04-13 | 167,000 |
| 1968-04-20 | 165,000 |
| 1968-04-27 | 216,000 |
| 1968-05-04 | 180,000 |
| 1968-05-11 | 164,000 |
| 1968-05-18 | 156,000 |
| 1968-05-25 | 148,000 |
| 1968-06-01 | 139,000 |
| 1968-06-08 | 149,000 |
| 1968-06-15 | 154,000 |
| 1968-06-22 | 152,000 |
| 1968-06-29 | 173,000 |
| 1968-07-06 | 266,000 |
| 1968-07-13 | 242,000 |
| 1968-07-20 | 216,000 |
| 1968-07-27 | 238,000 |
| 1968-08-03 | 235,000 |
| 1968-08-10 | 222,000 |
| 1968-08-17 | 160,000 |
| 1968-08-24 | 148,000 |
| 1968-08-31 | 139,000 |
| 1968-09-07 | 135,000 |
| 1968-09-14 | 141,000 |
| 1968-09-21 | 142,000 |
| 1968-09-28 | 143,000 |
| 1968-10-05 | 153,000 |
| 1968-10-12 | 151,000 |
| 1968-10-19 | 151,000 |
| 1968-10-26 | 152,000 |
| 1968-11-02 | 161,000 |
| 1968-11-09 | 174,000 |
| 1968-11-16 | 196,000 |
| 1968-11-23 | 211,000 |
| 1968-11-30 | 180,000 |
| 1968-12-07 | 223,000 |
| 1968-12-14 | 233,000 |
| 1968-12-21 | 243,000 |
| 1968-12-28 | 333,000 |
| 1969-01-04 | 290,000 |
| 1969-01-11 | 337,000 |
| 1969-01-18 | 265,000 |
| 1969-01-25 | 236,000 |
| 1969-02-01 | 250,000 |
| 1969-02-08 | 248,000 |
| 1969-02-15 | 219,000 |
| 1969-02-22 | 199,000 |
| 1969-03-01 | 206,000 |
| 1969-03-08 | 195,000 |
| 1969-03-15 | 179,000 |
| 1969-03-22 | 158,000 |
| 1969-03-29 | 157,000 |
| 1969-04-05 | 170,000 |
| 1969-04-12 | 187,000 |
| 1969-04-19 | 168,000 |
| 1969-04-26 | 151,000 |
| 1969-05-03 | 150,000 |
| 1969-05-10 | 157,000 |
| 1969-05-17 | 141,000 |
| 1969-05-24 | 138,000 |
| 1969-05-31 | 135,000 |
| 1969-06-07 | 148,000 |
| 1969-06-14 | 145,000 |
| 1969-06-21 | 155,000 |
| 1969-06-28 | 177,000 |
| 1969-07-05 | 267,000 |
| 1969-07-12 | 271,000 |
| 1969-07-19 | 246,000 |
| 1969-07-26 | 221,000 |
| 1969-08-02 | 223,000 |
| 1969-08-09 | 210,000 |
| 1969-08-16 | 168,000 |
| 1969-08-23 | 154,000 |
| 1969-08-30 | 144,000 |
| 1969-09-06 | 133,000 |
| 1969-09-13 | 149,000 |
| 1969-09-20 | 147,000 |
| 1969-09-27 | 147,000 |
| 1969-10-04 | 159,000 |
| 1969-10-11 | 168,000 |
| 1969-10-18 | 155,000 |
| 1969-10-25 | 171,000 |
| 1969-11-01 | 174,000 |
| 1969-11-08 | 206,000 |
| 1969-11-15 | 196,000 |
| 1969-11-22 | 230,000 |
| 1969-11-29 | 219,000 |
| 1969-12-06 | 247,000 |
| 1969-12-13 | 264,000 |
| 1969-12-20 | 289,000 |
| 1969-12-27 | 320,000 |
| 1970-01-03 | 344,000 |
| 1970-01-10 | 429,000 |
| 1970-01-17 | 386,000 |
| 1970-01-24 | 316,000 |
| 1970-01-31 | 293,000 |
| 1970-02-07 | 324,000 |
| 1970-02-14 | 308,000 |
| 1970-02-21 | 285,000 |
| 1970-02-28 | 241,000 |
| 1970-03-07 | 270,000 |
| 1970-03-14 | 258,000 |
| 1970-03-21 | 233,000 |
| 1970-03-28 | 236,000 |
| 1970-04-04 | 250,000 |
| 1970-04-11 | 300,000 |
| 1970-04-18 | 339,000 |
| 1970-04-25 | 299,000 |
| 1970-05-02 | 278,000 |
| 1970-05-09 | 279,000 |
| 1970-05-16 | 242,000 |
| 1970-05-23 | 231,000 |
| 1970-05-30 | 224,000 |
| 1970-06-06 | 234,000 |
| 1970-06-13 | 242,000 |
| 1970-06-20 | 245,000 |
| 1970-06-27 | 247,000 |
| 1970-07-04 | 309,000 |
| 1970-07-11 | 369,000 |
| 1970-07-18 | 353,000 |
| 1970-07-25 | 329,000 |
| 1970-08-01 | 293,000 |
| 1970-08-08 | 278,000 |
| 1970-08-15 | 257,000 |
| 1970-08-22 | 238,000 |
| 1970-08-29 | 220,000 |
| 1970-09-05 | 240,000 |
| 1970-09-12 | 207,000 |
| 1970-09-19 | 247,000 |
| 1970-09-26 | 256,000 |
| 1970-10-03 | 284,000 |
| 1970-10-10 | 287,000 |
| 1970-10-17 | 259,000 |
| 1970-10-24 | 280,000 |
| 1970-10-31 | 283,000 |
| 1970-11-07 | 333,000 |
| 1970-11-14 | 307,000 |
| 1970-11-21 | 333,000 |
| 1970-11-28 | 354,000 |
| 1970-12-05 | 378,000 |
| 1970-12-12 | 370,000 |
| 1970-12-19 | 354,000 |
| 1970-12-26 | 451,000 |
| 1971-01-02 | 443,000 |
| 1971-01-09 | 500,000 |
| 1971-01-16 | 452,000 |
| 1971-01-23 | 399,000 |
| 1971-01-30 | 353,000 |
| 1971-02-06 | 375,000 |
| 1971-02-13 | 333,000 |
| 1971-02-20 | 286,000 |
| 1971-02-27 | 289,000 |
| 1971-03-06 | 306,000 |
| 1971-03-13 | 275,000 |
| 1971-03-20 | 260,000 |
| 1971-03-27 | 261,000 |
| 1971-04-03 | 267,000 |
| 1971-04-10 | 278,000 |
| 1971-04-17 | 257,000 |
| 1971-04-24 | 248,000 |
| 1971-05-01 | 237,000 |
| 1971-05-08 | 260,000 |
| 1971-05-15 | 230,000 |
| 1971-05-22 | 231,000 |
| 1971-05-29 | 231,000 |
| 1971-06-05 | 232,000 |
| 1971-06-12 | 244,000 |
| 1971-06-19 | 249,000 |
| 1971-06-26 | 247,000 |
| 1971-07-03 | 288,000 |
| 1971-07-10 | 335,000 |
| 1971-07-17 | 367,000 |
| 1971-07-24 | 342,000 |
| 1971-07-31 | 340,000 |
| 1971-08-07 | 362,000 |
| 1971-08-14 | 282,000 |
| 1971-08-21 | 252,000 |
| 1971-08-28 | 228,000 |
| 1971-09-04 | 268,000 |
| 1971-09-11 | 219,000 |
| 1971-09-18 | 230,000 |
| 1971-09-25 | 236,000 |
| 1971-10-02 | 238,000 |
| 1971-10-09 | 280,000 |
| 1971-10-16 | 233,000 |
| 1971-10-23 | 251,000 |
| 1971-10-30 | 241,000 |
| 1971-11-06 | 297,000 |
| 1971-11-13 | 289,000 |
| 1971-11-20 | 291,000 |
| 1971-11-27 | 284,000 |
| 1971-12-04 | 372,000 |
| 1971-12-11 | 348,000 |
| 1971-12-18 | 329,000 |
| 1971-12-25 | 340,000 |
| 1972-01-01 | 405,000 |
| 1972-01-08 | 479,000 |
| 1972-01-15 | 395,000 |
| 1972-01-22 | 347,000 |
| 1972-01-29 | 326,000 |
| 1972-02-05 | 342,000 |
| 1972-02-12 | 318,000 |
| 1972-02-19 | 279,000 |
| 1972-02-26 | 252,000 |
| 1972-03-04 | 263,000 |
| 1972-03-11 | 257,000 |
| 1972-03-18 | 241,000 |
| 1972-03-25 | 231,000 |
| 1972-04-01 | 224,000 |
| 1972-04-08 | 271,000 |
| 1972-04-15 | 237,000 |
| 1972-04-22 | 223,000 |
| 1972-04-29 | 214,000 |
| 1972-05-06 | 234,000 |
| 1972-05-13 | 218,000 |
| 1972-05-20 | 210,000 |
| 1972-05-27 | 209,000 |
| 1972-06-03 | 198,000 |
| 1972-06-10 | 224,000 |
| 1972-06-17 | 227,000 |
| 1972-06-24 | 240,000 |
| 1972-07-01 | 327,000 |
| 1972-07-08 | 364,000 |
| 1972-07-15 | 367,000 |
| 1972-07-22 | 299,000 |
| 1972-07-29 | 266,000 |
| 1972-08-05 | 256,000 |
| 1972-08-12 | 220,000 |
| 1972-08-19 | 203,000 |
| 1972-08-26 | 195,000 |
| 1972-09-02 | 192,000 |
| 1972-09-09 | 178,000 |
| 1972-09-16 | 196,000 |
| 1972-09-23 | 193,000 |
| 1972-09-30 | 192,000 |
| 1972-10-07 | 233,000 |
| 1972-10-14 | 202,000 |
| 1972-10-21 | 214,000 |
| 1972-10-28 | 196,000 |
| 1972-11-04 | 242,000 |
| 1972-11-11 | 236,000 |
| 1972-11-18 | 280,000 |
| 1972-11-25 | 238,000 |
| 1972-12-02 | 268,000 |
| 1972-12-09 | 317,000 |
| 1972-12-16 | 323,000 |
| 1972-12-23 | 327,000 |
| 1972-12-30 | 338,000 |
| 1973-01-06 | 345,000 |
| 1973-01-13 | 412,000 |
| 1973-01-20 | 324,000 |
| 1973-01-27 | 267,000 |
| 1973-02-03 | 285,000 |
| 1973-02-10 | 276,000 |
| 1973-02-17 | 242,000 |
| 1973-02-24 | 220,000 |
| 1973-03-03 | 233,000 |
| 1973-03-10 | 227,000 |
| 1973-03-17 | 212,000 |
| 1973-03-24 | 209,000 |
| 1973-03-31 | 193,000 |
| 1973-04-07 | 244,000 |
| 1973-04-14 | 212,000 |
| 1973-04-21 | 211,000 |
| 1973-04-28 | 194,000 |
| 1973-05-05 | 214,000 |
| 1973-05-12 | 198,000 |
| 1973-05-19 | 189,000 |
| 1973-05-26 | 190,000 |
| 1973-06-02 | 173,000 |
| 1973-06-09 | 210,000 |
| 1973-06-16 | 198,000 |
| 1973-06-23 | 206,000 |
| 1973-06-30 | 215,000 |
| 1973-07-07 | 309,000 |
| 1973-07-14 | 270,000 |
| 1973-07-21 | 259,000 |
| 1973-07-28 | 265,000 |
| 1973-08-04 | 262,000 |
| 1973-08-11 | 238,000 |
| 1973-08-18 | 207,000 |
| 1973-08-25 | 190,000 |
| 1973-09-01 | 180,000 |
| 1973-09-08 | 177,000 |
| 1973-09-15 | 186,000 |
| 1973-09-22 | 187,000 |
| 1973-09-29 | 191,000 |
| 1973-10-06 | 210,000 |
| 1973-10-13 | 207,000 |
| 1973-10-20 | 208,000 |
| 1973-10-27 | 200,000 |
| 1973-11-03 | 230,000 |
| 1973-11-10 | 277,000 |
| 1973-11-17 | 261,000 |
| 1973-11-24 | 237,000 |
| 1973-12-01 | 299,000 |
| 1973-12-08 | 345,000 |
| 1973-12-15 | 340,000 |
| 1973-12-22 | 429,000 |
| 1973-12-29 | 461,000 |
| 1974-01-05 | 405,000 |
| 1974-01-12 | 584,000 |
| 1974-01-19 | 465,000 |
| 1974-01-26 | 373,000 |
| 1974-02-02 | 381,000 |
| 1974-02-09 | 459,000 |
| 1974-02-16 | 352,000 |
| 1974-02-23 | 296,000 |
| 1974-03-02 | 313,000 |
| 1974-03-09 | 310,000 |
| 1974-03-16 | 293,000 |
| 1974-03-23 | 285,000 |
| 1974-03-30 | 279,000 |
| 1974-04-06 | 288,000 |
| 1974-04-13 | 278,000 |
| 1974-04-20 | 256,000 |
| 1974-04-27 | 235,000 |
| 1974-05-04 | 243,000 |
| 1974-05-11 | 249,000 |
| 1974-05-18 | 238,000 |
| 1974-05-25 | 246,000 |
| 1974-06-01 | 209,000 |
| 1974-06-08 | 267,000 |
| 1974-06-15 | 255,000 |
| 1974-06-22 | 266,000 |
| 1974-06-29 | 285,000 |
| 1974-07-06 | 350,000 |
| 1974-07-13 | 351,000 |
| 1974-07-20 | 325,000 |
| 1974-07-27 | 333,000 |
| 1974-08-03 | 340,000 |
| 1974-08-10 | 318,000 |
| 1974-08-17 | 269,000 |
| 1974-08-24 | 260,000 |
| 1974-08-31 | 259,000 |
| 1974-09-07 | 253,000 |
| 1974-09-14 | 271,000 |
| 1974-09-21 | 283,000 |
| 1974-09-28 | 279,000 |
| 1974-10-05 | 325,000 |
| 1974-10-12 | 358,000 |
| 1974-10-19 | 324,000 |
| 1974-10-26 | 357,000 |
| 1974-11-02 | 375,000 |
| 1974-11-09 | 435,000 |
| 1974-11-16 | 450,000 |
| 1974-11-23 | 532,000 |
| 1974-11-30 | 524,000 |
| 1974-12-07 | 693,000 |
| 1974-12-14 | 637,000 |
| 1974-12-21 | 677,000 |
| 1974-12-28 | 813,000 |
| 1975-01-04 | 681,000 |
| 1975-01-11 | 969,000 |
| 1975-01-18 | 850,000 |
| 1975-01-25 | 729,000 |
| 1975-02-01 | 699,000 |
| 1975-02-08 | 691,000 |
| 1975-02-15 | 608,000 |
| 1975-02-22 | 567,000 |
| 1975-03-01 | 568,000 |
| 1975-03-08 | 569,000 |
| 1975-03-15 | 494,000 |
| 1975-03-22 | 499,000 |
| 1975-03-29 | 477,000 |
| 1975-04-05 | 505,000 |
| 1975-04-12 | 496,000 |
| 1975-04-19 | 456,000 |
| 1975-04-26 | 429,000 |
| 1975-05-03 | 420,000 |
| 1975-05-10 | 432,000 |
| 1975-05-17 | 410,000 |
| 1975-05-24 | 391,000 |
| 1975-05-31 | 360,000 |
| 1975-06-07 | 443,000 |
| 1975-06-14 | 422,000 |
| 1975-06-21 | 428,000 |
| 1975-06-28 | 407,000 |
| 1975-07-05 | 460,000 |
| 1975-07-12 | 517,000 |
| 1975-07-19 | 481,000 |
| 1975-07-26 | 471,000 |
| 1975-08-02 | 462,000 |
| 1975-08-09 | 429,000 |
| 1975-08-16 | 367,000 |
| 1975-08-23 | 353,000 |
| 1975-08-30 | 332,000 |
| 1975-09-06 | 331,000 |
| 1975-09-13 | 341,000 |
| 1975-09-20 | 336,000 |
| 1975-09-27 | 342,000 |
| 1975-10-04 | 365,000 |
| 1975-10-11 | 385,000 |
| 1975-10-18 | 332,000 |
| 1975-10-25 | 372,000 |
| 1975-11-01 | 378,000 |
| 1975-11-08 | 414,000 |
| 1975-11-15 | 371,000 |
| 1975-11-22 | 419,000 |
| 1975-11-29 | 403,000 |
| 1975-12-06 | 487,000 |
| 1975-12-13 | 456,000 |
| 1975-12-20 | 463,000 |
| 1975-12-27 | 573,000 |
| 1976-01-03 | 540,000 |
| 1976-01-10 | 708,000 |
| 1976-01-17 | 563,000 |
| 1976-01-24 | 486,000 |
| 1976-01-31 | 450,000 |
| 1976-02-07 | 452,000 |
| 1976-02-14 | 391,000 |
| 1976-02-21 | 367,000 |
| 1976-02-28 | 353,000 |
| 1976-03-06 | 366,000 |
| 1976-03-13 | 343,000 |
| 1976-03-20 | 330,000 |
| 1976-03-27 | 314,000 |
| 1976-04-03 | 334,000 |
| 1976-04-10 | 366,000 |
| 1976-04-17 | 316,000 |
| 1976-04-24 | 311,000 |
| 1976-05-01 | 313,000 |
| 1976-05-08 | 345,000 |
| 1976-05-15 | 308,000 |
| 1976-05-22 | 311,000 |
| 1976-05-29 | 310,000 |
| 1976-06-05 | 307,000 |
| 1976-06-12 | 351,000 |
| 1976-06-19 | 342,000 |
| 1976-06-26 | 339,000 |
| 1976-07-03 | 401,000 |
| 1976-07-10 | 445,000 |
| 1976-07-17 | 455,000 |
| 1976-07-24 | 418,000 |
| 1976-07-31 | 401,000 |
| 1976-08-07 | 373,000 |
| 1976-08-14 | 329,000 |
| 1976-08-21 | 320,000 |
| 1976-08-28 | 301,000 |
| 1976-09-04 | 321,000 |
| 1976-09-11 | 280,000 |
| 1976-09-18 | 320,000 |
| 1976-09-25 | 327,000 |
| 1976-10-02 | 332,000 |
| 1976-10-09 | 388,000 |
| 1976-10-16 | 325,000 |
| 1976-10-23 | 361,000 |
| 1976-10-30 | 370,000 |
| 1976-11-06 | 387,000 |
| 1976-11-13 | 363,000 |
| 1976-11-20 | 430,000 |
| 1976-11-27 | 369,000 |
| 1976-12-04 | 500,000 |
| 1976-12-11 | 494,000 |
| 1976-12-18 | 434,000 |
| 1976-12-25 | 466,000 |
| 1977-01-01 | 558,000 |
| 1977-01-08 | 685,000 |
| 1977-01-15 | 597,000 |
| 1977-01-22 | 589,000 |
| 1977-01-29 | 518,000 |
| 1977-02-05 | 704,000 |
| 1977-02-12 | 552,000 |
| 1977-02-19 | 422,000 |
| 1977-02-26 | 360,000 |
| 1977-03-05 | 367,000 |
| 1977-03-12 | 335,000 |
| 1977-03-19 | 321,000 |
| 1977-03-26 | 298,000 |
| 1977-04-02 | 296,000 |
| 1977-04-09 | 367,000 |
| 1977-04-16 | 316,000 |
| 1977-04-23 | 314,000 |
| 1977-04-30 | 305,000 |
| 1977-05-07 | 333,000 |
| 1977-05-14 | 309,000 |
| 1977-05-21 | 293,000 |
| 1977-05-28 | 298,000 |
| 1977-06-04 | 283,000 |
| 1977-06-11 | 308,000 |
| 1977-06-18 | 310,000 |
| 1977-06-25 | 321,000 |
| 1977-07-02 | 348,000 |
| 1977-07-09 | 431,000 |
| 1977-07-16 | 424,000 |
| 1977-07-23 | 391,000 |
| 1977-07-30 | 380,000 |
| 1977-08-06 | 379,000 |
| 1977-08-13 | 319,000 |
| 1977-08-20 | 298,000 |
| 1977-08-27 | 282,000 |
| 1977-09-03 | 289,000 |
| 1977-09-10 | 260,000 |
| 1977-09-17 | 289,000 |
| 1977-09-24 | 293,000 |
| 1977-10-01 | 275,000 |
| 1977-10-08 | 345,000 |
| 1977-10-15 | 287,000 |
| 1977-10-22 | 322,000 |
| 1977-10-29 | 309,000 |
| 1977-11-05 | 352,000 |
| 1977-11-12 | 310,000 |
| 1977-11-19 | 367,000 |
| 1977-11-26 | 342,000 |
| 1977-12-03 | 430,000 |
| 1977-12-10 | 448,000 |
| 1977-12-17 | 412,000 |
| 1977-12-24 | 450,000 |
| 1977-12-31 | 535,000 |
| 1978-01-07 | 559,000 |
| 1978-01-14 | 579,000 |
| 1978-01-21 | 500,000 |
| 1978-01-28 | 445,000 |
| 1978-02-04 | 447,000 |
| 1978-02-11 | 438,000 |
| 1978-02-18 | 455,000 |
| 1978-02-25 | 372,000 |
| 1978-03-04 | 360,000 |
| 1978-03-11 | 342,000 |
| 1978-03-18 | 302,000 |
| 1978-03-25 | 280,000 |
| 1978-04-01 | 278,000 |
| 1978-04-08 | 338,000 |
| 1978-04-15 | 279,000 |
| 1978-04-22 | 277,000 |
| 1978-04-29 | 269,000 |
| 1978-05-06 | 291,000 |
| 1978-05-13 | 268,000 |
| 1978-05-20 | 266,000 |
| 1978-05-27 | 256,000 |
| 1978-06-03 | 242,000 |
| 1978-06-10 | 292,000 |
| 1978-06-17 | 287,000 |
| 1978-06-24 | 297,000 |
| 1978-07-01 | 347,000 |
| 1978-07-08 | 428,000 |
| 1978-07-15 | 421,000 |
| 1978-07-22 | 387,000 |
| 1978-07-29 | 371,000 |
| 1978-08-05 | 376,000 |
| 1978-08-12 | 326,000 |
| 1978-08-19 | 287,000 |
| 1978-08-26 | 264,000 |
| 1978-09-02 | 249,000 |
| 1978-09-09 | 246,000 |
| 1978-09-16 | 262,000 |
| 1978-09-23 | 254,000 |
| 1978-09-30 | 249,000 |
| 1978-10-07 | 323,000 |
| 1978-10-14 | 262,000 |
| 1978-10-21 | 287,000 |
| 1978-10-28 | 280,000 |
| 1978-11-04 | 302,000 |
| 1978-11-11 | 286,000 |
| 1978-11-18 | 345,000 |
| 1978-11-25 | 350,000 |
| 1978-12-02 | 427,000 |
| 1978-12-09 | 427,000 |
| 1978-12-16 | 390,000 |
| 1978-12-23 | 447,000 |
| 1978-12-30 | 515,000 |
| 1979-01-06 | 559,000 |
| 1979-01-13 | 680,000 |
| 1979-01-20 | 488,000 |
| 1979-01-27 | 423,000 |
| 1979-02-03 | 424,000 |
| 1979-02-10 | 418,000 |
| 1979-02-17 | 384,000 |
| 1979-02-24 | 364,000 |
| 1979-03-03 | 358,000 |
| 1979-03-10 | 346,000 |
| 1979-03-17 | 315,000 |
| 1979-03-24 | 296,000 |
| 1979-03-31 | 300,000 |
| 1979-04-07 | 449,000 |
| 1979-04-14 | 424,000 |
| 1979-04-21 | 340,000 |
| 1979-04-28 | 303,000 |
| 1979-05-05 | 307,000 |
| 1979-05-12 | 290,000 |
| 1979-05-19 | 280,000 |
| 1979-05-26 | 287,000 |
| 1979-06-02 | 262,000 |
| 1979-06-09 | 322,000 |
| 1979-06-16 | 312,000 |
| 1979-06-23 | 343,000 |
| 1979-06-30 | 366,000 |
| 1979-07-07 | 458,000 |
| 1979-07-14 | 446,000 |
| 1979-07-21 | 445,000 |
| 1979-07-28 | 417,000 |
| 1979-08-04 | 428,000 |
| 1979-08-11 | 360,000 |
| 1979-08-18 | 329,000 |
| 1979-08-25 | 313,000 |
| 1979-09-01 | 312,000 |
| 1979-09-08 | 285,000 |
| 1979-09-15 | 311,000 |
| 1979-09-22 | 309,000 |
| 1979-09-29 | 303,000 |
| 1979-10-06 | 379,000 |
| 1979-10-13 | 335,000 |
| 1979-10-20 | 342,000 |
| 1979-10-27 | 353,000 |
| 1979-11-03 | 372,000 |
| 1979-11-10 | 392,000 |
| 1979-11-17 | 401,000 |
| 1979-11-24 | 379,000 |
| 1979-12-01 | 513,000 |
| 1979-12-08 | 521,000 |
| 1979-12-15 | 455,000 |
| 1979-12-22 | 580,000 |
| 1979-12-29 | 596,000 |
| 1980-01-05 | 574,000 |
| 1980-01-12 | 804,000 |
| 1980-01-19 | 648,000 |
| 1980-01-26 | 515,000 |
| 1980-02-02 | 471,000 |
| 1980-02-09 | 493,000 |
| 1980-02-16 | 418,000 |
| 1980-02-23 | 415,000 |
| 1980-03-01 | 407,000 |
| 1980-03-08 | 413,000 |
| 1980-03-15 | 398,000 |
| 1980-03-22 | 392,000 |
| 1980-03-29 | 399,000 |
| 1980-04-05 | 451,000 |
| 1980-04-12 | 535,000 |
| 1980-04-19 | 495,000 |
| 1980-04-26 | 482,000 |
| 1980-05-03 | 491,000 |
| 1980-05-10 | 526,000 |
| 1980-05-17 | 539,000 |
| 1980-05-24 | 525,000 |
| 1980-05-31 | 477,000 |
| 1980-06-07 | 562,000 |
| 1980-06-14 | 511,000 |
| 1980-06-21 | 529,000 |
| 1980-06-28 | 563,000 |
| 1980-07-05 | 584,000 |
| 1980-07-12 | 643,000 |
| 1980-07-19 | 628,000 |
| 1980-07-26 | 569,000 |
| 1980-08-02 | 536,000 |
| 1980-08-09 | 494,000 |
| 1980-08-16 | 435,000 |
| 1980-08-23 | 410,000 |
| 1980-08-30 | 397,000 |
| 1980-09-06 | 374,000 |
| 1980-09-13 | 414,000 |
| 1980-09-20 | 381,000 |
| 1980-09-27 | 363,000 |
| 1980-10-04 | 410,000 |
| 1980-10-11 | 417,000 |
| 1980-10-18 | 355,000 |
| 1980-10-25 | 384,000 |
| 1980-11-01 | 395,000 |
| 1980-11-08 | 416,000 |
| 1980-11-15 | 403,000 |
| 1980-11-22 | 440,000 |
| 1980-11-29 | 407,000 |
| 1980-12-06 | 534,000 |
| 1980-12-13 | 481,000 |
| 1980-12-20 | 499,000 |
| 1980-12-27 | 546,000 |
| 1981-01-03 | 580,000 |
| 1981-01-10 | 839,000 |
| 1981-01-17 | 638,000 |
| 1981-01-24 | 521,000 |
| 1981-01-31 | 490,000 |
| 1981-02-07 | 500,000 |
| 1981-02-14 | 439,000 |
| 1981-02-21 | 430,000 |
| 1981-02-28 | 432,000 |
| 1981-03-07 | 414,000 |
| 1981-03-14 | 385,000 |
| 1981-03-21 | 365,000 |
| 1981-03-28 | 356,000 |
| 1981-04-04 | 383,000 |
| 1981-04-11 | 401,000 |
| 1981-04-18 | 350,000 |
| 1981-04-25 | 379,000 |
| 1981-05-02 | 342,000 |
| 1981-05-09 | 369,000 |
| 1981-05-16 | 340,000 |
| 1981-05-23 | 342,000 |
| 1981-05-30 | 301,000 |
| 1981-06-06 | 384,000 |
| 1981-06-13 | 367,000 |
| 1981-06-20 | 376,000 |
| 1981-06-27 | 387,000 |
| 1981-07-04 | 430,000 |
| 1981-07-11 | 516,000 |
| 1981-07-18 | 481,000 |
| 1981-07-25 | 429,000 |
| 1981-08-01 | 444,000 |
| 1981-08-08 | 419,000 |
| 1981-08-15 | 369,000 |
| 1981-08-22 | 351,000 |
| 1981-08-29 | 352,000 |
| 1981-09-05 | 396,000 |
| 1981-09-12 | 331,000 |
| 1981-09-19 | 392,000 |
| 1981-09-26 | 392,000 |
| 1981-10-03 | 416,000 |
| 1981-10-10 | 476,000 |
| 1981-10-17 | 408,000 |
| 1981-10-24 | 450,000 |
| 1981-10-31 | 479,000 |
| 1981-11-07 | 534,000 |
| 1981-11-14 | 483,000 |
| 1981-11-21 | 522,000 |
| 1981-11-28 | 535,000 |
| 1981-12-05 | 726,000 |
| 1981-12-12 | 657,000 |
| 1981-12-19 | 644,000 |
| 1981-12-26 | 702,000 |
| 1982-01-02 | 694,300 |
| 1982-01-09 | 1,073,500 |
| 1982-01-16 | 761,700 |
| 1982-01-23 | 771,200 |
| 1982-01-30 | 692,300 |
| 1982-02-06 | 671,000 |
| 1982-02-13 | 532,800 |
| 1982-02-20 | 522,900 |
| 1982-02-27 | 536,300 |
| 1982-03-06 | 566,300 |
| 1982-03-13 | 515,100 |
| 1982-03-20 | 510,500 |
| 1982-03-27 | 501,500 |
| 1982-04-03 | 516,600 |
| 1982-04-10 | 606,300 |
| 1982-04-17 | 540,300 |
| 1982-04-24 | 518,600 |
| 1982-05-01 | 475,600 |
| 1982-05-08 | 516,500 |
| 1982-05-15 | 486,500 |
| 1982-05-22 | 486,300 |
| 1982-05-29 | 485,800 |
| 1982-06-05 | 478,600 |
| 1982-06-12 | 541,600 |
| 1982-06-19 | 508,100 |
| 1982-06-26 | 507,700 |
| 1982-07-03 | 594,400 |
| 1982-07-10 | 631,400 |
| 1982-07-17 | 647,000 |
| 1982-07-24 | 576,100 |
| 1982-07-31 | 562,600 |
| 1982-08-07 | 569,200 |
| 1982-08-14 | 536,400 |
| 1982-08-21 | 510,400 |
| 1982-08-28 | 502,300 |
| 1982-09-04 | 537,600 |
| 1982-09-11 | 467,700 |
| 1982-09-18 | 559,500 |
| 1982-09-25 | 535,000 |
| 1982-10-02 | 565,600 |
| 1982-10-09 | 638,100 |
| 1982-10-16 | 540,300 |
| 1982-10-23 | 577,600 |
| 1982-10-30 | 576,800 |
| 1982-11-06 | 604,800 |
| 1982-11-13 | 546,700 |
| 1982-11-20 | 650,400 |
| 1982-11-27 | 574,100 |
| 1982-12-04 | 709,400 |
| 1982-12-11 | 638,200 |
| 1982-12-18 | 598,000 |
| 1982-12-25 | 653,600 |
| 1983-01-01 | 745,100 |
| 1983-01-08 | 976,600 |
| 1983-01-15 | 773,600 |
| 1983-01-22 | 650,600 |
| 1983-01-29 | 597,700 |
| 1983-02-05 | 594,200 |
| 1983-02-12 | 525,100 |
| 1983-02-19 | 506,300 |
| 1983-02-26 | 448,700 |
| 1983-03-05 | 497,400 |
| 1983-03-12 | 459,700 |
| 1983-03-19 | 427,500 |
| 1983-03-26 | 422,100 |
| 1983-04-02 | 423,000 |
| 1983-04-09 | 509,700 |
| 1983-04-16 | 464,800 |
| 1983-04-23 | 431,300 |
| 1983-04-30 | 399,900 |
| 1983-05-07 | 435,000 |
| 1983-05-14 | 385,200 |
| 1983-05-21 | 380,300 |
| 1983-05-28 | 373,000 |
| 1983-06-04 | 351,100 |
| 1983-06-11 | 390,100 |
| 1983-06-18 | 369,200 |
| 1983-06-25 | 383,500 |
| 1983-07-02 | 397,400 |
| 1983-07-09 | 451,900 |
| 1983-07-16 | 459,400 |
| 1983-07-23 | 428,300 |
| 1983-07-30 | 383,400 |
| 1983-08-06 | 382,500 |
| 1983-08-13 | 382,300 |
| 1983-08-20 | 356,900 |
| 1983-08-27 | 323,600 |
| 1983-09-03 | 328,800 |
| 1983-09-10 | 288,700 |
| 1983-09-17 | 326,900 |
| 1983-09-24 | 324,700 |
| 1983-10-01 | 318,500 |
| 1983-10-08 | 390,500 |
| 1983-10-15 | 319,900 |
| 1983-10-22 | 354,900 |
| 1983-10-29 | 356,400 |
| 1983-11-05 | 398,200 |
| 1983-11-12 | 347,300 |
| 1983-11-19 | 431,900 |
| 1983-11-26 | 362,900 |
| 1983-12-03 | 458,400 |
| 1983-12-10 | 442,900 |
| 1983-12-17 | 414,600 |
| 1983-12-24 | 496,800 |
| 1983-12-31 | 558,900 |
| 1984-01-07 | 621,600 |
| 1984-01-14 | 637,900 |
| 1984-01-21 | 475,100 |
| 1984-01-28 | 448,500 |
| 1984-02-04 | 408,400 |
| 1984-02-11 | 381,500 |
| 1984-02-18 | 349,300 |
| 1984-02-25 | 329,100 |
| 1984-03-03 | 350,500 |
| 1984-03-10 | 344,000 |
| 1984-03-17 | 323,500 |
| 1984-03-24 | 317,600 |
| 1984-03-31 | 291,400 |
| 1984-04-07 | 390,300 |
| 1984-04-14 | 330,800 |
| 1984-04-21 | 326,500 |
| 1984-04-28 | 309,300 |
| 1984-05-05 | 318,900 |
| 1984-05-12 | 312,100 |
| 1984-05-19 | 294,200 |
| 1984-05-26 | 292,700 |
| 1984-06-02 | 268,700 |
| 1984-06-09 | 333,800 |
| 1984-06-16 | 309,900 |
| 1984-06-23 | 316,800 |
| 1984-06-30 | 329,000 |
| 1984-07-07 | 432,500 |
| 1984-07-14 | 435,900 |
| 1984-07-21 | 396,200 |
| 1984-07-28 | 343,800 |
| 1984-08-04 | 348,100 |
| 1984-08-11 | 328,100 |
| 1984-08-18 | 321,000 |
| 1984-08-25 | 303,300 |
| 1984-09-01 | 303,500 |
| 1984-09-08 | 289,300 |
| 1984-09-15 | 320,700 |
| 1984-09-22 | 313,200 |
| 1984-09-29 | 304,700 |
| 1984-10-06 | 373,300 |
| 1984-10-13 | 353,200 |
| 1984-10-20 | 378,700 |
| 1984-10-27 | 380,500 |
| 1984-11-03 | 413,400 |
| 1984-11-10 | 397,500 |
| 1984-11-17 | 370,800 |
| 1984-11-24 | 387,000 |
| 1984-12-01 | 494,700 |
| 1984-12-08 | 477,900 |
| 1984-12-15 | 443,700 |
| 1984-12-22 | 482,300 |
| 1984-12-29 | 527,500 |
| 1985-01-05 | 568,300 |
| 1985-01-12 | 770,000 |
| 1985-01-19 | 537,700 |
| 1985-01-26 | 478,300 |
| 1985-02-02 | 452,400 |
| 1985-02-09 | 473,300 |
| 1985-02-16 | 404,700 |
| 1985-02-23 | 379,000 |
| 1985-03-02 | 377,300 |
| 1985-03-09 | 389,200 |
| 1985-03-16 | 360,500 |
| 1985-03-23 | 346,700 |
| 1985-03-30 | 329,100 |
| 1985-04-06 | 398,000 |
| 1985-04-13 | 397,500 |
| 1985-04-20 | 351,800 |
| 1985-04-27 | 324,700 |
| 1985-05-04 | 335,600 |
| 1985-05-11 | 339,100 |
| 1985-05-18 | 324,900 |
| 1985-05-25 | 328,500 |
| 1985-06-01 | 293,500 |
| 1985-06-08 | 368,900 |
| 1985-06-15 | 339,200 |
| 1985-06-22 | 339,500 |
| 1985-06-29 | 349,800 |
| 1985-07-06 | 409,500 |
| 1985-07-13 | 481,500 |
| 1985-07-20 | 413,700 |
| 1985-07-27 | 358,700 |
| 1985-08-03 | 365,800 |
| 1985-08-10 | 358,200 |
| 1985-08-17 | 319,400 |
| 1985-08-24 | 314,800 |
| 1985-08-31 | 317,600 |
| 1985-09-07 | 304,700 |
| 1985-09-14 | 332,900 |
| 1985-09-21 | 317,600 |
| 1985-09-28 | 301,600 |
| 1985-10-05 | 355,600 |
| 1985-10-12 | 358,000 |
| 1985-10-19 | 331,000 |
| 1985-10-26 | 375,700 |
| 1985-11-02 | 375,300 |
| 1985-11-09 | 404,100 |
| 1985-11-16 | 380,300 |
| 1985-11-23 | 423,100 |
| 1985-11-30 | 384,700 |
| 1985-12-07 | 504,200 |
| 1985-12-14 | 443,400 |
| 1985-12-21 | 458,200 |
| 1985-12-28 | 548,200 |
| 1986-01-04 | 547,500 |
| 1986-01-11 | 803,900 |
| 1986-01-18 | 568,800 |
| 1986-01-25 | 395,700 |
| 1986-02-01 | 425,400 |
| 1986-02-08 | 438,100 |
| 1986-02-15 | 374,200 |
| 1986-02-22 | 382,200 |
| 1986-03-01 | 381,200 |
| 1986-03-08 | 371,700 |
| 1986-03-15 | 361,600 |
| 1986-03-22 | 363,100 |
| 1986-03-29 | 333,300 |
| 1986-04-05 | 366,100 |
| 1986-04-12 | 386,100 |
| 1986-04-19 | 348,700 |
| 1986-04-26 | 335,100 |
| 1986-05-03 | 333,600 |
| 1986-05-10 | 343,800 |
| 1986-05-17 | 319,000 |
| 1986-05-24 | 321,700 |
| 1986-05-31 | 278,700 |
| 1986-06-07 | 342,200 |
| 1986-06-14 | 324,700 |
| 1986-06-21 | 327,400 |
| 1986-06-28 | 336,100 |
| 1986-07-05 | 377,400 |
| 1986-07-12 | 456,200 |
| 1986-07-19 | 402,400 |
| 1986-07-26 | 370,700 |
| 1986-08-02 | 370,900 |
| 1986-08-09 | 376,900 |
| 1986-08-16 | 326,000 |
| 1986-08-23 | 310,200 |
| 1986-08-30 | 307,100 |
| 1986-09-06 | 283,700 |
| 1986-09-13 | 320,800 |
| 1986-09-20 | 315,800 |
| 1986-09-27 | 294,200 |
| 1986-10-04 | 328,900 |
| 1986-10-11 | 357,700 |
| 1986-10-18 | 313,000 |
| 1986-10-25 | 332,400 |
| 1986-11-01 | 334,100 |
| 1986-11-08 | 357,600 |
| 1986-11-15 | 347,400 |
| 1986-11-22 | 410,600 |
| 1986-11-29 | 350,900 |
| 1986-12-06 | 462,700 |
| 1986-12-13 | 438,600 |
| 1986-12-20 | 423,800 |
| 1986-12-27 | 483,900 |
| 1987-01-03 | 483,977 |
| 1987-01-10 | 710,493 |
| 1987-01-17 | 545,768 |
| 1987-01-24 | 412,977 |
| 1987-01-31 | 435,743 |
| 1987-02-07 | 444,240 |
| 1987-02-14 | 359,219 |
| 1987-02-21 | 332,930 |
| 1987-02-28 | 355,357 |
| 1987-03-07 | 343,065 |
| 1987-03-14 | 321,153 |
| 1987-03-21 | 313,104 |
| 1987-03-28 | 288,648 |
| 1987-04-04 | 308,940 |
| 1987-04-11 | 344,364 |
| 1987-04-18 | 305,201 |
| 1987-04-25 | 285,566 |
| 1987-05-02 | 277,726 |
| 1987-05-09 | 276,773 |
| 1987-05-16 | 283,832 |
| 1987-05-23 | 286,150 |
| 1987-05-30 | 242,793 |
| 1987-06-06 | 299,672 |
| 1987-06-13 | 281,043 |
| 1987-06-20 | 285,191 |
| 1987-06-27 | 294,288 |
| 1987-07-04 | 321,855 |
| 1987-07-11 | 402,706 |
| 1987-07-18 | 361,491 |
| 1987-07-25 | 339,756 |
| 1987-08-01 | 309,433 |
| 1987-08-08 | 296,403 |
| 1987-08-15 | 256,647 |
| 1987-08-22 | 245,058 |
| 1987-08-29 | 243,829 |
| 1987-09-05 | 255,589 |
| 1987-09-12 | 210,375 |
| 1987-09-19 | 243,651 |
| 1987-09-26 | 242,206 |
| 1987-10-03 | 244,736 |
| 1987-10-10 | 291,075 |
| 1987-10-17 | 242,157 |
| 1987-10-24 | 271,190 |
| 1987-10-31 | 261,036 |
| 1987-11-07 | 306,340 |
| 1987-11-14 | 286,334 |
| 1987-11-21 | 354,037 |
| 1987-11-28 | 288,614 |
| 1987-12-05 | 412,297 |
| 1987-12-12 | 372,869 |
| 1987-12-19 | 384,763 |
| 1987-12-26 | 397,287 |
| 1988-01-02 | 465,503 |
| 1988-01-09 | 654,620 |
| 1988-01-16 | 577,975 |
| 1988-01-23 | 412,685 |
| 1988-01-30 | 394,776 |
| 1988-02-06 | 380,906 |
| 1988-02-13 | 334,833 |
| 1988-02-20 | 315,497 |
| 1988-02-27 | 324,517 |
| 1988-03-05 | 312,409 |
| 1988-03-12 | 294,321 |
| 1988-03-19 | 275,545 |
| 1988-03-26 | 269,000 |
| 1988-04-02 | 256,607 |
| 1988-04-09 | 319,713 |
| 1988-04-16 | 273,160 |
| 1988-04-23 | 272,440 |
| 1988-04-30 | 247,619 |
| 1988-05-07 | 267,315 |
| 1988-05-14 | 257,101 |
| 1988-05-21 | 259,640 |
| 1988-05-28 | 255,852 |
| 1988-06-04 | 235,308 |
| 1988-06-11 | 268,052 |
| 1988-06-18 | 264,100 |
| 1988-06-25 | 268,770 |
| 1988-07-02 | 290,079 |
| 1988-07-09 | 335,780 |
| 1988-07-16 | 377,872 |
| 1988-07-23 | 384,920 |
| 1988-07-30 | 311,475 |
| 1988-08-06 | 293,718 |
| 1988-08-13 | 261,066 |
| 1988-08-20 | 253,359 |
| 1988-08-27 | 241,809 |
| 1988-09-03 | 243,944 |
| 1988-09-10 | 220,226 |
| 1988-09-17 | 247,250 |
| 1988-09-24 | 236,230 |
| 1988-10-01 | 226,453 |
| 1988-10-08 | 276,732 |
| 1988-10-15 | 237,722 |
| 1988-10-22 | 264,201 |
| 1988-10-29 | 265,794 |
| 1988-11-05 | 293,412 |
| 1988-11-12 | 257,201 |
| 1988-11-19 | 335,818 |
| 1988-11-26 | 281,841 |
| 1988-12-03 | 391,406 |
| 1988-12-10 | 354,028 |
| 1988-12-17 | 354,768 |
| 1988-12-24 | 413,175 |
| 1988-12-31 | 474,226 |
| 1989-01-07 | 544,138 |
| 1989-01-14 | 519,727 |
| 1989-01-21 | 364,499 |
| 1989-01-28 | 361,331 |
| 1989-02-04 | 340,647 |
| 1989-02-11 | 365,301 |
| 1989-02-18 | 317,676 |
| 1989-02-25 | 288,690 |
| 1989-03-04 | 333,669 |
| 1989-03-11 | 325,019 |
| 1989-03-18 | 291,112 |
| 1989-03-25 | 276,369 |
| 1989-04-01 | 275,799 |
| 1989-04-08 | 321,723 |
| 1989-04-15 | 275,240 |
| 1989-04-22 | 271,002 |
| 1989-04-29 | 247,646 |
| 1989-05-06 | 275,425 |
| 1989-05-13 | 275,507 |
| 1989-05-20 | 260,543 |
| 1989-05-27 | 266,146 |
| 1989-06-03 | 243,246 |
| 1989-06-10 | 295,499 |
| 1989-06-17 | 285,589 |
| 1989-06-24 | 295,338 |
| 1989-07-01 | 319,577 |
| 1989-07-08 | 364,594 |
| 1989-07-15 | 423,847 |
| 1989-07-22 | 365,026 |
| 1989-07-29 | 320,773 |
| 1989-08-05 | 311,584 |
| 1989-08-12 | 291,429 |
| 1989-08-19 | 261,419 |
| 1989-08-26 | 254,488 |
| 1989-09-02 | 259,540 |
| 1989-09-09 | 239,989 |
| 1989-09-16 | 271,903 |
| 1989-09-23 | 262,895 |
| 1989-09-30 | 265,310 |
| 1989-10-07 | 375,972 |
| 1989-10-14 | 284,584 |
| 1989-10-21 | 315,473 |
| 1989-10-28 | 317,538 |
| 1989-11-04 | 336,759 |
| 1989-11-11 | 303,556 |
| 1989-11-18 | 377,814 |
| 1989-11-25 | 316,458 |
| 1989-12-02 | 443,684 |
| 1989-12-09 | 426,514 |
| 1989-12-16 | 420,795 |
| 1989-12-23 | 534,261 |
| 1989-12-30 | 515,926 |
| 1990-01-06 | 581,679 |
| 1990-01-13 | 730,995 |
| 1990-01-20 | 485,424 |
| 1990-01-27 | 440,748 |
| 1990-02-03 | 432,922 |
| 1990-02-10 | 429,764 |
| 1990-02-17 | 364,616 |
| 1990-02-24 | 341,969 |
| 1990-03-03 | 361,937 |
| 1990-03-10 | 355,935 |
| 1990-03-17 | 325,164 |
| 1990-03-24 | 306,391 |
| 1990-03-31 | 297,117 |
| 1990-04-07 | 372,079 |
| 1990-04-14 | 315,624 |
| 1990-04-21 | 324,936 |
| 1990-04-28 | 294,785 |
| 1990-05-05 | 304,160 |
| 1990-05-12 | 299,266 |
| 1990-05-19 | 287,082 |
| 1990-05-26 | 295,476 |
| 1990-06-02 | 273,910 |
| 1990-06-09 | 321,727 |
| 1990-06-16 | 305,690 |
| 1990-06-23 | 316,999 |
| 1990-06-30 | 326,407 |
| 1990-07-07 | 419,256 |
| 1990-07-14 | 448,952 |
| 1990-07-21 | 407,676 |
| 1990-07-28 | 353,149 |
| 1990-08-04 | 336,997 |
| 1990-08-11 | 330,678 |
| 1990-08-18 | 313,804 |
| 1990-08-25 | 302,267 |
| 1990-09-01 | 305,510 |
| 1990-09-08 | 277,768 |
| 1990-09-15 | 323,246 |
| 1990-09-22 | 306,549 |
| 1990-09-29 | 308,080 |
| 1990-10-06 | 361,538 |
| 1990-10-13 | 356,203 |
| 1990-10-20 | 387,444 |
| 1990-10-27 | 394,598 |
| 1990-11-03 | 424,771 |
| 1990-11-10 | 463,874 |
| 1990-11-17 | 433,003 |
| 1990-11-24 | 422,676 |
| 1990-12-01 | 568,583 |
| 1990-12-08 | 574,323 |
| 1990-12-15 | 523,403 |
| 1990-12-22 | 637,449 |
| 1990-12-29 | 649,471 |
| 1991-01-05 | 651,775 |
| 1991-01-12 | 872,742 |
| 1991-01-19 | 691,092 |
| 1991-01-26 | 511,360 |
| 1991-02-02 | 563,060 |
| 1991-02-09 | 574,760 |
| 1991-02-16 | 498,200 |
| 1991-02-23 | 492,325 |
| 1991-03-02 | 504,023 |
| 1991-03-09 | 514,410 |
| 1991-03-16 | 470,801 |
| 1991-03-23 | 477,877 |
| 1991-03-30 | 412,904 |
| 1991-04-06 | 448,082 |
| 1991-04-13 | 459,364 |
| 1991-04-20 | 433,912 |
| 1991-04-27 | 385,153 |
| 1991-05-04 | 384,458 |
| 1991-05-11 | 382,113 |
| 1991-05-18 | 366,492 |
| 1991-05-25 | 365,117 |
| 1991-06-01 | 320,632 |
| 1991-06-08 | 397,682 |
| 1991-06-15 | 369,074 |
| 1991-06-22 | 371,232 |
| 1991-06-29 | 370,372 |
| 1991-07-06 | 427,161 |
| 1991-07-13 | 517,888 |
| 1991-07-20 | 454,655 |
| 1991-07-27 | 408,098 |
| 1991-08-03 | 397,522 |
| 1991-08-10 | 385,740 |
| 1991-08-17 | 344,969 |
| 1991-08-24 | 329,287 |
| 1991-08-31 | 328,040 |
| 1991-09-07 | 302,187 |
| 1991-09-14 | 342,419 |
| 1991-09-21 | 333,110 |
| 1991-09-28 | 334,206 |
| 1991-10-05 | 366,862 |
| 1991-10-12 | 388,370 |
| 1991-10-19 | 344,189 |
| 1991-10-26 | 380,253 |
| 1991-11-02 | 427,789 |
| 1991-11-09 | 473,432 |
| 1991-11-16 | 417,766 |
| 1991-11-23 | 503,032 |
| 1991-11-30 | 433,180 |
| 1991-12-07 | 610,113 |
| 1991-12-14 | 554,059 |
| 1991-12-21 | 555,747 |
| 1991-12-28 | 625,772 |
| 1992-01-04 | 652,046 |
| 1992-01-11 | 882,118 |
| 1992-01-18 | 687,914 |
| 1992-01-25 | 504,838 |
| 1992-02-01 | 508,594 |
| 1992-02-08 | 537,238 |
| 1992-02-15 | 469,794 |
| 1992-02-22 | 429,723 |
| 1992-02-29 | 454,987 |
| 1992-03-07 | 434,426 |
| 1992-03-14 | 417,282 |
| 1992-03-21 | 413,180 |
| 1992-03-28 | 370,883 |
| 1992-04-04 | 393,384 |
| 1992-04-11 | 412,948 |
| 1992-04-18 | 366,621 |
| 1992-04-25 | 364,454 |
| 1992-05-02 | 363,794 |
| 1992-05-09 | 364,100 |
| 1992-05-16 | 341,425 |
| 1992-05-23 | 343,432 |
| 1992-05-30 | 305,080 |
| 1992-06-06 | 374,978 |
| 1992-06-13 | 369,067 |
| 1992-06-20 | 369,995 |
| 1992-06-27 | 370,373 |
| 1992-07-04 | 395,505 |
| 1992-07-11 | 506,050 |
| 1992-07-18 | 452,468 |
| 1992-07-25 | 554,590 |
| 1992-08-01 | 382,138 |
| 1992-08-08 | 366,092 |
| 1992-08-15 | 322,729 |
| 1992-08-22 | 312,436 |
| 1992-08-29 | 309,806 |
| 1992-09-05 | 339,006 |
| 1992-09-12 | 299,189 |
| 1992-09-19 | 345,093 |
| 1992-09-26 | 315,455 |
| 1992-10-03 | 326,938 |
| 1992-10-10 | 353,504 |
| 1992-10-17 | 310,235 |
| 1992-10-24 | 333,005 |
| 1992-10-31 | 331,922 |
| 1992-11-07 | 392,213 |
| 1992-11-14 | 348,011 |
| 1992-11-21 | 401,972 |
| 1992-11-28 | 317,218 |
| 1992-12-05 | 449,726 |
| 1992-12-12 | 424,677 |
| 1992-12-19 | 396,619 |
| 1992-12-26 | 392,612 |
| 1993-01-02 | 487,466 |
| 1993-01-09 | 704,930 |
| 1993-01-16 | 558,516 |
| 1993-01-23 | 410,944 |
| 1993-01-30 | 397,000 |
| 1993-02-06 | 384,707 |
| 1993-02-13 | 344,520 |
| 1993-02-20 | 345,116 |
| 1993-02-27 | 367,412 |
| 1993-03-06 | 364,185 |
| 1993-03-13 | 335,154 |
| 1993-03-20 | 315,473 |
| 1993-03-27 | 330,512 |
| 1993-04-03 | 331,871 |
| 1993-04-10 | 346,648 |
| 1993-04-17 | 321,564 |
| 1993-04-24 | 310,916 |
| 1993-05-01 | 285,098 |
| 1993-05-08 | 301,906 |
| 1993-05-15 | 287,944 |
| 1993-05-22 | 285,444 |
| 1993-05-29 | 291,206 |
| 1993-06-05 | 273,411 |
| 1993-06-12 | 308,535 |
| 1993-06-19 | 304,843 |
| 1993-06-26 | 301,549 |
| 1993-07-03 | 334,335 |
| 1993-07-10 | 362,425 |
| 1993-07-17 | 402,348 |
| 1993-07-24 | 418,260 |
| 1993-07-31 | 320,155 |
| 1993-08-07 | 314,579 |
| 1993-08-14 | 277,263 |
| 1993-08-21 | 270,913 |
| 1993-08-28 | 254,231 |
| 1993-09-04 | 270,528 |
| 1993-09-11 | 238,902 |
| 1993-09-18 | 280,903 |
| 1993-09-25 | 265,510 |
| 1993-10-02 | 263,636 |
| 1993-10-09 | 338,726 |
| 1993-10-16 | 288,699 |
| 1993-10-23 | 321,509 |
| 1993-10-30 | 309,359 |
| 1993-11-06 | 365,280 |
| 1993-11-13 | 310,455 |
| 1993-11-20 | 377,935 |
| 1993-11-27 | 306,788 |
| 1993-12-04 | 431,210 |
| 1993-12-11 | 398,560 |
| 1993-12-18 | 382,583 |
| 1993-12-25 | 398,084 |
| 1994-01-01 | 481,735 |
| 1994-01-08 | 676,076 |
| 1994-01-15 | 571,816 |
| 1994-01-22 | 427,570 |
| 1994-01-29 | 481,458 |
| 1994-02-05 | 429,800 |
| 1994-02-12 | 385,594 |
| 1994-02-19 | 368,626 |
| 1994-02-26 | 307,194 |
| 1994-03-05 | 355,250 |
| 1994-03-12 | 331,023 |
| 1994-03-19 | 308,038 |
| 1994-03-26 | 292,661 |
| 1994-04-02 | 289,631 |
| 1994-04-09 | 361,348 |
| 1994-04-16 | 327,166 |
| 1994-04-23 | 298,620 |
| 1994-04-30 | 285,837 |
| 1994-05-07 | 332,414 |
| 1994-05-14 | 303,190 |
| 1994-05-21 | 299,324 |
| 1994-05-28 | 291,797 |
| 1994-06-04 | 273,849 |
| 1994-06-11 | 309,033 |
| 1994-06-18 | 298,198 |
| 1994-06-25 | 305,863 |
| 1994-07-02 | 327,262 |
| 1994-07-09 | 394,428 |
| 1994-07-16 | 443,698 |
| 1994-07-23 | 354,495 |
| 1994-07-30 | 295,979 |
| 1994-08-06 | 304,363 |
| 1994-08-13 | 277,614 |
| 1994-08-20 | 262,131 |
| 1994-08-27 | 257,299 |
| 1994-09-03 | 270,561 |
| 1994-09-10 | 237,526 |
| 1994-09-17 | 264,553 |
| 1994-09-24 | 251,191 |
| 1994-10-01 | 255,588 |
| 1994-10-08 | 322,522 |
| 1994-10-15 | 272,742 |
| 1994-10-22 | 296,646 |
| 1994-10-29 | 291,557 |
| 1994-11-05 | 338,561 |
| 1994-11-12 | 298,030 |
| 1994-11-19 | 366,719 |
| 1994-11-26 | 295,729 |
| 1994-12-03 | 412,824 |
| 1994-12-10 | 397,238 |
| 1994-12-17 | 376,210 |
| 1994-12-24 | 423,387 |
| 1994-12-31 | 482,735 |
| 1995-01-07 | 612,648 |
| 1995-01-14 | 608,872 |
| 1995-01-21 | 400,772 |
| 1995-01-28 | 396,457 |
| 1995-02-04 | 381,813 |
| 1995-02-11 | 387,408 |
| 1995-02-18 | 356,237 |
| 1995-02-25 | 316,927 |
| 1995-03-04 | 342,015 |
| 1995-03-11 | 339,580 |
| 1995-03-18 | 319,218 |
| 1995-03-25 | 305,471 |
| 1995-04-01 | 294,031 |
| 1995-04-08 | 356,914 |
| 1995-04-15 | 318,030 |
| 1995-04-22 | 317,072 |
| 1995-04-29 | 305,594 |
| 1995-05-06 | 325,398 |
| 1995-05-13 | 311,646 |
| 1995-05-20 | 316,305 |
| 1995-05-27 | 314,442 |
| 1995-06-03 | 286,566 |
| 1995-06-10 | 340,606 |
| 1995-06-17 | 337,812 |
| 1995-06-24 | 324,411 |
| 1995-07-01 | 341,207 |
| 1995-07-08 | 428,632 |
| 1995-07-15 | 491,891 |
| 1995-07-22 | 409,319 |
| 1995-07-29 | 311,708 |
| 1995-08-05 | 310,703 |
| 1995-08-12 | 296,712 |
| 1995-08-19 | 286,017 |
| 1995-08-26 | 272,182 |
| 1995-09-02 | 278,703 |
| 1995-09-09 | 266,145 |
| 1995-09-16 | 304,323 |
| 1995-09-23 | 272,431 |
| 1995-09-30 | 269,067 |
| 1995-10-07 | 345,311 |
| 1995-10-14 | 306,465 |
| 1995-10-21 | 322,856 |
| 1995-10-28 | 332,061 |
| 1995-11-04 | 383,687 |
| 1995-11-11 | 335,181 |
| 1995-11-18 | 425,889 |
| 1995-11-25 | 336,269 |
| 1995-12-02 | 474,548 |
| 1995-12-09 | 421,109 |
| 1995-12-16 | 423,450 |
| 1995-12-23 | 490,349 |
| 1995-12-30 | 513,686 |
| 1996-01-06 | 596,010 |
| 1996-01-13 | 637,910 |
| 1996-01-20 | 510,820 |
| 1996-01-27 | 492,966 |
| 1996-02-03 | 433,693 |
| 1996-02-10 | 440,961 |
| 1996-02-17 | 395,332 |
| 1996-02-24 | 347,053 |
| 1996-03-02 | 368,044 |
| 1996-03-09 | 355,818 |
| 1996-03-16 | 357,070 |
| 1996-03-23 | 396,731 |
| 1996-03-30 | 342,023 |
| 1996-04-06 | 353,032 |
| 1996-04-13 | 343,654 |
| 1996-04-20 | 336,033 |
| 1996-04-27 | 291,957 |
| 1996-05-04 | 298,195 |
| 1996-05-11 | 303,532 |
| 1996-05-18 | 287,891 |
| 1996-05-25 | 287,622 |
| 1996-06-01 | 266,116 |
| 1996-06-08 | 329,099 |
| 1996-06-15 | 307,141 |
| 1996-06-22 | 312,226 |
| 1996-06-29 | 315,615 |
| 1996-07-06 | 382,989 |
| 1996-07-13 | 449,510 |
| 1996-07-20 | 360,385 |
| 1996-07-27 | 294,762 |
| 1996-08-03 | 283,216 |
| 1996-08-10 | 285,795 |
| 1996-08-17 | 265,742 |
| 1996-08-24 | 259,677 |
| 1996-08-31 | 251,425 |
| 1996-09-07 | 238,893 |
| 1996-09-14 | 272,464 |
| 1996-09-21 | 273,232 |
| 1996-09-28 | 261,251 |
| 1996-10-05 | 292,029 |
| 1996-10-12 | 306,521 |
| 1996-10-19 | 271,934 |
| 1996-10-26 | 311,965 |
| 1996-11-02 | 320,827 |
| 1996-11-09 | 340,240 |
| 1996-11-16 | 330,730 |
| 1996-11-23 | 383,512 |
| 1996-11-30 | 328,186 |
| 1996-12-07 | 444,305 |
| 1996-12-14 | 404,436 |
| 1996-12-21 | 429,566 |
| 1996-12-28 | 520,650 |
| 1997-01-04 | 541,210 |
| 1997-01-11 | 654,473 |
| 1997-01-18 | 513,913 |
| 1997-01-25 | 385,310 |
| 1997-02-01 | 380,099 |
| 1997-02-08 | 370,766 |
| 1997-02-15 | 320,374 |
| 1997-02-22 | 309,202 |
| 1997-03-01 | 317,339 |
| 1997-03-08 | 314,787 |
| 1997-03-15 | 296,698 |
| 1997-03-22 | 291,463 |
| 1997-03-29 | 268,823 |
| 1997-04-05 | 311,186 |
| 1997-04-12 | 329,663 |
| 1997-04-19 | 286,593 |
| 1997-04-26 | 295,166 |
| 1997-05-03 | 295,629 |
| 1997-05-10 | 278,052 |
| 1997-05-17 | 267,251 |
| 1997-05-24 | 264,697 |
| 1997-05-31 | 248,167 |
| 1997-06-07 | 309,928 |
| 1997-06-14 | 302,577 |
| 1997-06-21 | 290,720 |
| 1997-06-28 | 298,299 |
| 1997-07-05 | 372,574 |
| 1997-07-12 | 434,598 |
| 1997-07-19 | 339,250 |
| 1997-07-26 | 281,794 |
| 1997-08-02 | 273,471 |
| 1997-08-09 | 289,083 |
| 1997-08-16 | 272,910 |
| 1997-08-23 | 255,236 |
| 1997-08-30 | 250,205 |
| 1997-09-06 | 224,948 |
| 1997-09-13 | 253,456 |
| 1997-09-20 | 246,061 |
| 1997-09-27 | 237,214 |
| 1997-10-04 | 260,705 |
| 1997-10-11 | 286,436 |
| 1997-10-18 | 255,634 |
| 1997-10-25 | 272,593 |
| 1997-11-01 | 293,086 |
| 1997-11-08 | 322,842 |
| 1997-11-15 | 311,499 |
| 1997-11-22 | 341,845 |
| 1997-11-29 | 309,788 |
| 1997-12-06 | 402,699 |
| 1997-12-13 | 374,107 |
| 1997-12-20 | 368,823 |
| 1997-12-27 | 445,345 |
| 1998-01-03 | 479,854 |
| 1998-01-10 | 682,016 |
| 1998-01-17 | 512,837 |
| 1998-01-24 | 355,092 |
| 1998-01-31 | 357,976 |
| 1998-02-07 | 368,113 |
| 1998-02-14 | 328,354 |
| 1998-02-21 | 313,367 |
| 1998-02-28 | 313,480 |
| 1998-03-07 | 305,542 |
| 1998-03-14 | 298,302 |
| 1998-03-21 | 293,692 |
| 1998-03-28 | 272,808 |
| 1998-04-04 | 288,484 |
| 1998-04-11 | 294,014 |
| 1998-04-18 | 288,059 |
| 1998-04-25 | 278,220 |
| 1998-05-02 | 261,089 |
| 1998-05-09 | 270,108 |
| 1998-05-16 | 262,107 |
| 1998-05-23 | 259,125 |
| 1998-05-30 | 248,550 |
| 1998-06-06 | 289,495 |
| 1998-06-13 | 293,195 |
| 1998-06-20 | 322,017 |
| 1998-06-27 | 348,842 |
| 1998-07-04 | 379,734 |
| 1998-07-11 | 428,977 |
| 1998-07-18 | 364,767 |
| 1998-07-25 | 314,782 |
| 1998-08-01 | 277,621 |
| 1998-08-08 | 279,621 |
| 1998-08-15 | 246,823 |
| 1998-08-22 | 237,999 |
| 1998-08-29 | 233,516 |
| 1998-09-05 | 255,938 |
| 1998-09-12 | 217,454 |
| 1998-09-19 | 237,609 |
| 1998-09-26 | 220,668 |
| 1998-10-03 | 246,284 |
| 1998-10-10 | 300,862 |
| 1998-10-17 | 257,172 |
| 1998-10-24 | 275,574 |
| 1998-10-31 | 281,932 |
| 1998-11-07 | 332,611 |
| 1998-11-14 | 315,504 |
| 1998-11-21 | 338,501 |
| 1998-11-28 | 295,041 |
| 1998-12-05 | 421,605 |
| 1998-12-12 | 355,872 |
| 1998-12-19 | 344,452 |
| 1998-12-26 | 442,200 |
| 1999-01-02 | 508,983 |
| 1999-01-09 | 713,805 |
| 1999-01-16 | 514,082 |
| 1999-01-23 | 364,737 |
| 1999-01-30 | 349,733 |
| 1999-02-06 | 344,947 |
| 1999-02-13 | 320,679 |
| 1999-02-20 | 286,130 |
| 1999-02-27 | 297,918 |
| 1999-03-06 | 297,325 |
| 1999-03-13 | 289,813 |
| 1999-03-20 | 275,453 |
| 1999-03-27 | 260,817 |
| 1999-04-03 | 263,516 |
| 1999-04-10 | 327,621 |
| 1999-04-17 | 286,018 |
| 1999-04-24 | 263,835 |
| 1999-05-01 | 252,190 |
| 1999-05-08 | 274,268 |
| 1999-05-15 | 251,063 |
| 1999-05-22 | 250,360 |
| 1999-05-29 | 260,517 |
| 1999-06-05 | 256,922 |
| 1999-06-12 | 267,582 |
| 1999-06-19 | 267,825 |
| 1999-06-26 | 269,755 |
| 1999-07-03 | 303,758 |
| 1999-07-10 | 364,078 |
| 1999-07-17 | 369,123 |
| 1999-07-24 | 293,348 |
| 1999-07-31 | 254,195 |
| 1999-08-07 | 259,805 |
| 1999-08-14 | 236,658 |
| 1999-08-21 | 226,061 |
| 1999-08-28 | 219,278 |
| 1999-09-04 | 235,849 |
| 1999-09-11 | 204,302 |
| 1999-09-18 | 219,070 |
| 1999-09-25 | 232,486 |
| 1999-10-02 | 246,445 |
| 1999-10-09 | 278,925 |
| 1999-10-16 | 234,580 |
| 1999-10-23 | 250,864 |
| 1999-10-30 | 257,767 |
| 1999-11-06 | 297,136 |
| 1999-11-13 | 262,607 |
| 1999-11-20 | 309,248 |
| 1999-11-27 | 268,255 |
| 1999-12-04 | 378,735 |
| 1999-12-11 | 318,175 |
| 1999-12-18 | 329,649 |
| 1999-12-25 | 377,695 |
| 2000-01-01 | 439,912 |
| 2000-01-08 | 606,897 |
| 2000-01-15 | 442,494 |
| 2000-01-22 | 328,841 |
| 2000-01-29 | 332,740 |
| 2000-02-05 | 365,245 |
| 2000-02-12 | 311,897 |
| 2000-02-19 | 281,256 |
| 2000-02-26 | 258,962 |
| 2000-03-04 | 283,024 |
| 2000-03-11 | 255,109 |
| 2000-03-18 | 242,139 |
| 2000-03-25 | 239,835 |
| 2000-04-01 | 229,520 |
| 2000-04-08 | 274,130 |
| 2000-04-15 | 237,218 |
| 2000-04-22 | 240,266 |
| 2000-04-29 | 249,458 |
| 2000-05-06 | 259,546 |
| 2000-05-13 | 231,706 |
| 2000-05-20 | 234,599 |
| 2000-05-27 | 239,836 |
| 2000-06-03 | 242,991 |
| 2000-06-10 | 267,752 |
| 2000-06-17 | 265,617 |
| 2000-06-24 | 273,344 |
| 2000-07-01 | 280,979 |
| 2000-07-08 | 363,793 |
| 2000-07-15 | 377,982 |
| 2000-07-22 | 296,255 |
| 2000-07-29 | 253,466 |
| 2000-08-05 | 266,151 |
| 2000-08-12 | 261,358 |
| 2000-08-19 | 251,844 |
| 2000-08-26 | 239,030 |
| 2000-09-02 | 242,375 |
| 2000-09-09 | 229,954 |
| 2000-09-16 | 245,991 |
| 2000-09-23 | 222,219 |
| 2000-09-30 | 227,249 |
| 2000-10-07 | 292,784 |
| 2000-10-14 | 255,082 |
| 2000-10-21 | 263,445 |
| 2000-10-28 | 269,489 |
| 2000-11-04 | 342,414 |
| 2000-11-11 | 294,727 |
| 2000-11-18 | 374,160 |
| 2000-11-25 | 321,859 |
| 2000-12-02 | 447,262 |
| 2000-12-09 | 390,088 |
| 2000-12-16 | 402,476 |
| 2000-12-23 | 481,720 |
| 2000-12-30 | 568,973 |
| 2001-01-06 | 558,768 |
| 2001-01-13 | 599,562 |
| 2001-01-20 | 398,188 |
| 2001-01-27 | 447,386 |
| 2001-02-03 | 424,696 |
| 2001-02-10 | 396,151 |
| 2001-02-17 | 345,841 |
| 2001-02-24 | 357,591 |
| 2001-03-03 | 379,286 |
| 2001-03-10 | 377,210 |
| 2001-03-17 | 351,497 |
| 2001-03-24 | 334,747 |
| 2001-03-31 | 328,576 |
| 2001-04-07 | 397,282 |
| 2001-04-14 | 346,981 |
| 2001-04-21 | 369,745 |
| 2001-04-28 | 353,831 |
| 2001-05-05 | 336,319 |
| 2001-05-12 | 331,765 |
| 2001-05-19 | 338,374 |
| 2001-05-26 | 346,231 |
| 2001-06-02 | 335,765 |
| 2001-06-09 | 397,015 |
| 2001-06-16 | 354,526 |
| 2001-06-23 | 351,770 |
| 2001-06-30 | 375,885 |
| 2001-07-07 | 526,826 |
| 2001-07-14 | 524,139 |
| 2001-07-21 | 406,038 |
| 2001-07-28 | 332,957 |
| 2001-08-04 | 341,660 |
| 2001-08-11 | 333,042 |
| 2001-08-18 | 317,046 |
| 2001-08-25 | 307,850 |
| 2001-09-01 | 319,016 |
| 2001-09-08 | 309,567 |
| 2001-09-15 | 317,245 |
| 2001-09-22 | 353,611 |
| 2001-09-29 | 400,400 |
| 2001-10-06 | 441,754 |
| 2001-10-13 | 426,881 |
| 2001-10-20 | 429,542 |
| 2001-10-27 | 436,901 |
| 2001-11-03 | 443,971 |
| 2001-11-10 | 456,366 |
| 2001-11-17 | 420,259 |
| 2001-11-24 | 438,893 |
| 2001-12-01 | 605,916 |
| 2001-12-08 | 491,836 |
| 2001-12-15 | 440,906 |
| 2001-12-22 | 529,570 |
| 2001-12-29 | 647,045 |
| 2002-01-05 | 637,343 |
| 2002-01-12 | 799,246 |
| 2002-01-19 | 558,297 |
| 2002-01-26 | 431,690 |
| 2002-02-02 | 445,552 |
| 2002-02-09 | 438,611 |
| 2002-02-16 | 376,573 |
| 2002-02-23 | 367,504 |
| 2002-03-02 | 385,272 |
| 2002-03-09 | 386,992 |
| 2002-03-16 | 352,045 |
| 2002-03-23 | 366,372 |
| 2002-03-30 | 386,296 |
| 2002-04-06 | 432,384 |
| 2002-04-13 | 428,834 |
| 2002-04-20 | 385,151 |
| 2002-04-27 | 367,350 |
| 2002-05-04 | 362,681 |
| 2002-05-11 | 358,286 |
| 2002-05-18 | 348,887 |
| 2002-05-25 | 346,439 |
| 2002-06-01 | 309,183 |
| 2002-06-08 | 378,613 |
| 2002-06-15 | 356,096 |
| 2002-06-22 | 358,959 |
| 2002-06-29 | 358,658 |
| 2002-07-06 | 456,716 |
| 2002-07-13 | 506,718 |
| 2002-07-20 | 394,586 |
| 2002-07-27 | 338,441 |
| 2002-08-03 | 326,356 |
| 2002-08-10 | 332,673 |
| 2002-08-17 | 313,869 |
| 2002-08-24 | 314,852 |
| 2002-08-31 | 310,864 |
| 2002-09-07 | 318,361 |
| 2002-09-14 | 337,577 |
| 2002-09-21 | 317,264 |
| 2002-09-28 | 319,063 |
| 2002-10-05 | 365,613 |
| 2002-10-12 | 385,689 |
| 2002-10-19 | 349,927 |
| 2002-10-26 | 375,591 |
| 2002-11-02 | 397,346 |
| 2002-11-09 | 427,078 |
| 2002-11-16 | 372,829 |
| 2002-11-23 | 436,549 |
| 2002-11-30 | 385,788 |
| 2002-12-07 | 547,430 |
| 2002-12-14 | 486,258 |
| 2002-12-21 | 483,449 |
| 2002-12-28 | 620,929 |
| 2003-01-04 | 620,004 |
| 2003-01-11 | 724,111 |
| 2003-01-18 | 542,563 |
| 2003-01-25 | 434,888 |
| 2003-02-01 | 449,286 |
| 2003-02-08 | 439,520 |
| 2003-02-15 | 398,291 |
| 2003-02-22 | 387,536 |
| 2003-03-01 | 429,782 |
| 2003-03-08 | 414,568 |
| 2003-03-15 | 389,909 |
| 2003-03-22 | 361,492 |
| 2003-03-29 | 371,692 |
| 2003-04-05 | 394,160 |
| 2003-04-12 | 434,911 |
| 2003-04-19 | 399,180 |
| 2003-04-26 | 401,342 |
| 2003-05-03 | 377,383 |
| 2003-05-10 | 364,287 |
| 2003-05-17 | 362,276 |
| 2003-05-24 | 359,500 |
| 2003-05-31 | 351,890 |
| 2003-06-07 | 421,190 |
| 2003-06-14 | 383,371 |
| 2003-06-21 | 376,560 |
| 2003-06-28 | 394,214 |
| 2003-07-05 | 483,401 |
| 2003-07-12 | 552,621 |
| 2003-07-19 | 429,381 |
| 2003-07-26 | 348,382 |
| 2003-08-02 | 333,770 |
| 2003-08-09 | 348,207 |
| 2003-08-16 | 312,087 |
| 2003-08-23 | 313,058 |
| 2003-08-30 | 319,362 |
| 2003-09-06 | 322,501 |
| 2003-09-13 | 328,414 |
| 2003-09-20 | 301,217 |
| 2003-09-27 | 304,968 |
| 2003-10-04 | 337,880 |
| 2003-10-11 | 368,876 |
| 2003-10-18 | 328,572 |
| 2003-10-25 | 352,117 |
| 2003-11-01 | 345,573 |
| 2003-11-08 | 397,387 |
| 2003-11-15 | 347,719 |
| 2003-11-22 | 397,990 |
| 2003-11-29 | 357,811 |
| 2003-12-06 | 486,202 |
| 2003-12-13 | 412,627 |
| 2003-12-20 | 424,192 |
| 2003-12-27 | 516,493 |
| 2004-01-03 | 552,815 |
| 2004-01-10 | 677,897 |
| 2004-01-17 | 490,763 |
| 2004-01-24 | 382,262 |
| 2004-01-31 | 406,298 |
| 2004-02-07 | 433,234 |
| 2004-02-14 | 341,634 |
| 2004-02-21 | 328,171 |
| 2004-02-28 | 342,140 |
| 2004-03-06 | 339,007 |
| 2004-03-13 | 312,067 |
| 2004-03-20 | 304,462 |
| 2004-03-27 | 296,776 |
| 2004-04-03 | 304,249 |
| 2004-04-10 | 350,739 |
| 2004-04-17 | 334,965 |
| 2004-04-24 | 313,686 |
| 2004-05-01 | 283,236 |
| 2004-05-08 | 292,754 |
| 2004-05-15 | 297,061 |
| 2004-05-22 | 293,974 |
| 2004-05-29 | 304,067 |
| 2004-06-05 | 308,229 |
| 2004-06-12 | 313,930 |
| 2004-06-19 | 322,481 |
| 2004-06-26 | 318,746 |
| 2004-07-03 | 349,920 |
| 2004-07-10 | 444,531 |
| 2004-07-17 | 394,372 |
| 2004-07-24 | 313,225 |
| 2004-07-31 | 282,128 |
| 2004-08-07 | 291,611 |
| 2004-08-14 | 262,936 |
| 2004-08-21 | 274,433 |
| 2004-08-28 | 276,308 |
| 2004-09-04 | 274,930 |
| 2004-09-11 | 250,568 |
| 2004-09-18 | 275,846 |
| 2004-09-25 | 282,729 |
| 2004-10-02 | 279,591 |
| 2004-10-09 | 338,711 |
| 2004-10-16 | 279,846 |
| 2004-10-23 | 317,573 |
| 2004-10-30 | 305,546 |
| 2004-11-06 | 351,404 |
| 2004-11-13 | 311,901 |
| 2004-11-20 | 355,954 |
| 2004-11-27 | 320,690 |
| 2004-12-04 | 473,570 |
| 2004-12-11 | 370,604 |
| 2004-12-18 | 374,749 |
| 2004-12-25 | 446,699 |
| 2005-01-01 | 540,927 |
| 2005-01-08 | 693,776 |
| 2005-01-15 | 467,862 |
| 2005-01-22 | 360,583 |
| 2005-01-29 | 364,704 |
| 2005-02-05 | 347,391 |
| 2005-02-12 | 309,290 |
| 2005-02-19 | 303,814 |
| 2005-02-26 | 290,776 |
| 2005-03-05 | 332,067 |
| 2005-03-12 | 307,061 |
| 2005-03-19 | 290,719 |
| 2005-03-26 | 291,378 |
| 2005-04-02 | 294,994 |
| 2005-04-09 | 339,709 |
| 2005-04-16 | 285,657 |
| 2005-04-23 | 299,891 |
| 2005-04-30 | 290,824 |
| 2005-05-07 | 297,347 |
| 2005-05-14 | 275,524 |
| 2005-05-21 | 276,761 |
| 2005-05-28 | 304,306 |
| 2005-06-04 | 289,914 |
| 2005-06-11 | 315,938 |
| 2005-06-18 | 289,831 |
| 2005-06-25 | 286,681 |
| 2005-07-02 | 327,268 |
| 2005-07-09 | 427,323 |
| 2005-07-16 | 374,665 |
| 2005-07-23 | 295,026 |
| 2005-07-30 | 261,906 |
| 2005-08-06 | 269,746 |
| 2005-08-13 | 257,151 |
| 2005-08-20 | 252,016 |
| 2005-08-27 | 251,642 |
| 2005-09-03 | 271,613 |
| 2005-09-10 | 322,387 |
| 2005-09-17 | 346,204 |
| 2005-09-24 | 292,435 |
| 2005-10-01 | 313,847 |
| 2005-10-08 | 380,093 |
| 2005-10-15 | 303,158 |
| 2005-10-22 | 304,733 |
| 2005-10-29 | 294,376 |
| 2005-11-05 | 340,491 |
| 2005-11-12 | 283,564 |
| 2005-11-19 | 368,859 |
| 2005-11-26 | 290,730 |
| 2005-12-03 | 444,600 |
| 2005-12-10 | 391,961 |
| 2005-12-17 | 359,108 |
| 2005-12-24 | 433,397 |
| 2005-12-31 | 475,889 |
| 2006-01-07 | 555,114 |
| 2006-01-14 | 439,873 |
| 2006-01-21 | 317,926 |
| 2006-01-28 | 318,805 |
| 2006-02-04 | 321,527 |
| 2006-02-11 | 310,078 |
| 2006-02-18 | 269,571 |
| 2006-02-25 | 272,478 |
| 2006-03-04 | 301,867 |
| 2006-03-11 | 294,764 |
| 2006-03-18 | 269,237 |
| 2006-03-25 | 265,370 |
| 2006-04-01 | 253,985 |
| 2006-04-08 | 314,696 |
| 2006-04-15 | 268,472 |
| 2006-04-22 | 291,349 |
| 2006-04-29 | 279,715 |
| 2006-05-06 | 317,239 |
| 2006-05-13 | 288,972 |
| 2006-05-20 | 277,168 |
| 2006-05-27 | 292,714 |
| 2006-06-03 | 260,263 |
| 2006-06-10 | 285,892 |
| 2006-06-17 | 277,441 |
| 2006-06-24 | 287,503 |
| 2006-07-01 | 304,638 |
| 2006-07-08 | 418,363 |
| 2006-07-15 | 377,115 |
| 2006-07-22 | 288,875 |
| 2006-07-29 | 259,974 |
| 2006-08-05 | 275,430 |
| 2006-08-12 | 256,259 |
| 2006-08-19 | 252,357 |
| 2006-08-26 | 251,275 |
| 2006-09-02 | 259,539 |
| 2006-09-09 | 240,231 |
| 2006-09-16 | 267,036 |
| 2006-09-23 | 261,396 |
| 2006-09-30 | 249,288 |
| 2006-10-07 | 307,646 |
| 2006-10-14 | 271,863 |
| 2006-10-21 | 291,372 |
| 2006-10-28 | 301,079 |
| 2006-11-04 | 326,711 |
| 2006-11-11 | 286,151 |
| 2006-11-18 | 367,690 |
| 2006-11-25 | 323,509 |
| 2006-12-02 | 448,898 |
| 2006-12-09 | 384,123 |
| 2006-12-16 | 361,672 |
| 2006-12-23 | 425,357 |
| 2006-12-30 | 499,979 |
| 2007-01-06 | 506,059 |
| 2007-01-13 | 506,709 |
| 2007-01-20 | 367,583 |
| 2007-01-27 | 359,959 |
| 2007-02-03 | 339,018 |
| 2007-02-10 | 363,018 |
| 2007-02-17 | 305,945 |
| 2007-02-24 | 299,000 |
| 2007-03-03 | 320,194 |
| 2007-03-10 | 298,927 |
| 2007-03-17 | 277,187 |
| 2007-03-24 | 273,432 |
| 2007-03-31 | 268,218 |
| 2007-04-07 | 328,266 |
| 2007-04-14 | 317,917 |
| 2007-04-21 | 303,984 |
| 2007-04-28 | 267,672 |
| 2007-05-05 | 274,801 |
| 2007-05-12 | 258,516 |
| 2007-05-19 | 270,446 |
| 2007-05-26 | 273,397 |
| 2007-06-02 | 263,527 |
| 2007-06-09 | 302,368 |
| 2007-06-16 | 290,951 |
| 2007-06-23 | 292,583 |
| 2007-06-30 | 300,348 |
| 2007-07-07 | 417,554 |
| 2007-07-14 | 383,839 |
| 2007-07-21 | 298,366 |
| 2007-07-28 | 257,426 |
| 2007-08-04 | 270,563 |
| 2007-08-11 | 266,420 |
| 2007-08-18 | 257,573 |
| 2007-08-25 | 266,179 |
| 2007-09-01 | 257,454 |
| 2007-09-08 | 245,526 |
| 2007-09-15 | 261,971 |
| 2007-09-22 | 247,643 |
| 2007-09-29 | 255,431 |
| 2007-10-06 | 298,317 |
| 2007-10-13 | 306,519 |
| 2007-10-20 | 307,675 |
| 2007-10-27 | 303,357 |
| 2007-11-03 | 325,831 |
| 2007-11-10 | 351,760 |
| 2007-11-17 | 323,124 |
| 2007-11-24 | 324,047 |
| 2007-12-01 | 462,902 |
| 2007-12-08 | 423,130 |
| 2007-12-15 | 393,042 |
| 2007-12-22 | 456,280 |
| 2007-12-29 | 507,908 |
| 2008-01-05 | 522,700 |
| 2008-01-12 | 547,943 |
| 2008-01-19 | 415,397 |
| 2008-01-26 | 369,498 |
| 2008-02-02 | 380,234 |
| 2008-02-09 | 377,595 |
| 2008-02-16 | 325,886 |
| 2008-02-23 | 330,013 |
| 2008-03-01 | 345,287 |
| 2008-03-08 | 341,364 |
| 2008-03-15 | 335,909 |
| 2008-03-22 | 316,208 |
| 2008-03-29 | 342,189 |
| 2008-04-05 | 357,209 |
| 2008-04-12 | 370,960 |
| 2008-04-19 | 328,334 |
| 2008-04-26 | 337,854 |
| 2008-05-03 | 335,533 |
| 2008-05-10 | 325,479 |
| 2008-05-17 | 319,817 |
| 2008-05-24 | 326,627 |
| 2008-05-31 | 300,989 |
| 2008-06-07 | 373,033 |
| 2008-06-14 | 349,254 |
| 2008-06-21 | 358,158 |
| 2008-06-28 | 368,544 |
| 2008-07-05 | 401,672 |
| 2008-07-12 | 476,071 |
| 2008-07-19 | 403,607 |
| 2008-07-26 | 374,182 |
| 2008-08-02 | 381,887 |
| 2008-08-09 | 372,807 |
| 2008-08-16 | 342,164 |
| 2008-08-23 | 344,255 |
| 2008-08-30 | 360,485 |
| 2008-09-06 | 336,131 |
| 2008-09-13 | 381,720 |
| 2008-09-20 | 397,610 |
| 2008-09-27 | 392,121 |
| 2008-10-04 | 426,786 |
| 2008-10-11 | 454,100 |
| 2008-10-18 | 416,114 |
| 2008-10-25 | 449,429 |
| 2008-11-01 | 466,373 |
| 2008-11-08 | 539,812 |
| 2008-11-15 | 513,047 |
| 2008-11-22 | 609,128 |
| 2008-11-29 | 537,230 |
| 2008-12-06 | 760,481 |
| 2008-12-13 | 629,867 |
| 2008-12-20 | 719,691 |
| 2008-12-27 | 717,000 |
| 2009-01-03 | 731,958 |
| 2009-01-10 | 956,791 |
| 2009-01-17 | 763,987 |
| 2009-01-24 | 620,143 |
| 2009-01-31 | 682,176 |
| 2009-02-07 | 710,152 |
| 2009-02-14 | 619,951 |
| 2009-02-21 | 605,668 |
| 2009-02-28 | 645,827 |
| 2009-03-07 | 652,635 |
| 2009-03-14 | 601,192 |
| 2009-03-21 | 590,067 |
| 2009-03-28 | 599,299 |
| 2009-04-04 | 623,279 |
| 2009-04-11 | 610,522 |
| 2009-04-18 | 596,564 |
| 2009-04-25 | 583,457 |
| 2009-05-02 | 536,648 |
| 2009-05-09 | 570,412 |
| 2009-05-16 | 540,925 |
| 2009-05-23 | 538,311 |
| 2009-05-30 | 500,380 |
| 2009-06-06 | 581,092 |
| 2009-06-13 | 562,449 |
| 2009-06-20 | 572,425 |
| 2009-06-27 | 563,387 |
| 2009-07-04 | 585,963 |
| 2009-07-11 | 677,038 |
| 2009-07-18 | 590,730 |
| 2009-07-25 | 516,351 |
| 2009-08-01 | 470,988 |
| 2009-08-08 | 486,586 |
| 2009-08-15 | 461,780 |
| 2009-08-22 | 460,998 |
| 2009-08-29 | 460,525 |
| 2009-09-05 | 470,079 |
| 2009-09-12 | 414,557 |
| 2009-09-19 | 441,311 |
| 2009-09-26 | 449,620 |
| 2009-10-03 | 456,233 |
| 2009-10-10 | 513,852 |
| 2009-10-17 | 464,985 |
| 2009-10-24 | 499,374 |
| 2009-10-31 | 487,714 |
| 2009-11-07 | 537,230 |
| 2009-11-14 | 479,350 |
| 2009-11-21 | 547,022 |
| 2009-11-28 | 462,090 |
| 2009-12-05 | 673,097 |
| 2009-12-12 | 561,655 |
| 2009-12-19 | 571,378 |
| 2009-12-26 | 561,852 |
| 2010-01-02 | 651,215 |
| 2010-01-09 | 825,891 |
| 2010-01-16 | 659,173 |
| 2010-01-23 | 507,651 |
| 2010-01-30 | 538,617 |
| 2010-02-06 | 512,463 |
| 2010-02-13 | 482,078 |
| 2010-02-20 | 458,160 |
| 2010-02-27 | 474,662 |
| 2010-03-06 | 462,679 |
| 2010-03-13 | 439,061 |
| 2010-03-20 | 413,067 |
| 2010-03-27 | 412,710 |
| 2010-04-03 | 421,130 |
| 2010-04-10 | 514,136 |
| 2010-04-17 | 436,814 |
| 2010-04-24 | 429,196 |
| 2010-05-01 | 399,350 |
| 2010-05-08 | 414,327 |
| 2010-05-15 | 414,572 |
| 2010-05-22 | 410,778 |
| 2010-05-29 | 418,873 |
| 2010-06-05 | 398,864 |
| 2010-06-12 | 448,305 |
| 2010-06-19 | 427,080 |
| 2010-06-26 | 444,712 |
| 2010-07-03 | 470,366 |
| 2010-07-10 | 515,991 |
| 2010-07-17 | 502,065 |
| 2010-07-24 | 413,679 |
| 2010-07-31 | 402,140 |
| 2010-08-07 | 425,471 |
| 2010-08-14 | 405,484 |
| 2010-08-21 | 384,955 |
| 2010-08-28 | 383,135 |
| 2010-09-04 | 381,863 |
| 2010-09-11 | 341,791 |
| 2010-09-18 | 382,341 |
| 2010-09-25 | 372,551 |
| 2010-10-02 | 373,681 |
| 2010-10-09 | 462,667 |
| 2010-10-16 | 394,016 |
| 2010-10-23 | 408,489 |
| 2010-10-30 | 421,097 |
| 2010-11-06 | 452,657 |
| 2010-11-13 | 409,548 |
| 2010-11-20 | 464,817 |
| 2010-11-27 | 412,922 |
| 2010-12-04 | 585,711 |
| 2010-12-11 | 491,776 |
| 2010-12-18 | 495,548 |
| 2010-12-25 | 525,710 |
| 2011-01-01 | 578,904 |
| 2011-01-08 | 773,499 |
| 2011-01-15 | 549,688 |
| 2011-01-22 | 485,950 |
| 2011-01-29 | 464,775 |
| 2011-02-05 | 440,706 |
| 2011-02-12 | 424,400 |
| 2011-02-19 | 380,985 |
| 2011-02-26 | 353,797 |
| 2011-03-05 | 407,299 |
| 2011-03-12 | 371,721 |
| 2011-03-19 | 354,457 |
| 2011-03-26 | 357,457 |
| 2011-04-02 | 353,817 |
| 2011-04-09 | 448,029 |
| 2011-04-16 | 381,834 |
| 2011-04-23 | 387,867 |
| 2011-04-30 | 415,974 |
| 2011-05-07 | 397,737 |
| 2011-05-14 | 361,573 |
| 2011-05-21 | 376,632 |
| 2011-05-28 | 381,497 |
| 2011-06-04 | 366,816 |
| 2011-06-11 | 400,608 |
| 2011-06-18 | 394,286 |
| 2011-06-25 | 406,633 |
| 2011-07-02 | 425,640 |
| 2011-07-09 | 473,963 |
| 2011-07-16 | 470,086 |
| 2011-07-23 | 369,207 |
| 2011-07-30 | 341,103 |
| 2011-08-06 | 354,408 |
| 2011-08-13 | 346,014 |
| 2011-08-20 | 344,870 |
| 2011-08-27 | 336,761 |
| 2011-09-03 | 348,582 |
| 2011-09-10 | 328,868 |
| 2011-09-17 | 353,820 |
| 2011-09-24 | 328,073 |
| 2011-10-01 | 332,394 |
| 2011-10-08 | 405,906 |
| 2011-10-15 | 357,562 |
| 2011-10-22 | 377,156 |
| 2011-10-29 | 369,647 |
| 2011-11-05 | 402,532 |
| 2011-11-12 | 363,016 |
| 2011-11-19 | 440,157 |
| 2011-11-26 | 372,640 |
| 2011-12-03 | 528,793 |
| 2011-12-10 | 435,863 |
| 2011-12-17 | 421,103 |
| 2011-12-24 | 497,689 |
| 2011-12-31 | 540,057 |
| 2012-01-07 | 646,219 |
| 2012-01-14 | 525,422 |
| 2012-01-21 | 416,880 |
| 2012-01-28 | 422,287 |
| 2012-02-04 | 401,365 |
| 2012-02-11 | 365,014 |
| 2012-02-18 | 346,659 |
| 2012-02-25 | 334,242 |
| 2012-03-03 | 368,433 |
| 2012-03-10 | 340,102 |
| 2012-03-17 | 319,498 |
| 2012-03-24 | 323,373 |
| 2012-03-31 | 315,800 |
| 2012-04-07 | 390,064 |
| 2012-04-14 | 370,482 |
| 2012-04-21 | 370,632 |
| 2012-04-28 | 333,476 |
| 2012-05-05 | 341,080 |
| 2012-05-12 | 325,094 |
| 2012-05-19 | 330,427 |
| 2012-05-26 | 346,260 |
| 2012-06-02 | 324,385 |
| 2012-06-09 | 376,610 |
| 2012-06-16 | 364,548 |
| 2012-06-23 | 370,521 |
| 2012-06-30 | 369,826 |
| 2012-07-07 | 442,192 |
| 2012-07-14 | 455,260 |
| 2012-07-21 | 340,780 |
| 2012-07-28 | 312,931 |
| 2012-08-04 | 320,219 |
| 2012-08-11 | 317,680 |
| 2012-08-18 | 311,857 |
| 2012-08-25 | 312,542 |
| 2012-09-01 | 309,537 |
| 2012-09-08 | 299,729 |
| 2012-09-15 | 330,454 |
| 2012-09-22 | 303,685 |
| 2012-09-29 | 301,046 |
| 2012-10-06 | 329,925 |
| 2012-10-13 | 362,730 |
| 2012-10-20 | 345,227 |
| 2012-10-27 | 339,924 |
| 2012-11-03 | 361,823 |
| 2012-11-10 | 478,551 |
| 2012-11-17 | 403,636 |
| 2012-11-24 | 358,865 |
| 2012-12-01 | 500,163 |
| 2012-12-08 | 429,191 |
| 2012-12-15 | 401,431 |
| 2012-12-22 | 457,584 |
| 2012-12-29 | 490,126 |
| 2013-01-05 | 557,424 |
| 2013-01-12 | 558,047 |
| 2013-01-19 | 437,360 |
| 2013-01-26 | 369,567 |
| 2013-02-02 | 388,708 |
| 2013-02-09 | 361,759 |
| 2013-02-16 | 351,087 |
| 2013-02-23 | 310,512 |
| 2013-03-02 | 335,794 |
| 2013-03-09 | 317,661 |
| 2013-03-16 | 301,471 |
| 2013-03-23 | 316,133 |
| 2013-03-30 | 317,494 |
| 2013-04-06 | 356,935 |
| 2013-04-13 | 359,415 |
| 2013-04-20 | 326,264 |
| 2013-04-27 | 301,622 |
| 2013-05-04 | 301,602 |
| 2013-05-11 | 320,253 |
| 2013-05-18 | 303,357 |
| 2013-05-25 | 319,508 |
| 2013-06-01 | 294,608 |
| 2013-06-08 | 332,964 |
| 2013-06-15 | 336,970 |
| 2013-06-22 | 336,901 |
| 2013-06-29 | 335,424 |
| 2013-07-06 | 383,811 |
| 2013-07-13 | 410,974 |
| 2013-07-20 | 340,457 |
| 2013-07-27 | 281,692 |
| 2013-08-03 | 288,861 |
| 2013-08-10 | 282,756 |
| 2013-08-17 | 281,164 |
| 2013-08-24 | 279,803 |
| 2013-08-31 | 269,359 |
| 2013-09-07 | 229,648 |
| 2013-09-14 | 272,946 |
| 2013-09-21 | 255,087 |
| 2013-09-28 | 252,196 |
| 2013-10-05 | 335,937 |
| 2013-10-12 | 360,957 |
| 2013-10-19 | 312,037 |
| 2013-10-26 | 325,326 |
| 2013-11-02 | 331,867 |
| 2013-11-09 | 364,167 |
| 2013-11-16 | 327,053 |
| 2013-11-23 | 369,197 |
| 2013-11-30 | 321,896 |
| 2013-12-07 | 463,413 |
| 2013-12-14 | 414,613 |
| 2013-12-21 | 418,272 |
| 2013-12-28 | 452,664 |
| 2014-01-04 | 488,537 |
| 2014-01-11 | 534,966 |
| 2014-01-18 | 416,116 |
| 2014-01-25 | 357,806 |
| 2014-02-01 | 357,742 |
| 2014-02-08 | 360,338 |
| 2014-02-15 | 322,761 |
| 2014-02-22 | 312,665 |
| 2014-03-01 | 317,832 |
| 2014-03-08 | 302,311 |
| 2014-03-15 | 285,970 |
| 2014-03-22 | 274,072 |
| 2014-03-29 | 294,862 |
| 2014-04-05 | 299,162 |
| 2014-04-12 | 318,793 |
| 2014-04-19 | 299,182 |
| 2014-04-26 | 318,127 |
| 2014-05-03 | 288,748 |
| 2014-05-10 | 270,738 |
| 2014-05-17 | 287,398 |
| 2014-05-24 | 275,412 |
| 2014-05-31 | 264,133 |
| 2014-06-07 | 313,371 |
| 2014-06-14 | 301,195 |
| 2014-06-21 | 305,029 |
| 2014-06-28 | 305,791 |
| 2014-07-05 | 322,753 |
| 2014-07-12 | 370,559 |
| 2014-07-19 | 287,049 |
| 2014-07-26 | 257,625 |
| 2014-08-02 | 247,877 |
| 2014-08-09 | 269,468 |
| 2014-08-16 | 249,463 |
| 2014-08-23 | 249,006 |
| 2014-08-30 | 249,780 |
| 2014-09-06 | 234,755 |
| 2014-09-13 | 242,318 |
| 2014-09-20 | 239,780 |
| 2014-09-27 | 227,571 |
| 2014-10-04 | 257,545 |
| 2014-10-11 | 273,756 |
| 2014-10-18 | 256,166 |
| 2014-10-25 | 271,331 |
| 2014-11-01 | 266,921 |
| 2014-11-08 | 309,338 |
| 2014-11-15 | 286,115 |
| 2014-11-22 | 357,202 |
| 2014-11-29 | 294,389 |
| 2014-12-06 | 389,284 |
| 2014-12-13 | 327,827 |
| 2014-12-20 | 340,827 |
| 2014-12-27 | 389,757 |
| 2015-01-03 | 439,342 |
| 2015-01-10 | 529,685 |
| 2015-01-17 | 383,538 |
| 2015-01-24 | 281,885 |
| 2015-01-31 | 306,643 |
| 2015-02-07 | 324,158 |
| 2015-02-14 | 277,904 |
| 2015-02-21 | 280,639 |
| 2015-02-28 | 315,566 |
| 2015-03-07 | 277,925 |
| 2015-03-14 | 260,242 |
| 2015-03-21 | 248,032 |
| 2015-03-28 | 239,748 |
| 2015-04-04 | 253,533 |
| 2015-04-11 | 308,173 |
| 2015-04-18 | 279,797 |
| 2015-04-25 | 250,780 |
| 2015-05-02 | 236,421 |
| 2015-05-09 | 242,882 |
| 2015-05-16 | 243,612 |
| 2015-05-23 | 253,454 |
| 2015-05-30 | 230,676 |
| 2015-06-06 | 275,619 |
| 2015-06-13 | 258,764 |
| 2015-06-20 | 263,199 |
| 2015-06-27 | 274,646 |
| 2015-07-04 | 303,585 |
| 2015-07-11 | 344,471 |
| 2015-07-18 | 262,949 |
| 2015-07-25 | 230,314 |
| 2015-08-01 | 224,104 |
| 2015-08-08 | 239,326 |
| 2015-08-15 | 229,251 |
| 2015-08-22 | 226,649 |
| 2015-08-29 | 230,079 |
| 2015-09-05 | 232,507 |
| 2015-09-12 | 198,903 |
| 2015-09-19 | 219,342 |
| 2015-09-26 | 215,116 |
| 2015-10-03 | 227,176 |
| 2015-10-10 | 256,522 |
| 2015-10-17 | 232,860 |
| 2015-10-24 | 245,365 |
| 2015-10-31 | 258,440 |
| 2015-11-07 | 291,098 |
| 2015-11-14 | 264,816 |
| 2015-11-21 | 305,424 |
| 2015-11-28 | 262,628 |
| 2015-12-05 | 384,491 |
| 2015-12-12 | 313,276 |
| 2015-12-19 | 319,641 |
| 2015-12-26 | 346,542 |
| 2016-01-02 | 405,368 |
| 2016-01-09 | 502,904 |
| 2016-01-16 | 378,747 |
| 2016-01-23 | 295,936 |
| 2016-01-30 | 311,940 |
| 2016-02-06 | 290,796 |
| 2016-02-13 | 258,380 |
| 2016-02-20 | 248,870 |
| 2016-02-27 | 265,802 |
| 2016-03-05 | 247,628 |
| 2016-03-12 | 236,888 |
| 2016-03-19 | 230,882 |
| 2016-03-26 | 235,716 |
| 2016-04-02 | 245,035 |
| 2016-04-09 | 270,419 |
| 2016-04-16 | 242,400 |
| 2016-04-23 | 245,040 |
| 2016-04-30 | 243,392 |
| 2016-05-07 | 261,899 |
| 2016-05-14 | 244,869 |
| 2016-05-21 | 240,798 |
| 2016-05-28 | 246,740 |
| 2016-06-04 | 232,300 |
| 2016-06-11 | 266,277 |
| 2016-06-18 | 247,968 |
| 2016-06-25 | 263,662 |
| 2016-07-02 | 267,437 |
| 2016-07-09 | 298,673 |
| 2016-07-16 | 268,526 |
| 2016-07-23 | 231,925 |
| 2016-07-30 | 219,202 |
| 2016-08-06 | 231,542 |
| 2016-08-13 | 219,570 |
| 2016-08-20 | 217,011 |
| 2016-08-27 | 215,688 |
| 2016-09-03 | 217,715 |
| 2016-09-10 | 193,291 |
| 2016-09-17 | 205,649 |
| 2016-09-24 | 198,455 |
| 2016-10-01 | 200,456 |
| 2016-10-08 | 238,581 |
| 2016-10-15 | 233,633 |
| 2016-10-22 | 237,314 |
| 2016-10-29 | 245,751 |
| 2016-11-05 | 258,608 |
| 2016-11-12 | 223,770 |
| 2016-11-19 | 287,794 |
| 2016-11-26 | 249,774 |
| 2016-12-03 | 351,580 |
| 2016-12-10 | 305,268 |
| 2016-12-17 | 315,068 |
| 2016-12-24 | 343,213 |
| 2016-12-31 | 350,561 |
| 2017-01-07 | 414,742 |
| 2017-01-14 | 352,799 |
| 2017-01-21 | 284,030 |
| 2017-01-28 | 280,983 |
| 2017-02-04 | 259,713 |
| 2017-02-11 | 245,886 |
| 2017-02-18 | 239,322 |
| 2017-02-25 | 212,829 |
| 2017-03-04 | 243,959 |
| 2017-03-11 | 222,227 |
| 2017-03-18 | 224,693 |
| 2017-03-25 | 228,269 |
| 2017-04-01 | 208,347 |
| 2017-04-08 | 239,823 |
| 2017-04-15 | 225,864 |
| 2017-04-22 | 241,611 |
| 2017-04-29 | 210,955 |
| 2017-05-06 | 215,040 |
| 2017-05-13 | 206,905 |
| 2017-05-20 | 210,544 |
| 2017-05-27 | 232,138 |
| 2017-06-03 | 212,696 |
| 2017-06-10 | 234,652 |
| 2017-06-17 | 228,883 |
| 2017-06-24 | 239,635 |
| 2017-07-01 | 252,886 |
| 2017-07-08 | 284,329 |
| 2017-07-15 | 257,763 |
| 2017-07-22 | 220,455 |
| 2017-07-29 | 198,776 |
| 2017-08-05 | 211,924 |
| 2017-08-12 | 198,280 |
| 2017-08-19 | 195,130 |
| 2017-08-26 | 196,227 |
| 2017-09-02 | 250,627 |
| 2017-09-09 | 211,923 |
| 2017-09-16 | 212,313 |
| 2017-09-23 | 212,987 |
| 2017-09-30 | 204,180 |
| 2017-10-07 | 229,241 |
| 2017-10-14 | 205,592 |
| 2017-10-21 | 216,004 |
| 2017-10-28 | 215,977 |
| 2017-11-04 | 242,111 |
| 2017-11-11 | 236,654 |
| 2017-11-18 | 275,004 |
| 2017-11-25 | 224,851 |
| 2017-12-02 | 326,052 |
| 2017-12-09 | 282,055 |
| 2017-12-16 | 287,479 |
| 2017-12-23 | 325,180 |
| 2017-12-30 | 351,500 |
| 2018-01-06 | 403,930 |
| 2018-01-13 | 354,708 |
| 2018-01-20 | 260,432 |
| 2018-01-27 | 268,197 |
| 2018-02-03 | 243,422 |
| 2018-02-10 | 233,252 |
| 2018-02-17 | 212,609 |
| 2018-02-24 | 196,294 |
| 2018-03-03 | 225,893 |
| 2018-03-10 | 205,185 |
| 2018-03-17 | 198,649 |
| 2018-03-24 | 195,433 |
| 2018-03-31 | 201,057 |
| 2018-04-07 | 231,759 |
| 2018-04-14 | 226,090 |
| 2018-04-21 | 200,139 |
| 2018-04-28 | 186,451 |
| 2018-05-05 | 190,262 |
| 2018-05-12 | 195,214 |
| 2018-05-19 | 207,043 |
| 2018-05-26 | 202,846 |
| 2018-06-02 | 191,523 |
| 2018-06-09 | 217,289 |
| 2018-06-16 | 206,023 |
| 2018-06-23 | 222,766 |
| 2018-06-30 | 231,539 |
| 2018-07-07 | 264,869 |
| 2018-07-14 | 232,238 |
| 2018-07-21 | 201,288 |
| 2018-07-28 | 179,880 |
| 2018-08-04 | 185,174 |
| 2018-08-11 | 180,038 |
| 2018-08-18 | 173,331 |
| 2018-08-25 | 175,745 |
| 2018-09-01 | 173,607 |
| 2018-09-08 | 162,640 |
| 2018-09-15 | 173,624 |
| 2018-09-22 | 172,930 |
| 2018-09-29 | 171,816 |
| 2018-10-06 | 193,936 |
| 2018-10-13 | 190,501 |
| 2018-10-20 | 198,733 |
| 2018-10-27 | 198,530 |
| 2018-11-03 | 214,814 |
| 2018-11-10 | 235,981 |
| 2018-11-17 | 226,576 |
| 2018-11-24 | 218,658 |
| 2018-12-01 | 317,936 |
| 2018-12-08 | 261,525 |
| 2018-12-15 | 255,195 |
| 2018-12-22 | 291,581 |
| 2018-12-29 | 327,388 |
| 2019-01-05 | 350,681 |
| 2019-01-12 | 343,678 |
| 2019-01-19 | 269,369 |
| 2019-01-26 | 250,580 |
| 2019-02-02 | 254,263 |
| 2019-02-09 | 242,762 |
| 2019-02-16 | 210,679 |
| 2019-02-23 | 203,049 |
| 2019-03-02 | 220,540 |
| 2019-03-09 | 209,302 |
| 2019-03-16 | 194,335 |
| 2019-03-23 | 190,023 |
| 2019-03-30 | 183,775 |
| 2019-04-06 | 196,071 |
| 2019-04-13 | 196,364 |
| 2019-04-20 | 211,762 |
| 2019-04-27 | 204,755 |
| 2019-05-04 | 204,033 |
| 2019-05-11 | 188,264 |
| 2019-05-18 | 191,931 |
| 2019-05-25 | 198,194 |
| 2019-06-01 | 189,577 |
| 2019-06-08 | 220,186 |
| 2019-06-15 | 205,921 |
| 2019-06-22 | 225,819 |
| 2019-06-29 | 224,565 |
| 2019-07-06 | 231,995 |
| 2019-07-13 | 243,621 |
| 2019-07-20 | 196,382 |
| 2019-07-27 | 178,897 |
| 2019-08-03 | 179,879 |
| 2019-08-10 | 186,914 |
| 2019-08-17 | 171,386 |
| 2019-08-24 | 176,867 |
| 2019-08-31 | 179,516 |
| 2019-09-07 | 160,342 |
| 2019-09-14 | 173,134 |
| 2019-09-21 | 175,394 |
| 2019-09-28 | 172,968 |
| 2019-10-05 | 188,106 |
| 2019-10-12 | 201,677 |
| 2019-10-19 | 186,748 |
| 2019-10-26 | 198,733 |
| 2019-11-02 | 205,625 |
| 2019-11-09 | 238,996 |
| 2019-11-16 | 227,892 |
| 2019-11-23 | 252,428 |
| 2019-11-30 | 216,827 |
| 2019-12-07 | 317,866 |
| 2019-12-14 | 270,547 |
| 2019-12-21 | 287,243 |
| 2019-12-28 | 312,524 |
| 2020-01-04 | 335,480 |
| 2020-01-11 | 338,550 |
| 2020-01-18 | 282,088 |
| 2020-01-25 | 229,002 |
| 2020-02-01 | 224,664 |
| 2020-02-08 | 219,601 |
| 2020-02-15 | 209,336 |
| 2020-02-22 | 199,278 |
| 2020-02-29 | 216,982 |
| 2020-03-07 | 200,382 |
| 2020-03-14 | 251,416 |
| 2020-03-21 | 2,920,162 |
| 2020-03-28 | 6,015,821 |
| 2020-04-04 | 6,211,406 |
| 2020-04-11 | 4,964,568 |
| 2020-04-18 | 4,267,395 |
Note: Due to the scale of the chart and rapid increase in initial unemployment insurance (UI) claims, the initial UI claims for the last five weeks appear to align vertically.
Source: U.S. Employment and Training Administration, Initial Claims [ICSA], retrieved from Department of Labor (DOL), https://www.dol.gov/ui/data.pdf and https://oui.doleta.gov/unemploy/claims.asp, April 23, 2020
All else equal, job losses of this magnitude would translate into an unemployment rate of 18.3%. However, the official unemployment rate, when it is released, will likely not reflect all coronavirus-related layoffs. This is due to the fact that jobless workers are only counted as unemployed if they are actively seeking work. That means many workers who lose their job as a result of the virus will be counted as dropping out of the labor force instead of as unemployed, because they are unable to search for work due to the lockdown.
Widespread reports of UI systems collapsing under the weight of so many applications raise the question not only of how many would-be applicants have been frozen out, but also of how many of those who managed to apply are actually receiving benefits. The data to get at that last question are lagged a week, but they show that roughly 71% of applicants are receiving benefits. That is calculated from noting that between March 14 and April 11, the total number of workers receiving benefits (known as “continued claims” or “insured unemployment”) increased by 14.4 million. Over the same period, 20.1 million workers filed unemployment insurance claims. That means that by April 11, only roughly 14.4 million out of 20.1 million new filers, or 71%, were receiving benefits. Applied to the current data, that would mean that roughly 7.0 million UI applicants from the coronavirus period are still waiting to receive their benefits.
Trump’s corporate-first agenda has weakened worker protections needed to combat the coronavirus
Using the COVID-19 pandemic as cover, the Trump administration is reportedly preparing to take executive action to repeal and suspend federal regulations. This should not be a surprise—one of Trump’s first actions after taking office was to issue an executive order requiring federal agencies to identify at least two existing regulations to “repeal” when proposing a new regulation. Now seizing on the public health crisis and its economic impact as an excuse, the Trump administration is framing this renewed push to deregulate as a necessary policy response to promote economic growth, focusing on repealing and suspending regulations that impact businesses.
Deregulation has long been a central component of the corporate-interest agenda, and the Trump administration has certainly obliged. While the coronavirus was not under anyone’s control, President Trump’s failure to establish strong worker protections during his first term, through laws and regulations, has helped create the crisis millions of essential workers now confront every day on the job. The following are examples of how the Trump administration’s corporate-driven agenda has weakened worker protections needed to combat the coronavirus.
President Trump blocked the Workplace Injury and Illness record-keeping rule, which would have clarified an employer’s obligation under the Occupational Safety and Health Act to maintain accurate records of workplace injuries and illnesses. As a result, OSHA does not require employers to keep accurate records that could be used to identify unsafe, potentially life-threatening working conditions.
President Trump blocked the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces rule, which would have helped ensure that taxpayer dollars were not awarded to contractors who violate basic labor and employment laws. Without this regulatory safeguard, more than 300,000 workers have been the victims of wage-related labor violations while working under federal contracts in the last decade.
The extreme jobless numbers will lead to a jump in the unemployment rate, but that won’t tell the whole story
In the four weeks between March 15 and April 11, more than 20 million workers applied for unemployment insurance (UI) benefits. This is more than five times the worst four-week stretch of the Great Recession, which, at the time, was the worst recession the United States had seen since the Great Depression. What are we really up against here?
The situation is unfolding quickly, but one helpful way to understand it is to put the UI numbers in the context of the unemployment rate. When we do that, we find the jump in jobless claims over the last four weeks would have increased the unemployment rate to 15.7%—if everything else (like the rate of hiring and the rate of people voluntarily quitting their jobs) stayed the same—and all the workers who filed for unemployment benefits were counted as unemployed. But everything else definitely did not stay the same, and it is unlikely that all the workers applying for UI were counted as unemployed.
- Everything else did not stay the same. The overall change in employment over any period is equal to the number of hires over the period minus the number of job “separations” over the period (in the pre-virus period, there were around 5.9 million hires and 5.7 million separations every month). For one, hires drop dramatically in recessions. And secondly, separations are not just job losses where people filed for UI. They can also be job losses where people didn’t file for UI (or were frozen out of the system), or voluntary quits, retirements, or worker deaths. All these parts are moving right now. In other words, there are important elements aside from what shows up in the UI data that go into determining the overall change in employment. As a result, it remains to be seen if the overall employment decline related to the coronavirus will be greater or less than the increase in coronavirus-related jobless claims.
- Not all workers who filed for unemployment benefits will be counted as unemployed. A worker is counted as unemployed in the monthly unemployment numbers if they are on furlough (i.e., on temporary layoff), or if they don’t have a job but are available to work and are actively seeking work. So, someone who lost their job but is not actively seeking work because the virus makes job search impossible will not be counted as unemployed. And someone who lost their job because they have to care for a child whose school or day care closed would not be counted as unemployed because they are not available to work. Instead, these workers would be counted as dropping out of the labor force. It is difficult to know what share of workers who applied for unemployment insurance benefits will be counted as unemployed, but in the March unemployment data, which showed the leading edge of the impact of the virus, only about half of the drop in employment showed up as an increase in unemployment, and the rest showed up as a drop in the labor force participation rate. If that ratio holds, the unemployment rate will rise only half as much as it “should” in this crisis. (This is why it would be useful to use the employment rate as the metric when determining when pandemic-related relief provisions should trigger off, instead of solely the unemployment rate.)
Workers Memorial Day highlights Secretary of Labor Scalia’s failure to protect workers during the coronavirus crisis
April 28 is Workers Memorial Day, a day observed around the world to remember those workers killed or injured on the job and to fight for strong safety and health protections for all workers. This fight has never been more critical. The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed a reality many workers have long confronted—workers are routinely forced to work in unsafe conditions, risking their health and safety for a job.
In 2018, the most recent annual data available, more than 5,000 U.S. workers died on the job. Prior to the pandemic, an average of 14 workers died each day of workplace injuries. This does not include workers who died from occupational diseases, estimated to be nearly 100,000 each year. In total, 275 workers died each day in 2018 as the result of workplace injuries and illnesses, and more than 3.5 million workers were injured at work in 2018.
As staggering as these data are, they understate the problem. Widespread underreporting as well as limitations in the injury and illness reporting system mean that many worker injuries remain uncounted. Worker health and safety experts estimate that more than seven million workers suffer workplace injuries and illnesses each year.
The coronavirus pandemic lays bare the long-standing failure of existing U.S. health and safety laws to protect workers. Weak worker protections cost thousands of workers’ lives each year and are now leaving essential workers unprotected on the job during this crisis. Over the last few months alone, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has received thousands of complaints from workers concerned about workplace exposure to COVID-19 and a lack of safeguards on the job.
While policymakers have been quick to highlight the sacrifices and heroic efforts of essential workers at this moment, they have done little to change the system to ensure that these workers are protected on the job. As a result, workers continue to be required to work without protective gear. Sick workers continue to lack access to paid leave. And, when workers try to speak up for themselves and each other, they are fired. Workers are dying as a result.
Instead of looking for ways to address weak health and safety protections for workers in this crisis, Secretary of Labor Eugene Scalia is taking this opportunity to weaken protections for millions of workers. He issued a rule exempting certain firms from being required to provide paid sick and family medical leave to workers, which could rob nine million health care workers and 4.4 million first responders from paid leave protections. Further, Scalia has refused to require employers to follow Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance for public businesses.
Weak labor protections have put Midwestern food processing workers at risk for coronavirus
Earlier this year, our report Race in the Heartland detailed stark and pervasive racial disparities in Midwestern states—tracing these to long-standing patterns of discrimination and segregation in the region and the disproportionate impact of “rust belt” deindustrialization and the collapse of union membership for workers of color. Unsurprisingly, the COVID-19 crisis has magnified these disparities and their consequences. Across the Midwest, residential and occupational segregation put African Americans and Hispanics in the region more at risk. And across the Midwest, public policies—by design and by neglect—do little to address or alleviate that risk.
Workers of color are disproportionately exposed at work. The luxury of working from home is steeply stratified by race and income. African American and Hispanic workers are overrepresented in low-wage direct service occupations; in the 12 states of the Midwest, for example, Hispanic workers make up 7% of the labor force but over 18% of the workforce in building and cleaning services. In Midwestern cities, African American workers are dramatically overrepresented in occupations like child care and public transit. Across the rural Midwest, workers of color make up the majority of the workforce in the concentrations of low-wage food-processing production that dot the landscape.
In all of these settings, workers face both a greater risk of unemployment as the service economy shuts down and a heightened risk of exposure if and where they keep working. These risks are exaggerated in the Midwest, where four states (Iowa, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska) are among the five nationwide that still do not have statewide stay-at-home orders. In these states, the list of “essential businesses” is expansive and idiosyncratic, the expectation that workers show up—regardless of the risks—is clear, and the protection offered workers—by public policies or by their places of employment—is virtually nonexistent.
How Southern state policymakers can strengthen democracy and protect voter health during the coronavirus pandemic
This is the final installment of a three-part series examining the economic and social conditions that impact health outcomes in Southern states, and how these conditions leave communities underprepared to protect front-line workers and communities during the COVID-19 pandemic.
In the earlier pieces of this three-part series, we described what actions are especially needed in Southern states to protect public health and front-line workers and communities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Here we highlight action that is also needed in the South to address the threats the coronavirus poses to participation in our democracy at the expense of voter and poll worker health. The country witnessed this most recently during the Wisconsin presidential primary election last week. As we describe below, Southern states already face significant challenges to democratic participation. The coronavirus pandemic further heightens the need around the country and especially in the South to address longstanding barriers to free and fair elections, an accurate count for the once-a-decade census, and a legislative process that is accountable to the communities elected officials represent.
Free and fair elections and healthy voters
Today, voter suppression, which disproportionately impacts black and brown people, comes in the form of enforcing strict voter identification laws, disenfranchising people with felony convictions, purging registered voters from voter lists, closing polling locations, and failing to provide required language assistance. In Southern states, these barriers are layered on top of the legacy of Jim Crow, which as our colleague Jhacova Williams demonstrates in her research, continues to stifle rates of black voter registration today.
The coronavirus pandemic creates additional barriers, asking voters to choose between protecting their health and their right to participate in our democracy and compromising the health and safety of poll workers during presidential primary as well as state and local elections. Today, progress for fair and accessible election reforms remains mixed. In Kentucky, the legislature overrode a veto by the governor to create a new voter identification law at the worst possible time. On the other hand, Virginia policymakers have enacted the kinds of voting reforms necessary to strengthen democracy in the wake of the crisis.Virginia’s governor recently signed multiple bills that expanded early voting, repealed voter identification laws, made election day a holiday, expanded absentee voting, and implemented automatic voter registration.
Southern state policymakers and election officials have taken some useful steps to protect public health and limit the spread of the coronavirus by postponing elections. For example, though most states in the South have already had their presidential primary elections, officials in states such as Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, and West Virginia delayed theirs until June. The North Carolina Board of Elections and Mississippi Governor Reeves postponed congressional runoff elections, and other officials in Alabama, Oklahoma, and Texas postponed local elections. In Oklahoma, the secretary of state will identify a new deadline for collecting ballot initiative signatures once the governor indicates that the state’s emergency declaration is over.
Access to online learning amid coronavirus is far from universal, and children who are poor suffer from a digital divide
In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, teachers, parents, school districts, and communities are doing their best to replace in-person with online learning. But as a recent Washington Post article notes, the move to e-learning prompted by school closures has “exposed the technology divides”—with K–12 students who lack the resources they now need to learn at home facing long-term academic disadvantages.
Although the Post article focused on the digital divide in the District of Columbia, this is a national problem.
EPI analysis of data from the most comprehensive study of primary and secondary education in the country illustrates a widespread digital divide based on family income. The data, from the National Center for Education Statistics’ National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) for eighth-graders, show that full access to online learning is far from universal and that students who are poor are less likely to have access to the key tools and experiences they need to attend school online. For example, nearly 16% of eighth-graders overall, and almost a quarter of eighth-graders who are poor, don’t have a desktop or laptop computer at home on which to follow their classes. About 8% of eighth-graders who are not poor lack access to these essential devices. The data also show that low shares of students have teachers with full technological proficiency to teach online. (Poor students are defined as students who are eligible for the federal free or reduced-price lunch program.)
Not all students are set up for online learning and students who are poor have less access to key tools: Share of eighth-graders with access to tool for online learning, by income level, 2017
| All students | 95.8% |
|---|---|
| Non-poor | 98.4% |
| Poor | 93.0% |
| All students | 84.4% |
| Non-poor | 92.3% |
| Poor | 76.3% |
| All students | 76.3% |
| Non-poor | 81.8% |
| Poor | 70.6% |
| All students | 51.3% |
| Non-poor | 56.1% |
| Poor | 46.4% |
| All students | 43.4% |
| Non-poor | 45.0% |
| Poor | 41.7% |
| All students | 69.2% |
| Non-poor | 71.4% |
| Poor | 66.8% |
| All students | 32.5% |
| Non-poor | 32.5% |
| Poor | 32.6% |
| All students | 19.3% |
| Non-poor | 18.3% |
| Poor | 20.3% |
Notes: Poor students are students eligible for the federal free or reduced-price lunch programs. Non-poor students are students who are ineligible for those programs. Frequent use of internet at home for homework means every day or almost every day. Students’ teachers were either “already proficient” in, “have not” received training in, or “had received training” in “software applications” and “integrating computers into instruction” in the last two years.
Source: 2017 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), eighth-grade reading sample microdata from the U.S. Department of Education’s National Center for Education Statistics
A coronavirus recovery: How to ensure older workers fully participate
Key takeaways:
- Because older workers are more likely to be unemployed for long periods, have work-limiting disabilities, and live in areas of the country that were struggling even before the crisis, policies aimed at addressing these problems will especially benefit these workers.
- While infrastructure spending could help jump-start the post-pandemic recovery, policies must ensure that older workers participate in training and jobs programs related to these investments.
- Regulatory protections for front-line workers, especially older workers and others at heightened risk for contracting or suffering serious consequences from contagious diseases, need to be strengthened and updated using lessons learned from the pandemic.
- Employer-provided benefits result in spotty coverage and higher costs for older workers. The United States should catch up to other countries and provide sick leave, paid family leave, and health insurance through government programs rather than leaving these to the discretion of employers.
(See the companion blog post outlining steps needed to protect vulnerable older workers in the economic collapse caused by measures needed to combat the COVID-19 pandemic.)
Once the worst of the outbreak is over and social distancing measures are relaxed, policies to help older workers will be needed to ensure they share in the recovery.
Deficit-financed stimulus spending—needed to quickly bring the economy back to something approaching full employment—will help but not ensure broad-based prosperity. Policymakers also need to address power imbalances between employers and workers and target policies at disadvantaged workers, including unemployed older workers.
Older workers, as I discussed in my last blog post, may find it harder to get back in the job market after layoffs for a number of reasons. They may have health conditions that limit what they can do or they may feel forced to accept large pay cuts because some skills and knowledge they’ve built up aren’t transferable and may be undervalued by prospective employers. Absent policies to help these workers regain their footing, they may become “discouraged workers” who give up on the job search and retire before they’re ready to.
This post lays out a series of policies to address barriers to employment for unemployed older workers and to protect older workers from health and financial risks.
Updated state unemployment numbers remain astonishingly high: Six states saw record-high levels of initial unemployment claims last week
This morning, the Department of Labor released the latest initial unemployment insurance (UI) claims data, showing that another five million people (not seasonally adjusted) filed for UI last week. In the last four weeks, more than 20 million workers—whose economic security has been upended by the coronavirus crisis and inadequate policy responses—filed for UI.
Last week, Colorado, New York, South Carolina, Connecticut, Mississippi, and West Virginia saw their highest level of initial UI claim filings ever. These six states, along with Florida, Missouri, and North Carolina, saw increases in initial filings compared with the prior week.
Most states had fewer initial UI claims last week than in the week prior, but the number of UI claims remained astonishingly high. California and Michigan—the two states with the largest decline since the week before—still had 661,000 and 219,000 claims filed last week, respectively—the third-highest week on record for both.
Figure A compares UI claims filed last week with filings in the pre-virus period, showing once again that Southern states are faring particularly poorly. Seven of the 10 states that had the highest percent change last week relative to the pre-virus period are Southern: Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, Louisiana, Kentucky, South Carolina, and Alabama.
Initial unemployment insurance claims filed during the week ending April 11, by state
| State | Initial claims filed | Percent change from the prior week | Level change from prior week | Percent change from pre-virus period | Level change from pre-virus period | Sum of initial claims for the five weeks ending April 11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 91,079 | -14.7% | -15,660 | 4221% | 88,971 | 291,513 |
| Alaska | 12,752 | -12.6% | -1,838 | 1410% | 11,908 | 50,083 |
| Arizona | 97,784 | -26.2% | -34,644 | 2878% | 94,501 | 352,344 |
| Arkansas | 34,635 | -44.2% | -27,451 | 2241% | 33,156 | 135,134 |
| California | 660,966 | -28.1% | -257,848 | 1517% | 620,094 | 2,882,044 |
| Colorado | 105,073 | 126.8% | 58,747 | 5418% | 103,169 | 235,332 |
| Connecticut | 33,962 | 1.5% | 498 | 1216% | 31,381 | 129,193 |
| Delaware | 13,272 | -29.6% | -5,579 | 2224% | 12,701 | 62,508 |
| Washington D.C. | 9,904 | -35.4% | -5,425 | 2079% | 9,450 | 56,777 |
| Florida | 181,293 | 6.7% | 11,408 | 3478% | 176,226 | 660,438 |
| Georgia | 317,526 | -18.6% | -72,606 | 5831% | 312,173 | 859,063 |
| Hawaii | 34,693 | -34.7% | -18,408 | 2955% | 33,557 | 146,794 |
| Idaho | 17,817 | -42.3% | -13,087 | 1518% | 16,716 | 96,279 |
| Illinois | 141,049 | -29.8% | -59,992 | 1402% | 131,658 | 645,495 |
| Indiana | 118,184 | -6.9% | -8,826 | 4611% | 115,676 | 446,719 |
| Iowa | 46,356 | -27.8% | -17,838 | 1887% | 44,023 | 209,697 |
| Kansas | 30,769 | -37.6% | -18,537 | 1808% | 29,156 | 159,723 |
| Kentucky | 115,763 | -1.5% | -1,812 | 4527% | 113,261 | 398,295 |
| Louisiana | 80,045 | -20.4% | -20,576 | 4648% | 78,359 | 352,759 |
| Maine | 13,273 | -57.1% | -17,637 | 1610% | 12,497 | 90,046 |
| Maryland | 60,823 | -44.4% | -48,666 | 2103% | 58,063 | 302,474 |
| Massachusetts | 103,040 | -26.2% | -36,607 | 1601% | 96,982 | 580,011 |
| Michigan | 219,320 | -43.6% | -169,234 | 3870% | 213,796 | 1,045,553 |
| Minnesota | 89,634 | -18.7% | -20,626 | 2447% | 86,115 | 428,772 |
| Mississippi | 46,160 | 0.7% | 308 | 5477% | 45,332 | 130,693 |
| Missouri | 95,785 | 4.7% | 4,327 | 3053% | 92,747 | 337,796 |
| Montana | 13,437 | -36.7% | -7,807 | 1620% | 12,656 | 71,610 |
| Nebraska | 16,391 | -39.4% | -10,663 | 3125% | 15,883 | 84,665 |
| Nevada | 60,180 | -24.1% | -19,105 | 2509% | 57,873 | 310,061 |
| New Hampshire | 23,936 | -38.9% | -15,266 | 4142% | 23,372 | 124,537 |
| New Jersey | 140,600 | -34.6% | -74,236 | 1619% | 132,421 | 686,971 |
| New Mexico | 19,494 | -25.4% | -6,638 | 2652% | 18,786 | 92,449 |
| New York | 395,949 | 15.0% | 51,498 | 2048% | 377,519 | 1,201,266 |
| North Carolina | 137,934 | 0.4% | 512 | 5263% | 135,362 | 545,117 |
| North Dakota | 10,378 | -31.4% | -4,747 | 2374% | 9,959 | 43,398 |
| Ohio | 157,218 | -30.5% | -68,973 | 2054% | 149,918 | 861,052 |
| Oklahoma | 48,977 | -19.1% | -11,557 | 3076% | 47,435 | 181,017 |
| Oregon | 50,930 | -18.9% | -11,858 | 1182% | 46,958 | 195,539 |
| Pennsylvania | 238,357 | -14.1% | -39,283 | 1788% | 225,736 | 1,313,564 |
| Rhode Island | 22,805 | -19.3% | -5,438 | 1931% | 21,682 | 115,803 |
| South Carolina | 87,686 | 1.3% | 1,113 | 4409% | 85,742 | 274,653 |
| South Dakota | 6,152 | -24.4% | -1,986 | 3276% | 5,970 | 23,042 |
| Tennessee | 74,772 | -33.3% | -37,414 | 3620% | 72,762 | 320,237 |
| Texas | 273,567 | -13.2% | -41,600 | 2009% | 260,596 | 1,036,521 |
| Utah | 24,171 | -26.8% | -8,869 | 2314% | 23,170 | 106,738 |
| Vermont | 9,478 | -42.5% | -6,996 | 1440% | 8,863 | 45,028 |
| Virginia | 106,723 | -27.6% | -40,646 | 3940% | 104,082 | 415,572 |
| Washington | 150,516 | -12.1% | -20,736 | 2379% | 144,446 | 648,766 |
| West Virginia | 14,595 | 0.7% | 101 | 1192% | 13,465 | 48,013 |
| Wisconsin | 69,884 | -33.3% | -34,939 | 1136% | 64,230 | 341,862 |
| Wyoming | 4,904 | -25.0% | -1,639 | 885% | 4,406 | 22,013 |
Notes: Initial claims for the week ending April 11 reflect advance state claims, not seasonally adjusted. For comparisons with the “pre-virus period,” we use a four-week average of initial claims for the weeks ending February 15–March 7, 2020.
Source: U.S. Employment and Training Administration, Initial Claims [ICSA], retrieved from Department of Labor (DOL), https://www.dol.gov/ui/data.pdf and https://oui.doleta.gov/unemploy/claims.asp, April 16, 2020
9.2 million workers likely lost their employer-provided health insurance in the past four weeks
These estimates were updated on May 14, 2020. See the updated estimates.
We estimate that 9.2 million workers were at high risk of losing their employer-provided health insurance in the past four weeks. To avoid prohibitively costly insurance options, the federal government should fund an expansion of Medicare and Medicaid to all those suffering job losses during the pandemic period.
Two weeks ago, when the two-week total of unemployment insurance (UI) initial claims was 8.7 million, we estimated that 3.5 million workers may have lost their health insurance at work. Since then, 11.4 million more workers filed claims for unemployment benefits, bringing the total of UI initial claims over the last four weeks to 20.1 million, currently the most comprehensive measure of the extent of job losses and furloughs due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
We estimate that across all industries where workers have filed UI claims, about 45.7% of workers had their own health insurance provided through their employer. As a result, of the 20.1 million workers who filed initial UI claims in the last four weeks, 9.2 million may have lost coverage through their own employer-provided health insurance (EPHI).
The analysis, described below, combines industry-specific UI claims data for 11 states, representing about 20% of national employment, with national, industry-specific health insurance coverage rates. Using these data, we provide a rough prediction of 9.2 million workers losing EPHI. We can’t say exactly how many people will lose insurance coverage altogether for several reasons. For example, some workers who lose EPHI due to layoffs or hours reductions that trigger UI claims may be able to obtain coverage through health care exchanges set up by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or through Medicaid. Some of this group may also be able to obtain continuing coverage through COBRA, paying out of pocket the full cost of their EPHI coverage. Some workers may be able to obtain coverage through other family members, or if only experiencing a temporary furlough or hours reduction, their employers might continue to pay for coverage. On the other hand, our calculations might understate the loss of health insurance coverage because they do not account for family members who are no longer covered because of the policyholder’s layoff. And, because not all layoffs result in UI claims, we will underestimate the actual magnitude of job losses.