Areas of expertise
Macroeconomics • Globalization • Social insurance • Public investment
Biography
Josh Bivens is the director of research at the Economic Policy Institute (EPI). His areas of research include macroeconomics, fiscal and monetary policy, the economics of globalization, social insurance, and public investment. He frequently appears as an economics expert on news shows, including the Public Broadcasting Service’s “NewsHour,” the “Melissa Harris-Perry” show on MSNBC, WAMU’s “The Diane Rehm Show,” American Public Media’s “Marketplace,” and programs of the BBC.
As a leading policy analyst, Bivens regularly testifies before the U.S. Congress on fiscal and monetary policy, the economic impact of regulations, and other issues. He has also provided analyses for the annual meeting of Project LINK of the United Nations and the Trade Union Advisory Committee (TUAC) of the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
Bivens is the author of Failure by Design: The Story behind America’s Broken Economy (EPI and Cornell University Press) and Everybody Wins Except for Most of Us: What Economics Really Teaches About Globalization (EPI). He is the co-author of The State of Working America, 12th Edition (EPI and Cornell University Press) and a co-editor of Good Jobs, Bad Jobs, No Jobs: Labor Markets and Informal Work in Egypt, El Salvador, India, Russia and South Africa (EPI).
His academic articles have appeared in the International Review of Applied Economics, the Journal of Economic Issues and the Journal of Economic Perspectives. Bivens has also provided peer-reviewed articles to several edited collections, including The Handbook of the Political Economy of Financial Crises (Oxford University Press), Public Economics in the United States: How the Federal Government Analyzes and Influences the Economy (ABC-CLIO), and Restoring Shared Prosperity: A Policy Agenda from Leading Keynesian Economists (AFL-CIO and the Macroeconomic Policy Institute).
Prior to becoming director of research, Bivens was a research economist at EPI. Before coming to EPI, he was an assistant professor of economics at Roosevelt University and provided consulting services to Oxfam America. He has a Ph.D. in economics from the New School for Social Research and a bachelor’s degree from the University of Maryland at College Park.
Education
Ph.D., Economics, New School for Social Research
B.A., Economics, University of Maryland at College Park
By Content:
By Area of Research:
By Type:
-
News from EPI › The coronavirus shock was historically large—and the bounceback has already likely stalled
-
Cutting UI benefits by $400 per week will significantly harm U.S. families, jobs, and growth: 3.4 million fewer jobs will be created over the next year as a result
-
Ambitious investments in child and elder care could boost labor supply enough to support 3 million new jobs
-
Recovering fully from the coronavirus shock will require large increases in federal debt—and there’s nothing wrong with that
-
Debt and deficits in the coronavirus recovery: Answers to frequently asked questions
-
Cutting off the $600 boost to unemployment benefits would be both cruel and bad economics: New personal income data show just how steep the coming fiscal cliff will be
-
Without federal aid to state and local governments, 5.3 million workers will likely lose their jobs by the end of 2021: See estimated job losses by state
-
The Fed’s crisis response: Helping corporations, yes, but mostly at the expense of financial predators
-
A prolonged depression is guaranteed without significant federal aid to state and local governments
-
16.2 million workers have likely lost employer-provided health insurance since the coronavirus shock began
-
As economic forecasts worsen, up to $1 trillion in federal aid to state and local governments could be needed by the end of 2021
-
The extra $600 in unemployment insurance has been the best response yet to the economic shock of the coronavirus and should be extended
-
12.7 million workers have likely lost employer-provided health insurance since the coronavirus shock began
-
The next coronavirus relief package should provide aid to state and local governments, protect employed and unemployed workers, and invest in our democracy
-
9.2 million workers likely lost their employer-provided health insurance in the past four weeks
-
At least $500 billion more in coronavirus aid is needed for state and local governments by the end of 2021
-
How can the U.S. get more transformative with its coronavirus-shock response? With payroll guarantees and an economic ‘deep freeze’ plan.
-
A ‘phase four’ relief and recovery package should provide economic assistance to state and local governments, extended unemployment benefits, and better protections for workers and jobs
-
Even with already-passed relief and recovery measures, job losses from the coronavirus shock could easily exceed 20 million
-
3.5 million workers likely lost their employer-provided health insurance in the past two weeks
-
With smart policy, a temporary collapse in GDP doesn’t have to cause great human suffering
-
Despite some good provisions, the CARES Act has glaring flaws and falls short of fully protecting workers during the coronavirus crisis
-
The coronavirus economic policy response must include relief and redistribution now and major demand stimulus once the crisis passes
-
The coronavirus fiscal response should be as big as needed—but current forecasts indicate at least $2.1 trillion is needed through 2020: The expected hit to the economy would mean almost 14 million job losses by summer
-
Coronavirus shock will likely claim 3 million jobs by summer: Policy is needed now to curb further losses
-
Why a fiscal stimulus that is big and fast is so necessary—and why it should continue so long as the economy is weak
-
Trump’s payroll tax cuts are a terrible opening bid to address the economic fallout of COVID-19: But employer tax credits can be part of the economic response if they finance direct benefits for workers
-
Getting serious about the economic response to COVID-19
-
Even HBO’s John Oliver didn’t provide the full context on ‘Medicare for All’ and jobs
-
Fundamental health reform like ‘Medicare for All’ would help the labor market: Job loss claims are misleading, and substantial boosts to job quality are often overlooked