Domestic workers are at risk during the coronavirus crisis: Data show most domestic workers are black, Hispanic, or Asian women

The coronavirus pandemic is placing the nation’s 2.2 million domestic workers—91.5% of whom are women—in a particularly precarious position. Steep declines in work are leading to a devastating loss of income while a lack of protective equipment for those who still work is a real threat to their health. This blog post provides details on who domestic workers are and where they live.

Domestic workers, whose worksites are private homes, have always faced unique challenges and have seen their work undervalued. In the face of the coronavirus pandemic, this already-vulnerable group is placed in a particularly precarious position. Many domestic workers are experiencing a steep decline in work. According to new data from the National Domestic Workers Alliance (NDWA), just over half (52%) of domestic workers surveyed said they had no job for the week beginning March 30—and that share increased to 68% by the next week. Domestic workers face long-term uncertainty, with 66% reporting that they are unsure if their clients will give them their jobs back after the pandemic. The decline in employment for domestic workers represents a significant loss of income for these workers and their families.

Domestic workers who are still on the front lines risk sacrificing their health for economic security. House cleaners—who help families follow the practices advocated by public health officials to help to prevent the spread of disease—and home care aides—who care for sick, disabled, and elderly people—may lack the protective equipment they need. Certain groups of domestic workers are excluded from basic labor protections, including those guaranteed under the Occupational Safety and Health Act and the Family Medical Leave Act, which are particularly important sets of protections for workers in the midst of a pandemic.

Read more

Wisconsin’s election during this pandemic shows that limiting voting options is the new form of voter suppression

In an unprecedented ruling Monday night, the United States Supreme Court voted to allow Wisconsin’s primary election to occur as scheduled, even as nearly a dozen other states have postponed their primaries due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Today, as voting is happening, Wisconsin has almost 2,500 reported cases of the coronavirus and is under a “safer at home” order that Democratic Governor Tony Evers issued on March 25. It orders Wisconsin residents to stay at home unless engaged in an essential activity.

After a lengthy battle between the state’s Democratic governor, the Republican-controlled legislature, and the judiciary branch on whether or not to postpone the election and extend absentee ballot deadlines, the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision left Wisconsin voters with a difficult choice: stay safely at home or risk getting sick and waiting in long lines to exercise their fundamental right to vote.

This choice was particularly cruel for voters in Wisconsin’s largest and most diverse city, Milwaukee. There, so few poll workers signed up to work that the city was able to open only five polling locations, instead of the usual 180. In a city of around 600,000 residents, opening only a handful of polling locations led to extremely long lines that wrapped around city blocks and forced people to wait for hours.

Unfortunately, Milwaukee is used to this type of voter suppression.

Since 2011, Wisconsin has had one of the strictest voter ID laws in the country, requiring residents to have a current address on their identification. This disproportionately hurts voters in urban parts of the state, like Milwaukee County, which has one of the highest eviction rates in the state, making it harder for residents to keep a current address on their ID. In fact, research by the University of Wisconsin found that 17,000 Wisconsin voters were kept from the polls in 2016 because of the strict voter ID law.

Read more

A ‘phase four’ relief and recovery package should provide economic assistance to state and local governments, extended unemployment benefits, and better protections for workers and jobs

A “phase four” coronavirus recovery and relief package must be passed quickly and must be sufficient in scope and magnitude to address the severity of the economic and public health crisis we are experiencing. The package must include:

  • More aid to state and local governments
  • Extended unemployment insurance benefits
  • Another direct cash payment to households
  • Better protection for workers and jobs
  • Full funding for coronavirus testing, treatment, and front-line worker personal protective equipment (PPE)

In the last two weeks, nearly 10 million people applied for unemployment insurance. The March jobs report revealed a loss of 701,000 jobs—the first monthly job loss in nearly 10 years and already one of the worst monthly losses on record. Further, March’s job loss numbers are just the tip of the iceberg, as they do not capture the entire month of March, but refer only to the payroll period containing March 12, before the shutdowns accelerated significantly.

How policymakers respond now will determine the level of pain working families experience and the speed at which the economy can get back on track after the shutdown period is over. The relief and recovery packages passed since the crisis began included many good measures, but they are still too little and some provisions in these packages represent policy missteps. More relief and recovery aid will certainly be needed.

The biggest misstep taken in the earlier relief and recovery packages was allocating so much of the aid to financial rescues of large firms with insufficient conditions to ensure that jobs and wages of workers were saved. Policymakers approved over $450 billion in direct fiscal aid to this effort, with more potentially forthcoming in subsidized loans from the Federal Reserve. Yet this aid (apart from the stronger stipulations for the airline industry) is largely not tied to preserving rank-and-file workers on payrolls.

Another large tranche of aid ($350 billion) was better targeted in preserving the payroll of small firms. But this aid will likely underperform in actually saving jobs because the administrative capacity of the Small Business Administration and banks servicing small and medium-sized firms are too poor to ensure the full amount of aid reaches employers and preserves payroll.

These two tranches of aid could have been bundled and made into more direct and better administered financial relief that hinged entirely on the willingness of employers to preserve workers on payroll with the federal government financing their pay during the shutdown. This would have allowed workers to remain in the jobs they held before the coronavirus shock, and this would have helped ensure a rapid economic recovery once the public health crisis had subsided.

Read more

Even with already-passed relief and recovery measures, job losses from the coronavirus shock could easily exceed 20 million

This blog post is based on a particular GDP forecast from 3/31. If new and substantially different forecasts are released, we will update these numbers.

The effect of the novel coronavirus and the public health measures enacted to slow its spread—particularly “social distancing”—have been profound for economic activity in the United States. We have already seen some of the leading edge of this effect in recent data releases. This post highlights some recent forecasts of the effects of the coronavirus shock on measures of economic activity, and what these contractions in economic activity mean for jobs. Its key findings are:

  • Forecasts of the size of the drag on growth imposed by the coronavirus (and associated public health measures) have risen rapidly in recent weeks.
  • Currently, forecasts indicate that gross domestic product (GDP) will be roughly 12.8% smaller by the end of June 2020 due to coronavirus effects—an extraordinarily fast economic collapse.
  • To return to pre-shock economic health by the middle of 2021, at least $1.4 trillion in additional recovery spending would be needed—with $2 trillion being a more prudent target.
  • A contraction this rapid would be consistent with job loss of roughly 19.8 million by the end of June 2020.
  • This estimate of 19.8 million jobs lost could be too high or too low, for a number of reasons. For example, employers could reduce hours instead of laying off workers, and policies to keep workers on the payroll may be effective, keeping job losses down. Or coronavirus effects may be concentrated in relatively labor-intensive industries, so employment might actually fall faster than GDP. A plausible range is between 18 and 28 million jobs lost.

On March 15, Goldman Sachs forecast that GDP would contract at a 5% annualized rate in the second quarter of 2020. On March 20, their forecast jumped to 24% annualized contraction. And on March 31, their forecast for second quarter contraction grew to 34%. This pattern of rapid deterioration in projected coronavirus-related contraction has been true across literally every other forecaster. The logic of these forecasts of rapid and historically large collapses in GDP is easy to see. Even a 5% across-the-board contraction in consumer spending over a short period of time (say because a housing price bubble popped) can send the economy into a steep recession. But the coronavirus is causing well over half of all economic activity in some major sectors to stop dead. For example, accommodations and food service by itself accounts for 14% of all consumer spending. If economic activity in just this sector is cut in half, this alone can drive a steep recession. But, of course, other sectors are also affected and contraction in some sectors will be well over 50%.Read more

Coronavirus job losses for the past two weeks could match two years of the Great Recession’s job losses: Estimates of new claims filed are 10 million

In the last two weeks, Americans have experienced a net loss of jobs on scale with the two years of job losses in the Great Recession.

Thursday, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) reported that a record-breaking 6.6 million Americans filed new claims for unemployment insurance benefits in the week ending March 28, doubling the prior week’s 3.3 million, an eye-popping record that lasted only a week. New claims in each of the last two weeks dwarf any prior week in over 50 years of weekly data (Figure A).

Figure A

The U.S. is experiencing a record-breaking spike in unemployment claims: Initial weekly unemployment claims from 1967 to the week ending March 28, 2020

Week ending date Initial claims, seasonally adjusted
1967-01-07 208000
1967-01-14 207000
1967-01-21 217000
1967-01-28 204000
1967-02-04 216000
1967-02-11 229000
1967-02-18 229000
1967-02-25 242000
1967-03-04 310000
1967-03-11 241000
1967-03-18 245000
1967-03-25 247000
1967-04-01 259000
1967-04-08 257000
1967-04-15 299000
1967-04-22 245000
1967-04-29 255000
1967-05-06 254000
1967-05-13 231000
1967-05-20 230000
1967-05-27 228000
1967-06-03 248000
1967-06-10 238000
1967-06-17 224000
1967-06-24 218000
1967-07-01 209000
1967-07-08 240000
1967-07-15 241000
1967-07-22 240000
1967-07-29 209000
1967-08-05 221000
1967-08-12 202000
1967-08-19 215000
1967-08-26 213000
1967-09-02 218000
1967-09-09 231000
1967-09-16 220000
1967-09-23 209000
1967-09-30 204000
1967-10-07 231000
1967-10-14 206000
1967-10-21 223000
1967-10-28 207000
1967-11-04 222000
1967-11-11 214000
1967-11-18 198000
1967-11-25 191000
1967-12-02 196000
1967-12-09 221000
1967-12-16 204000
1967-12-23 219000
1967-12-30 216000
1968-01-06 222000
1968-01-13 222000
1968-01-20 221000
1968-01-27 198000
1968-02-03 244000
1968-02-10 210000
1968-02-17 196000
1968-02-24 193000
1968-03-02 190000
1968-03-09 204000
1968-03-16 190000
1968-03-23 200000
1968-03-30 192000
1968-04-06 191000
1968-04-13 171000
1968-04-20 183000
1968-04-27 251000
1968-05-04 209000
1968-05-11 194000
1968-05-18 199000
1968-05-25 194000
1968-06-01 199000
1968-06-08 192000
1968-06-15 194000
1968-06-22 189000
1968-06-29 194000
1968-07-06 214000
1968-07-13 186000
1968-07-20 180000
1968-07-27 205000
1968-08-03 206000
1968-08-10 218000
1968-08-17 192000
1968-08-24 193000
1968-08-31 188000
1968-09-07 189000
1968-09-14 195000
1968-09-21 191000
1968-09-28 189000
1968-10-05 185000
1968-10-12 186000
1968-10-19 191000
1968-10-26 182000
1968-11-02 181000
1968-11-09 183000
1968-11-16 192000
1968-11-23 199000
1968-11-30 162000
1968-12-07 188000
1968-12-14 195000
1968-12-21 192000
1968-12-28 223000
1969-01-04 190000
1969-01-11 191000
1969-01-18 192000
1969-01-25 193000
1969-02-01 203000
1969-02-08 197000
1969-02-15 192000
1969-02-22 192000
1969-03-01 201000
1969-03-08 191000
1969-03-15 189000
1969-03-22 181000
1969-03-29 183000
1969-04-05 182000
1969-04-12 190000
1969-04-19 187000
1969-04-26 177000
1969-05-03 177000
1969-05-10 183000
1969-05-17 179000
1969-05-24 180000
1969-05-31 187000
1969-06-07 192000
1969-06-14 182000
1969-06-21 191000
1969-06-28 203000
1969-07-05 227000
1969-07-12 210000
1969-07-19 206000
1969-07-26 192000
1969-08-02 196000
1969-08-09 203000
1969-08-16 199000
1969-08-23 199000
1969-08-30 195000
1969-09-06 182000
1969-09-13 209000
1969-09-20 195000
1969-09-27 193000
1969-10-04 193000
1969-10-11 200000
1969-10-18 199000
1969-10-25 205000
1969-11-01 198000
1969-11-08 211000
1969-11-15 197000
1969-11-22 217000
1969-11-29 202000
1969-12-06 202000
1969-12-13 222000
1969-12-20 232000
1969-12-27 223000
1970-01-03 230000
1970-01-10 242000
1970-01-17 268000
1970-01-24 256000
1970-01-31 239000
1970-02-07 256000
1970-02-14 265000
1970-02-21 271000
1970-02-28 242000
1970-03-07 262000
1970-03-14 271000
1970-03-21 264000
1970-03-28 276000
1970-04-04 273000
1970-04-11 305000
1970-04-18 374000
1970-04-25 349000
1970-05-02 334000
1970-05-09 318000
1970-05-16 303000
1970-05-23 296000
1970-05-30 301000
1970-06-06 301000
1970-06-13 298000
1970-06-20 296000
1970-06-27 291000
1970-07-04 277000
1970-07-11 288000
1970-07-18 294000
1970-07-25 287000
1970-08-01 261000
1970-08-08 266000
1970-08-15 300000
1970-08-22 303000
1970-08-29 297000
1970-09-05 324000
1970-09-12 292000
1970-09-19 325000
1970-09-26 333000
1970-10-03 350000
1970-10-10 327000
1970-10-17 334000
1970-10-24 330000
1970-10-31 327000
1970-11-07 336000
1970-11-14 314000
1970-11-21 314000
1970-11-28 337000
1970-12-05 308000
1970-12-12 306000
1970-12-19 289000
1970-12-26 321000
1971-01-02 303000
1971-01-09 288000
1971-01-16 299000
1971-01-23 312000
1971-01-30 292000
1971-02-06 296000
1971-02-13 282000
1971-02-20 268000
1971-02-27 290000
1971-03-06 297000
1971-03-13 287000
1971-03-20 291000
1971-03-27 300000
1971-04-03 299000
1971-04-10 279000
1971-04-17 284000
1971-04-24 288000
1971-05-01 290000
1971-05-08 293000
1971-05-15 284000
1971-05-22 295000
1971-05-29 299000
1971-06-05 301000
1971-06-12 295000
1971-06-19 299000
1971-06-26 291000
1971-07-03 277000
1971-07-10 264000
1971-07-17 313000
1971-07-24 304000
1971-07-31 308000
1971-08-07 349000
1971-08-14 325000
1971-08-21 320000
1971-08-28 307000
1971-09-04 359000
1971-09-11 312000
1971-09-18 302000
1971-09-25 308000
1971-10-02 299000
1971-10-09 313000
1971-10-16 299000
1971-10-23 294000
1971-10-30 283000
1971-11-06 301000
1971-11-13 295000
1971-11-20 274000
1971-11-27 278000
1971-12-04 299000
1971-12-11 280000
1971-12-18 269000
1971-12-25 244000
1972-01-01 279000
1972-01-08 295000
1972-01-15 250000
1972-01-22 263000
1972-01-29 269000
1972-02-05 276000
1972-02-12 266000
1972-02-19 258000
1972-02-26 254000
1972-03-04 257000
1972-03-11 264000
1972-03-18 266000
1972-03-25 264000
1972-04-01 258000
1972-04-08 274000
1972-04-15 259000
1972-04-22 259000
1972-04-29 265000
1972-05-06 271000
1972-05-13 266000
1972-05-20 267000
1972-05-27 267000
1972-06-03 264000
1972-06-10 268000
1972-06-17 275000
1972-06-24 286000
1972-07-01 350000
1972-07-08 297000
1972-07-15 318000
1972-07-22 276000
1972-07-29 247000
1972-08-05 250000
1972-08-12 246000
1972-08-19 256000
1972-08-26 262000
1972-09-02 258000
1972-09-09 259000
1972-09-16 258000
1972-09-23 255000
1972-09-30 251000
1972-10-07 263000
1972-10-14 250000
1972-10-21 257000
1972-10-28 234000
1972-11-04 255000
1972-11-11 242000
1972-11-18 271000
1972-11-25 235000
1972-12-02 226000
1972-12-09 252000
1972-12-16 263000
1972-12-23 246000
1972-12-30 225000
1973-01-06 226000
1973-01-13 245000
1973-01-20 229000
1973-01-27 214000
1973-02-03 228000
1973-02-10 226000
1973-02-17 216000
1973-02-24 218000
1973-03-03 225000
1973-03-10 229000
1973-03-17 228000
1973-03-24 232000
1973-03-31 222000
1973-04-07 247000
1973-04-14 230000
1973-04-21 243000
1973-04-28 236000
1973-05-05 248000
1973-05-12 238000
1973-05-19 237000
1973-05-26 238000
1973-06-02 232000
1973-06-09 246000
1973-06-16 237000
1973-06-23 242000
1973-06-30 237000
1973-07-07 248000
1973-07-14 232000
1973-07-21 241000
1973-07-28 250000
1973-08-04 256000
1973-08-11 265000
1973-08-18 258000
1973-08-25 254000
1973-09-01 242000
1973-09-08 252000
1973-09-15 245000
1973-09-22 246000
1973-09-29 249000
1973-10-06 236000
1973-10-13 246000
1973-10-20 249000
1973-10-27 235000
1973-11-03 246000
1973-11-10 282000
1973-11-17 254000
1973-11-24 233000
1973-12-01 256000
1973-12-08 266000
1973-12-15 272000
1973-12-22 326000
1973-12-29 300000
1974-01-05 269000
1974-01-12 340000
1974-01-19 321000
1974-01-26 291000
1974-02-02 302000
1974-02-09 369000
1974-02-16 311000
1974-02-23 292000
1974-03-02 301000
1974-03-09 305000
1974-03-16 315000
1974-03-23 314000
1974-03-30 323000
1974-04-06 296000
1974-04-13 297000
1974-04-20 296000
1974-04-27 283000
1974-05-04 287000
1974-05-11 296000
1974-05-18 298000
1974-05-25 309000
1974-06-01 278000
1974-06-08 314000
1974-06-15 303000
1974-06-22 308000
1974-06-29 325000
1974-07-06 311000
1974-07-13 304000
1974-07-20 303000
1974-07-27 320000
1974-08-03 335000
1974-08-10 347000
1974-08-17 332000
1974-08-24 343000
1974-08-31 350000
1974-09-07 350000
1974-09-14 357000
1974-09-21 370000
1974-09-28 366000
1974-10-05 371000
1974-10-12 413000
1974-10-19 389000
1974-10-26 414000
1974-11-02 406000
1974-11-09 441000
1974-11-16 449000
1974-11-23 518000
1974-11-30 474000
1974-12-07 528000
1974-12-14 510000
1974-12-21 521000
1974-12-28 537000
1975-01-04 456000
1975-01-11 554000
1975-01-18 575000
1975-01-25 555000
1975-02-01 559000
1975-02-08 545000
1975-02-15 530000
1975-02-22 544000
1975-03-01 546000
1975-03-08 551000
1975-03-15 531000
1975-03-22 550000
1975-03-29 555000
1975-04-05 537000
1975-04-12 520000
1975-04-19 531000
1975-04-26 513000
1975-05-03 505000
1975-05-10 507000
1975-05-17 514000
1975-05-24 493000
1975-05-31 475000
1975-06-07 529000
1975-06-14 497000
1975-06-21 497000
1975-06-28 459000
1975-07-05 423000
1975-07-12 446000
1975-07-19 445000
1975-07-26 454000
1975-08-02 454000
1975-08-09 459000
1975-08-16 444000
1975-08-23 457000
1975-08-30 446000
1975-09-06 447000
1975-09-13 456000
1975-09-20 433000
1975-09-27 445000
1975-10-04 426000
1975-10-11 429000
1975-10-18 404000
1975-10-25 426000
1975-11-01 414000
1975-11-08 415000
1975-11-15 386000
1975-11-22 401000
1975-11-29 387000
1975-12-06 373000
1975-12-13 368000
1975-12-20 365000
1975-12-27 391000
1976-01-03 362000
1976-01-10 402000
1976-01-17 370000
1976-01-24 363000
1976-01-31 359000
1976-02-07 353000
1976-02-14 344000
1976-02-21 347000
1976-02-28 349000
1976-03-06 348000
1976-03-13 360000
1976-03-20 368000
1976-03-27 366000
1976-04-03 380000
1976-04-10 373000
1976-04-17 361000
1976-04-24 367000
1976-05-01 385000
1976-05-08 395000
1976-05-15 382000
1976-05-22 394000
1976-05-29 402000
1976-06-05 382000
1976-06-12 407000
1976-06-19 399000
1976-06-26 387000
1976-07-03 394000
1976-07-10 372000
1976-07-17 406000
1976-07-24 394000
1976-07-31 388000
1976-08-07 378000
1976-08-14 382000
1976-08-21 400000
1976-08-28 394000
1976-09-04 421000
1976-09-11 383000
1976-09-18 403000
1976-09-25 423000
1976-10-02 408000
1976-10-09 411000
1976-10-16 403000
1976-10-23 409000
1976-10-30 414000
1976-11-06 390000
1976-11-13 383000
1976-11-20 408000
1976-11-27 377000
1976-12-04 402000
1976-12-11 395000
1976-12-18 365000
1976-12-25 333000
1977-01-01 380000
1977-01-08 416000
1977-01-15 368000
1977-01-22 423000
1977-01-29 422000
1977-02-05 565000
1977-02-12 477000
1977-02-19 399000
1977-02-26 362000
1977-03-05 361000
1977-03-12 355000
1977-03-19 369000
1977-03-26 356000
1977-04-02 350000
1977-04-09 376000
1977-04-16 361000
1977-04-23 375000
1977-04-30 375000
1977-05-07 384000
1977-05-14 381000
1977-05-21 375000
1977-05-28 381000
1977-06-04 363000
1977-06-11 358000
1977-06-18 359000
1977-06-25 365000
1977-07-02 350000
1977-07-09 361000
1977-07-16 366000
1977-07-23 365000
1977-07-30 365000
1977-08-06 378000
1977-08-13 359000
1977-08-20 367000
1977-08-27 365000
1977-09-03 374000
1977-09-10 359000
1977-09-17 362000
1977-09-24 380000
1977-10-01 348000
1977-10-08 365000
1977-10-15 358000
1977-10-22 375000
1977-10-29 349000
1977-11-05 366000
1977-11-12 334000
1977-11-19 360000
1977-11-26 354000
1977-12-03 367000
1977-12-10 364000
1977-12-17 359000
1977-12-24 344000
1977-12-31 364000
1978-01-07 346000
1978-01-14 343000
1978-01-21 352000
1978-01-28 363000
1978-02-04 360000
1978-02-11 373000
1978-02-18 429000
1978-02-25 371000
1978-03-04 355000
1978-03-11 359000
1978-03-18 347000
1978-03-25 335000
1978-04-01 333000
1978-04-08 345000
1978-04-15 309000
1978-04-22 319000
1978-04-29 324000
1978-05-06 334000
1978-05-13 322000
1978-05-20 334000
1978-05-27 318000
1978-06-03 310000
1978-06-10 331000
1978-06-17 326000
1978-06-24 330000
1978-07-01 348000
1978-07-08 356000
1978-07-15 352000
1978-07-22 349000
1978-07-29 346000
1978-08-05 365000
1978-08-12 354000
1978-08-19 343000
1978-08-26 333000
1978-09-02 313000
1978-09-09 337000
1978-09-16 322000
1978-09-23 323000
1978-09-30 318000
1978-10-07 343000
1978-10-14 316000
1978-10-21 338000
1978-10-28 316000
1978-11-04 317000
1978-11-11 304000
1978-11-18 342000
1978-11-25 359000
1978-12-02 377000
1978-12-09 344000
1978-12-16 347000
1978-12-23 352000
1978-12-30 358000
1979-01-06 359000
1979-01-13 392000
1979-01-20 337000
1979-01-27 342000
1979-02-03 348000
1979-02-10 359000
1979-02-17 367000
1979-02-24 360000
1979-03-03 355000
1979-03-10 363000
1979-03-17 359000
1979-03-24 353000
1979-03-31 360000
1979-04-07 465000
1979-04-14 457000
1979-04-21 383000
1979-04-28 357000
1979-05-05 353000
1979-05-12 344000
1979-05-19 346000
1979-05-26 349000
1979-06-02 336000
1979-06-09 365000
1979-06-16 351000
1979-06-23 379000
1979-06-30 369000
1979-07-07 368000
1979-07-14 368000
1979-07-21 395000
1979-07-28 386000
1979-08-04 412000
1979-08-11 386000
1979-08-18 387000
1979-08-25 390000
1979-09-01 389000
1979-09-08 378000
1979-09-15 384000
1979-09-22 388000
1979-09-29 390000
1979-10-06 412000
1979-10-13 393000
1979-10-20 406000
1979-10-27 398000
1979-11-03 395000
1979-11-10 414000
1979-11-17 430000
1979-11-24 414000
1979-12-01 416000
1979-12-08 415000
1979-12-15 411000
1979-12-22 471000
1979-12-29 428000
1980-01-05 394000
1980-01-12 405000
1980-01-19 446000
1980-01-26 412000
1980-02-02 404000
1980-02-09 425000
1980-02-16 415000
1980-02-23 428000
1980-03-01 409000
1980-03-08 418000
1980-03-15 432000
1980-03-22 435000
1980-03-29 475000
1980-04-05 464000
1980-04-12 544000
1980-04-19 548000
1980-04-26 563000
1980-05-03 572000
1980-05-10 601000
1980-05-17 642000
1980-05-24 627000
1980-05-31 637000
1980-06-07 610000
1980-06-14 592000
1980-06-21 599000
1980-06-28 627000
1980-07-05 579000
1980-07-12 533000
1980-07-19 567000
1980-07-26 558000
1980-08-02 569000
1980-08-09 533000
1980-08-16 525000
1980-08-23 512000
1980-08-30 502000
1980-09-06 511000
1980-09-13 492000
1980-09-20 465000
1980-09-27 463000
1980-10-04 462000
1980-10-11 447000
1980-10-18 425000
1980-10-25 418000
1980-11-01 419000
1980-11-08 407000
1980-11-15 427000
1980-11-22 398000
1980-11-29 412000
1980-12-06 416000
1980-12-13 413000
1980-12-20 412000
1980-12-27 399000
1981-01-03 410000
1981-01-10 419000
1981-01-17 421000
1981-01-24 396000
1981-01-31 419000
1981-02-07 420000
1981-02-14 423000
1981-02-21 438000
1981-02-28 434000
1981-03-07 409000
1981-03-14 408000
1981-03-21 401000
1981-03-28 412000
1981-04-04 417000
1981-04-11 396000
1981-04-18 392000
1981-04-25 436000
1981-05-02 413000
1981-05-09 423000
1981-05-16 414000
1981-05-23 415000
1981-05-30 417000
1981-06-06 428000
1981-06-13 425000
1981-06-20 435000
1981-06-27 444000
1981-07-04 460000
1981-07-11 426000
1981-07-18 430000
1981-07-25 407000
1981-08-01 476000
1981-08-08 448000
1981-08-15 442000
1981-08-22 434000
1981-08-29 451000
1981-09-05 473000
1981-09-12 454000
1981-09-19 475000
1981-09-26 491000
1981-10-03 489000
1981-10-10 491000
1981-10-17 487000
1981-10-24 483000
1981-10-31 514000
1981-11-07 514000
1981-11-14 517000
1981-11-21 464000
1981-11-28 552000
1981-12-05 558000
1981-12-12 551000
1981-12-19 539000
1981-12-26 556000
1982-01-02 495000
1982-01-09 545000
1982-01-16 489000
1982-01-23 564000
1982-01-30 583000
1982-02-06 556000
1982-02-13 507000
1982-02-20 544000
1982-02-27 528000
1982-03-06 556000
1982-03-13 539000
1982-03-20 557000
1982-03-27 574000
1982-04-03 578000
1982-04-10 585000
1982-04-17 597000
1982-04-24 588000
1982-05-01 576000
1982-05-08 584000
1982-05-15 585000
1982-05-22 586000
1982-05-29 588000
1982-06-05 611000
1982-06-12 614000
1982-06-19 591000
1982-06-26 582000
1982-07-03 600000
1982-07-10 572000
1982-07-17 567000
1982-07-24 536000
1982-07-31 605000
1982-08-07 606000
1982-08-14 637000
1982-08-21 628000
1982-08-28 647000
1982-09-04 651000
1982-09-11 641000
1982-09-18 680000
1982-09-25 671000
1982-10-02 695000
1982-10-09 651000
1982-10-16 656000
1982-10-23 623000
1982-10-30 637000
1982-11-06 589000
1982-11-13 599000
1982-11-20 577000
1982-11-27 612000
1982-12-04 557000
1982-12-11 533000
1982-12-18 516000
1982-12-25 489000
1983-01-01 534000
1983-01-08 510000
1983-01-15 479000
1983-01-22 479000
1983-01-29 503000
1983-02-05 501000
1983-02-12 486000
1983-02-19 487000
1983-02-26 481000
1983-03-05 495000
1983-03-12 475000
1983-03-19 470000
1983-03-26 481000
1983-04-02 491000
1983-04-09 496000
1983-04-16 515000
1983-04-23 488000
1983-04-30 490000
1983-05-07 494000
1983-05-14 464000
1983-05-21 460000
1983-05-28 454000
1983-06-04 459000
1983-06-11 442000
1983-06-18 434000
1983-06-25 442000
1983-07-02 422000
1983-07-09 412000
1983-07-16 396000
1983-07-23 395000
1983-07-30 415000
1983-08-06 415000
1983-08-13 457000
1983-08-20 445000
1983-08-27 426000
1983-09-03 411000
1983-09-10 403000
1983-09-17 405000
1983-09-24 416000
1983-10-01 413000
1983-10-08 406000
1983-10-15 394000
1983-10-22 394000
1983-10-29 404000
1983-11-05 395000
1983-11-12 390000
1983-11-19 387000
1983-11-26 398000
1983-12-03 365000
1983-12-10 368000
1983-12-17 362000
1983-12-24 377000
1983-12-31 372000
1984-01-07 356000
1984-01-14 351000
1984-01-21 333000
1984-01-28 364000
1984-02-04 342000
1984-02-11 338000
1984-02-18 334000
1984-02-25 343000
1984-03-03 347000
1984-03-10 346000
1984-03-17 349000
1984-03-24 346000
1984-03-31 341000
1984-04-07 381000
1984-04-14 357000
1984-04-21 364000
1984-04-28 375000
1984-05-05 365000
1984-05-12 368000
1984-05-19 354000
1984-05-26 354000
1984-06-02 355000
1984-06-09 369000
1984-06-16 361000
1984-06-23 362000
1984-06-30 360000
1984-07-07 366000
1984-07-14 360000
1984-07-21 357000
1984-07-28 359000
1984-08-04 382000
1984-08-11 380000
1984-08-18 401000
1984-08-25 395000
1984-09-01 385000
1984-09-08 402000
1984-09-15 393000
1984-09-22 395000
1984-09-29 402000
1984-10-06 403000
1984-10-13 410000
1984-10-20 439000
1984-10-27 425000
1984-11-03 423000
1984-11-10 393000
1984-11-17 383000
1984-11-24 429000
1984-12-01 401000
1984-12-08 383000
1984-12-15 386000
1984-12-22 379000
1984-12-29 379000
1985-01-05 369000
1985-01-12 387000
1985-01-19 359000
1985-01-26 368000
1985-02-02 386000
1985-02-09 401000
1985-02-16 390000
1985-02-23 390000
1985-03-02 374000
1985-03-09 385000
1985-03-16 386000
1985-03-23 373000
1985-03-30 386000
1985-04-06 405000
1985-04-13 411000
1985-04-20 391000
1985-04-27 386000
1985-05-04 390000
1985-05-11 394000
1985-05-18 391000
1985-05-25 396000
1985-06-01 393000
1985-06-08 403000
1985-06-15 390000
1985-06-22 386000
1985-06-29 390000
1985-07-06 395000
1985-07-13 386000
1985-07-20 370000
1985-07-27 362000
1985-08-03 407000
1985-08-10 402000
1985-08-17 399000
1985-08-24 405000
1985-08-31 409000
1985-09-07 426000
1985-09-14 408000
1985-09-21 401000
1985-09-28 399000
1985-10-05 405000
1985-10-12 400000
1985-10-19 400000
1985-10-26 418000
1985-11-02 398000
1985-11-09 397000
1985-11-16 397000
1985-11-23 382000
1985-11-30 393000
1985-12-07 399000
1985-12-14 382000
1985-12-21 370000
1985-12-28 390000
1986-01-04 362000
1986-01-11 397000
1986-01-18 364000
1986-01-25 344000
1986-02-01 364000
1986-02-08 366000
1986-02-15 358000
1986-02-22 390000
1986-03-01 375000
1986-03-08 366000
1986-03-15 382000
1986-03-22 387000
1986-03-29 396000
1986-04-05 381000
1986-04-12 388000
1986-04-19 383000
1986-04-26 391000
1986-05-03 392000
1986-05-10 395000
1986-05-17 384000
1986-05-24 386000
1986-05-31 373000
1986-06-07 375000
1986-06-14 369000
1986-06-21 367000
1986-06-28 371000
1986-07-05 371000
1986-07-12 361000
1986-07-19 354000
1986-07-26 362000
1986-08-02 416000
1986-08-09 416000
1986-08-16 407000
1986-08-23 397000
1986-08-30 401000
1986-09-06 400000
1986-09-13 394000
1986-09-20 399000
1986-09-27 389000
1986-10-04 391000
1986-10-11 387000
1986-10-18 385000
1986-10-25 370000
1986-11-01 364000
1986-11-08 349000
1986-11-15 368000
1986-11-22 369000
1986-11-29 366000
1986-12-06 363000
1986-12-13 375000
1986-12-20 350000
1986-12-27 345000
1987-01-03 323000
1987-01-10 348000
1987-01-17 341000
1987-01-24 346000
1987-01-31 370000
1987-02-07 368000
1987-02-14 338000
1987-02-21 341000
1987-02-28 348000
1987-03-07 337000
1987-03-14 335000
1987-03-21 335000
1987-03-28 326000
1987-04-04 330000
1987-04-11 338000
1987-04-18 349000
1987-04-25 328000
1987-05-02 330000
1987-05-09 315000
1987-05-16 341000
1987-05-23 343000
1987-05-30 326000
1987-06-06 328000
1987-06-13 316000
1987-06-20 319000
1987-06-27 326000
1987-07-04 326000
1987-07-11 317000
1987-07-18 310000
1987-07-25 324000
1987-08-01 348000
1987-08-08 327000
1987-08-15 319000
1987-08-22 312000
1987-08-29 322000
1987-09-05 316000
1987-09-12 297000
1987-09-19 309000
1987-09-26 317000
1987-10-03 301000
1987-10-10 308000
1987-10-17 301000
1987-10-24 301000
1987-10-31 289000
1987-11-07 297000
1987-11-14 307000
1987-11-21 317000
1987-11-28 306000
1987-12-05 319000
1987-12-12 317000
1987-12-19 323000
1987-12-26 316000
1988-01-02 315000
1988-01-09 325000
1988-01-16 361000
1988-01-23 335000
1988-01-30 342000
1988-02-06 318000
1988-02-13 311000
1988-02-20 327000
1988-02-27 319000
1988-03-05 307000
1988-03-12 304000
1988-03-19 307000
1988-03-26 304000
1988-04-02 309000
1988-04-09 313000
1988-04-16 314000
1988-04-23 312000
1988-04-30 313000
1988-05-07 309000
1988-05-14 314000
1988-05-21 319000
1988-05-28 313000
1988-06-04 310000
1988-06-11 305000
1988-06-18 311000
1988-06-25 307000
1988-07-02 305000
1988-07-09 303000
1988-07-16 315000
1988-07-23 354000
1988-07-30 331000
1988-08-06 316000
1988-08-13 312000
1988-08-20 316000
1988-08-27 315000
1988-09-03 306000
1988-09-10 305000
1988-09-17 306000
1988-09-24 301000
1988-10-01 292000
1988-10-08 292000
1988-10-15 293000
1988-10-22 286000
1988-10-29 294000
1988-11-05 285000
1988-11-12 284000
1988-11-19 294000
1988-11-26 299000
1988-12-03 298000
1988-12-10 285000
1988-12-17 293000
1988-12-24 286000
1988-12-31 304000
1989-01-07 299000
1989-01-14 283000
1989-01-21 282000
1989-01-28 295000
1989-02-04 288000
1989-02-11 322000
1989-02-18 305000
1989-02-25 300000
1989-03-04 325000
1989-03-11 325000
1989-03-18 319000
1989-03-25 319000
1989-04-01 323000
1989-04-08 314000
1989-04-15 307000
1989-04-22 304000
1989-04-29 311000
1989-05-06 320000
1989-05-13 332000
1989-05-20 321000
1989-05-27 325000
1989-06-03 325000
1989-06-10 332000
1989-06-17 337000
1989-06-24 338000
1989-07-01 349000
1989-07-08 341000
1989-07-15 349000
1989-07-22 332000
1989-07-29 337000
1989-08-05 338000
1989-08-12 341000
1989-08-19 327000
1989-08-26 332000
1989-09-02 329000
1989-09-09 336000
1989-09-16 334000
1989-09-23 334000
1989-09-30 347000
1989-10-07 407000
1989-10-14 345000
1989-10-21 347000
1989-10-28 354000
1989-11-04 333000
1989-11-11 336000
1989-11-18 336000
1989-11-25 342000
1989-12-02 344000
1989-12-09 338000
1989-12-16 355000
1989-12-23 381000
1989-12-30 358000
1990-01-06 355000
1990-01-13 369000
1990-01-20 375000
1990-01-27 345000
1990-02-03 368000
1990-02-10 367000
1990-02-17 348000
1990-02-24 350000
1990-03-03 351000
1990-03-10 349000
1990-03-17 349000
1990-03-24 331000
1990-03-31 346000
1990-04-07 367000
1990-04-14 357000
1990-04-21 360000
1990-04-28 363000
1990-05-05 354000
1990-05-12 355000
1990-05-19 353000
1990-05-26 359000
1990-06-02 368000
1990-06-09 359000
1990-06-16 359000
1990-06-23 362000
1990-06-30 364000
1990-07-07 362000
1990-07-14 367000
1990-07-21 370000
1990-07-28 369000
1990-08-04 369000
1990-08-11 381000
1990-08-18 393000
1990-08-25 394000
1990-09-01 392000
1990-09-08 390000
1990-09-15 395000
1990-09-22 389000
1990-09-29 404000
1990-10-06 404000
1990-10-13 422000
1990-10-20 435000
1990-10-27 440000
1990-11-03 430000
1990-11-10 448000
1990-11-17 447000
1990-11-24 462000
1990-12-01 451000
1990-12-08 449000
1990-12-15 447000
1990-12-22 474000
1990-12-29 454000
1991-01-05 415000
1991-01-12 437000
1991-01-19 445000
1991-01-26 462000
1991-02-02 483000
1991-02-09 480000
1991-02-16 474000
1991-02-23 499000
1991-03-02 488000
1991-03-09 499000
1991-03-16 498000
1991-03-23 509000
1991-03-30 499000
1991-04-06 452000
1991-04-13 477000
1991-04-20 478000
1991-04-27 462000
1991-05-04 451000
1991-05-11 446000
1991-05-18 448000
1991-05-25 443000
1991-06-01 432000
1991-06-08 441000
1991-06-15 429000
1991-06-22 423000
1991-06-29 418000
1991-07-06 422000
1991-07-13 420000
1991-07-20 408000
1991-07-27 423000
1991-08-03 438000
1991-08-10 437000
1991-08-17 433000
1991-08-24 425000
1991-08-31 425000
1991-09-07 424000
1991-09-14 418000
1991-09-21 419000
1991-09-28 437000
1991-10-05 424000
1991-10-12 425000
1991-10-19 419000
1991-10-26 423000
1991-11-02 447000
1991-11-09 453000
1991-11-16 439000
1991-11-23 444000
1991-11-30 444000
1991-12-07 475000
1991-12-14 475000
1991-12-21 436000
1991-12-28 441000
1992-01-04 432000
1992-01-11 440000
1992-01-18 443000
1992-01-25 441000
1992-02-01 440000
1992-02-08 445000
1992-02-15 446000
1992-02-22 436000
1992-02-29 444000
1992-03-07 421000
1992-03-14 437000
1992-03-21 440000
1992-03-28 420000
1992-04-04 412000
1992-04-11 413000
1992-04-18 424000
1992-04-25 424000
1992-05-02 431000
1992-05-09 417000
1992-05-16 414000
1992-05-23 414000
1992-05-30 411000
1992-06-06 416000
1992-06-13 420000
1992-06-20 419000
1992-06-27 420000
1992-07-04 407000
1992-07-11 408000
1992-07-18 392000
1992-07-25 564000
1992-08-01 423000
1992-08-08 406000
1992-08-15 401000
1992-08-22 398000
1992-08-29 408000
1992-09-05 416000
1992-09-12 416000
1992-09-19 427000
1992-09-26 409000
1992-10-03 398000
1992-10-10 374000
1992-10-17 385000
1992-10-24 367000
1992-10-31 365000
1992-11-07 374000
1992-11-14 377000
1992-11-21 357000
1992-11-28 341000
1992-12-05 350000
1992-12-12 359000
1992-12-19 334000
1992-12-26 313000
1993-01-02 341000
1993-01-09 354000
1993-01-16 352000
1993-01-23 341000
1993-01-30 340000
1993-02-06 319000
1993-02-13 321000
1993-02-20 351000
1993-02-27 362000
1993-03-06 354000
1993-03-13 346000
1993-03-20 338000
1993-03-27 366000
1993-04-03 365000
1993-04-10 353000
1993-04-17 351000
1993-04-24 350000
1993-05-01 343000
1993-05-08 339000
1993-05-15 345000
1993-05-22 342000
1993-05-29 349000
1993-06-05 343000
1993-06-12 343000
1993-06-19 345000
1993-06-26 340000
1993-07-03 334000
1993-07-10 314000
1993-07-17 335000
1993-07-24 415000
1993-07-31 356000
1993-08-07 346000
1993-08-14 339000
1993-08-21 342000
1993-08-28 337000
1993-09-04 334000
1993-09-11 333000
1993-09-18 346000
1993-09-25 343000
1993-10-02 333000
1993-10-09 355000
1993-10-16 359000
1993-10-23 354000
1993-10-30 348000
1993-11-06 350000
1993-11-13 341000
1993-11-20 336000
1993-11-27 337000
1993-12-04 337000
1993-12-11 334000
1993-12-18 331000
1993-12-25 290000
1994-01-01 341000
1994-01-08 343000
1994-01-15 355000
1994-01-22 351000
1994-01-29 406000
1994-02-05 361000
1994-02-12 354000
1994-02-19 352000
1994-02-26 327000
1994-03-05 348000
1994-03-12 341000
1994-03-19 332000
1994-03-26 322000
1994-04-02 342000
1994-04-09 349000
1994-04-16 354000
1994-04-23 331000
1994-04-30 344000
1994-05-07 371000
1994-05-14 360000
1994-05-21 357000
1994-05-28 348000
1994-06-04 345000
1994-06-11 338000
1994-06-18 336000
1994-06-25 341000
1994-07-02 334000
1994-07-09 341000
1994-07-16 359000
1994-07-23 345000
1994-07-30 332000
1994-08-06 338000
1994-08-13 335000
1994-08-20 331000
1994-08-27 341000
1994-09-03 339000
1994-09-10 331000
1994-09-17 326000
1994-09-24 325000
1994-10-01 330000
1994-10-08 341000
1994-10-15 335000
1994-10-22 330000
1994-10-29 331000
1994-11-05 328000
1994-11-12 329000
1994-11-19 326000
1994-11-26 329000
1994-12-03 324000
1994-12-10 329000
1994-12-17 330000
1994-12-24 314000
1994-12-31 319000
1995-01-07 338000
1995-01-14 347000
1995-01-21 325000
1995-01-28 324000
1995-02-04 324000
1995-02-11 348000
1995-02-18 343000
1995-02-25 336000
1995-03-04 339000
1995-03-11 347000
1995-03-18 343000
1995-03-25 332000
1995-04-01 335000
1995-04-08 347000
1995-04-15 355000
1995-04-22 349000
1995-04-29 365000
1995-05-06 364000
1995-05-13 366000
1995-05-20 377000
1995-05-27 374000
1995-06-03 362000
1995-06-10 367000
1995-06-17 378000
1995-06-24 358000
1995-07-01 355000
1995-07-08 372000
1995-07-15 389000
1995-07-22 390000
1995-07-29 351000
1995-08-05 351000
1995-08-12 353000
1995-08-19 362000
1995-08-26 359000
1995-09-02 355000
1995-09-09 371000
1995-09-16 376000
1995-09-23 353000
1995-09-30 355000
1995-10-07 374000
1995-10-14 369000
1995-10-21 366000
1995-10-28 377000
1995-11-04 380000
1995-11-11 370000
1995-11-18 379000
1995-11-25 379000
1995-12-02 373000
1995-12-09 346000
1995-12-16 373000
1995-12-23 374000
1995-12-30 359000
1996-01-06 361000
1996-01-13 333000
1996-01-20 415000
1996-01-27 387000
1996-02-03 374000
1996-02-10 387000
1996-02-17 383000
1996-02-24 365000
1996-03-02 368000
1996-03-09 361000
1996-03-16 384000
1996-03-23 426000
1996-03-30 393000
1996-04-06 369000
1996-04-13 357000
1996-04-20 368000
1996-04-27 343000
1996-05-04 338000
1996-05-11 352000
1996-05-18 345000
1996-05-25 343000
1996-06-01 340000
1996-06-08 351000
1996-06-15 342000
1996-06-22 341000
1996-06-29 337000
1996-07-06 342000
1996-07-13 347000
1996-07-20 332000
1996-07-27 327000
1996-08-03 326000
1996-08-10 331000
1996-08-17 336000
1996-08-24 337000
1996-08-31 329000
1996-09-07 333000
1996-09-14 338000
1996-09-21 352000
1996-09-28 348000
1996-10-05 335000
1996-10-12 334000
1996-10-19 335000
1996-10-26 352000
1996-11-02 334000
1996-11-09 327000
1996-11-16 342000
1996-11-23 347000
1996-11-30 332000
1996-12-07 355000
1996-12-14 352000
1996-12-21 350000
1996-12-28 357000
1997-01-04 347000
1997-01-11 324000
1997-01-18 345000
1997-01-25 340000
1997-02-01 333000
1997-02-08 315000
1997-02-15 313000
1997-02-22 322000
1997-03-01 321000
1997-03-08 317000
1997-03-15 319000
1997-03-22 315000
1997-03-29 325000
1997-04-05 325000
1997-04-12 330000
1997-04-19 316000
1997-04-26 337000
1997-05-03 342000
1997-05-10 318000
1997-05-17 322000
1997-05-24 316000
1997-05-31 321000
1997-06-07 329000
1997-06-14 335000
1997-06-21 316000
1997-06-28 322000
1997-07-05 346000
1997-07-12 328000
1997-07-19 301000
1997-07-26 306000
1997-08-02 320000
1997-08-09 329000
1997-08-16 343000
1997-08-23 327000
1997-08-30 332000
1997-09-06 313000
1997-09-13 314000
1997-09-20 317000
1997-09-27 317000
1997-10-04 311000
1997-10-11 305000
1997-10-18 318000
1997-10-25 306000
1997-11-01 313000
1997-11-08 308000
1997-11-15 325000
1997-11-22 309000
1997-11-29 318000
1997-12-06 317000
1997-12-13 323000
1997-12-20 310000
1997-12-27 303000
1998-01-03 312000
1998-01-10 331000
1998-01-17 341000
1998-01-24 307000
1998-01-31 315000
1998-02-07 311000
1998-02-14 321000
1998-02-21 327000
1998-02-28 317000
1998-03-07 308000
1998-03-14 319000
1998-03-21 321000
1998-03-28 312000
1998-04-04 312000
1998-04-11 304000
1998-04-18 317000
1998-04-25 311000
1998-05-02 304000
1998-05-09 306000
1998-05-16 315000
1998-05-23 309000
1998-05-30 322000
1998-06-06 306000
1998-06-13 321000
1998-06-20 349000
1998-06-27 376000
1998-07-04 362000
1998-07-11 320000
1998-07-18 315000
1998-07-25 335000
1998-08-01 327000
1998-08-08 316000
1998-08-15 308000
1998-08-22 302000
1998-08-29 310000
1998-09-05 313000
1998-09-12 304000
1998-09-19 305000
1998-09-26 294000
1998-10-03 302000
1998-10-10 316000
1998-10-17 318000
1998-10-24 309000
1998-10-31 308000
1998-11-07 316000
1998-11-14 334000
1998-11-21 304000
1998-11-28 310000
1998-12-05 326000
1998-12-12 305000
1998-12-19 297000
1998-12-26 336000
1999-01-02 331000
1999-01-09 345000
1999-01-16 339000
1999-01-23 311000
1999-01-30 305000
1999-02-06 291000
1999-02-13 312000
1999-02-20 302000
1999-02-27 301000
1999-03-06 300000
1999-03-13 308000
1999-03-20 305000
1999-03-27 298000
1999-04-03 310000
1999-04-10 319000
1999-04-17 314000
1999-04-24 291000
1999-05-01 296000
1999-05-08 310000
1999-05-15 301000
1999-05-22 298000
1999-05-29 303000
1999-06-05 303000
1999-06-12 290000
1999-06-19 292000
1999-06-26 291000
1999-07-03 287000
1999-07-10 288000
1999-07-17 309000
1999-07-24 306000
1999-07-31 300000
1999-08-07 295000
1999-08-14 292000
1999-08-21 286000
1999-08-28 290000
1999-09-04 290000
1999-09-11 281000
1999-09-18 281000
1999-09-25 306000
1999-10-02 309000
1999-10-09 291000
1999-10-16 287000
1999-10-23 280000
1999-10-30 285000
1999-11-06 282000
1999-11-13 281000
1999-11-20 276000
1999-11-27 288000
1999-12-04 287000
1999-12-11 272000
1999-12-18 287000
1999-12-25 268000
2000-01-01 286000
2000-01-08 298000
2000-01-15 289000
2000-01-22 284000
2000-01-29 285000
2000-02-05 312000
2000-02-12 300000
2000-02-19 283000
2000-02-26 280000
2000-03-04 286000
2000-03-11 270000
2000-03-18 271000
2000-03-25 272000
2000-04-01 266000
2000-04-08 268000
2000-04-15 259000
2000-04-22 274000
2000-04-29 291000
2000-05-06 293000
2000-05-13 276000
2000-05-20 280000
2000-05-27 280000
2000-06-03 290000
2000-06-10 284000
2000-06-17 294000
2000-06-24 296000
2000-07-01 281000
2000-07-08 293000
2000-07-15 303000
2000-07-22 300000
2000-07-29 298000
2000-08-05 306000
2000-08-12 315000
2000-08-19 318000
2000-08-26 312000
2000-09-02 301000
2000-09-09 309000
2000-09-16 311000
2000-09-23 288000
2000-09-30 292000
2000-10-07 309000
2000-10-14 299000
2000-10-21 295000
2000-10-28 301000
2000-11-04 331000
2000-11-11 318000
2000-11-18 332000
2000-11-25 356000
2000-12-02 338000
2000-12-09 321000
2000-12-16 354000
2000-12-23 364000
2000-12-30 353000
2001-01-06 337000
2001-01-13 318000
2001-01-20 343000
2001-01-27 362000
2001-02-03 376000
2001-02-10 365000
2001-02-17 358000
2001-02-24 386000
2001-03-03 384000
2001-03-10 393000
2001-03-17 393000
2001-03-24 378000
2001-03-31 388000
2001-04-07 398000
2001-04-14 383000
2001-04-21 400000
2001-04-28 406000
2001-05-05 381000
2001-05-12 390000
2001-05-19 402000
2001-05-26 405000
2001-06-02 406000
2001-06-09 411000
2001-06-16 394000
2001-06-23 381000
2001-06-30 394000
2001-07-07 401000
2001-07-14 405000
2001-07-21 398000
2001-07-28 388000
2001-08-04 401000
2001-08-11 394000
2001-08-18 402000
2001-08-25 395000
2001-09-01 402000
2001-09-08 408000
2001-09-15 395000
2001-09-22 453000
2001-09-29 517000
2001-10-06 476000
2001-10-13 482000
2001-10-20 482000
2001-10-27 483000
2001-11-03 440000
2001-11-10 428000
2001-11-17 431000
2001-11-24 491000
2001-12-01 465000
2001-12-08 393000
2001-12-15 389000
2001-12-22 416000
2001-12-29 421000
2002-01-05 397000
2002-01-12 418000
2002-01-19 405000
2002-01-26 414000
2002-02-02 404000
2002-02-09 397000
2002-02-16 397000
2002-02-23 398000
2002-03-02 392000
2002-03-09 399000
2002-03-16 392000
2002-03-23 415000
2002-03-30 479000
2002-04-06 445000
2002-04-13 442000
2002-04-20 416000
2002-04-27 414000
2002-05-04 409000
2002-05-11 413000
2002-05-18 411000
2002-05-25 403000
2002-06-01 378000
2002-06-08 388000
2002-06-15 396000
2002-06-22 388000
2002-06-29 386000
2002-07-06 391000
2002-07-13 384000
2002-07-20 379000
2002-07-27 390000
2002-08-03 388000
2002-08-10 389000
2002-08-17 399000
2002-08-24 398000
2002-08-31 394000
2002-09-07 416000
2002-09-14 412000
2002-09-21 401000
2002-09-28 409000
2002-10-05 404000
2002-10-12 405000
2002-10-19 412000
2002-10-26 409000
2002-11-02 405000
2002-11-09 400000
2002-11-16 389000
2002-11-23 390000
2002-11-30 377000
2002-12-07 425000
2002-12-14 429000
2002-12-21 394000
2002-12-28 409000
2003-01-04 393000
2003-01-11 378000
2003-01-18 402000
2003-01-25 407000
2003-02-01 413000
2003-02-08 390000
2003-02-15 420000
2003-02-22 421000
2003-03-01 436000
2003-03-08 424000
2003-03-15 430000
2003-03-22 411000
2003-03-29 436000
2003-04-05 417000
2003-04-12 434000
2003-04-19 450000
2003-04-26 444000
2003-05-03 428000
2003-05-10 417000
2003-05-17 425000
2003-05-24 419000
2003-05-31 431000
2003-06-07 429000
2003-06-14 421000
2003-06-21 408000
2003-06-28 429000
2003-07-05 433000
2003-07-12 412000
2003-07-19 403000
2003-07-26 398000
2003-08-02 401000
2003-08-09 404000
2003-08-16 398000
2003-08-23 391000
2003-08-30 407000
2003-09-06 422000
2003-09-13 394000
2003-09-20 379000
2003-09-27 387000
2003-10-04 386000
2003-10-11 376000
2003-10-18 387000
2003-10-25 379000
2003-11-01 363000
2003-11-08 371000
2003-11-15 370000
2003-11-22 354000
2003-11-29 357000
2003-12-06 367000
2003-12-13 363000
2003-12-20 354000
2003-12-27 349000
2004-01-03 356000
2004-01-10 354000
2004-01-17 362000
2004-01-24 353000
2004-01-31 376000
2004-02-07 380000
2004-02-14 356000
2004-02-21 359000
2004-02-28 348000
2004-03-06 344000
2004-03-13 338000
2004-03-20 346000
2004-03-27 340000
2004-04-03 335000
2004-04-10 355000
2004-04-17 364000
2004-04-24 339000
2004-05-01 324000
2004-05-08 329000
2004-05-15 349000
2004-05-22 342000
2004-05-29 337000
2004-06-05 355000
2004-06-12 339000
2004-06-19 354000
2004-06-26 348000
2004-07-03 326000
2004-07-10 345000
2004-07-17 355000
2004-07-24 348000
2004-07-31 341000
2004-08-07 336000
2004-08-14 332000
2004-08-21 343000
2004-08-28 352000
2004-09-04 326000
2004-09-11 331000
2004-09-18 341000
2004-09-25 351000
2004-10-02 335000
2004-10-09 338000
2004-10-16 327000
2004-10-23 338000
2004-10-30 332000
2004-11-06 330000
2004-11-13 337000
2004-11-20 313000
2004-11-27 335000
2004-12-04 343000
2004-12-11 316000
2004-12-18 322000
2004-12-25 320000
2005-01-01 356000
2005-01-08 369000
2005-01-15 332000
2005-01-22 329000
2005-01-29 331000
2005-02-05 307000
2005-02-12 308000
2005-02-19 318000
2005-02-26 314000
2005-03-05 333000
2005-03-12 324000
2005-03-19 329000
2005-03-26 342000
2005-04-02 335000
2005-04-09 323000
2005-04-16 307000
2005-04-23 317000
2005-04-30 334000
2005-05-07 327000
2005-05-14 321000
2005-05-21 320000
2005-05-28 340000
2005-06-04 338000
2005-06-11 333000
2005-06-18 321000
2005-06-25 311000
2005-07-02 327000
2005-07-09 338000
2005-07-16 323000
2005-07-23 318000
2005-07-30 316000
2005-08-06 311000
2005-08-13 319000
2005-08-20 315000
2005-08-27 318000
2005-09-03 326000
2005-09-10 422000
2005-09-17 424000
2005-09-24 359000
2005-10-01 384000
2005-10-08 383000
2005-10-15 348000
2005-10-22 324000
2005-10-29 322000
2005-11-05 325000
2005-11-12 309000
2005-11-19 324000
2005-11-26 311000
2005-12-03 321000
2005-12-10 327000
2005-12-17 312000
2005-12-24 320000
2005-12-31 302000
2006-01-07 326000
2006-01-14 285000
2006-01-21 290000
2006-01-28 282000
2006-02-04 289000
2006-02-11 298000
2006-02-18 283000
2006-02-25 293000
2006-03-04 302000
2006-03-11 307000
2006-03-18 303000
2006-03-25 295000
2006-04-01 291000
2006-04-08 299000
2006-04-15 299000
2006-04-22 308000
2006-04-29 321000
2006-05-06 347000
2006-05-13 335000
2006-05-20 319000
2006-05-27 330000
2006-06-03 307000
2006-06-10 298000
2006-06-17 308000
2006-06-24 309000
2006-07-01 316000
2006-07-08 343000
2006-07-15 318000
2006-07-22 306000
2006-07-29 311000
2006-08-05 318000
2006-08-12 310000
2006-08-19 315000
2006-08-26 314000
2006-09-02 315000
2006-09-09 314000
2006-09-16 324000
2006-09-23 319000
2006-09-30 309000
2006-10-07 316000
2006-10-14 305000
2006-10-21 313000
2006-10-28 328000
2006-11-04 319000
2006-11-11 311000
2006-11-18 326000
2006-11-25 349000
2006-12-02 327000
2006-12-09 311000
2006-12-16 318000
2006-12-23 323000
2006-12-30 341000
2007-01-06 330000
2007-01-13 296000
2007-01-20 335000
2007-01-27 308000
2007-02-03 310000
2007-02-10 338000
2007-02-17 321000
2007-02-24 322000
2007-03-03 320000
2007-03-10 308000
2007-03-17 309000
2007-03-24 303000
2007-03-31 307000
2007-04-07 332000
2007-04-14 327000
2007-04-21 321000
2007-04-28 301000
2007-05-05 300000
2007-05-12 297000
2007-05-19 310000
2007-05-26 310000
2007-06-02 313000
2007-06-09 313000
2007-06-16 320000
2007-06-23 313000
2007-06-30 317000
2007-07-07 321000
2007-07-14 317000
2007-07-21 310000
2007-07-28 305000
2007-08-04 314000
2007-08-11 316000
2007-08-18 321000
2007-08-25 329000
2007-09-01 314000
2007-09-08 321000
2007-09-15 313000
2007-09-22 302000
2007-09-29 317000
2007-10-06 316000
2007-10-13 335000
2007-10-20 334000
2007-10-27 328000
2007-11-03 327000
2007-11-10 333000
2007-11-17 332000
2007-11-24 352000
2007-12-01 344000
2007-12-08 332000
2007-12-15 350000
2007-12-22 355000
2007-12-29 360000
2008-01-05 346000
2008-01-12 322000
2008-01-19 321000
2008-01-26 366000
2008-02-02 350000
2008-02-09 344000
2008-02-16 339000
2008-02-23 354000
2008-03-01 345000
2008-03-08 348000
2008-03-15 369000
2008-03-22 368000
2008-03-29 387000
2008-04-05 354000
2008-04-12 365000
2008-04-19 349000
2008-04-26 370000
2008-05-03 370000
2008-05-10 366000
2008-05-17 367000
2008-05-24 369000
2008-05-31 362000
2008-06-07 382000
2008-06-14 378000
2008-06-21 381000
2008-06-28 392000
2008-07-05 371000
2008-07-12 385000
2008-07-19 402000
2008-07-26 434000
2008-08-02 448000
2008-08-09 430000
2008-08-16 424000
2008-08-23 421000
2008-08-30 442000
2008-09-06 441000
2008-09-13 449000
2008-09-20 483000
2008-09-27 483000
2008-10-04 482000
2008-10-11 461000
2008-10-18 478000
2008-10-25 480000
2008-11-01 490000
2008-11-08 512000
2008-11-15 536000
2008-11-22 532000
2008-11-29 529000
2008-12-06 570000
2008-12-13 566000
2008-12-20 587000
2008-12-27 533000
2009-01-03 503000
2009-01-10 551000
2009-01-17 591000
2009-01-24 586000
2009-01-31 629000
2009-02-07 637000
2009-02-14 632000
2009-02-21 655000
2009-02-28 652000
2009-03-07 660000
2009-03-14 651000
2009-03-21 661000
2009-03-28 665000
2009-04-04 653000
2009-04-11 599000
2009-04-18 639000
2009-04-25 620000
2009-05-02 602000
2009-05-09 625000
2009-05-16 620000
2009-05-23 606000
2009-05-30 607000
2009-06-06 596000
2009-06-13 595000
2009-06-20 608000
2009-06-27 594000
2009-07-04 573000
2009-07-11 546000
2009-07-18 560000
2009-07-25 587000
2009-08-01 555000
2009-08-08 555000
2009-08-15 562000
2009-08-22 560000
2009-08-29 564000
2009-09-05 558000
2009-09-12 542000
2009-09-19 536000
2009-09-26 554000
2009-10-03 533000
2009-10-10 511000
2009-10-17 531000
2009-10-24 530000
2009-10-31 522000
2009-11-07 512000
2009-11-14 507000
2009-11-21 482000
2009-11-28 475000
2009-12-05 497000
2009-12-12 498000
2009-12-19 479000
2009-12-26 468000
2010-01-02 456000
2010-01-09 469000
2010-01-16 507000
2010-01-23 471000
2010-01-30 496000
2010-02-06 466000
2010-02-13 489000
2010-02-20 500000
2010-02-27 488000
2010-03-06 472000
2010-03-13 478000
2010-03-20 472000
2010-03-27 459000
2010-04-03 479000
2010-04-10 479000
2010-04-17 469000
2010-04-24 449000
2010-05-01 451000
2010-05-08 451000
2010-05-15 474000
2010-05-22 463000
2010-05-29 458000
2010-06-05 459000
2010-06-12 467000
2010-06-19 452000
2010-06-26 464000
2010-07-03 454000
2010-07-10 439000
2010-07-17 462000
2010-07-24 465000
2010-07-31 476000
2010-08-07 483000
2010-08-14 486000
2010-08-21 464000
2010-08-28 467000
2010-09-04 452000
2010-09-11 444000
2010-09-18 459000
2010-09-25 459000
2010-10-02 446000
2010-10-09 459000
2010-10-16 444000
2010-10-23 432000
2010-10-30 453000
2010-11-06 434000
2010-11-13 432000
2010-11-20 407000
2010-11-27 432000
2010-12-04 428000
2010-12-11 425000
2010-12-18 424000
2010-12-25 404000
2011-01-01 413000
2011-01-08 434000
2011-01-15 421000
2011-01-22 446000
2011-01-29 420000
2011-02-05 402000
2011-02-12 425000
2011-02-19 394000
2011-02-26 385000
2011-03-05 414000
2011-03-12 404000
2011-03-19 407000
2011-03-26 399000
2011-04-02 395000
2011-04-09 416000
2011-04-16 402000
2011-04-23 422000
2011-04-30 468000
2011-05-07 435000
2011-05-14 414000
2011-05-21 423000
2011-05-28 418000
2011-06-04 423000
2011-06-11 413000
2011-06-18 416000
2011-06-25 421000
2011-07-02 418000
2011-07-09 408000
2011-07-16 420000
2011-07-23 411000
2011-07-30 406000
2011-08-06 405000
2011-08-13 409000
2011-08-20 415000
2011-08-27 409000
2011-09-03 414000
2011-09-10 429000
2011-09-17 422000
2011-09-24 406000
2011-10-01 405000
2011-10-08 410000
2011-10-15 395000
2011-10-22 403000
2011-10-29 399000
2011-11-05 392000
2011-11-12 383000
2011-11-19 385000
2011-11-26 397000
2011-12-03 387000
2011-12-10 368000
2011-12-17 368000
2011-12-24 386000
2011-12-31 376000
2012-01-07 391000
2012-01-14 367000
2012-01-21 381000
2012-01-28 372000
2012-02-04 368000
2012-02-11 361000
2012-02-18 359000
2012-02-25 365000
2012-03-03 375000
2012-03-10 369000
2012-03-17 368000
2012-03-24 363000
2012-03-31 358000
2012-04-07 387000
2012-04-14 381000
2012-04-21 387000
2012-04-28 372000
2012-05-05 373000
2012-05-12 369000
2012-05-19 371000
2012-05-26 381000
2012-06-02 377000
2012-06-09 383000
2012-06-16 384000
2012-06-23 380000
2012-06-30 372000
2012-07-07 360000
2012-07-14 390000
2012-07-21 368000
2012-07-28 372000
2012-08-04 371000
2012-08-11 369000
2012-08-18 376000
2012-08-25 377000
2012-09-01 371000
2012-09-08 393000
2012-09-15 392000
2012-09-22 377000
2012-09-29 376000
2012-10-06 350000
2012-10-13 386000
2012-10-20 374000
2012-10-27 364000
2012-11-03 365000
2012-11-10 446000
2012-11-17 406000
2012-11-24 388000
2012-12-01 375000
2012-12-08 340000
2012-12-15 356000
2012-12-22 362000
2012-12-29 362000
2013-01-05 363000
2013-01-12 344000
2013-01-19 339000
2013-01-26 366000
2013-02-02 361000
2013-02-09 347000
2013-02-16 362000
2013-02-23 342000
2013-03-02 340000
2013-03-09 343000
2013-03-16 343000
2013-03-23 358000
2013-03-30 375000
2013-04-06 359000
2013-04-13 356000
2013-04-20 343000
2013-04-27 331000
2013-05-04 335000
2013-05-11 360000
2013-05-18 343000
2013-05-25 353000
2013-06-01 346000
2013-06-08 337000
2013-06-15 353000
2013-06-22 347000
2013-06-29 340000
2013-07-06 351000
2013-07-13 344000
2013-07-20 355000
2013-07-27 334000
2013-08-03 339000
2013-08-10 327000
2013-08-17 340000
2013-08-24 336000
2013-08-31 325000
2013-09-07 300000
2013-09-14 323000
2013-09-21 314000
2013-09-28 319000
2013-10-05 368000
2013-10-12 368000
2013-10-19 351000
2013-10-26 347000
2013-11-02 342000
2013-11-09 340000
2013-11-16 331000
2013-11-23 316000
2013-11-30 312000
2013-12-07 354000
2013-12-14 364000
2013-12-21 334000
2013-12-28 332000
2014-01-04 322000
2014-01-11 318000
2014-01-18 327000
2014-01-25 340000
2014-02-01 331000
2014-02-08 337000
2014-02-15 332000
2014-02-22 341000
2014-03-01 319000
2014-03-08 322000
2014-03-15 321000
2014-03-22 313000
2014-03-29 330000
2014-04-05 311000
2014-04-12 308000
2014-04-19 327000
2014-04-26 345000
2014-05-03 325000
2014-05-10 303000
2014-05-17 324000
2014-05-24 305000
2014-05-31 312000
2014-06-07 317000
2014-06-14 314000
2014-06-21 315000
2014-06-28 308000
2014-07-05 302000
2014-07-12 308000
2014-07-19 294000
2014-07-26 303000
2014-08-02 295000
2014-08-09 309000
2014-08-16 303000
2014-08-23 300000
2014-08-30 303000
2014-09-06 307000
2014-09-13 288000
2014-09-20 295000
2014-09-27 290000
2014-10-04 293000
2014-10-11 281000
2014-10-18 290000
2014-10-25 291000
2014-11-01 280000
2014-11-08 291000
2014-11-15 293000
2014-11-22 303000
2014-11-29 291000
2014-12-06 291000
2014-12-13 286000
2014-12-20 276000
2014-12-27 285000
2015-01-03 294000
2015-01-10 304000
2015-01-17 298000
2015-01-24 261000
2015-01-31 281000
2015-02-07 298000
2015-02-14 285000
2015-02-21 305000
2015-02-28 317000
2015-03-07 293000
2015-03-14 290000
2015-03-21 284000
2015-03-28 269000
2015-04-04 282000
2015-04-11 298000
2015-04-18 295000
2015-04-25 269000
2015-05-02 267000
2015-05-09 271000
2015-05-16 276000
2015-05-23 281000
2015-05-30 275000
2015-06-06 278000
2015-06-13 269000
2015-06-20 273000
2015-06-27 275000
2015-07-04 292000
2015-07-11 285000
2015-07-18 265000
2015-07-25 269000
2015-08-01 270000
2015-08-08 274000
2015-08-15 279000
2015-08-22 274000
2015-08-29 279000
2015-09-05 273000
2015-09-12 264000
2015-09-19 269000
2015-09-26 272000
2015-10-03 267000
2015-10-10 265000
2015-10-17 264000
2015-10-24 264000
2015-10-31 275000
2015-11-07 276000
2015-11-14 272000
2015-11-21 261000
2015-11-28 265000
2015-12-05 280000
2015-12-12 268000
2015-12-19 260000
2015-12-26 276000
2016-01-02 273000
2016-01-09 284000
2016-01-16 290000
2016-01-23 269000
2016-01-30 281000
2016-02-06 265000
2016-02-13 263000
2016-02-20 272000
2016-02-27 269000
2016-03-05 257000
2016-03-12 263000
2016-03-19 264000
2016-03-26 273000
2016-04-02 272000
2016-04-09 263000
2016-04-16 255000
2016-04-23 259000
2016-04-30 277000
2016-05-07 290000
2016-05-14 279000
2016-05-21 268000
2016-05-28 264000
2016-06-04 265000
2016-06-11 273000
2016-06-18 261000
2016-06-25 262000
2016-07-02 256000
2016-07-09 257000
2016-07-16 260000
2016-07-23 264000
2016-07-30 266000
2016-08-06 266000
2016-08-13 265000
2016-08-20 265000
2016-08-27 262000
2016-09-03 257000
2016-09-10 253000
2016-09-17 252000
2016-09-24 247000
2016-10-01 246000
2016-10-08 251000
2016-10-15 264000
2016-10-22 257000
2016-10-29 265000
2016-11-05 251000
2016-11-12 232000
2016-11-19 248000
2016-11-26 260000
2016-12-03 252000
2016-12-10 251000
2016-12-17 262000
2016-12-24 254000
2016-12-31 236000
2017-01-07 244000
2017-01-14 246000
2017-01-21 256000
2017-01-28 241000
2017-02-04 236000
2017-02-11 242000
2017-02-18 247000
2017-02-25 232000
2017-03-04 246000
2017-03-11 244000
2017-03-18 255000
2017-03-25 256000
2017-04-01 236000
2017-04-08 237000
2017-04-15 244000
2017-04-22 251000
2017-04-29 241000
2017-05-06 237000
2017-05-13 237000
2017-05-20 234000
2017-05-27 251000
2017-06-03 244000
2017-06-10 238000
2017-06-17 243000
2017-06-24 237000
2017-07-01 248000
2017-07-08 248000
2017-07-15 241000
2017-07-22 245000
2017-07-29 242000
2017-08-05 246000
2017-08-12 236000
2017-08-19 241000
2017-08-26 239000
2017-09-02 299000
2017-09-09 275000
2017-09-16 260000
2017-09-23 262000
2017-09-30 255000
2017-10-07 246000
2017-10-14 232000
2017-10-21 236000
2017-10-28 235000
2017-11-04 240000
2017-11-11 246000
2017-11-18 238000
2017-11-25 237000
2017-12-02 235000
2017-12-09 226000
2017-12-16 242000
2017-12-23 242000
2017-12-30 243000
2018-01-06 251000
2018-01-13 229000
2018-01-20 237000
2018-01-27 221000
2018-02-03 221000
2018-02-10 224000
2018-02-17 220000
2018-02-24 215000
2018-03-03 226000
2018-03-10 223000
2018-03-17 224000
2018-03-24 220000
2018-03-31 237000
2018-04-07 234000
2018-04-14 235000
2018-04-21 207000
2018-04-28 212000
2018-05-05 210000
2018-05-12 224000
2018-05-19 230000
2018-05-26 221000
2018-06-02 221000
2018-06-09 218000
2018-06-16 220000
2018-06-23 220000
2018-06-30 228000
2018-07-07 215000
2018-07-14 212000
2018-07-21 220000
2018-07-28 218000
2018-08-04 218000
2018-08-11 213000
2018-08-18 216000
2018-08-25 214000
2018-09-01 210000
2018-09-08 211000
2018-09-15 213000
2018-09-22 212000
2018-09-29 217000
2018-10-06 213000
2018-10-13 213000
2018-10-20 219000
2018-10-27 217000
2018-11-03 217000
2018-11-10 218000
2018-11-17 222000
2018-11-24 232000
2018-12-01 232000
2018-12-08 203000
2018-12-15 216000
2018-12-22 219000
2018-12-29 228000
2019-01-05 220000
2019-01-12 216000
2019-01-19 209000
2019-01-26 236000
2019-02-02 230000
2019-02-09 228000
2019-02-16 218000
2019-02-23 224000
2019-03-02 220000
2019-03-09 224000
2019-03-16 219000
2019-03-23 215000
2019-03-30 211000
2019-04-06 203000
2019-04-13 203000
2019-04-20 226000
2019-04-27 230000
2019-05-04 225000
2019-05-11 217000
2019-05-18 213000
2019-05-25 218000
2019-06-01 220000
2019-06-08 220000
2019-06-15 219000
2019-06-22 224000
2019-06-29 222000
2019-07-06 211000
2019-07-13 217000
2019-07-20 211000
2019-07-27 216000
2019-08-03 214000
2019-08-10 218000
2019-08-17 215000
2019-08-24 215000
2019-08-31 219000
2019-09-07 208000
2019-09-14 211000
2019-09-21 215000
2019-09-28 218000
2019-10-05 212000
2019-10-12 218000
2019-10-19 213000
2019-10-26 217000
2019-11-02 212000
2019-11-09 222000
2019-11-16 223000
2019-11-23 211000
2019-11-30 206000
2019-12-07 237000
2019-12-14 229000
2019-12-21 218000
2019-12-28 220000
2020-01-04 212000
2020-01-11 207000
2020-01-18 220000
2020-01-25 212000
2020-02-01 201000
2020-02-08 204000
2020-02-15 215000
2020-02-22 220000
2020-02-29 217000
2020-03-07 211000
2020-03-14 281000
2020-03-21 3,394,000
2020-03-28 6,648,000
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Note: Shaded areas denote recessions.

Source: U.S. Employment and Training Administration, Initial Claims [ICSA], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ICSA, April 2, 2020

Copy the code below to embed this chart on your website.

In the two weeks ending last Saturday, about 10 million Americans filed new claims for unemployment insurance. For a sense of scale, the Great Recession reduced total number of U.S. jobs by 8.7 million through 2 years of losses, from 138.4 million in January 2008 to 129.7 million in February 2010. The share of adults employed is now almost certainly below its lowest level since the start of the Great Recession.

Based on Americans’ internet search activity through the first three days of this week, our model predicts that, next Thursday, DOL will report that another 4.7–5.7 million Americans filed new claims in the current week ending tomorrow.

Read more

Why is Trump putting critical protective equipment on layaway at Walmart?

This week, President Trump announced he’s essentially putting an order for critically needed surgical gowns on layaway at Walmart despite urgent demand.

At a coronavirus task force briefing on Wednesday, Trump said he was placing a “very, very, big” order for gowns with Walmart CEO Doug McMillon. But it turns out that the gowns—which are part of vital personal protective equipment known as PPE—aren’t actually available right now.

A Walmart spokesperson said the company would have to “delve into its sprawling global supply chain to identify a company to make an undisclosed number of gowns.”

Why is the president placing orders through retailers—if they can’t quickly fill such needed requisitions?

The answer is that Trump is touting corporate partnerships in a display that’s more showmanship than substance. And at the same time, he’s refusing to fully invoke a longstanding law, the Defense Production Act (DPA), that could help close serious PPE shortfalls.

If Trump invoked the DPA, key agencies like the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Department of Defense (DOD) would start issuing federal contracts for all available supplies of PPE, ventilators, and other needed equipment. And they could distribute those supplies to the areas of greatest need.

However, Trump appears to not trust DOD or FEMA to manage production of critically needed medical supplies and equipment. Instead, he’s doling out contracts one at a time—and apparently picking fights with favorite villains, like General Motors CEO Mary BarraRead more

The South’s worst unemployment numbers may be yet to come given social distancing delays in the region

The first set of data on unemployment insurance claims amid the coronavirus pandemic were unprecedented, but the hardest-hit areas were not generally states in the South. A second week of data shows a portrait of a disaster, with 6.6 million people filing for unemployment insurance (UI) in the week ending March 28. Every single state has now reported a record number of claims during one of those two weeks.

Some Southern states were particularly hard hit, with North Carolina, Alabama, and Louisiana all ranking among the five states with the largest two-week percent increase in UI claims. But since the most recent data is from the week ending March 28, the greatest spike in the South’s unemployment may be yet to come. That’s because there is strong evidence that much of the South (and broad swaths of the West) was not engaging in widespread social distancing by that week.

Many Southern policymakers were slow to accept that stopping the pandemic required social distancing, closing schools and nonessential businesses, and limiting public gatherings. Stay-at-home orders have only begun to ramp up in Southern states in recent days, and some Southern states still don’t have them. For many businesses, layoffs and closures will take place only as these necessary public health measures are implemented and the general public follows suit. Some of the Southern states that saw the largest increases in unemployment claims for the week ending March 28 were those that instituted stay-at-home orders earlier than others, like Kentucky and Louisiana. This suggests that the largest unemployment claims in many Southern states have yet to materialize.

Read more

How state attorneys general are protecting workers during the coronavirus pandemic

Attorneys general (AGs) in some states are:

  • Protecting nonessential workers from the risks of contracting COVID-19 by enforcing or leading implementation of stay-at-home orders.
  • Ensuring that workers who are misclassified as independent contractors can access the unemployment insurance and paid leave they are entitled to.
  • Protecting employees from losing unpaid wages.
  • Protecting workers seeking safe working conditions.
  • Providing clear and accessible public information about workers’ rights and legal protections.

Much of the coverage of state attorneys general work during the coronavirus crisis has focused on consumer protection, but many state AGs—even those without dedicated workers’ rights units—are helping protect workers facing unprecedented challenges.

These efforts come in the midst of a general increase over the past several years in state attorney general activity to enforce labor laws and advocate for workers.

Five years ago, only three state AG offices had dedicated workers’ rights units: California, Massachusetts, and New York. Since then, six other AGs have created workers’ rights units: the AGs of the District of Columbia, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania). Other state AG offices, even without dedicated bureaus or divisions, have also become more involved in worker issues in recent years. With or without dedicated worker rights units, state AGs have a range of powers that enable them to advance workplace protections.

Workers’ needs during the coronavirus crisis are urgent and stark. Some workers who are not essential are being required to work despite state or local stay-at-home orders. Other workers who are unquestionably essential are working without adequate protection.

A record number of workers have lost their jobs; among them are workers who have been misclassified as independent contractors and will struggle to get unemployment insurance they’re entitled to. And workers may require enforcement in order to access any legally required paid sick or family leave. On top of these challenges, there is a serious dearth of readily accessible public information about workers’ rights and legal protections, particularly in light of the rapidly changing legal landscape.

Read more

Higher rates of poverty and incarceration put front-line workers and communities in Southern states at greater risk from the coronavirus

This piece is the second in a three-part series examining the economic and social conditions that impact health outcomes in Southern states, and how these conditions leave communities underprepared to protect front-line workers and communities during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Key takeaways

  • Poverty rates tend to be higher in Southern states. State policymakers should increase aid to social services and increase benefit amounts for direct income support programs like the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP).
  • Incarceration rates are highest in the South, and people who are incarcerated face greater health risks from the coronavirus. Many options are available to state and local policymakers to protect the health and safety of people who are incarcerated, including offering necessary medical care and supplies at no cost and prioritizing people for release.
  • Several states in the South have some of the lowest unemployment insurance recipiency rates in the country. State policymakers must do more to bolster and expand access to an already strained unemployment insurance system.

In our earlier post, we described how Southern state lawmakers’ refusal to expand Medicaid, implement paid sick leave policies, allocate sufficient public health resources, and quickly adopt social distancing practices put the health of many workers and families at risk from COVID-19. The coronavirus pandemic is also causing an extraordinary economic crisis that is projected to disproportionately harm Southern states because retail, leisure, and hospitality make up higher-than-average shares of total private-sector employment in almost all Southern states. That’s a key reason why average wages in the South are lower than the rest of the country, and this economic crisis will hit low-wage workers first and hardest.

There are many actions state and local policymakers can take to mitigate economic harm and target responses effectively to provide relief to impacted communities. This includes strengthening unemployment insurance, increasing basic needs assistance, and addressing racial, gender, and additional equity concerns.

Read more

Every state in the country reported its highest initial unemployment claims ever either last week or the week before

This morning, the U.S. Department of Labor released the latest initial unemployment insurance claims data, showing another unprecedented spike. Nearly 10 million people across the country filed for unemployment insurance (UI) in the past two weeks: 3.3 million filed for unemployment in the week ending March 21, and another 6.6 million filed in the week ending March 28. For comparison, 282,000 claims were filed during the week ending March 14 when we were just starting to see the economic effects of the coronavirus. This greatly outnumbers the number of claims filed during any week since this data has been collected, including during the Great Recession.

The map in Figure A shows each state’s percentage change in “advance” initial unemployment claims for the week ending March 28 relative to the week ending March 14. Initial claims for the past week were unprecedented in virtually every state. The largest percentage increase occurred in Michigan, where the 311,000 new initial claims equaled a 5,728% increase over the number of initial claims filed in the week ending March 14. The smallest percentage increase was in Wyoming, where 4,675 new claims were filed—an 804% increase over the number of claims filed the week ending March 14, and still the largest number of claims ever filed in Wyoming. In fact, every state in the country reported its highest initial claims ever either last week or the week before.

Read more

The Trump NLRB needs to be removed

That’s it. The Trump appointees to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) need to be removed for neglect of duty and malfeasance—now.

The latest outrage? Yesterday, the Trump board added to its long and growing list of anti-worker, anti-union actions, issuing new rules that undermine the longstanding practice of voluntary recognition, by which employers agree to recognize and bargain with a union when a majority of employees sign cards saying they want a union. The Trump board is now requiring these employers to post a notice telling workers they can file a petition and have an election to get rid of the union—the very same union that a majority of workers have just chosen. And the new rules call for running union elections and counting ballots even when charges have been filed alleging that an employer has engaged in illegal unfair labor practices that have tainted the election. In an Orwellian twist, the Trump board calls these new rules, which undermine workers’ ability to form and keep their unions, rules to “Protect Employee Free Choice.”

What makes this latest action so egregious and outrageous is that it is happening at the very same time that the Trump board had unilaterally halted all elections by workers seeking to form unions. Thousands of workers who were poised to vote on forming unions have had their elections cancelled—even though the elections could be held by U.S. mail, whose employees are courageously keeping the Postal Service going. Instead, workers are left without a voice, and the Trump NLRB has done nothing to discourage or prohibit employers from running anti-union campaigns while workers are left in the lurch.Read more

3.5 million workers likely lost their employer-provided health insurance in the past two weeks

These estimates were updated on May 14, 2020. See the updated estimates.

We estimate that 3.5 million workers were at high risk of losing their employer-provided health insurance in the past two weeks. Because the United States is unique among rich countries in tying health insurance benefits to employment—roughly half of all U.S. workers receive health insurance through their own employer’s provided coverage—many of the newly unemployed will suddenly face prohibitively costly insurance options. The linkage between specific jobs and the availability of health insurance is a prime source of inefficiency and inequity in the U.S. health system. It is especially terrifying for workers to lose their health insurance as a result of, and during, an ongoing pandemic.

Background

Last week and this week saw a historically large number of workers filing initial claims for unemployment insurance (UI) benefits due to layoffs (or furloughs or hours reductions) connected to the economic impact of the coronavirus and associated “social distancing” measures. The 8.7 million (non-seasonally-adjusted) new claims over the past two weeks are about 5.9% of total employment over the last year, 2.5 times as large as any previous two-week period on record.

This scale of job loss will obviously cause huge distress for the affected workers and their families. One aspect of this distress will be the likely loss of employer-provided health insurance (EPHI). Most nonelderly people in the United States who have health insurance get it through their own employer or through the employer-sponsored plan that was available to somebody in their family. When jobs are lost, this primary source of health insurance coverage is also lost.

Using new UI claims by industry from the state of Washington—the epicenter of the coronavirus outbreak in the United States—we are able to provide a very rough estimate of the number of workers at high risk of losing health insurance they had through their own employer due to coronavirus-related layoffs (or furloughs or hours reductions). We can’t say exactly how many people will lose insurance coverage altogether for several reasons. For example, some workers who lose EPHI due to layoffs or hours reductions that trigger UI claims may be able to obtain coverage through health care exchanges set up by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or through Medicaid. Some of this group may also be able to obtain continuing coverage through COBRA, paying out of pocket the full cost of their EPHI coverage. Some workers may be able to obtain coverage through other family members, or if only experiencing a temporary furlough or hours reduction, their employers might continue to pay for coverage. On the other hand, our calculations might understate the loss of health insurance coverage because they do not account for family members who are no longer covered because of the policyholder’s layoff. And because not all layoffs result in UI claims, we will underestimate the actual magnitude of job losses.Read more

Workers exposed to the coronavirus need to be able to protect themselves from illness or death without risking their employment

Key takeaways

  • Essential front-line workers don’t have access to the equipment they need to protect themselves from the coronavirus.
  • This crisis shines a light on the lack of power most workers in this country have over conditions affecting their own safety and health.
  • The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) provides only limited protections to these workers.
  • Workers have sought to gain protections through multiple means—union negotiations, walkouts, social media appeals, and drawing media attention to the problems.
  • The government needs to do more to protect workers. Policies that empower workers in their workplaces and in the political and policy worlds are sorely needed.

This pandemic world is highlighting, for those who care to notice, that most workers in this country lack any power over workplace conditions affecting their own safety and health. Workers certainly do not have any effective right to refuse assignments that are dangerous, perhaps deadly. Workers, even front-line health care workers, do not have an effective right to protective equipment. This lack of freedom to protect one’s person reflects a weakness in worker power both in the workplace and in the policymaking realm.

For many, physical distancing during this pandemic has meant working at home, staring at our own laptop screens, sitting on our own couches, in our most comfortable clothes. Not everyone is so fortunate. The economy has not ground to a complete stop. Sectors such as food production, food preparation, and grocery sales are still operating, and workers in those sectors still go to their jobs. People are ordering online, which means that warehouse and delivery staff still report to work. Repair people still make house calls when our appliances break down. And, of course, the medical professions and supporting staff are still operating at full strength, although their exposure is greatest of all. How do these workers protect themselves and keep from becoming disease vectors for the rest of us?
Read more

Policymakers twice missed the chance to avert widespread job loss, now they should act to avoid more layoffs

The economic impact of the coronavirus is well upon us. Though not yet officially declared, we are certainly now in a recession. Nearly 10 million people applied for unemployment insurance claims in the last two weeks alone, and we will see much worse in coming weeks. I have been a labor market economist for a long time—including through the Great Recession—and I have never seen anything like this.

Congress just passed a bill that, while problematic in important respects, will reduce the hardship for millions of people who are out of work because of the virus. The most effective parts of the bill are a $600 increase in weekly unemployment insurance checks and the creation of a special disaster relief program that expands unemployment insurance coverage to many of those who fall through the gaping holes in our current system, including gig workers and the self-employed.

But it is important to remember that mass unemployment as a result of the coronavirus did not have to happen—in fact, policymakers twice missed the chance to avert widespread job loss. First, the failure to take the coronavirus seriously early on and to implement rapid and accurate testing means we cannot now distinguish between those who are sick and need to be quarantined, and those who are healthy and could largely continue normal activity. This in turn means that to avert a much greater disaster, we have no choice but to enforce widespread lockdowns rather than more targeted quarantines. In other words, the lack of early response turned a public health threat into an economic recession, which will continue at least as long as our testing and tracing capability is insufficient.

Moreover, even after we failed to test for the virus on a sufficient scale and control its spread, we still could have protected jobs. Other countries have chosen to compensate coronavirus-impacted employers for close to the entire amount of their workers’ salaries, as long as they keep their workers on payroll. Making it possible for businesses to keep workers on payroll is crucial because at some point, hopefully sooner rather than later, the threat of the virus will be over, and the economy will be able to restart. People who have been on lockdown will be very excited to go out to restaurants and do other things they have missed out on (count me among them!). But that sudden surge in demand could go one of two ways. If employers still have their workers on payroll, they will be able to turn the lights back on and deal with the rush of customers. But if they had to lay off workers, they will need to spend great deal of resources posting jobs, interviewing, hiring, onboarding, and training. This scramble to re-match workers with jobs will prolong the pain of the recession much longer than necessary.Read more

Nearly 20 million workers will likely be laid off or furloughed by July: Updated state numbers project further job losses due to the coronavirus

As the United States comes to terms with the scale of the coronavirus pandemic, new economic projections continue to deteriorate, indicating an increasingly devastating impact on the U.S. economy. The latest Goldman Sachs forecast predicts a 9% contraction for the first quarter of this year and a 34% contraction in the second quarter. This large drop in GDP is consistent with 19.8 million jobs lost by July, bringing unemployment rates across the country into the mid-teens.

Our estimate is much larger than was predicted even a week ago, when the forecasting implied 14 million would be furloughed or laid off. Each escalating forecast is an indication that policymakers at every level of government need to be acting immediately to curb the spread of the virus and protect the health and economic well-being of their communities.

Importantly, these latest estimates account for the recently enacted CARES Act and assume a fourth coronavirus-related federal relief bill that will ramp up state aid—a particularly effective form of stimulus. In other words, Congress must pass additional stimulus measures—especially aid to state and local governments—just to keep the losses where we are predicting them to be today. Policymakers could go one step further and use public debt to finance the wages of workers who would otherwise lose their jobs, as Britain and Denmark are doing. This would allow workers to keep their jobs, even if they are unable to work from home or their employer is closed. It would also allow some workers to save money that they could spend once the pandemic has subsided, which would help jump-start the recovery.

In the map and tables below, we have updated our estimates of predicted layoffs and furloughs by state and added a projection of the resulting unemployment rates in each state. The map in Figure A shows that California is expected to have the largest number of jobs lost, with the state losing nearly 2.3 million jobs through June. Texas, Florida, and New York have the next largest job loss numbers at 1.7 million, 1.3 million, and 1.2 million jobs lost, respectively—losses representing between 14.7 and 17.0% of total private-sector employment in these states.

Read more

Which data to watch and not watch this week: Watch Thursday’s unemployment insurance claims, not Friday’s jobs day numbers

It’s not often that you’ll hear us telling you not to pay attention to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’s monthly employment situation report that is released on the first Friday of every month. We usually elevate these “jobs day” numbers because they are the timeliest data on payroll employment, the unemployment rate, the share of the population with a job, and wage growth. But this week, the numbers coming out on Friday will be genuinely outdated, if we want a true look at how the coronavirus has affected the economy. Therefore, this week we recommend you focus on the unemployment insurance (UI) claims data that will be released on Thursday morning, which will provide a much more up-to-date read on the state of the labor market.

Why? It’s all about the different reference periods for these two data releases. The reference period for Thursday’s initial UI numbers is last week (March 22–28). That means these numbers capture key information about layoffs in almost real time. The reference period for Friday’s jobs day report, on the other hand, is mid-month—specifically, it’s the payroll period that includes March 12 for the establishment survey and the calendar week that includes March 12 for the household survey. Even though mid-March was just a couple weeks ago, things deteriorated so fast in the last half of March that a mid-month measure will not come close to capturing the current state of the labor market.

The Friday jobs numbers will likely, however, reflect the leading edge of the downturn. We already know from the unemployment insurance claims data that there was a significant uptick in initial unemployment insurance claims for the week ending March 14, which includes the relevant reference period for this Friday’s report. UI claims rose from 211,000 in the week ending March 7 to 282,000 in the week ending March 14. However, initial claims skyrocketed in the week ending March 21 to 3.3 million, by far the highest level in the history of the series, and is expected to have risen even higher last week. Friday’s jobs report will decidedly not include this huge increase in job losses in the last half of the month. Therefore, the measures reported on Friday will be nothing more than the tip of the iceberg for the pandemic-induced recession we are in now. Thursday’s UI data from March 22–28, on the other hand, will provide a much clearer read on what workers are up against.Read more

Unions are giving workers a seat at the table when it comes to the coronavirus response

We have never seen such immediate and sweeping changes at so many workplaces in modern history. What are unions doing to ensure that workers have a seat at the table?

EPI reports and blog posts have documented the ways that workers through their unions solve problems and make changes that improve their lives and their communities. This includes ensuring broader access to paid sick leave and health insurance, two issues of particular importance in the current pandemic. This blog post, culled from public news sources, summarizes just a few ways unionized workers are using their bargaining rights to have a say in how they are going to safely and effectively do their jobs during the pandemic. We encourage readers to share their stories to add to these examples.

  • Teamsters have negotiated an agreement with UPS providing paid leave, and are pressing UPS for extra protections. The Teamsters’ UPS and UPS Freight National Negotiating Committees and UPS reached an agreement that provides for paid leave for any worker who is diagnosed with COVID-19 or quarantined because a family member in their household is ill with the virus. According to Transport Topics, “the paid-leave agreement applies to about 300,000 full- and part-time hourly employees, primarily drivers, package handlers and mechanics, if they should become directly impacted by the novel coronavirus.” The leave pay includes pension contributions. Workers who use paid time off to self-quarantine and are later diagnosed with COVID-19 can get that time back in their leave bank.

    UPS is also implementing other protective measures, such as altering delivery requirements to minimize direct contact with customers, specifically by not requiring signatures from customers. Efforts to keep workers safe are ongoing. For example, the president of a local Teamsters chapter in Boston is insisting that UPS step up its cleaning of trucks and equipment  These protections are especially important, as UPS union members will reportedly be delivering and picking up test kits and supplies for COVID-19 drive-through testing sites.
  • Teamsters have secured job security commitments from Waste Management. The Teamsters Waste and Recycling Division represents more than 32,000 workers in the private sanitation industry. The division sent a letter to the three largest companies in the industry—Waste Management, Republic Services, and Waste Connections—asking the companies to outline what they are doing to ensure the safety and health of sanitation workers and requesting specific changes to attendance and paid-time-off policies. Subsequent communications with Waste Management have secured proposals for job security, guaranteed pay, and excused absences for workers.
  • The United Auto Workers (UAW) is negotiating plant operations with Ford, GM, and Fiat Chrysler, including plans to make face shields and ventilators. The UAW represent about 150,000 auto workers at General Motors, Ford, and Fiat Chrysler. In mid-March, UAW officials urged the companies to shut down their factories for two weeks to protect autoworkers from the spreading coronavirus. The request followed union members’ concerns that continued work at the plants would expose them to the virus (a worker at a Fiat Chrysler transmission plant in Kokomo, Indiana, tested positive for COVID-19) and was made the day before UAW members at a Fiat Chrysler factory in Warren, Michigan, went on strike to protest the unsafe working conditions caused by working in close quarters. Initially the companies agreed only to creating a joint task force with the union to implement protection measures for workers and cutting shifts so that factories would be cleared of workers on a rotating basis for deep cleaning of the facility and equipment. But shortly after that agreement was announced, the automakers announced plans to halt production at plants across North America.The UAW and the automakers also said they would work together on plans to restart the plants when it is safe to do so, according to a statement from Ford.
    ­—
    Meanwhile, Ford and the UAW announced that they will start assembling plastic face shields —clear plastic shields that can be used to protect health care workers and others who deal with the public from virus-containing droplets—at a Ford manufacturing site, and start making ventilators at another Ford plant. As Reuters reports, Ford officials say the safety procedures followed to keep workers safe as they produce the ventilators “will be adapted from work Ford and the UAW have been doing to prepare for the automaker to reopen other U.S. factories.” These efforts are part of a recently announced entree by the automakers into production of ventilators, face masks, and face shields for health care workers and first responders.
  • Communications Workers of America (CWA) and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) have won paid leave for Verizon workers. According to Labor Notes, “the unions representing 34,000 workers at Verizon have negotiated paid leave for union members who can’t work during the COVID-19 outbreak.” Telephone workers, like many health care workers and grocery workers, are considered essential workers and thus must stay on the job. The agreement between the unions and Verizon specifies that workers will get paid leave if they are diagnosed with COVID-19, are directed by a doctor to stay at home due to underlying health conditions that make them vulnerable, have to care for a child whose school or day care has been closed due to the pandemic, or have to care for a person in their family who has been diagnosed with COVID-19. Labor Notes quoted a statement from Teamsters for a Democratic Union: “The paid leave won by the union at Verizon surpasses anything even raised by our International Union for Teamsters working in parcel, trucking, grocery, food, beverage, waste, and other essential frontline services that put workers at risk.”
  • Service Employees International Union United Healthcare Workers West (SEIU-UHW) has secured masks for health care workers. SEIU UHW represents more than 97,000 front-line health care workers in hospitals, clinics, and other facilities in California as well as patients and health care consumers. After hearing from members about the lack of protective equipment, the union found a supplier and secured 39 million of the N95 masks, according to the Bay area NBC affiliate. The masks will be distributed to state and local governments and health care systems. Union officials also said they found suppliers of protective masks and face shields.

A broader seat at the table for all workers

Not only are unions helping workers at individual workplaces, they are also seeking a broader seat at the table for all workers.

For example, the International Trade Union Confederation, which represents 200 million members of 332 affiliates in 163 countries and territories, joined with the Trade Union Advisory Committee to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) to send a letter to G20 leaders. They called for coordinated action through International Labor Organization, World Health Organization, OECD, International Monetary Fund, and World Bank to “protect the health of all people and the incomes and jobs of all working people as the key to stability of business and the real economy.”

The letters calls for urgent investment in public health and measures to support all workers regardless of their employment status, including those in the informal economy, including paid sick leave from day one; wage/income protection; managed reduction of hours where necessary, with government support to maximize income security; mortgage, rent and loan relief; universal social protection and free access to health care; and, child care support for front-line workers working in health care, supermarkets, pharmacies and other vital areas.

Keep the vital stories coming

Stories keep coming in of ways union workers are demanding protections and winning health and safety protections. In her recent blog post on the very ill-timed and harmful rulemakings affecting union organizing, my colleague Celine McNicholas notes how “grocery unions have won personal protective equipment, paid sick time, and hazard pay for their members.” That is the kind of seat at the table that is so crucial—at all times, but especially now.

Please keep these important stories coming. If you have examples of unions winning critical provisions to help their members stay safe and navigate workplace changes during this crisis, please email me at lengdahl@epi.org.

 

Nine in 10 farmworkers could be covered by the paid leave provisions of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act—but not if smaller employers are exempted

Key takeaways:

  • Starting on April 1, the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) will require employers with fewer than 500 employees to provide paid sick days and paid family and medical leave for workers if they have been impacted by the coronavirus, but the law includes a possible exemption for smaller employers with fewer than 50 employees.
  • The U.S. Department of Labor is currently developing regulations to implement the FFCRA and they are expected sometime in early April. The agency is likely to include guidelines regarding the small business exemption for paid leave, which will have an impact on how many farmworkers are eligible.
  • Data show that nearly all farms in the United States have fewer than 500 employees (99.8%); nine out of every 10 farmworkers (88.3%) are employed on those farms and would be covered by the FFCRA’s new paid leave provisions.
  • However, most farms are smaller and employ fewer than 50 employees (96.6% of all farms). If all farms with fewer than 50 employees are exempted under the small business exemption in the FFCRA, just over one-third of farmworkers (36.2%) would be eligible for paid leave—those employed by farms with 50–499 employees.

The Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA), the second of the three coronavirus stimulus packages passed by Congress in response to the ongoing pandemic, was enacted on March 18, 2020. During the period beginning on April 1 and ending on December 31, 2020, the FFCRA will require employers with fewer than 500 employees—but with a possible exemption for smaller businesses with fewer than 50 employees—to provide paid sick days and paid family and medical leave for workers if they have been impacted by the coronavirus.

The farmworkers who grow, pick, and pack the food that ends up on our grocery store shelves have been deemed essential workers during the coronavirus pandemic, but are vulnerable and need additional health and safety measures in place to protect them from being infected by, and spreading, the coronavirus. One major agribusiness lobby has publicly stated that farm employers “would be losing way too much money” if basic safety measures were implemented, while some major producers report they’re putting new safety measures in place. The current reality for farmworkers is that most lack paid sick days and paid family and medical leave—but if they qualify, the FFCRA could offer them a lifeline.

There are no reliable estimates of how many farmworkers may be eligible for the FFCRA’s emergency paid leave benefits, but our review of the available data sources suggests that almost all farmworkers could be eligible. However, if all smaller farm employers were to be exempted, just over one-third of farmworkers would be eligible.Read more

In midst of a pandemic, Trump’s NLRB makes it nearly impossible for workers to organize a union

Today, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a rule making it harder for workers to win and keep a union. At the same time, the Trump NLRB has suspended all union elections, including mail ballot elections. The decision to finalize this rulemaking at a time when the agency is failing to fulfill its most basic statutory obligation—to enable workers to organize—is a disgrace. Congress must hold the agency accountable for this decision.

This is a moment when more and more workers are voicing concerns over the terms and conditions of their work as the entire country grapples with the COVID-19 pandemic. Workers are being forced to work without adequate protective gear or sick leave if they or their family members get sick. As a result, workers at places like Amazon, Instacart, and Whole Foods are walking off the job to demand stronger protections, and many are seeking to form unions.

Unions play a critical role in winning workers health and safety protections, as well as fair wages and benefits. In fact, unions have a long history of developing training related to infectious disease and providing workplace protections, in many cases through strong safety and health committees set up to assist when issues like the coronavirus crisis emerge. Notably, a nurses’ union recently located 39 million N95 masks, after their employer failed to provide them, and grocery unions have won personal protective equipment, paid sick time, and hazard pay for their members. Further, unions promote worker safety by investing in programs to educate workers about on-the-job hazards and working with employers to reduce worker injuries and the time lost due to injury.

At a time when many workers deemed “essential” during the COVID-19 pandemic are navigating issues of health and safety, and looking for ways to have their voices heard, it is unconscionable that the agency responsible for ensuring workers have the right to a voice in the workplace has denied them the ability to exercise these rights. By suspending all union elections, the Trump board is betraying its responsibility to our nation’s workers when they most need these basic rights. But today’s rulemaking makes clear that the agency will find a way to conduct the business it deems important—namely, making it more difficult for workers to unionize.Read more

Older workers can’t work from home and are at a higher risk for COVID-19

Key takeaways

  • Nearly three-fourths of workers age 65 and older—or over 5 million older workers—are unable to telecommute. That means that these workers, who are at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19 because of their age, could be putting themselves at risk to earn a paycheck.
  • Policymakers can mitigate the damage from workplace exposure to the coronavirus afflicting older and other highly vulnerable people by designing unemployment insurance and paid sick days measures to protect workers who are vulnerable themselves or who have vulnerable family members.
  • Specifically, policymakers should extend paid sick leave to all employers, to at-risk workers, and to workers whose family members are at risk. They should also ensure that older workers who have to quit their job or lose pay due to the risks of COVID-19 are among the newly eligible for unemployment insurance under the new $2.2 trillion coronavirus package.

As COVID-19 continues to spread throughout the United States, more and more workers who are on the front lines of the economy are at risk, but little attention has been paid to the impact on older workers, who are among the most vulnerable.

Because testing is far from universal, official reports are likely to understate the extent of the pandemic, but it’s clear that older adults are at higher risk for severe illness. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that eight out of 10 deaths from COVID-19 in the U.S. have been adults ages 65 years old and older, and significant shares of older Americans require hospitalization and admission to intensive care units.

At the same time, over 5 million workers age 65 years old and older in the pre-pandemic economy could not work from home. Although some of these workers are likely to be the ones who have been laid off or furloughed in recent days, many will remain out in the workforce, going to work, risking their own health and the health of their family members. And many more workers—younger than age 65—will continue going to work and potentially risking the health of their family members who are older and/or have other health conditions that make them more vulnerable.

Read more

Exposed and underpaid: Women still make less than men, including in sectors especially affected by the coronavirus

  • Women are paid 22.6% less than men with similar education and experience.
  • Women doctors are paid 12% less than doctors who are men.
  • Women nurses are paid 8% less than nurses who are men.
  • Women who wait tables in restaurants are paid 12% less than male wait staff.
  • Women desk clerks at hotels and resorts are paid 11% less than male desk clerks.

Equal Pay Day arrives in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, and in occupations radically transformed as we deal with the crisis, women still make less than men.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, one-third of working women (33.4%), compared with just 15.7% of working men, are employed in two industries that have been significantly impacted by COVID-19 in very different ways: the health care and social assistance industry, which is experiencing surging demand, and the leisure and hospitality industry, which is being crushed by closures. Women employed in both industries experience a gender wage gap.

Given this harsh reality, Equal Pay Day on March 31 is a day to call attention to the significant pay gap between men and women in our country. On average in 2019, women were paid 22.6% less than men, after controlling for race and ethnicity, education, age, and geographic division. The gaps for black and Hispanic women relative to white men are larger than the overall gap and the white men–white women gap. Compared with white men, black and Hispanic women are paid 33.7% and 33.0% less, respectively, after controlling for age, education, and geographic division. For white women, the gap is 25.7%.

The timing of these events also coincides with March, Women’s History Month, a time to reflect on the often overlooked contributions women have made to the United States. At this historic moment, both the essential contributions as well as the economic vulnerabilities of working women have taken center stage.

Read more

EPI President Thea Lee tells MSNBC’s Velshi the coronavirus shines a light on economic inequality in the United States

“This crisis has laid bare the underlying inequality in the U.S. economy,” said EPI President Thea Lee Friday on MSNBC’s The Last Word hosted by Ali Velshi. Because of these inequities, she added, “we were ill-prepared for this crisis.”

Now, she stressed, we need universal paid sick leave, a health care system that doesn’t bankrupt people, and a stronger unemployment insurance system to “make sure we aren’t as ill-prepared for the next crisis.”

With smart policy, a temporary collapse in GDP doesn’t have to cause great human suffering

The “social distancing” measures needed to slow the spread of the coronavirus clearly reduce economic activity. A growing meme in recent days argues that this reduction might be so damaging that it would be a societal benefit to end the social distancing measures shortly and try to return to normal economic activity.

This is extraordinarily risky from a public health perspective—the potential deaths caused by a premature end to social distancing measures—without exaggeration—could reach the millions.

Further, a scenario that saw this many deaths would also see tens of millions of workers falling so ill they would be unable to work for extended periods. This would cause an economic shock of its own.

Finally, and most fundamentally, this view that terrible (but generally unspecified) economic damage will inevitably occur due to the recent public health measures undertaken represents a profound misunderstanding of how the economy works, and how smart policy measures can neutralize this type of trade-off.

To see why, consider a quick thought experiment.Read more

The CARES Act’s aid to state and local governments isn’t enough to shield vital public services from the coronavirus shock: Lessons from the Great Recession tell us why

Key takeaways

  • The CARES Act is a good first step, but Congress needs to further bolster state and local government aid to curb potential draconian measures to deal with budget fallouts.
  • The Great Recession’s lessons show that aid shortfalls then led to slashed state and local budgets, severely hampering the economic recovery.
  • Subsequent relief and recovery bills should include increased federal Medicaid matching funds, shown to have the greatest bang for the buck as economic stimulus.

The recently passed Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act is an important step in the right direction toward providing economic relief during the coronavirus pandemic, but it contains some serious flaws, including inadequate aid to state and local governments.

The aid is both too stingy and too restrictive, providing insufficient relief to hold state and local budgets harmless against the effects of the crisis and forcing them to jump through bureaucratic hoops even to get this insufficient amount.

The lessons of the Great Recession tell us that this aid shortfall could carry serious economic ramifications.

Unlike the federal government, state and local governments must largely balance their budgets. This means that when revenues fall off a cliff because of lower incomes and spending during this economic crisis, state and local governments will face serious fiscal constraints, often leading to budget cuts that further depress demand in the economy. During the Great Recession, such budget cuts severely hampered the economic recovery.

The economic recovery also taught us what works: additional federal Medicaid matching funds. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009’s enhanced federal Medicaid matching funds helped to alleviate the budget constraints that state and local governments faced. Research has since shown that these increased federal funds stood out as providing some of the greatest bang for the buck as economic stimulus.Read more

Early state unemployment insurance data foreshadow the massive shock the coronavirus is having on state labor markets: The real surge will be seen in next week’s data

The data released yesterday by the Department of Labor showed there was a breathtaking increase in the number of people filing for unemployment insurance (UI) during the week ending in March 21, 2020. Initial UI claims skyrocketed to 3.3 million last week—a nearly 1,500% increase over three weeks ago, when 211,000 initial claims were filed.

The comparable state-level data on UI claims is released one week later than the national data, so the most recent information available at the state-level is for two weeks ago—the week ending March 14. While this does not capture the staggering spike in claims that we saw last week, the early effects of coronavirus are already apparent in many states. Figure A displays the percent change in unemployment insurance claims from the prior week.

UI is a critical tool for ensuring that those who are out of work or have seen their hours reduced are still able to make ends meet. The CARES Act, which Congress is currently debating, would adapt UI to meet the needs of the current crisis by expanding who is eligible (gig workers and the self-employed are usually excluded), giving an additional $600 in weekly benefits, and reducing burdensome waiting period, job search, and earnings requirements. Still, UI is just one of many policy levers that should be used to support workers throughout this crisis. Policymakers in every state should work to ensure that they are protecting public health while reducing economic harm to workers.Read more

Without fast action from Congress, low-wage workers will be ineligible for unemployment benefits during the coronavirus crisis

Key takeaways

  • Without immediate action from Congress, large numbers of low-wage workers won’t be eligible to get unemployment checks.
  • Many workers don’t make enough money to qualify for unemployment because they work low hours or are in low-paying jobs (e.g., fast-food workers or retail clerks).
  • Federal and state legislators can act to protect these most vulnerable workers.
  • The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act—which has passed the Senate by unanimous consent and is moving to the House today—is a good first step to fill the hole low-wage workers fall into during this crisis.
  • The CARES Act expands eligibility to workers who typically have been unable to get unemployment benefits, such as those who are self-employed, are seeking part-time work, or do not have sufficient work history to qualify for unemployment insurance.

About 3 million workers filed unemployment claims last week, and 14 million workers are expected to be out of work by June. Large numbers of those who lose their jobs will be low-wage workers, and unfortunately many will be ineligible for unemployment compensation under current overly restrictive eligibility rules.

Federal and state legislators, however, have the power to act and come to the aid of these vulnerable workers. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act—which has passed the Senate by unanimous consent and is moving to the House today—has notable limitations, but would greatly expand eligibility for unemployment insurance.

The expansion is necessary and important because unemployment benefits are generally limited to those who had high enough earnings when they were working. But low-wage workers experience higher rates of joblessness, lowering their baseline earnings and making them less eligible to collect UI benefits.

Figure A shows that unemployment rates are substantially higher for low-wage workers, defined as those workers who earn less than their state’s 30th percentile wage.

During the Great Recession, nearly one out of five workers who had earned low wages also experienced some unemployment. In contrast, unemployment rates were only about half as high for the rest of the workforce who earned more than their state’s 30th percentile wage. Given the toll on the service industry during the current pandemic, we should expect unemployment to skyrocket for low-wage workers.Read more

The coronavirus pandemic highlights that Americans need more options to vote

The coronavirus outbreak has caused 10 U.S. states and territories to postpone their 2020 primary elections in order to reduce the spread of the virus by protecting voters and poll workers—a majority of whom are age 61 and older and face the greatest risk from the virus. These postponements demonstrate the urgent need for safe, alternative voting methods to safeguard democracy amid a pandemic, especially before November’s general election.

One promising method is a vote-by-mail system. Five states—Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington, and Utah—already conduct their elections through mail. Several voting rights groups have expressed support for a vote-by-mail system for the remaining primaries and the general election. And the U.S. House of Representative’s latest coronavirus response bill proposes a national requirement of 15 days of early voting, no-excuse absentee voting, and mailing ballots to all registered voters during an emergency.

We should also consider a radical change to our voting options: online voting. While online voting may seem farfetched, it has already been successfully implemented in some U.S. elections. For example, earlier this year, the Greater Seattle area held the first election in U.S. history where all voters could cast a ballot by smartphone, while West Virginia has allowed voters living overseas to vote using a mobile app. Given that 81% of Americans own smartphones, studies show that online voting could dramatically increase voter turnout. Imagine the kinds of policies lawmakers could enact, that would represent the views of all Americans, if we had higher voter turnout due to more voting options. Think about how many primaries could continue as scheduled this year if Americans were given all options to vote.

Read more

Despite some good provisions, the CARES Act has glaring flaws and falls short of fully protecting workers during the coronavirus crisis

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act is an important step in the U.S. response to the coronavirus pandemic. It includes provisions for expanded unemployment insurance ($250 billion), aid to small businesses ($350 billion), cash payments to households ($300 billion), aid to states ($150 billion), emergency funding for health care supplies and investments ($100 billion), and money for industry bailouts ($450 billion). The total package will provide more than $2 trillion in funds.

There is much to like in this package, and timely relief is critical. But it also contains many flaws, largely left over from the first proposal forwarded by Senate Republicans. Because many of the weaknesses of this first proposal remain, the package will not be up to the job of fully protecting U.S. workers and their families from the economic consequences of the coronavirus shock, and it will not allow the economy to reboot quickly enough once the public health crisis ends. Further help from policymakers will clearly be needed.

When we estimated that a relief and recovery package needed to be at least $2.1 trillion just through the end of 2020, we noted that this was the number for a package that was well-targeted and would reliably deliver the vast majority of benefits to workers and their families. The CARES Act does not do that. Even though it includes more than $2 trillion in funding, key design failures mean the legislation will not be large enough to provide the necessary economic relief and recovery. The economy will continue to operate significantly below potential through the end of the year, even in optimistic scenarios where the shock caused by social distancing measures is relatively short.

Read more

States are projected to lose more jobs due to the coronavirus: 14 million jobs could be lost by summer

Last week, we published a map showing the job losses in each state likely to occur over the coming months as businesses shutter in response to the social distancing measures necessary to stop the spread of COVID-19. Sadly, our predictions were likely too optimistic. Expectations of how many jobs will ultimately be lost are rapidly evolving, with new forecasts from different macroeconomic analysts being released on an almost daily basis. As new data and projections become available, EPI is updating our estimates of the number of jobs nationally, and by state, that the economy is likely to lose in the coming months.

Our best guess at this point is that the national economy could lose 14 million jobs by summer 2020. These estimates assume $1 trillion in fiscal stimulus—in other words, even with $1 trillion in stimulus, the job losses will be enormous. EPI estimates we will need at least $2.1 trillion in federal stimulus through 2020 to restore the country to reasonable economic health. Congress is debating an economic stimulus package around $2 trillion, and if it is targeted enough, it could help mitigate some of these losses. Yet even with these measures, many people will still need to remain out of work, potentially for months, in order to stop the virus’s spread. In addition to federal action, lawmakers at the state and local levels must do everything they can to ensure that these workers and their families do not suffer economically during this time.

As with our previous post, the map in Figure A shows how the projected 14 million jobs lost nationally are likely to be distributed across the states. The national job losses are distributed in proportion to the average of each state’s share of total national private-sector employment and each state’s share of national retail, leisure, and hospitality employment. We give added weight to these sectors as they are likely to be disproportionately affected by the social distancing measures that are needed to slow this pandemic. States like Nevada, Montana, and Hawaii are projected to lose the highest percentage of their employment because a large amount of their workforce is employed in the leisure, hospitality, and retail sectors.Read more

Southern state policymakers must do more to respond to the coronavirus pandemic: Medicaid expansion, emergency paid sick leave, and dedicated public health resources are especially needed

This piece is the first in a three-part series examining the economic and social conditions that impact health outcomes in Southern states, and how these conditions leave communities underprepared to protect frontline workers and communities during the pandemic.

U.S. federal lawmakers are poised to pass a stimulus package to combat the coronavirus pandemic’s public health and economic damage. In a recent post, we laid out the critical steps that state and local lawmakers should take to protect workers and families, slow the spread of the virus, and mitigate its economic toll. This piece will highlight how state and local policymakers in the Southern states are responding to the crisis, and what more is needed.

Health organizations broadly recognize that where we live and work impacts health risks and health outcomes. By recognizing the economic and social conditions that influence health equity for people living in Southern states, policymakers can provide more targeted solutions to protect public health and support families already struggling to make ends meet.

Read more