Without federal aid, many state and local governments could make the same budget cuts that hampered the last economic recovery
If policymakers should learn one lesson from the long, sluggish recovery from the Great Recession, it is that cutting public spending, particularly by state and local governments, is a recipe for prolonged economic pain. My colleague Josh Bivens has described in detail how the state and local austerity of the early 2010s was both an unprecedented cutback in public spending following a recession and directly to blame for the slow pace of recovery.
Unfortunately, facing massive projected losses in revenue as the coronavirus has forced them to lock down their economies, many state and local governments are already cutting critical services and laying off staff. The April jobs report showed that nearly 981,000 state and local public-sector jobs have already been lost. To put that in perspective, that’s more than all the state and local public-sector jobs lost in the Great Recession and its aftermath.
As shown in Figure A, the peak for state and local government employment occurred in July 2008. As state and local budgets deteriorated throughout that year, governments began cutting services and staff. When the recession officially ended in June 2009, lawmakers in many states were already cutting jobs, choosing to slash budgets rather than pursuing new revenues. These cuts accelerated in 2010 as relief funding from the federal recovery act dried up, and they continued for several years, particularly in many states where conservative lawmakers took control following the 2010 elections. The result was a loss of nearly 800,000 state and local public-sector jobs by July 2013.
April's state and local government job losses were larger than the entirety of cuts in the Great Recession: State and local government employment (in thousands), December 2007–April 2020
State and local actual | |
---|---|
2007-12-01 | 19620 |
2008-01-01 | 19650 |
2008-02-01 | 19670 |
2008-03-01 | 19691 |
2008-04-01 | 19695 |
2008-05-01 | 19726 |
2008-06-01 | 19758 |
2008-07-01 | 19801 |
2008-08-01 | 19801 |
2008-09-01 | 19769 |
2008-10-01 | 19777 |
2008-11-01 | 19782 |
2008-12-01 | 19781 |
2009-01-01 | 19793 |
2009-02-01 | 19781 |
2009-03-01 | 19763 |
2009-04-01 | 19755 |
2009-05-01 | 19757 |
2009-06-01 | 19762 |
2009-07-01 | 19695 |
2009-08-01 | 19712 |
2009-09-01 | 19625 |
2009-10-01 | 19681 |
2009-11-01 | 19691 |
2009-12-01 | 19651 |
2010-01-01 | 19631 |
2010-02-01 | 19604 |
2010-03-01 | 19595 |
2010-04-01 | 19585 |
2010-05-01 | 19580 |
2010-06-01 | 19547 |
2010-07-01 | 19518 |
2010-08-01 | 19475 |
2010-09-01 | 19378 |
2010-10-01 | 19431 |
2010-11-01 | 19421 |
2010-12-01 | 19396 |
2011-01-01 | 19384 |
2011-02-01 | 19339 |
2011-03-01 | 19315 |
2011-04-01 | 19314 |
2011-05-01 | 19258 |
2011-06-01 | 19304 |
2011-07-01 | 19187 |
2011-08-01 | 19167 |
2011-09-01 | 19137 |
2011-10-01 | 19148 |
2011-11-01 | 19129 |
2011-12-01 | 19118 |
2012-01-01 | 19113 |
2012-02-01 | 19119 |
2012-03-01 | 19115 |
2012-04-01 | 19105 |
2012-05-01 | 19088 |
2012-06-01 | 19106 |
2012-07-01 | 19098 |
2012-08-01 | 19096 |
2012-09-01 | 19103 |
2012-10-01 | 19079 |
2012-11-01 | 19074 |
2012-12-01 | 19081 |
2013-01-01 | 19063 |
2013-02-01 | 19075 |
2013-03-01 | 19076 |
2013-04-01 | 19075 |
2013-05-01 | 19089 |
2013-06-01 | 19069 |
2013-07-01 | 19054 |
2013-08-01 | 19077 |
2013-09-01 | 19082 |
2013-10-01 | 19091 |
2013-11-01 | 19097 |
2013-12-01 | 19079 |
2014-01-01 | 19078 |
2014-02-01 | 19094 |
2014-03-01 | 19105 |
2014-04-01 | 19125 |
2014-05-01 | 19104 |
2014-06-01 | 19166 |
2014-07-01 | 19170 |
2014-08-01 | 19120 |
2014-09-01 | 19162 |
2014-10-01 | 19182 |
2014-11-01 | 19192 |
2014-12-01 | 19204 |
2015-01-01 | 19215 |
2015-02-01 | 19231 |
2015-03-01 | 19222 |
2015-04-01 | 19242 |
2015-05-01 | 19259 |
2015-06-01 | 19261 |
2015-07-01 | 19294 |
2015-08-01 | 19300 |
2015-09-01 | 19281 |
2015-10-01 | 19297 |
2015-11-01 | 19315 |
2015-12-01 | 19321 |
2016-01-01 | 19346 |
2016-02-01 | 19366 |
2016-03-01 | 19397 |
2016-04-01 | 19401 |
2016-05-01 | 19405 |
2016-06-01 | 19387 |
2016-07-01 | 19486 |
2016-08-01 | 19465 |
2016-09-01 | 19496 |
2016-10-01 | 19488 |
2016-11-01 | 19491 |
2016-12-01 | 19491 |
2017-01-01 | 19487 |
2017-02-01 | 19506 |
2017-03-01 | 19514 |
2017-04-01 | 19530 |
2017-05-01 | 19524 |
2017-06-01 | 19540 |
2017-07-01 | 19554 |
2017-08-01 | 19555 |
2017-09-01 | 19564 |
2017-10-01 | 19566 |
2017-11-01 | 19601 |
2017-12-01 | 19587 |
2018-01-01 | 19554 |
2018-02-01 | 19613 |
2018-03-01 | 19611 |
2018-04-01 | 19619 |
2018-05-01 | 19639 |
2018-06-01 | 19663 |
2018-07-01 | 19664 |
2018-08-01 | 19689 |
2018-09-01 | 19685 |
2018-10-01 | 19680 |
2018-11-01 | 19675 |
2018-12-01 | 19686 |
2019-01-01 | 19695 |
2019-02-01 | 19699 |
2019-03-01 | 19713 |
2019-04-01 | 19730 |
2019-05-01 | 19725 |
2019-06-01 | 19724 |
2019-07-01 | 19756 |
2019-08-01 | 19780 |
2019-09-01 | 19793 |
2019-10-01 | 19801 |
2019-11-01 | 19809 |
2019-12-01 | 19832 |
2020-01-01 | 19859 |
2020-02-01 | 19878 |
2020-03-01 | 19831 |
2020-04-01 | 18850 |
Note: Shaded area denotes recession.
Source: Current Employment Statistics data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Republicans and corporate interests exploit coronavirus crisis to erase companies’ liability
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Senator John Cornyn (R-Texas) announced that they are working on legislation to give companies enhanced protections against lawsuits by employees and consumers who contract COVID-19 and claim that the business is responsible for their infection. Instead of advancing crucial worker protections and aid to state and local governments, Republicans and corporate advocacy organizations have made “liability shield” legislation the main priority for additional pandemic relief and recovery measures—claiming that it is necessary to remove liability from businesses in order to reopen the economy. To be clear, removing legal accountability from businesses would jeopardize the health and safety of workers and consumers and threaten the overall economic recovery.
In the last several months, there have been many examples of businesses failing to provide workers with the necessary personal protective equipment to enable them to perform their jobs safely and effectively. Further, some workplaces have continued to operate when workers reported infection and have become epicenters of a local outbreak. Eliminating all legal liability for businesses will likely lead to more businesses acting irresponsibly and placing potential profits ahead of worker and consumer safety.
Compounding this problem is the fact that policymakers have gutted federal budgets for worker protection enforcement over the last decade, as shown in Table 1.
More than a quarter of the workforce in 10 states has filed for unemployment
The Department of Labor (DOL) released the most recent unemployment insurance (UI) claims data this morning, showing that another 2.2 million people filed for regular UI benefits last week (not seasonally adjusted) and 1.2 million for Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA), the new program for workers who aren’t eligible for regular UI, such as gig workers.
While most states saw a decline in UI claims filed relative to the prior week, 12 states saw increases in UI claims. Washington saw the largest percent increase in claims (31.0%) compared with the prior week, followed by California (15.7%), New York (13.6%), and North Dakota (10.1%).
A note about the data: Unless otherwise noted, the numbers in this blog post are the ones reported by the U.S. Department of Labor, which they receive from the state agencies that administer UI. While DOL is asking states to report regular UI claims and PUA claims separately, many states are also including some or all PUA claimants in their reported regular UI claims. As state agencies work to get these new programs up and running, there will likely continue to be some misreporting. Since the number of UI claims is one of the most up-to-date measures of labor market weakness and access to benefits, we will still be analyzing it each week as reported by DOL, but we ask that you keep these caveats in mind when interpreting the data.
Figure A and Table 1 below compare regular UI claims filed last week with the prior week and the pre-virus period, in both level and percent terms. It also shows the cumulative number of unemployment claims since March 7 and that number as a share of each state’s labor force. In 10 states, more than a quarter of the workforce filed an initial claim during the past 10 weeks: Georgia (39.2%), Kentucky (38.0%), Hawaii (35.0%), Washington (30.9%), Louisiana (29.9%), Rhode Island (29.7%), Nevada (29.6%), Michigan (29.2%), Pennsylvania (28.4%), and Alaska (27.9%).
Nearly one in four workers has applied for unemployment benefits: Congress must do much, much more
Last week, 3.3 million workers applied for unemployment benefits. That is an improvement over the 6 million per week we saw in late March/early April, but is an increase from the prior week—and is still well over three times the worst week of the Great Recession.
Of the 3.3 million who applied for unemployment benefits last week, 2.2 million applied for regular state unemployment insurance (UI), and 1.2 million applied for Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA). PUA is the new federal program for workers who are not eligible for regular UI (e.g., gig workers) but are still out of work as a result of the virus. At this point, 15 states and the District of Columbia are not yet reporting PUA data, so PUA claims are being undercounted. Note, the number of PUA claims for Massachusetts was misreported as 1,184,792. It should have been 115,952. I have corrected for that error throughout this blog post.
It is also worth noting that the Department of Labor (DOL) reports that 2.4 million workers applied for regular state unemployment insurance last week on a “seasonally adjusted” basis, compared with 2.2 million on an unadjusted basis. Seasonal adjustments are usually helpful—they are used to even out seasonal changes in claims that have nothing to do with the underlying strength or weakness of the labor market, typically providing a clearer picture of underlying trends. However, the way DOL does seasonal adjustments is distortionary at a time like this, so I focus on unadjusted numbers when looking at regular state UI. PUA claims are available only on an unadjusted basis.
The coronavirus recession will become a long depression unless federal policymakers act now
This blog post was originally posted in Newsweek.
The coronavirus recession is well upon us. In the U.S., layoffs related to the coronavirus began to intensify around the middle of March. By mid-April, the labor market had shed more than 20 million jobs, by far the most dramatic job loss on record—about two and a half times the job loss of the entire Great Recession. And the situation continues to deteriorate—an additional 12 million workers have applied for unemployment compensation since mid-April. There has never been anything like this.
The official unemployment rate was 14.7% in mid-April, up from 3.5% in February. And even though that is the highest unemployment rate since the Great Depression, it is not actually reflecting all coronavirus-related job losses. In fact, only about half of people who are out of work as a result of the virus are showing up as unemployed. About a quarter are being misclassified—they have been furloughed and should be counted as unemployed and on temporary layoff, but are instead being counted as “employed but not at work.” Another quarter are being counted as having dropped out of the labor force altogether, rather than unemployed. This is because jobless people who have not been furloughed are only counted as unemployed if they are actively seeking work, which is currently impossible for many. How is a jobless worker supposed to look for work in a lockdown or if he/she needs to care for a child whose school or day care has been shuttered?
If all workers who are out of work as a result of the virus had shown up as unemployed, the unemployment rate would have been 23.5% in mid-April instead of 14.7%. And the situation is going to get worse before it gets better—reasonable forecasts predict that the unemployment rate will average over 30% in May and June. Further, because our health system ties health insurance to work, people aren’t just losing their jobs. We estimate that 16.2 million workers have already lost the health insurance they get directly from their employer since the pandemic began—and these workers often cover family members through their employer-based plan, so the total number of people who have lost health insurance is likely almost twice as high.
Ending offshoring and bringing jobs back home will take more than tweets, press releases, and op-eds
Despite repeated warnings, America’s industrial base has been whittled away by corporations offshoring work to Mexico, China, and other countries. The offshoring of much-needed medical equipment in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic heightens the urgency to bring these supply chains home.
While U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer’s recent op-ed heralding an end to “the era of reflexive offshoring” highlights some positive steps forward by the USTR, much more needs to be done to bring supply chains home. It is not enough to—as the administration has done—set tariff policy by tweet, negotiate trade agreements that do not directly take on outsourcing across manufacturing and service sectors, and hope that corporations finally “see the light” and bring jobs home. Rather, returning jobs to America requires a robust, comprehensive strategy that coordinates policies in trade, currency valuation, investment, financing, energy, technology, tax, education, training, government procurement, and labor.
To start, this strategy would include the following:
- Insist that the Defense Department and other U.S. agencies cease their reflexive support for continued use of outside supply chains in Mexico and elsewhere and instead push for bringing work home.
- Ensure that “Made in the U.S.” in government procurement programs actually means that a product is manufactured by U.S. workers with U.S. supplies and materials.
- Require employment impact statements in government contract and award determinations in order to maximize U.S. job creation.
- Create a U.S. Manufacturing Investment Bank.
- Address currency misalignment.
- Eliminate tax incentives that encourage corporations to outsource production.
Who are essential workers?: A comprehensive look at their wages, demographics, and unionization rates
While the coronavirus pandemic has shut down much of the U.S. economy, with over 33 million workers applying for unemployment insurance since March 15, millions of workers are still on the job providing essential services. Nearly every state governor has issued executive orders that outline industries deemed “essential” during the pandemic, which typically include health care, food service, and public transportation, among others. However, despite being categorized as essential, many workers in these industries are not receiving the most basic health and safety measures to combat the spread of the coronavirus. Essential workers are dying as a result. While the Trump administration has failed to provide essential workers basic protections, working people are taking action. Some are walking off the job in protest over unsafe conditions and demanding personal protective equipment (PPE), and unions are fighting to ensure workers are receiving adequate workplace protections.
What is essential work?
The coronavirus pandemic has revealed much about the nature of work in the U.S. As state executive orders defined “essential services,” attention was focused on the workers performing those services and the conditions under which they work. Using executive orders from California and Maryland as models, we identify below 12 “essential” industries that employ more than 55 million workers, and we detail the demographics, median wages, and union coverage rates for these workers. In doing this, we build on the excellent work by the Center for Economic and Policy Research in their report A Basic Demographic Profile of Workers in Frontline Industries. Key differences are that we use a different data set—the Current Population Survey (CPS) instead of the American Community Survey (ACS), so we could get union breakdowns—and we expand the definition of essential to include occupations found in California and Maryland’s executive orders.
As shown in Table 1, a majority of essential workers by these definitions are employed in health care (30%), food and agriculture (20%), and the industrial, commercial, residential facilities and services industry (12%).
Essential workers by industry, 2019
Total | Percent of industry | |
---|---|---|
All essential workers | 55,217,845 | 100% |
Food and agriculture | 11,398,233 | 20.6% |
Emergency services | 1,849,630 | 3.3% |
Transportation, warehouse, and delivery | 3,972,089 | 7.2% |
Industrial, commercial, residential facilities and services | 6,806,407 | 12.3% |
Health care | 16,679,875 | 30.2% |
Government and community-based services | 4,590,070 | 8.3% |
Communications and IT | 3,189,140 | 5.8% |
Financial sector | 3,070,404 | 5.6% |
Energy sector | 1,327,760 | 2.4% |
Water and wastewater management | 107,846 | 0.2% |
Chemical sector | 271,160 | 0.5% |
Critical manufacturing | 1,955,233 | 3.5% |
Note: Code for the definition of essential services used here is available upon request.
Source: Economic Policy Institute (EPI) analysis of Current Population Survey Outgoing Rotation Group microdata, EPI Current Population Survey Extracts, Version 1.0.2 (2020), https://microdata.epi.org
A prolonged depression is guaranteed without significant federal aid to state and local governments
Congress is currently debating a new relief and recover package—the HEROES Act—that would deliver significant amounts of fiscal aid to state and local governments—more than $1 trillion over the next two years, all told. This is a very welcome proposal. The incredibly steep recession we’re currently in is guaranteed to torpedo state and local governments’ ability to collect revenues. Further, nearly all of these governments are tightly constrained—both by law as well as by genuine economic constraints—from taking on large amounts of debt to maintain spending in the face of this downward shock to their revenues. The result will be intense pressure for large cutbacks in public spending by state and local governments in coming years. Such cutbacks would be absolutely devastating to the cause of restarting the economy and allowing people to find jobs, even if the virus has completely abated.
We know how devastating these cutbacks would be because we have lived through the mistake of allowing them to drag on growth in the quite recent past. State and local governments became relentless anti-stimulus machines during most of the recovery from the Great Recession of 2008–2009. This post highlights a couple of findings from that period that should inform policymakers’ decisions this time around.
- Growth in state and local spending was far slower during the recovery following the Great Recession than in any other post–World War II business cycle on record.
- This state and local spending austerity dragged heavily on growth during that time. If this spending had instead followed the trajectory it established following the recovery from the similarly steep recession of the early 1980s, pre-recession unemployment rates could have been achieved by early 2013 rather than 2017. In short, this austerity delayed recovery by over four years.
- Recent justifications for denying aid to state and local governments sometimes rest on claims that this spending has been profligate in recent years. This is absolutely not so—growth in state and local spending has been historically slow for nearly two decades. Given the importance of what this spending focuses on (education, health care, public order), this decades-long disinvestment should be reversed, not accelerated due to an unforeseen economic crisis.
- If federal aid is passed that is sufficient to close the enormous revenue shortfalls the economic crisis will cause for state and local governments, it will create or save roughly 5–6 million jobs by the end of 2021. Without this aid, we will remain at least that far away from a full economic recovery by then.
Radical far-right CFPB task force threatens consumer protection
This blog post is cross-posted in the American Constitution Society’s Expert Forum Blog.
As unemployment approaches levels last seen during the Great Depression, and requests for mortgage forbearance increase every week, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has proceeded doggedly ahead in undermining consumer protection. The CFPB has suspended enforcement of most of the rules requiring mortgage servicers to help homeowners who have fallen behind in their payments; eased disclosure requirements for remittance transfer providers; and reduced collection and reporting of critical fair lending data. Apparently unsatisfied with rolling back regulatory requirements in the middle of a pandemic-driven economic crisis, the CFPB is also paying hundreds of thousands of dollars to a small “task force” of conservative academics and industry lawyers whose charter is to reconsider every aspect of consumer protection.
Although Congress specifically mandated that the CFPB’s advisory committees follow federal sunshine laws, the CFPB has allowed the task force to meet without notice behind closed doors. The first public glimpse of its plans was a sweeping request for information issued in late March. While the rest of the country was struggling to address the spiraling economic threats posed by COVID-19, the task force asked questions about weakening fair lending laws and deregulating consumer finance markets.
Following the CFPB’s expected repeal of consumer protections on payday loans and encouragement to banks to make their own high-priced, short-term loans, the task force asked about “impediments” to expanding such lending. It questioned whether consumer benefits like privacy and accuracy in credit reporting are worth the cost to industry and suggests that enforcement penalties discourage competition. In the midst of the pandemic, the CFPB task force is giving the public a mere two months to comment on fundamental questions like “the optimal mix of regulation, enforcement, supervision, and consumer financial education,” how best to measure whether or not consumer protection is effective, and which markets should and should not be regulated.
Latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey data further illustrate the catastrophic COVID-19 labor market
This morning, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released the latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) data for March, which further confirms what we already know: The labor market deteriorated quickly through the month of March. As a reminder, JOLTS data are for the whole month (not just mid-month, like the monthly employment numbers). JOLTS shows a net decline of 9.3 million jobs in March, while the monthly employment numbers showed a loss of 870,000. The difference is due to the labor market collapse in the last half of March.
Total separations hit an all-time high of 14.5 million in March. The increase from February of 8.9 million was nearly 13 times faster than any other point in the history of the survey, which dates back to 2000. Separations occurred across nearly all sectors of the economy, but the largest losses were found in leisure and hospitality, other services, retail trade, and education and health services.
The number of layoffs more than account for the increase in the total number of separations. Between February and March, layoffs increased by 9.5 million, hitting 11.4 million in March. In April 2009—the worst month of the Great Recession for layoffs—there were nearly 2.7 million layoffs, or 2% of the workforce. Layoffs in March were more than four times larger than the worst month in the Great Recession.
The layoffs rate—the number of layoffs during the entire month as a percent of total employment—hit 7.5%, more than three times larger than the series high. As with separations, the largest numbers of layoffs occurred in the service sectors. There were nearly 4.9 million layoffs in leisure and hospitality, almost all in accommodation and food services. There were more than 1.1 million layoffs in retail trade and 1.2 million layoffs in education and health services.
Six states saw increases in unemployment claims last week: Many workers who are not usually eligible have filed for unemployment
Correction: This blog post has been updated on 5/15/20 with the correct number of claims for Connecticut. The U.S. Department of Labor’s release on 5/14/20 reported that 298,680 initial claims were filed in Connecticut last week, but Connecticut’s Department of Labor reported that the correct number is 29,846. The total number of initial claims in the U.S. last week, not seasonally adjusted, has also been corrected to 2.3 million to reflect this change.
Another 2.3 million people filed for unemployment insurance (UI) benefits last week (not seasonally adjusted), bringing the total to more than 33 million workers filing for UI benefits in the past eight weeks during the coronavirus pandemic.
While most states saw a decline in UI claims filed relative to the prior week, six states saw increases in UI claims. South Dakota saw the largest percent increase in claims (30.6%) compared with the prior week, followed by Florida (26.9%), Washington (13.7%), Georgia (5.7%), New York (2.7%), and Wisconsin (1.8%).
Georgia had 241,387 initial UI claims last week—more than any other state—followed by Florida (221,905). This comes after several states, including Florida and Georgia, have allowed restaurants and similar businesses to reopen, indicating that state policymakers are risking a greater outbreak with very little of the economic benefits they had expected.
Figure A and Table 1 below compare UI claims filed last week with the prior week and the pre-virus period, in both level and percent terms. It also shows the cumulative number of unemployment claims since March 7 and that number as a share of each state’s labor force. In three states, over a third of the workforce filed an initial claim during the past two months: Georgia (35.8%), Kentucky (35.8%), and Hawaii (33.4%).
What to watch for in tomorrow’s Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey data release: A sharp fall in job openings and hires
On Friday, the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) data for March will be released. Even though we already have more recent data on the labor market from other sources, this survey will provide important new information about how the coronavirus recession is unfolding.
That’s because JOLTS provides information on the moving parts that go into the net change in the number of jobs—job openings, hires, layoffs, voluntary quits, and other separations (which includes worker deaths). With JOLTS, we can get a picture of what is driving the net changes reported in the monthly jobs report.
Further, the JOLTS data that will be released tomorrow cover the entire month of March (as opposed to the monthly employment situation numbers, which only cover through the middle of the reference month). Because the labor market began deteriorating dramatically around mid-March, Friday’s release will provide a good sense of the underlying dynamics of the coronavirus labor market. At the bottom of this post is a text box explaining how the JOLTS data fit into the labor market data landscape.
What do we expect to see? Job openings and hires both have surely dropped dramatically, while layoffs have skyrocketed (note, in the JOLTS data, people who were temporarily laid off or furloughed are counted as layoffs, as long as the furlough is expected to last more than seven days). In April 2009—the worst month of the Great Recession for layoffs—there were nearly 2.7 million layoffs, or 2% of the workforce. In that same month, around 2.5 million people applied for unemployment insurance (UI). In March 2020, more than 10 million people applied for UI, so total layoffs will almost surely be higher than 10 million, which would far exceed the highest value in the series.
16.2 million workers have likely lost employer-provided health insurance since the coronavirus shock began
Since the economic fallout of the coronavirus shock began in early March, the number of workers laid off or furloughed—as measured by new claims for unemployment insurance (UI)—has skyrocketed. We have used data from states that track UI claims by industry to get a rough estimate of how many workers are at high risk of losing their employer-provided health insurance (EPHI) over this as well.
The methodology is described in this blog post, and the underlying UI data (which has begun to include more and more states tracking UI claims by industry) can be found here. Table 1 below shows UI claims by industry across states that collect this data, and also shows employer-provided health insurance (EPHI) coverage rates in those industries in 2018. As of May 9, more than 35 million workers had been laid off or furloughed since mid-March, as measured by total initial UI claims during that period. We find that this translates into likely EPHI losses of 16.2 million.
Because the United States is unique among rich countries in tying health insurance benefits to employment, many of the newly unemployed will suddenly face prohibitively costly insurance options. A comprehensive policy solution would be to extend Medicare and Medicaid to all those suffering job losses during the pandemic period, with the federal government funding this expansion. It has been proposed that the federal government pay for all of COBRA coverage so that workers who are laid off or furloughed may continue their employer-provided coverage. While this policy proposal will help many workers continue coverage, in some states it will not help workers from small businesses with fewer than 20 employees, who are not eligible for COBRA.
In the last eight weeks, more than one in five workers applied for state unemployment insurance benefits: Congress must act
In the last eight weeks, more than 33 million people—more than one in five workers—have applied for unemployment insurance (UI) through regular state UI programs. That is more than five times the worst eight-week stretch of the Great Recession.
Weekly initial state unemployment insurance claims: Not seasonally adjusted, 1967–present
Week ending | Initial claims |
---|---|
1967-01-07 | 346,000 |
1967-01-14 | 334,000 |
1967-01-21 | 277,000 |
1967-01-28 | 252,000 |
1967-02-04 | 274,000 |
1967-02-11 | 276,000 |
1967-02-18 | 247,000 |
1967-02-25 | 248,000 |
1967-03-04 | 326,000 |
1967-03-11 | 240,000 |
1967-03-18 | 225,000 |
1967-03-25 | 215,000 |
1967-04-01 | 223,000 |
1967-04-08 | 251,000 |
1967-04-15 | 289,000 |
1967-04-22 | 218,000 |
1967-04-29 | 216,000 |
1967-05-06 | 221,000 |
1967-05-13 | 188,000 |
1967-05-20 | 177,000 |
1967-05-27 | 170,000 |
1967-06-03 | 175,000 |
1967-06-10 | 188,000 |
1967-06-17 | 176,000 |
1967-06-24 | 178,000 |
1967-07-01 | 206,000 |
1967-07-08 | 322,000 |
1967-07-15 | 309,000 |
1967-07-22 | 282,000 |
1967-07-29 | 243,000 |
1967-08-05 | 250,000 |
1967-08-12 | 193,000 |
1967-08-19 | 174,000 |
1967-08-26 | 160,000 |
1967-09-02 | 163,000 |
1967-09-09 | 156,000 |
1967-09-16 | 165,000 |
1967-09-23 | 155,000 |
1967-09-30 | 154,000 |
1967-10-07 | 195,000 |
1967-10-14 | 159,000 |
1967-10-21 | 181,000 |
1967-10-28 | 174,000 |
1967-11-04 | 204,000 |
1967-11-11 | 201,000 |
1967-11-18 | 209,000 |
1967-11-25 | 200,000 |
1967-12-02 | 228,000 |
1967-12-09 | 258,000 |
1967-12-16 | 241,000 |
1967-12-23 | 289,000 |
1967-12-30 | 332,000 |
1968-01-06 | 357,000 |
1968-01-13 | 373,000 |
1968-01-20 | 293,000 |
1968-01-27 | 242,000 |
1968-02-03 | 308,000 |
1968-02-10 | 257,000 |
1968-02-17 | 214,000 |
1968-02-24 | 199,000 |
1968-03-02 | 198,000 |
1968-03-09 | 208,000 |
1968-03-16 | 179,000 |
1968-03-23 | 175,000 |
1968-03-30 | 165,000 |
1968-04-06 | 184,000 |
1968-04-13 | 167,000 |
1968-04-20 | 165,000 |
1968-04-27 | 216,000 |
1968-05-04 | 180,000 |
1968-05-11 | 164,000 |
1968-05-18 | 156,000 |
1968-05-25 | 148,000 |
1968-06-01 | 139,000 |
1968-06-08 | 149,000 |
1968-06-15 | 154,000 |
1968-06-22 | 152,000 |
1968-06-29 | 173,000 |
1968-07-06 | 266,000 |
1968-07-13 | 242,000 |
1968-07-20 | 216,000 |
1968-07-27 | 238,000 |
1968-08-03 | 235,000 |
1968-08-10 | 222,000 |
1968-08-17 | 160,000 |
1968-08-24 | 148,000 |
1968-08-31 | 139,000 |
1968-09-07 | 135,000 |
1968-09-14 | 141,000 |
1968-09-21 | 142,000 |
1968-09-28 | 143,000 |
1968-10-05 | 153,000 |
1968-10-12 | 151,000 |
1968-10-19 | 151,000 |
1968-10-26 | 152,000 |
1968-11-02 | 161,000 |
1968-11-09 | 174,000 |
1968-11-16 | 196,000 |
1968-11-23 | 211,000 |
1968-11-30 | 180,000 |
1968-12-07 | 223,000 |
1968-12-14 | 233,000 |
1968-12-21 | 243,000 |
1968-12-28 | 333,000 |
1969-01-04 | 290,000 |
1969-01-11 | 337,000 |
1969-01-18 | 265,000 |
1969-01-25 | 236,000 |
1969-02-01 | 250,000 |
1969-02-08 | 248,000 |
1969-02-15 | 219,000 |
1969-02-22 | 199,000 |
1969-03-01 | 206,000 |
1969-03-08 | 195,000 |
1969-03-15 | 179,000 |
1969-03-22 | 158,000 |
1969-03-29 | 157,000 |
1969-04-05 | 170,000 |
1969-04-12 | 187,000 |
1969-04-19 | 168,000 |
1969-04-26 | 151,000 |
1969-05-03 | 150,000 |
1969-05-10 | 157,000 |
1969-05-17 | 141,000 |
1969-05-24 | 138,000 |
1969-05-31 | 135,000 |
1969-06-07 | 148,000 |
1969-06-14 | 145,000 |
1969-06-21 | 155,000 |
1969-06-28 | 177,000 |
1969-07-05 | 267,000 |
1969-07-12 | 271,000 |
1969-07-19 | 246,000 |
1969-07-26 | 221,000 |
1969-08-02 | 223,000 |
1969-08-09 | 210,000 |
1969-08-16 | 168,000 |
1969-08-23 | 154,000 |
1969-08-30 | 144,000 |
1969-09-06 | 133,000 |
1969-09-13 | 149,000 |
1969-09-20 | 147,000 |
1969-09-27 | 147,000 |
1969-10-04 | 159,000 |
1969-10-11 | 168,000 |
1969-10-18 | 155,000 |
1969-10-25 | 171,000 |
1969-11-01 | 174,000 |
1969-11-08 | 206,000 |
1969-11-15 | 196,000 |
1969-11-22 | 230,000 |
1969-11-29 | 219,000 |
1969-12-06 | 247,000 |
1969-12-13 | 264,000 |
1969-12-20 | 289,000 |
1969-12-27 | 320,000 |
1970-01-03 | 344,000 |
1970-01-10 | 429,000 |
1970-01-17 | 386,000 |
1970-01-24 | 316,000 |
1970-01-31 | 293,000 |
1970-02-07 | 324,000 |
1970-02-14 | 308,000 |
1970-02-21 | 285,000 |
1970-02-28 | 241,000 |
1970-03-07 | 270,000 |
1970-03-14 | 258,000 |
1970-03-21 | 233,000 |
1970-03-28 | 236,000 |
1970-04-04 | 250,000 |
1970-04-11 | 300,000 |
1970-04-18 | 339,000 |
1970-04-25 | 299,000 |
1970-05-02 | 278,000 |
1970-05-09 | 279,000 |
1970-05-16 | 242,000 |
1970-05-23 | 231,000 |
1970-05-30 | 224,000 |
1970-06-06 | 234,000 |
1970-06-13 | 242,000 |
1970-06-20 | 245,000 |
1970-06-27 | 247,000 |
1970-07-04 | 309,000 |
1970-07-11 | 369,000 |
1970-07-18 | 353,000 |
1970-07-25 | 329,000 |
1970-08-01 | 293,000 |
1970-08-08 | 278,000 |
1970-08-15 | 257,000 |
1970-08-22 | 238,000 |
1970-08-29 | 220,000 |
1970-09-05 | 240,000 |
1970-09-12 | 207,000 |
1970-09-19 | 247,000 |
1970-09-26 | 256,000 |
1970-10-03 | 284,000 |
1970-10-10 | 287,000 |
1970-10-17 | 259,000 |
1970-10-24 | 280,000 |
1970-10-31 | 283,000 |
1970-11-07 | 333,000 |
1970-11-14 | 307,000 |
1970-11-21 | 333,000 |
1970-11-28 | 354,000 |
1970-12-05 | 378,000 |
1970-12-12 | 370,000 |
1970-12-19 | 354,000 |
1970-12-26 | 451,000 |
1971-01-02 | 443,000 |
1971-01-09 | 500,000 |
1971-01-16 | 452,000 |
1971-01-23 | 399,000 |
1971-01-30 | 353,000 |
1971-02-06 | 375,000 |
1971-02-13 | 333,000 |
1971-02-20 | 286,000 |
1971-02-27 | 289,000 |
1971-03-06 | 306,000 |
1971-03-13 | 275,000 |
1971-03-20 | 260,000 |
1971-03-27 | 261,000 |
1971-04-03 | 267,000 |
1971-04-10 | 278,000 |
1971-04-17 | 257,000 |
1971-04-24 | 248,000 |
1971-05-01 | 237,000 |
1971-05-08 | 260,000 |
1971-05-15 | 230,000 |
1971-05-22 | 231,000 |
1971-05-29 | 231,000 |
1971-06-05 | 232,000 |
1971-06-12 | 244,000 |
1971-06-19 | 249,000 |
1971-06-26 | 247,000 |
1971-07-03 | 288,000 |
1971-07-10 | 335,000 |
1971-07-17 | 367,000 |
1971-07-24 | 342,000 |
1971-07-31 | 340,000 |
1971-08-07 | 362,000 |
1971-08-14 | 282,000 |
1971-08-21 | 252,000 |
1971-08-28 | 228,000 |
1971-09-04 | 268,000 |
1971-09-11 | 219,000 |
1971-09-18 | 230,000 |
1971-09-25 | 236,000 |
1971-10-02 | 238,000 |
1971-10-09 | 280,000 |
1971-10-16 | 233,000 |
1971-10-23 | 251,000 |
1971-10-30 | 241,000 |
1971-11-06 | 297,000 |
1971-11-13 | 289,000 |
1971-11-20 | 291,000 |
1971-11-27 | 284,000 |
1971-12-04 | 372,000 |
1971-12-11 | 348,000 |
1971-12-18 | 329,000 |
1971-12-25 | 340,000 |
1972-01-01 | 405,000 |
1972-01-08 | 479,000 |
1972-01-15 | 395,000 |
1972-01-22 | 347,000 |
1972-01-29 | 326,000 |
1972-02-05 | 342,000 |
1972-02-12 | 318,000 |
1972-02-19 | 279,000 |
1972-02-26 | 252,000 |
1972-03-04 | 263,000 |
1972-03-11 | 257,000 |
1972-03-18 | 241,000 |
1972-03-25 | 231,000 |
1972-04-01 | 224,000 |
1972-04-08 | 271,000 |
1972-04-15 | 237,000 |
1972-04-22 | 223,000 |
1972-04-29 | 214,000 |
1972-05-06 | 234,000 |
1972-05-13 | 218,000 |
1972-05-20 | 210,000 |
1972-05-27 | 209,000 |
1972-06-03 | 198,000 |
1972-06-10 | 224,000 |
1972-06-17 | 227,000 |
1972-06-24 | 240,000 |
1972-07-01 | 327,000 |
1972-07-08 | 364,000 |
1972-07-15 | 367,000 |
1972-07-22 | 299,000 |
1972-07-29 | 266,000 |
1972-08-05 | 256,000 |
1972-08-12 | 220,000 |
1972-08-19 | 203,000 |
1972-08-26 | 195,000 |
1972-09-02 | 192,000 |
1972-09-09 | 178,000 |
1972-09-16 | 196,000 |
1972-09-23 | 193,000 |
1972-09-30 | 192,000 |
1972-10-07 | 233,000 |
1972-10-14 | 202,000 |
1972-10-21 | 214,000 |
1972-10-28 | 196,000 |
1972-11-04 | 242,000 |
1972-11-11 | 236,000 |
1972-11-18 | 280,000 |
1972-11-25 | 238,000 |
1972-12-02 | 268,000 |
1972-12-09 | 317,000 |
1972-12-16 | 323,000 |
1972-12-23 | 327,000 |
1972-12-30 | 338,000 |
1973-01-06 | 345,000 |
1973-01-13 | 412,000 |
1973-01-20 | 324,000 |
1973-01-27 | 267,000 |
1973-02-03 | 285,000 |
1973-02-10 | 276,000 |
1973-02-17 | 242,000 |
1973-02-24 | 220,000 |
1973-03-03 | 233,000 |
1973-03-10 | 227,000 |
1973-03-17 | 212,000 |
1973-03-24 | 209,000 |
1973-03-31 | 193,000 |
1973-04-07 | 244,000 |
1973-04-14 | 212,000 |
1973-04-21 | 211,000 |
1973-04-28 | 194,000 |
1973-05-05 | 214,000 |
1973-05-12 | 198,000 |
1973-05-19 | 189,000 |
1973-05-26 | 190,000 |
1973-06-02 | 173,000 |
1973-06-09 | 210,000 |
1973-06-16 | 198,000 |
1973-06-23 | 206,000 |
1973-06-30 | 215,000 |
1973-07-07 | 309,000 |
1973-07-14 | 270,000 |
1973-07-21 | 259,000 |
1973-07-28 | 265,000 |
1973-08-04 | 262,000 |
1973-08-11 | 238,000 |
1973-08-18 | 207,000 |
1973-08-25 | 190,000 |
1973-09-01 | 180,000 |
1973-09-08 | 177,000 |
1973-09-15 | 186,000 |
1973-09-22 | 187,000 |
1973-09-29 | 191,000 |
1973-10-06 | 210,000 |
1973-10-13 | 207,000 |
1973-10-20 | 208,000 |
1973-10-27 | 200,000 |
1973-11-03 | 230,000 |
1973-11-10 | 277,000 |
1973-11-17 | 261,000 |
1973-11-24 | 237,000 |
1973-12-01 | 299,000 |
1973-12-08 | 345,000 |
1973-12-15 | 340,000 |
1973-12-22 | 429,000 |
1973-12-29 | 461,000 |
1974-01-05 | 405,000 |
1974-01-12 | 584,000 |
1974-01-19 | 465,000 |
1974-01-26 | 373,000 |
1974-02-02 | 381,000 |
1974-02-09 | 459,000 |
1974-02-16 | 352,000 |
1974-02-23 | 296,000 |
1974-03-02 | 313,000 |
1974-03-09 | 310,000 |
1974-03-16 | 293,000 |
1974-03-23 | 285,000 |
1974-03-30 | 279,000 |
1974-04-06 | 288,000 |
1974-04-13 | 278,000 |
1974-04-20 | 256,000 |
1974-04-27 | 235,000 |
1974-05-04 | 243,000 |
1974-05-11 | 249,000 |
1974-05-18 | 238,000 |
1974-05-25 | 246,000 |
1974-06-01 | 209,000 |
1974-06-08 | 267,000 |
1974-06-15 | 255,000 |
1974-06-22 | 266,000 |
1974-06-29 | 285,000 |
1974-07-06 | 350,000 |
1974-07-13 | 351,000 |
1974-07-20 | 325,000 |
1974-07-27 | 333,000 |
1974-08-03 | 340,000 |
1974-08-10 | 318,000 |
1974-08-17 | 269,000 |
1974-08-24 | 260,000 |
1974-08-31 | 259,000 |
1974-09-07 | 253,000 |
1974-09-14 | 271,000 |
1974-09-21 | 283,000 |
1974-09-28 | 279,000 |
1974-10-05 | 325,000 |
1974-10-12 | 358,000 |
1974-10-19 | 324,000 |
1974-10-26 | 357,000 |
1974-11-02 | 375,000 |
1974-11-09 | 435,000 |
1974-11-16 | 450,000 |
1974-11-23 | 532,000 |
1974-11-30 | 524,000 |
1974-12-07 | 693,000 |
1974-12-14 | 637,000 |
1974-12-21 | 677,000 |
1974-12-28 | 813,000 |
1975-01-04 | 681,000 |
1975-01-11 | 969,000 |
1975-01-18 | 850,000 |
1975-01-25 | 729,000 |
1975-02-01 | 699,000 |
1975-02-08 | 691,000 |
1975-02-15 | 608,000 |
1975-02-22 | 567,000 |
1975-03-01 | 568,000 |
1975-03-08 | 569,000 |
1975-03-15 | 494,000 |
1975-03-22 | 499,000 |
1975-03-29 | 477,000 |
1975-04-05 | 505,000 |
1975-04-12 | 496,000 |
1975-04-19 | 456,000 |
1975-04-26 | 429,000 |
1975-05-03 | 420,000 |
1975-05-10 | 432,000 |
1975-05-17 | 410,000 |
1975-05-24 | 391,000 |
1975-05-31 | 360,000 |
1975-06-07 | 443,000 |
1975-06-14 | 422,000 |
1975-06-21 | 428,000 |
1975-06-28 | 407,000 |
1975-07-05 | 460,000 |
1975-07-12 | 517,000 |
1975-07-19 | 481,000 |
1975-07-26 | 471,000 |
1975-08-02 | 462,000 |
1975-08-09 | 429,000 |
1975-08-16 | 367,000 |
1975-08-23 | 353,000 |
1975-08-30 | 332,000 |
1975-09-06 | 331,000 |
1975-09-13 | 341,000 |
1975-09-20 | 336,000 |
1975-09-27 | 342,000 |
1975-10-04 | 365,000 |
1975-10-11 | 385,000 |
1975-10-18 | 332,000 |
1975-10-25 | 372,000 |
1975-11-01 | 378,000 |
1975-11-08 | 414,000 |
1975-11-15 | 371,000 |
1975-11-22 | 419,000 |
1975-11-29 | 403,000 |
1975-12-06 | 487,000 |
1975-12-13 | 456,000 |
1975-12-20 | 463,000 |
1975-12-27 | 573,000 |
1976-01-03 | 540,000 |
1976-01-10 | 708,000 |
1976-01-17 | 563,000 |
1976-01-24 | 486,000 |
1976-01-31 | 450,000 |
1976-02-07 | 452,000 |
1976-02-14 | 391,000 |
1976-02-21 | 367,000 |
1976-02-28 | 353,000 |
1976-03-06 | 366,000 |
1976-03-13 | 343,000 |
1976-03-20 | 330,000 |
1976-03-27 | 314,000 |
1976-04-03 | 334,000 |
1976-04-10 | 366,000 |
1976-04-17 | 316,000 |
1976-04-24 | 311,000 |
1976-05-01 | 313,000 |
1976-05-08 | 345,000 |
1976-05-15 | 308,000 |
1976-05-22 | 311,000 |
1976-05-29 | 310,000 |
1976-06-05 | 307,000 |
1976-06-12 | 351,000 |
1976-06-19 | 342,000 |
1976-06-26 | 339,000 |
1976-07-03 | 401,000 |
1976-07-10 | 445,000 |
1976-07-17 | 455,000 |
1976-07-24 | 418,000 |
1976-07-31 | 401,000 |
1976-08-07 | 373,000 |
1976-08-14 | 329,000 |
1976-08-21 | 320,000 |
1976-08-28 | 301,000 |
1976-09-04 | 321,000 |
1976-09-11 | 280,000 |
1976-09-18 | 320,000 |
1976-09-25 | 327,000 |
1976-10-02 | 332,000 |
1976-10-09 | 388,000 |
1976-10-16 | 325,000 |
1976-10-23 | 361,000 |
1976-10-30 | 370,000 |
1976-11-06 | 387,000 |
1976-11-13 | 363,000 |
1976-11-20 | 430,000 |
1976-11-27 | 369,000 |
1976-12-04 | 500,000 |
1976-12-11 | 494,000 |
1976-12-18 | 434,000 |
1976-12-25 | 466,000 |
1977-01-01 | 558,000 |
1977-01-08 | 685,000 |
1977-01-15 | 597,000 |
1977-01-22 | 589,000 |
1977-01-29 | 518,000 |
1977-02-05 | 704,000 |
1977-02-12 | 552,000 |
1977-02-19 | 422,000 |
1977-02-26 | 360,000 |
1977-03-05 | 367,000 |
1977-03-12 | 335,000 |
1977-03-19 | 321,000 |
1977-03-26 | 298,000 |
1977-04-02 | 296,000 |
1977-04-09 | 367,000 |
1977-04-16 | 316,000 |
1977-04-23 | 314,000 |
1977-04-30 | 305,000 |
1977-05-07 | 333,000 |
1977-05-14 | 309,000 |
1977-05-21 | 293,000 |
1977-05-28 | 298,000 |
1977-06-04 | 283,000 |
1977-06-11 | 308,000 |
1977-06-18 | 310,000 |
1977-06-25 | 321,000 |
1977-07-02 | 348,000 |
1977-07-09 | 431,000 |
1977-07-16 | 424,000 |
1977-07-23 | 391,000 |
1977-07-30 | 380,000 |
1977-08-06 | 379,000 |
1977-08-13 | 319,000 |
1977-08-20 | 298,000 |
1977-08-27 | 282,000 |
1977-09-03 | 289,000 |
1977-09-10 | 260,000 |
1977-09-17 | 289,000 |
1977-09-24 | 293,000 |
1977-10-01 | 275,000 |
1977-10-08 | 345,000 |
1977-10-15 | 287,000 |
1977-10-22 | 322,000 |
1977-10-29 | 309,000 |
1977-11-05 | 352,000 |
1977-11-12 | 310,000 |
1977-11-19 | 367,000 |
1977-11-26 | 342,000 |
1977-12-03 | 430,000 |
1977-12-10 | 448,000 |
1977-12-17 | 412,000 |
1977-12-24 | 450,000 |
1977-12-31 | 535,000 |
1978-01-07 | 559,000 |
1978-01-14 | 579,000 |
1978-01-21 | 500,000 |
1978-01-28 | 445,000 |
1978-02-04 | 447,000 |
1978-02-11 | 438,000 |
1978-02-18 | 455,000 |
1978-02-25 | 372,000 |
1978-03-04 | 360,000 |
1978-03-11 | 342,000 |
1978-03-18 | 302,000 |
1978-03-25 | 280,000 |
1978-04-01 | 278,000 |
1978-04-08 | 338,000 |
1978-04-15 | 279,000 |
1978-04-22 | 277,000 |
1978-04-29 | 269,000 |
1978-05-06 | 291,000 |
1978-05-13 | 268,000 |
1978-05-20 | 266,000 |
1978-05-27 | 256,000 |
1978-06-03 | 242,000 |
1978-06-10 | 292,000 |
1978-06-17 | 287,000 |
1978-06-24 | 297,000 |
1978-07-01 | 347,000 |
1978-07-08 | 428,000 |
1978-07-15 | 421,000 |
1978-07-22 | 387,000 |
1978-07-29 | 371,000 |
1978-08-05 | 376,000 |
1978-08-12 | 326,000 |
1978-08-19 | 287,000 |
1978-08-26 | 264,000 |
1978-09-02 | 249,000 |
1978-09-09 | 246,000 |
1978-09-16 | 262,000 |
1978-09-23 | 254,000 |
1978-09-30 | 249,000 |
1978-10-07 | 323,000 |
1978-10-14 | 262,000 |
1978-10-21 | 287,000 |
1978-10-28 | 280,000 |
1978-11-04 | 302,000 |
1978-11-11 | 286,000 |
1978-11-18 | 345,000 |
1978-11-25 | 350,000 |
1978-12-02 | 427,000 |
1978-12-09 | 427,000 |
1978-12-16 | 390,000 |
1978-12-23 | 447,000 |
1978-12-30 | 515,000 |
1979-01-06 | 559,000 |
1979-01-13 | 680,000 |
1979-01-20 | 488,000 |
1979-01-27 | 423,000 |
1979-02-03 | 424,000 |
1979-02-10 | 418,000 |
1979-02-17 | 384,000 |
1979-02-24 | 364,000 |
1979-03-03 | 358,000 |
1979-03-10 | 346,000 |
1979-03-17 | 315,000 |
1979-03-24 | 296,000 |
1979-03-31 | 300,000 |
1979-04-07 | 449,000 |
1979-04-14 | 424,000 |
1979-04-21 | 340,000 |
1979-04-28 | 303,000 |
1979-05-05 | 307,000 |
1979-05-12 | 290,000 |
1979-05-19 | 280,000 |
1979-05-26 | 287,000 |
1979-06-02 | 262,000 |
1979-06-09 | 322,000 |
1979-06-16 | 312,000 |
1979-06-23 | 343,000 |
1979-06-30 | 366,000 |
1979-07-07 | 458,000 |
1979-07-14 | 446,000 |
1979-07-21 | 445,000 |
1979-07-28 | 417,000 |
1979-08-04 | 428,000 |
1979-08-11 | 360,000 |
1979-08-18 | 329,000 |
1979-08-25 | 313,000 |
1979-09-01 | 312,000 |
1979-09-08 | 285,000 |
1979-09-15 | 311,000 |
1979-09-22 | 309,000 |
1979-09-29 | 303,000 |
1979-10-06 | 379,000 |
1979-10-13 | 335,000 |
1979-10-20 | 342,000 |
1979-10-27 | 353,000 |
1979-11-03 | 372,000 |
1979-11-10 | 392,000 |
1979-11-17 | 401,000 |
1979-11-24 | 379,000 |
1979-12-01 | 513,000 |
1979-12-08 | 521,000 |
1979-12-15 | 455,000 |
1979-12-22 | 580,000 |
1979-12-29 | 596,000 |
1980-01-05 | 574,000 |
1980-01-12 | 804,000 |
1980-01-19 | 648,000 |
1980-01-26 | 515,000 |
1980-02-02 | 471,000 |
1980-02-09 | 493,000 |
1980-02-16 | 418,000 |
1980-02-23 | 415,000 |
1980-03-01 | 407,000 |
1980-03-08 | 413,000 |
1980-03-15 | 398,000 |
1980-03-22 | 392,000 |
1980-03-29 | 399,000 |
1980-04-05 | 451,000 |
1980-04-12 | 535,000 |
1980-04-19 | 495,000 |
1980-04-26 | 482,000 |
1980-05-03 | 491,000 |
1980-05-10 | 526,000 |
1980-05-17 | 539,000 |
1980-05-24 | 525,000 |
1980-05-31 | 477,000 |
1980-06-07 | 562,000 |
1980-06-14 | 511,000 |
1980-06-21 | 529,000 |
1980-06-28 | 563,000 |
1980-07-05 | 584,000 |
1980-07-12 | 643,000 |
1980-07-19 | 628,000 |
1980-07-26 | 569,000 |
1980-08-02 | 536,000 |
1980-08-09 | 494,000 |
1980-08-16 | 435,000 |
1980-08-23 | 410,000 |
1980-08-30 | 397,000 |
1980-09-06 | 374,000 |
1980-09-13 | 414,000 |
1980-09-20 | 381,000 |
1980-09-27 | 363,000 |
1980-10-04 | 410,000 |
1980-10-11 | 417,000 |
1980-10-18 | 355,000 |
1980-10-25 | 384,000 |
1980-11-01 | 395,000 |
1980-11-08 | 416,000 |
1980-11-15 | 403,000 |
1980-11-22 | 440,000 |
1980-11-29 | 407,000 |
1980-12-06 | 534,000 |
1980-12-13 | 481,000 |
1980-12-20 | 499,000 |
1980-12-27 | 546,000 |
1981-01-03 | 580,000 |
1981-01-10 | 839,000 |
1981-01-17 | 638,000 |
1981-01-24 | 521,000 |
1981-01-31 | 490,000 |
1981-02-07 | 500,000 |
1981-02-14 | 439,000 |
1981-02-21 | 430,000 |
1981-02-28 | 432,000 |
1981-03-07 | 414,000 |
1981-03-14 | 385,000 |
1981-03-21 | 365,000 |
1981-03-28 | 356,000 |
1981-04-04 | 383,000 |
1981-04-11 | 401,000 |
1981-04-18 | 350,000 |
1981-04-25 | 379,000 |
1981-05-02 | 342,000 |
1981-05-09 | 369,000 |
1981-05-16 | 340,000 |
1981-05-23 | 342,000 |
1981-05-30 | 301,000 |
1981-06-06 | 384,000 |
1981-06-13 | 367,000 |
1981-06-20 | 376,000 |
1981-06-27 | 387,000 |
1981-07-04 | 430,000 |
1981-07-11 | 516,000 |
1981-07-18 | 481,000 |
1981-07-25 | 429,000 |
1981-08-01 | 444,000 |
1981-08-08 | 419,000 |
1981-08-15 | 369,000 |
1981-08-22 | 351,000 |
1981-08-29 | 352,000 |
1981-09-05 | 396,000 |
1981-09-12 | 331,000 |
1981-09-19 | 392,000 |
1981-09-26 | 392,000 |
1981-10-03 | 416,000 |
1981-10-10 | 476,000 |
1981-10-17 | 408,000 |
1981-10-24 | 450,000 |
1981-10-31 | 479,000 |
1981-11-07 | 534,000 |
1981-11-14 | 483,000 |
1981-11-21 | 522,000 |
1981-11-28 | 535,000 |
1981-12-05 | 726,000 |
1981-12-12 | 657,000 |
1981-12-19 | 644,000 |
1981-12-26 | 702,000 |
1982-01-02 | 694,300 |
1982-01-09 | 1,073,500 |
1982-01-16 | 761,700 |
1982-01-23 | 771,200 |
1982-01-30 | 692,300 |
1982-02-06 | 671,000 |
1982-02-13 | 532,800 |
1982-02-20 | 522,900 |
1982-02-27 | 536,300 |
1982-03-06 | 566,300 |
1982-03-13 | 515,100 |
1982-03-20 | 510,500 |
1982-03-27 | 501,500 |
1982-04-03 | 516,600 |
1982-04-10 | 606,300 |
1982-04-17 | 540,300 |
1982-04-24 | 518,600 |
1982-05-01 | 475,600 |
1982-05-08 | 516,500 |
1982-05-15 | 486,500 |
1982-05-22 | 486,300 |
1982-05-29 | 485,800 |
1982-06-05 | 478,600 |
1982-06-12 | 541,600 |
1982-06-19 | 508,100 |
1982-06-26 | 507,700 |
1982-07-03 | 594,400 |
1982-07-10 | 631,400 |
1982-07-17 | 647,000 |
1982-07-24 | 576,100 |
1982-07-31 | 562,600 |
1982-08-07 | 569,200 |
1982-08-14 | 536,400 |
1982-08-21 | 510,400 |
1982-08-28 | 502,300 |
1982-09-04 | 537,600 |
1982-09-11 | 467,700 |
1982-09-18 | 559,500 |
1982-09-25 | 535,000 |
1982-10-02 | 565,600 |
1982-10-09 | 638,100 |
1982-10-16 | 540,300 |
1982-10-23 | 577,600 |
1982-10-30 | 576,800 |
1982-11-06 | 604,800 |
1982-11-13 | 546,700 |
1982-11-20 | 650,400 |
1982-11-27 | 574,100 |
1982-12-04 | 709,400 |
1982-12-11 | 638,200 |
1982-12-18 | 598,000 |
1982-12-25 | 653,600 |
1983-01-01 | 745,100 |
1983-01-08 | 976,600 |
1983-01-15 | 773,600 |
1983-01-22 | 650,600 |
1983-01-29 | 597,700 |
1983-02-05 | 594,200 |
1983-02-12 | 525,100 |
1983-02-19 | 506,300 |
1983-02-26 | 448,700 |
1983-03-05 | 497,400 |
1983-03-12 | 459,700 |
1983-03-19 | 427,500 |
1983-03-26 | 422,100 |
1983-04-02 | 423,000 |
1983-04-09 | 509,700 |
1983-04-16 | 464,800 |
1983-04-23 | 431,300 |
1983-04-30 | 399,900 |
1983-05-07 | 435,000 |
1983-05-14 | 385,200 |
1983-05-21 | 380,300 |
1983-05-28 | 373,000 |
1983-06-04 | 351,100 |
1983-06-11 | 390,100 |
1983-06-18 | 369,200 |
1983-06-25 | 383,500 |
1983-07-02 | 397,400 |
1983-07-09 | 451,900 |
1983-07-16 | 459,400 |
1983-07-23 | 428,300 |
1983-07-30 | 383,400 |
1983-08-06 | 382,500 |
1983-08-13 | 382,300 |
1983-08-20 | 356,900 |
1983-08-27 | 323,600 |
1983-09-03 | 328,800 |
1983-09-10 | 288,700 |
1983-09-17 | 326,900 |
1983-09-24 | 324,700 |
1983-10-01 | 318,500 |
1983-10-08 | 390,500 |
1983-10-15 | 319,900 |
1983-10-22 | 354,900 |
1983-10-29 | 356,400 |
1983-11-05 | 398,200 |
1983-11-12 | 347,300 |
1983-11-19 | 431,900 |
1983-11-26 | 362,900 |
1983-12-03 | 458,400 |
1983-12-10 | 442,900 |
1983-12-17 | 414,600 |
1983-12-24 | 496,800 |
1983-12-31 | 558,900 |
1984-01-07 | 621,600 |
1984-01-14 | 637,900 |
1984-01-21 | 475,100 |
1984-01-28 | 448,500 |
1984-02-04 | 408,400 |
1984-02-11 | 381,500 |
1984-02-18 | 349,300 |
1984-02-25 | 329,100 |
1984-03-03 | 350,500 |
1984-03-10 | 344,000 |
1984-03-17 | 323,500 |
1984-03-24 | 317,600 |
1984-03-31 | 291,400 |
1984-04-07 | 390,300 |
1984-04-14 | 330,800 |
1984-04-21 | 326,500 |
1984-04-28 | 309,300 |
1984-05-05 | 318,900 |
1984-05-12 | 312,100 |
1984-05-19 | 294,200 |
1984-05-26 | 292,700 |
1984-06-02 | 268,700 |
1984-06-09 | 333,800 |
1984-06-16 | 309,900 |
1984-06-23 | 316,800 |
1984-06-30 | 329,000 |
1984-07-07 | 432,500 |
1984-07-14 | 435,900 |
1984-07-21 | 396,200 |
1984-07-28 | 343,800 |
1984-08-04 | 348,100 |
1984-08-11 | 328,100 |
1984-08-18 | 321,000 |
1984-08-25 | 303,300 |
1984-09-01 | 303,500 |
1984-09-08 | 289,300 |
1984-09-15 | 320,700 |
1984-09-22 | 313,200 |
1984-09-29 | 304,700 |
1984-10-06 | 373,300 |
1984-10-13 | 353,200 |
1984-10-20 | 378,700 |
1984-10-27 | 380,500 |
1984-11-03 | 413,400 |
1984-11-10 | 397,500 |
1984-11-17 | 370,800 |
1984-11-24 | 387,000 |
1984-12-01 | 494,700 |
1984-12-08 | 477,900 |
1984-12-15 | 443,700 |
1984-12-22 | 482,300 |
1984-12-29 | 527,500 |
1985-01-05 | 568,300 |
1985-01-12 | 770,000 |
1985-01-19 | 537,700 |
1985-01-26 | 478,300 |
1985-02-02 | 452,400 |
1985-02-09 | 473,300 |
1985-02-16 | 404,700 |
1985-02-23 | 379,000 |
1985-03-02 | 377,300 |
1985-03-09 | 389,200 |
1985-03-16 | 360,500 |
1985-03-23 | 346,700 |
1985-03-30 | 329,100 |
1985-04-06 | 398,000 |
1985-04-13 | 397,500 |
1985-04-20 | 351,800 |
1985-04-27 | 324,700 |
1985-05-04 | 335,600 |
1985-05-11 | 339,100 |
1985-05-18 | 324,900 |
1985-05-25 | 328,500 |
1985-06-01 | 293,500 |
1985-06-08 | 368,900 |
1985-06-15 | 339,200 |
1985-06-22 | 339,500 |
1985-06-29 | 349,800 |
1985-07-06 | 409,500 |
1985-07-13 | 481,500 |
1985-07-20 | 413,700 |
1985-07-27 | 358,700 |
1985-08-03 | 365,800 |
1985-08-10 | 358,200 |
1985-08-17 | 319,400 |
1985-08-24 | 314,800 |
1985-08-31 | 317,600 |
1985-09-07 | 304,700 |
1985-09-14 | 332,900 |
1985-09-21 | 317,600 |
1985-09-28 | 301,600 |
1985-10-05 | 355,600 |
1985-10-12 | 358,000 |
1985-10-19 | 331,000 |
1985-10-26 | 375,700 |
1985-11-02 | 375,300 |
1985-11-09 | 404,100 |
1985-11-16 | 380,300 |
1985-11-23 | 423,100 |
1985-11-30 | 384,700 |
1985-12-07 | 504,200 |
1985-12-14 | 443,400 |
1985-12-21 | 458,200 |
1985-12-28 | 548,200 |
1986-01-04 | 547,500 |
1986-01-11 | 803,900 |
1986-01-18 | 568,800 |
1986-01-25 | 395,700 |
1986-02-01 | 425,400 |
1986-02-08 | 438,100 |
1986-02-15 | 374,200 |
1986-02-22 | 382,200 |
1986-03-01 | 381,200 |
1986-03-08 | 371,700 |
1986-03-15 | 361,600 |
1986-03-22 | 363,100 |
1986-03-29 | 333,300 |
1986-04-05 | 366,100 |
1986-04-12 | 386,100 |
1986-04-19 | 348,700 |
1986-04-26 | 335,100 |
1986-05-03 | 333,600 |
1986-05-10 | 343,800 |
1986-05-17 | 319,000 |
1986-05-24 | 321,700 |
1986-05-31 | 278,700 |
1986-06-07 | 342,200 |
1986-06-14 | 324,700 |
1986-06-21 | 327,400 |
1986-06-28 | 336,100 |
1986-07-05 | 377,400 |
1986-07-12 | 456,200 |
1986-07-19 | 402,400 |
1986-07-26 | 370,700 |
1986-08-02 | 370,900 |
1986-08-09 | 376,900 |
1986-08-16 | 326,000 |
1986-08-23 | 310,200 |
1986-08-30 | 307,100 |
1986-09-06 | 283,700 |
1986-09-13 | 320,800 |
1986-09-20 | 315,800 |
1986-09-27 | 294,200 |
1986-10-04 | 328,900 |
1986-10-11 | 357,700 |
1986-10-18 | 313,000 |
1986-10-25 | 332,400 |
1986-11-01 | 334,100 |
1986-11-08 | 357,600 |
1986-11-15 | 347,400 |
1986-11-22 | 410,600 |
1986-11-29 | 350,900 |
1986-12-06 | 462,700 |
1986-12-13 | 438,600 |
1986-12-20 | 423,800 |
1986-12-27 | 483,900 |
1987-01-03 | 483,977 |
1987-01-10 | 710,493 |
1987-01-17 | 545,768 |
1987-01-24 | 412,977 |
1987-01-31 | 435,743 |
1987-02-07 | 444,240 |
1987-02-14 | 359,219 |
1987-02-21 | 332,930 |
1987-02-28 | 355,357 |
1987-03-07 | 343,065 |
1987-03-14 | 321,153 |
1987-03-21 | 313,104 |
1987-03-28 | 288,648 |
1987-04-04 | 308,940 |
1987-04-11 | 344,364 |
1987-04-18 | 305,201 |
1987-04-25 | 285,566 |
1987-05-02 | 277,726 |
1987-05-09 | 276,773 |
1987-05-16 | 283,832 |
1987-05-23 | 286,150 |
1987-05-30 | 242,793 |
1987-06-06 | 299,672 |
1987-06-13 | 281,043 |
1987-06-20 | 285,191 |
1987-06-27 | 294,288 |
1987-07-04 | 321,855 |
1987-07-11 | 402,706 |
1987-07-18 | 361,491 |
1987-07-25 | 339,756 |
1987-08-01 | 309,433 |
1987-08-08 | 296,403 |
1987-08-15 | 256,647 |
1987-08-22 | 245,058 |
1987-08-29 | 243,829 |
1987-09-05 | 255,589 |
1987-09-12 | 210,375 |
1987-09-19 | 243,651 |
1987-09-26 | 242,206 |
1987-10-03 | 244,736 |
1987-10-10 | 291,075 |
1987-10-17 | 242,157 |
1987-10-24 | 271,190 |
1987-10-31 | 261,036 |
1987-11-07 | 306,340 |
1987-11-14 | 286,334 |
1987-11-21 | 354,037 |
1987-11-28 | 288,614 |
1987-12-05 | 412,297 |
1987-12-12 | 372,869 |
1987-12-19 | 384,763 |
1987-12-26 | 397,287 |
1988-01-02 | 465,503 |
1988-01-09 | 654,620 |
1988-01-16 | 577,975 |
1988-01-23 | 412,685 |
1988-01-30 | 394,776 |
1988-02-06 | 380,906 |
1988-02-13 | 334,833 |
1988-02-20 | 315,497 |
1988-02-27 | 324,517 |
1988-03-05 | 312,409 |
1988-03-12 | 294,321 |
1988-03-19 | 275,545 |
1988-03-26 | 269,000 |
1988-04-02 | 256,607 |
1988-04-09 | 319,713 |
1988-04-16 | 273,160 |
1988-04-23 | 272,440 |
1988-04-30 | 247,619 |
1988-05-07 | 267,315 |
1988-05-14 | 257,101 |
1988-05-21 | 259,640 |
1988-05-28 | 255,852 |
1988-06-04 | 235,308 |
1988-06-11 | 268,052 |
1988-06-18 | 264,100 |
1988-06-25 | 268,770 |
1988-07-02 | 290,079 |
1988-07-09 | 335,780 |
1988-07-16 | 377,872 |
1988-07-23 | 384,920 |
1988-07-30 | 311,475 |
1988-08-06 | 293,718 |
1988-08-13 | 261,066 |
1988-08-20 | 253,359 |
1988-08-27 | 241,809 |
1988-09-03 | 243,944 |
1988-09-10 | 220,226 |
1988-09-17 | 247,250 |
1988-09-24 | 236,230 |
1988-10-01 | 226,453 |
1988-10-08 | 276,732 |
1988-10-15 | 237,722 |
1988-10-22 | 264,201 |
1988-10-29 | 265,794 |
1988-11-05 | 293,412 |
1988-11-12 | 257,201 |
1988-11-19 | 335,818 |
1988-11-26 | 281,841 |
1988-12-03 | 391,406 |
1988-12-10 | 354,028 |
1988-12-17 | 354,768 |
1988-12-24 | 413,175 |
1988-12-31 | 474,226 |
1989-01-07 | 544,138 |
1989-01-14 | 519,727 |
1989-01-21 | 364,499 |
1989-01-28 | 361,331 |
1989-02-04 | 340,647 |
1989-02-11 | 365,301 |
1989-02-18 | 317,676 |
1989-02-25 | 288,690 |
1989-03-04 | 333,669 |
1989-03-11 | 325,019 |
1989-03-18 | 291,112 |
1989-03-25 | 276,369 |
1989-04-01 | 275,799 |
1989-04-08 | 321,723 |
1989-04-15 | 275,240 |
1989-04-22 | 271,002 |
1989-04-29 | 247,646 |
1989-05-06 | 275,425 |
1989-05-13 | 275,507 |
1989-05-20 | 260,543 |
1989-05-27 | 266,146 |
1989-06-03 | 243,246 |
1989-06-10 | 295,499 |
1989-06-17 | 285,589 |
1989-06-24 | 295,338 |
1989-07-01 | 319,577 |
1989-07-08 | 364,594 |
1989-07-15 | 423,847 |
1989-07-22 | 365,026 |
1989-07-29 | 320,773 |
1989-08-05 | 311,584 |
1989-08-12 | 291,429 |
1989-08-19 | 261,419 |
1989-08-26 | 254,488 |
1989-09-02 | 259,540 |
1989-09-09 | 239,989 |
1989-09-16 | 271,903 |
1989-09-23 | 262,895 |
1989-09-30 | 265,310 |
1989-10-07 | 375,972 |
1989-10-14 | 284,584 |
1989-10-21 | 315,473 |
1989-10-28 | 317,538 |
1989-11-04 | 336,759 |
1989-11-11 | 303,556 |
1989-11-18 | 377,814 |
1989-11-25 | 316,458 |
1989-12-02 | 443,684 |
1989-12-09 | 426,514 |
1989-12-16 | 420,795 |
1989-12-23 | 534,261 |
1989-12-30 | 515,926 |
1990-01-06 | 581,679 |
1990-01-13 | 730,995 |
1990-01-20 | 485,424 |
1990-01-27 | 440,748 |
1990-02-03 | 432,922 |
1990-02-10 | 429,764 |
1990-02-17 | 364,616 |
1990-02-24 | 341,969 |
1990-03-03 | 361,937 |
1990-03-10 | 355,935 |
1990-03-17 | 325,164 |
1990-03-24 | 306,391 |
1990-03-31 | 297,117 |
1990-04-07 | 372,079 |
1990-04-14 | 315,624 |
1990-04-21 | 324,936 |
1990-04-28 | 294,785 |
1990-05-05 | 304,160 |
1990-05-12 | 299,266 |
1990-05-19 | 287,082 |
1990-05-26 | 295,476 |
1990-06-02 | 273,910 |
1990-06-09 | 321,727 |
1990-06-16 | 305,690 |
1990-06-23 | 316,999 |
1990-06-30 | 326,407 |
1990-07-07 | 419,256 |
1990-07-14 | 448,952 |
1990-07-21 | 407,676 |
1990-07-28 | 353,149 |
1990-08-04 | 336,997 |
1990-08-11 | 330,678 |
1990-08-18 | 313,804 |
1990-08-25 | 302,267 |
1990-09-01 | 305,510 |
1990-09-08 | 277,768 |
1990-09-15 | 323,246 |
1990-09-22 | 306,549 |
1990-09-29 | 308,080 |
1990-10-06 | 361,538 |
1990-10-13 | 356,203 |
1990-10-20 | 387,444 |
1990-10-27 | 394,598 |
1990-11-03 | 424,771 |
1990-11-10 | 463,874 |
1990-11-17 | 433,003 |
1990-11-24 | 422,676 |
1990-12-01 | 568,583 |
1990-12-08 | 574,323 |
1990-12-15 | 523,403 |
1990-12-22 | 637,449 |
1990-12-29 | 649,471 |
1991-01-05 | 651,775 |
1991-01-12 | 872,742 |
1991-01-19 | 691,092 |
1991-01-26 | 511,360 |
1991-02-02 | 563,060 |
1991-02-09 | 574,760 |
1991-02-16 | 498,200 |
1991-02-23 | 492,325 |
1991-03-02 | 504,023 |
1991-03-09 | 514,410 |
1991-03-16 | 470,801 |
1991-03-23 | 477,877 |
1991-03-30 | 412,904 |
1991-04-06 | 448,082 |
1991-04-13 | 459,364 |
1991-04-20 | 433,912 |
1991-04-27 | 385,153 |
1991-05-04 | 384,458 |
1991-05-11 | 382,113 |
1991-05-18 | 366,492 |
1991-05-25 | 365,117 |
1991-06-01 | 320,632 |
1991-06-08 | 397,682 |
1991-06-15 | 369,074 |
1991-06-22 | 371,232 |
1991-06-29 | 370,372 |
1991-07-06 | 427,161 |
1991-07-13 | 517,888 |
1991-07-20 | 454,655 |
1991-07-27 | 408,098 |
1991-08-03 | 397,522 |
1991-08-10 | 385,740 |
1991-08-17 | 344,969 |
1991-08-24 | 329,287 |
1991-08-31 | 328,040 |
1991-09-07 | 302,187 |
1991-09-14 | 342,419 |
1991-09-21 | 333,110 |
1991-09-28 | 334,206 |
1991-10-05 | 366,862 |
1991-10-12 | 388,370 |
1991-10-19 | 344,189 |
1991-10-26 | 380,253 |
1991-11-02 | 427,789 |
1991-11-09 | 473,432 |
1991-11-16 | 417,766 |
1991-11-23 | 503,032 |
1991-11-30 | 433,180 |
1991-12-07 | 610,113 |
1991-12-14 | 554,059 |
1991-12-21 | 555,747 |
1991-12-28 | 625,772 |
1992-01-04 | 652,046 |
1992-01-11 | 882,118 |
1992-01-18 | 687,914 |
1992-01-25 | 504,838 |
1992-02-01 | 508,594 |
1992-02-08 | 537,238 |
1992-02-15 | 469,794 |
1992-02-22 | 429,723 |
1992-02-29 | 454,987 |
1992-03-07 | 434,426 |
1992-03-14 | 417,282 |
1992-03-21 | 413,180 |
1992-03-28 | 370,883 |
1992-04-04 | 393,384 |
1992-04-11 | 412,948 |
1992-04-18 | 366,621 |
1992-04-25 | 364,454 |
1992-05-02 | 363,794 |
1992-05-09 | 364,100 |
1992-05-16 | 341,425 |
1992-05-23 | 343,432 |
1992-05-30 | 305,080 |
1992-06-06 | 374,978 |
1992-06-13 | 369,067 |
1992-06-20 | 369,995 |
1992-06-27 | 370,373 |
1992-07-04 | 395,505 |
1992-07-11 | 506,050 |
1992-07-18 | 452,468 |
1992-07-25 | 554,590 |
1992-08-01 | 382,138 |
1992-08-08 | 366,092 |
1992-08-15 | 322,729 |
1992-08-22 | 312,436 |
1992-08-29 | 309,806 |
1992-09-05 | 339,006 |
1992-09-12 | 299,189 |
1992-09-19 | 345,093 |
1992-09-26 | 315,455 |
1992-10-03 | 326,938 |
1992-10-10 | 353,504 |
1992-10-17 | 310,235 |
1992-10-24 | 333,005 |
1992-10-31 | 331,922 |
1992-11-07 | 392,213 |
1992-11-14 | 348,011 |
1992-11-21 | 401,972 |
1992-11-28 | 317,218 |
1992-12-05 | 449,726 |
1992-12-12 | 424,677 |
1992-12-19 | 396,619 |
1992-12-26 | 392,612 |
1993-01-02 | 487,466 |
1993-01-09 | 704,930 |
1993-01-16 | 558,516 |
1993-01-23 | 410,944 |
1993-01-30 | 397,000 |
1993-02-06 | 384,707 |
1993-02-13 | 344,520 |
1993-02-20 | 345,116 |
1993-02-27 | 367,412 |
1993-03-06 | 364,185 |
1993-03-13 | 335,154 |
1993-03-20 | 315,473 |
1993-03-27 | 330,512 |
1993-04-03 | 331,871 |
1993-04-10 | 346,648 |
1993-04-17 | 321,564 |
1993-04-24 | 310,916 |
1993-05-01 | 285,098 |
1993-05-08 | 301,906 |
1993-05-15 | 287,944 |
1993-05-22 | 285,444 |
1993-05-29 | 291,206 |
1993-06-05 | 273,411 |
1993-06-12 | 308,535 |
1993-06-19 | 304,843 |
1993-06-26 | 301,549 |
1993-07-03 | 334,335 |
1993-07-10 | 362,425 |
1993-07-17 | 402,348 |
1993-07-24 | 418,260 |
1993-07-31 | 320,155 |
1993-08-07 | 314,579 |
1993-08-14 | 277,263 |
1993-08-21 | 270,913 |
1993-08-28 | 254,231 |
1993-09-04 | 270,528 |
1993-09-11 | 238,902 |
1993-09-18 | 280,903 |
1993-09-25 | 265,510 |
1993-10-02 | 263,636 |
1993-10-09 | 338,726 |
1993-10-16 | 288,699 |
1993-10-23 | 321,509 |
1993-10-30 | 309,359 |
1993-11-06 | 365,280 |
1993-11-13 | 310,455 |
1993-11-20 | 377,935 |
1993-11-27 | 306,788 |
1993-12-04 | 431,210 |
1993-12-11 | 398,560 |
1993-12-18 | 382,583 |
1993-12-25 | 398,084 |
1994-01-01 | 481,735 |
1994-01-08 | 676,076 |
1994-01-15 | 571,816 |
1994-01-22 | 427,570 |
1994-01-29 | 481,458 |
1994-02-05 | 429,800 |
1994-02-12 | 385,594 |
1994-02-19 | 368,626 |
1994-02-26 | 307,194 |
1994-03-05 | 355,250 |
1994-03-12 | 331,023 |
1994-03-19 | 308,038 |
1994-03-26 | 292,661 |
1994-04-02 | 289,631 |
1994-04-09 | 361,348 |
1994-04-16 | 327,166 |
1994-04-23 | 298,620 |
1994-04-30 | 285,837 |
1994-05-07 | 332,414 |
1994-05-14 | 303,190 |
1994-05-21 | 299,324 |
1994-05-28 | 291,797 |
1994-06-04 | 273,849 |
1994-06-11 | 309,033 |
1994-06-18 | 298,198 |
1994-06-25 | 305,863 |
1994-07-02 | 327,262 |
1994-07-09 | 394,428 |
1994-07-16 | 443,698 |
1994-07-23 | 354,495 |
1994-07-30 | 295,979 |
1994-08-06 | 304,363 |
1994-08-13 | 277,614 |
1994-08-20 | 262,131 |
1994-08-27 | 257,299 |
1994-09-03 | 270,561 |
1994-09-10 | 237,526 |
1994-09-17 | 264,553 |
1994-09-24 | 251,191 |
1994-10-01 | 255,588 |
1994-10-08 | 322,522 |
1994-10-15 | 272,742 |
1994-10-22 | 296,646 |
1994-10-29 | 291,557 |
1994-11-05 | 338,561 |
1994-11-12 | 298,030 |
1994-11-19 | 366,719 |
1994-11-26 | 295,729 |
1994-12-03 | 412,824 |
1994-12-10 | 397,238 |
1994-12-17 | 376,210 |
1994-12-24 | 423,387 |
1994-12-31 | 482,735 |
1995-01-07 | 612,648 |
1995-01-14 | 608,872 |
1995-01-21 | 400,772 |
1995-01-28 | 396,457 |
1995-02-04 | 381,813 |
1995-02-11 | 387,408 |
1995-02-18 | 356,237 |
1995-02-25 | 316,927 |
1995-03-04 | 342,015 |
1995-03-11 | 339,580 |
1995-03-18 | 319,218 |
1995-03-25 | 305,471 |
1995-04-01 | 294,031 |
1995-04-08 | 356,914 |
1995-04-15 | 318,030 |
1995-04-22 | 317,072 |
1995-04-29 | 305,594 |
1995-05-06 | 325,398 |
1995-05-13 | 311,646 |
1995-05-20 | 316,305 |
1995-05-27 | 314,442 |
1995-06-03 | 286,566 |
1995-06-10 | 340,606 |
1995-06-17 | 337,812 |
1995-06-24 | 324,411 |
1995-07-01 | 341,207 |
1995-07-08 | 428,632 |
1995-07-15 | 491,891 |
1995-07-22 | 409,319 |
1995-07-29 | 311,708 |
1995-08-05 | 310,703 |
1995-08-12 | 296,712 |
1995-08-19 | 286,017 |
1995-08-26 | 272,182 |
1995-09-02 | 278,703 |
1995-09-09 | 266,145 |
1995-09-16 | 304,323 |
1995-09-23 | 272,431 |
1995-09-30 | 269,067 |
1995-10-07 | 345,311 |
1995-10-14 | 306,465 |
1995-10-21 | 322,856 |
1995-10-28 | 332,061 |
1995-11-04 | 383,687 |
1995-11-11 | 335,181 |
1995-11-18 | 425,889 |
1995-11-25 | 336,269 |
1995-12-02 | 474,548 |
1995-12-09 | 421,109 |
1995-12-16 | 423,450 |
1995-12-23 | 490,349 |
1995-12-30 | 513,686 |
1996-01-06 | 596,010 |
1996-01-13 | 637,910 |
1996-01-20 | 510,820 |
1996-01-27 | 492,966 |
1996-02-03 | 433,693 |
1996-02-10 | 440,961 |
1996-02-17 | 395,332 |
1996-02-24 | 347,053 |
1996-03-02 | 368,044 |
1996-03-09 | 355,818 |
1996-03-16 | 357,070 |
1996-03-23 | 396,731 |
1996-03-30 | 342,023 |
1996-04-06 | 353,032 |
1996-04-13 | 343,654 |
1996-04-20 | 336,033 |
1996-04-27 | 291,957 |
1996-05-04 | 298,195 |
1996-05-11 | 303,532 |
1996-05-18 | 287,891 |
1996-05-25 | 287,622 |
1996-06-01 | 266,116 |
1996-06-08 | 329,099 |
1996-06-15 | 307,141 |
1996-06-22 | 312,226 |
1996-06-29 | 315,615 |
1996-07-06 | 382,989 |
1996-07-13 | 449,510 |
1996-07-20 | 360,385 |
1996-07-27 | 294,762 |
1996-08-03 | 283,216 |
1996-08-10 | 285,795 |
1996-08-17 | 265,742 |
1996-08-24 | 259,677 |
1996-08-31 | 251,425 |
1996-09-07 | 238,893 |
1996-09-14 | 272,464 |
1996-09-21 | 273,232 |
1996-09-28 | 261,251 |
1996-10-05 | 292,029 |
1996-10-12 | 306,521 |
1996-10-19 | 271,934 |
1996-10-26 | 311,965 |
1996-11-02 | 320,827 |
1996-11-09 | 340,240 |
1996-11-16 | 330,730 |
1996-11-23 | 383,512 |
1996-11-30 | 328,186 |
1996-12-07 | 444,305 |
1996-12-14 | 404,436 |
1996-12-21 | 429,566 |
1996-12-28 | 520,650 |
1997-01-04 | 541,210 |
1997-01-11 | 654,473 |
1997-01-18 | 513,913 |
1997-01-25 | 385,310 |
1997-02-01 | 380,099 |
1997-02-08 | 370,766 |
1997-02-15 | 320,374 |
1997-02-22 | 309,202 |
1997-03-01 | 317,339 |
1997-03-08 | 314,787 |
1997-03-15 | 296,698 |
1997-03-22 | 291,463 |
1997-03-29 | 268,823 |
1997-04-05 | 311,186 |
1997-04-12 | 329,663 |
1997-04-19 | 286,593 |
1997-04-26 | 295,166 |
1997-05-03 | 295,629 |
1997-05-10 | 278,052 |
1997-05-17 | 267,251 |
1997-05-24 | 264,697 |
1997-05-31 | 248,167 |
1997-06-07 | 309,928 |
1997-06-14 | 302,577 |
1997-06-21 | 290,720 |
1997-06-28 | 298,299 |
1997-07-05 | 372,574 |
1997-07-12 | 434,598 |
1997-07-19 | 339,250 |
1997-07-26 | 281,794 |
1997-08-02 | 273,471 |
1997-08-09 | 289,083 |
1997-08-16 | 272,910 |
1997-08-23 | 255,236 |
1997-08-30 | 250,205 |
1997-09-06 | 224,948 |
1997-09-13 | 253,456 |
1997-09-20 | 246,061 |
1997-09-27 | 237,214 |
1997-10-04 | 260,705 |
1997-10-11 | 286,436 |
1997-10-18 | 255,634 |
1997-10-25 | 272,593 |
1997-11-01 | 293,086 |
1997-11-08 | 322,842 |
1997-11-15 | 311,499 |
1997-11-22 | 341,845 |
1997-11-29 | 309,788 |
1997-12-06 | 402,699 |
1997-12-13 | 374,107 |
1997-12-20 | 368,823 |
1997-12-27 | 445,345 |
1998-01-03 | 479,854 |
1998-01-10 | 682,016 |
1998-01-17 | 512,837 |
1998-01-24 | 355,092 |
1998-01-31 | 357,976 |
1998-02-07 | 368,113 |
1998-02-14 | 328,354 |
1998-02-21 | 313,367 |
1998-02-28 | 313,480 |
1998-03-07 | 305,542 |
1998-03-14 | 298,302 |
1998-03-21 | 293,692 |
1998-03-28 | 272,808 |
1998-04-04 | 288,484 |
1998-04-11 | 294,014 |
1998-04-18 | 288,059 |
1998-04-25 | 278,220 |
1998-05-02 | 261,089 |
1998-05-09 | 270,108 |
1998-05-16 | 262,107 |
1998-05-23 | 259,125 |
1998-05-30 | 248,550 |
1998-06-06 | 289,495 |
1998-06-13 | 293,195 |
1998-06-20 | 322,017 |
1998-06-27 | 348,842 |
1998-07-04 | 379,734 |
1998-07-11 | 428,977 |
1998-07-18 | 364,767 |
1998-07-25 | 314,782 |
1998-08-01 | 277,621 |
1998-08-08 | 279,621 |
1998-08-15 | 246,823 |
1998-08-22 | 237,999 |
1998-08-29 | 233,516 |
1998-09-05 | 255,938 |
1998-09-12 | 217,454 |
1998-09-19 | 237,609 |
1998-09-26 | 220,668 |
1998-10-03 | 246,284 |
1998-10-10 | 300,862 |
1998-10-17 | 257,172 |
1998-10-24 | 275,574 |
1998-10-31 | 281,932 |
1998-11-07 | 332,611 |
1998-11-14 | 315,504 |
1998-11-21 | 338,501 |
1998-11-28 | 295,041 |
1998-12-05 | 421,605 |
1998-12-12 | 355,872 |
1998-12-19 | 344,452 |
1998-12-26 | 442,200 |
1999-01-02 | 508,983 |
1999-01-09 | 713,805 |
1999-01-16 | 514,082 |
1999-01-23 | 364,737 |
1999-01-30 | 349,733 |
1999-02-06 | 344,947 |
1999-02-13 | 320,679 |
1999-02-20 | 286,130 |
1999-02-27 | 297,918 |
1999-03-06 | 297,325 |
1999-03-13 | 289,813 |
1999-03-20 | 275,453 |
1999-03-27 | 260,817 |
1999-04-03 | 263,516 |
1999-04-10 | 327,621 |
1999-04-17 | 286,018 |
1999-04-24 | 263,835 |
1999-05-01 | 252,190 |
1999-05-08 | 274,268 |
1999-05-15 | 251,063 |
1999-05-22 | 250,360 |
1999-05-29 | 260,517 |
1999-06-05 | 256,922 |
1999-06-12 | 267,582 |
1999-06-19 | 267,825 |
1999-06-26 | 269,755 |
1999-07-03 | 303,758 |
1999-07-10 | 364,078 |
1999-07-17 | 369,123 |
1999-07-24 | 293,348 |
1999-07-31 | 254,195 |
1999-08-07 | 259,805 |
1999-08-14 | 236,658 |
1999-08-21 | 226,061 |
1999-08-28 | 219,278 |
1999-09-04 | 235,849 |
1999-09-11 | 204,302 |
1999-09-18 | 219,070 |
1999-09-25 | 232,486 |
1999-10-02 | 246,445 |
1999-10-09 | 278,925 |
1999-10-16 | 234,580 |
1999-10-23 | 250,864 |
1999-10-30 | 257,767 |
1999-11-06 | 297,136 |
1999-11-13 | 262,607 |
1999-11-20 | 309,248 |
1999-11-27 | 268,255 |
1999-12-04 | 378,735 |
1999-12-11 | 318,175 |
1999-12-18 | 329,649 |
1999-12-25 | 377,695 |
2000-01-01 | 439,912 |
2000-01-08 | 606,897 |
2000-01-15 | 442,494 |
2000-01-22 | 328,841 |
2000-01-29 | 332,740 |
2000-02-05 | 365,245 |
2000-02-12 | 311,897 |
2000-02-19 | 281,256 |
2000-02-26 | 258,962 |
2000-03-04 | 283,024 |
2000-03-11 | 255,109 |
2000-03-18 | 242,139 |
2000-03-25 | 239,835 |
2000-04-01 | 229,520 |
2000-04-08 | 274,130 |
2000-04-15 | 237,218 |
2000-04-22 | 240,266 |
2000-04-29 | 249,458 |
2000-05-06 | 259,546 |
2000-05-13 | 231,706 |
2000-05-20 | 234,599 |
2000-05-27 | 239,836 |
2000-06-03 | 242,991 |
2000-06-10 | 267,752 |
2000-06-17 | 265,617 |
2000-06-24 | 273,344 |
2000-07-01 | 280,979 |
2000-07-08 | 363,793 |
2000-07-15 | 377,982 |
2000-07-22 | 296,255 |
2000-07-29 | 253,466 |
2000-08-05 | 266,151 |
2000-08-12 | 261,358 |
2000-08-19 | 251,844 |
2000-08-26 | 239,030 |
2000-09-02 | 242,375 |
2000-09-09 | 229,954 |
2000-09-16 | 245,991 |
2000-09-23 | 222,219 |
2000-09-30 | 227,249 |
2000-10-07 | 292,784 |
2000-10-14 | 255,082 |
2000-10-21 | 263,445 |
2000-10-28 | 269,489 |
2000-11-04 | 342,414 |
2000-11-11 | 294,727 |
2000-11-18 | 374,160 |
2000-11-25 | 321,859 |
2000-12-02 | 447,262 |
2000-12-09 | 390,088 |
2000-12-16 | 402,476 |
2000-12-23 | 481,720 |
2000-12-30 | 568,973 |
2001-01-06 | 558,768 |
2001-01-13 | 599,562 |
2001-01-20 | 398,188 |
2001-01-27 | 447,386 |
2001-02-03 | 424,696 |
2001-02-10 | 396,151 |
2001-02-17 | 345,841 |
2001-02-24 | 357,591 |
2001-03-03 | 379,286 |
2001-03-10 | 377,210 |
2001-03-17 | 351,497 |
2001-03-24 | 334,747 |
2001-03-31 | 328,576 |
2001-04-07 | 397,282 |
2001-04-14 | 346,981 |
2001-04-21 | 369,745 |
2001-04-28 | 353,831 |
2001-05-05 | 336,319 |
2001-05-12 | 331,765 |
2001-05-19 | 338,374 |
2001-05-26 | 346,231 |
2001-06-02 | 335,765 |
2001-06-09 | 397,015 |
2001-06-16 | 354,526 |
2001-06-23 | 351,770 |
2001-06-30 | 375,885 |
2001-07-07 | 526,826 |
2001-07-14 | 524,139 |
2001-07-21 | 406,038 |
2001-07-28 | 332,957 |
2001-08-04 | 341,660 |
2001-08-11 | 333,042 |
2001-08-18 | 317,046 |
2001-08-25 | 307,850 |
2001-09-01 | 319,016 |
2001-09-08 | 309,567 |
2001-09-15 | 317,245 |
2001-09-22 | 353,611 |
2001-09-29 | 400,400 |
2001-10-06 | 441,754 |
2001-10-13 | 426,881 |
2001-10-20 | 429,542 |
2001-10-27 | 436,901 |
2001-11-03 | 443,971 |
2001-11-10 | 456,366 |
2001-11-17 | 420,259 |
2001-11-24 | 438,893 |
2001-12-01 | 605,916 |
2001-12-08 | 491,836 |
2001-12-15 | 440,906 |
2001-12-22 | 529,570 |
2001-12-29 | 647,045 |
2002-01-05 | 637,343 |
2002-01-12 | 799,246 |
2002-01-19 | 558,297 |
2002-01-26 | 431,690 |
2002-02-02 | 445,552 |
2002-02-09 | 438,611 |
2002-02-16 | 376,573 |
2002-02-23 | 367,504 |
2002-03-02 | 385,272 |
2002-03-09 | 386,992 |
2002-03-16 | 352,045 |
2002-03-23 | 366,372 |
2002-03-30 | 386,296 |
2002-04-06 | 432,384 |
2002-04-13 | 428,834 |
2002-04-20 | 385,151 |
2002-04-27 | 367,350 |
2002-05-04 | 362,681 |
2002-05-11 | 358,286 |
2002-05-18 | 348,887 |
2002-05-25 | 346,439 |
2002-06-01 | 309,183 |
2002-06-08 | 378,613 |
2002-06-15 | 356,096 |
2002-06-22 | 358,959 |
2002-06-29 | 358,658 |
2002-07-06 | 456,716 |
2002-07-13 | 506,718 |
2002-07-20 | 394,586 |
2002-07-27 | 338,441 |
2002-08-03 | 326,356 |
2002-08-10 | 332,673 |
2002-08-17 | 313,869 |
2002-08-24 | 314,852 |
2002-08-31 | 310,864 |
2002-09-07 | 318,361 |
2002-09-14 | 337,577 |
2002-09-21 | 317,264 |
2002-09-28 | 319,063 |
2002-10-05 | 365,613 |
2002-10-12 | 385,689 |
2002-10-19 | 349,927 |
2002-10-26 | 375,591 |
2002-11-02 | 397,346 |
2002-11-09 | 427,078 |
2002-11-16 | 372,829 |
2002-11-23 | 436,549 |
2002-11-30 | 385,788 |
2002-12-07 | 547,430 |
2002-12-14 | 486,258 |
2002-12-21 | 483,449 |
2002-12-28 | 620,929 |
2003-01-04 | 620,004 |
2003-01-11 | 724,111 |
2003-01-18 | 542,563 |
2003-01-25 | 434,888 |
2003-02-01 | 449,286 |
2003-02-08 | 439,520 |
2003-02-15 | 398,291 |
2003-02-22 | 387,536 |
2003-03-01 | 429,782 |
2003-03-08 | 414,568 |
2003-03-15 | 389,909 |
2003-03-22 | 361,492 |
2003-03-29 | 371,692 |
2003-04-05 | 394,160 |
2003-04-12 | 434,911 |
2003-04-19 | 399,180 |
2003-04-26 | 401,342 |
2003-05-03 | 377,383 |
2003-05-10 | 364,287 |
2003-05-17 | 362,276 |
2003-05-24 | 359,500 |
2003-05-31 | 351,890 |
2003-06-07 | 421,190 |
2003-06-14 | 383,371 |
2003-06-21 | 376,560 |
2003-06-28 | 394,214 |
2003-07-05 | 483,401 |
2003-07-12 | 552,621 |
2003-07-19 | 429,381 |
2003-07-26 | 348,382 |
2003-08-02 | 333,770 |
2003-08-09 | 348,207 |
2003-08-16 | 312,087 |
2003-08-23 | 313,058 |
2003-08-30 | 319,362 |
2003-09-06 | 322,501 |
2003-09-13 | 328,414 |
2003-09-20 | 301,217 |
2003-09-27 | 304,968 |
2003-10-04 | 337,880 |
2003-10-11 | 368,876 |
2003-10-18 | 328,572 |
2003-10-25 | 352,117 |
2003-11-01 | 345,573 |
2003-11-08 | 397,387 |
2003-11-15 | 347,719 |
2003-11-22 | 397,990 |
2003-11-29 | 357,811 |
2003-12-06 | 486,202 |
2003-12-13 | 412,627 |
2003-12-20 | 424,192 |
2003-12-27 | 516,493 |
2004-01-03 | 552,815 |
2004-01-10 | 677,897 |
2004-01-17 | 490,763 |
2004-01-24 | 382,262 |
2004-01-31 | 406,298 |
2004-02-07 | 433,234 |
2004-02-14 | 341,634 |
2004-02-21 | 328,171 |
2004-02-28 | 342,140 |
2004-03-06 | 339,007 |
2004-03-13 | 312,067 |
2004-03-20 | 304,462 |
2004-03-27 | 296,776 |
2004-04-03 | 304,249 |
2004-04-10 | 350,739 |
2004-04-17 | 334,965 |
2004-04-24 | 313,686 |
2004-05-01 | 283,236 |
2004-05-08 | 292,754 |
2004-05-15 | 297,061 |
2004-05-22 | 293,974 |
2004-05-29 | 304,067 |
2004-06-05 | 308,229 |
2004-06-12 | 313,930 |
2004-06-19 | 322,481 |
2004-06-26 | 318,746 |
2004-07-03 | 349,920 |
2004-07-10 | 444,531 |
2004-07-17 | 394,372 |
2004-07-24 | 313,225 |
2004-07-31 | 282,128 |
2004-08-07 | 291,611 |
2004-08-14 | 262,936 |
2004-08-21 | 274,433 |
2004-08-28 | 276,308 |
2004-09-04 | 274,930 |
2004-09-11 | 250,568 |
2004-09-18 | 275,846 |
2004-09-25 | 282,729 |
2004-10-02 | 279,591 |
2004-10-09 | 338,711 |
2004-10-16 | 279,846 |
2004-10-23 | 317,573 |
2004-10-30 | 305,546 |
2004-11-06 | 351,404 |
2004-11-13 | 311,901 |
2004-11-20 | 355,954 |
2004-11-27 | 320,690 |
2004-12-04 | 473,570 |
2004-12-11 | 370,604 |
2004-12-18 | 374,749 |
2004-12-25 | 446,699 |
2005-01-01 | 540,927 |
2005-01-08 | 693,776 |
2005-01-15 | 467,862 |
2005-01-22 | 360,583 |
2005-01-29 | 364,704 |
2005-02-05 | 347,391 |
2005-02-12 | 309,290 |
2005-02-19 | 303,814 |
2005-02-26 | 290,776 |
2005-03-05 | 332,067 |
2005-03-12 | 307,061 |
2005-03-19 | 290,719 |
2005-03-26 | 291,378 |
2005-04-02 | 294,994 |
2005-04-09 | 339,709 |
2005-04-16 | 285,657 |
2005-04-23 | 299,891 |
2005-04-30 | 290,824 |
2005-05-07 | 297,347 |
2005-05-14 | 275,524 |
2005-05-21 | 276,761 |
2005-05-28 | 304,306 |
2005-06-04 | 289,914 |
2005-06-11 | 315,938 |
2005-06-18 | 289,831 |
2005-06-25 | 286,681 |
2005-07-02 | 327,268 |
2005-07-09 | 427,323 |
2005-07-16 | 374,665 |
2005-07-23 | 295,026 |
2005-07-30 | 261,906 |
2005-08-06 | 269,746 |
2005-08-13 | 257,151 |
2005-08-20 | 252,016 |
2005-08-27 | 251,642 |
2005-09-03 | 271,613 |
2005-09-10 | 322,387 |
2005-09-17 | 346,204 |
2005-09-24 | 292,435 |
2005-10-01 | 313,847 |
2005-10-08 | 380,093 |
2005-10-15 | 303,158 |
2005-10-22 | 304,733 |
2005-10-29 | 294,376 |
2005-11-05 | 340,491 |
2005-11-12 | 283,564 |
2005-11-19 | 368,859 |
2005-11-26 | 290,730 |
2005-12-03 | 444,600 |
2005-12-10 | 391,961 |
2005-12-17 | 359,108 |
2005-12-24 | 433,397 |
2005-12-31 | 475,889 |
2006-01-07 | 555,114 |
2006-01-14 | 439,873 |
2006-01-21 | 317,926 |
2006-01-28 | 318,805 |
2006-02-04 | 321,527 |
2006-02-11 | 310,078 |
2006-02-18 | 269,571 |
2006-02-25 | 272,478 |
2006-03-04 | 301,867 |
2006-03-11 | 294,764 |
2006-03-18 | 269,237 |
2006-03-25 | 265,370 |
2006-04-01 | 253,985 |
2006-04-08 | 314,696 |
2006-04-15 | 268,472 |
2006-04-22 | 291,349 |
2006-04-29 | 279,715 |
2006-05-06 | 317,239 |
2006-05-13 | 288,972 |
2006-05-20 | 277,168 |
2006-05-27 | 292,714 |
2006-06-03 | 260,263 |
2006-06-10 | 285,892 |
2006-06-17 | 277,441 |
2006-06-24 | 287,503 |
2006-07-01 | 304,638 |
2006-07-08 | 418,363 |
2006-07-15 | 377,115 |
2006-07-22 | 288,875 |
2006-07-29 | 259,974 |
2006-08-05 | 275,430 |
2006-08-12 | 256,259 |
2006-08-19 | 252,357 |
2006-08-26 | 251,275 |
2006-09-02 | 259,539 |
2006-09-09 | 240,231 |
2006-09-16 | 267,036 |
2006-09-23 | 261,396 |
2006-09-30 | 249,288 |
2006-10-07 | 307,646 |
2006-10-14 | 271,863 |
2006-10-21 | 291,372 |
2006-10-28 | 301,079 |
2006-11-04 | 326,711 |
2006-11-11 | 286,151 |
2006-11-18 | 367,690 |
2006-11-25 | 323,509 |
2006-12-02 | 448,898 |
2006-12-09 | 384,123 |
2006-12-16 | 361,672 |
2006-12-23 | 425,357 |
2006-12-30 | 499,979 |
2007-01-06 | 506,059 |
2007-01-13 | 506,709 |
2007-01-20 | 367,583 |
2007-01-27 | 359,959 |
2007-02-03 | 339,018 |
2007-02-10 | 363,018 |
2007-02-17 | 305,945 |
2007-02-24 | 299,000 |
2007-03-03 | 320,194 |
2007-03-10 | 298,927 |
2007-03-17 | 277,187 |
2007-03-24 | 273,432 |
2007-03-31 | 268,218 |
2007-04-07 | 328,266 |
2007-04-14 | 317,917 |
2007-04-21 | 303,984 |
2007-04-28 | 267,672 |
2007-05-05 | 274,801 |
2007-05-12 | 258,516 |
2007-05-19 | 270,446 |
2007-05-26 | 273,397 |
2007-06-02 | 263,527 |
2007-06-09 | 302,368 |
2007-06-16 | 290,951 |
2007-06-23 | 292,583 |
2007-06-30 | 300,348 |
2007-07-07 | 417,554 |
2007-07-14 | 383,839 |
2007-07-21 | 298,366 |
2007-07-28 | 257,426 |
2007-08-04 | 270,563 |
2007-08-11 | 266,420 |
2007-08-18 | 257,573 |
2007-08-25 | 266,179 |
2007-09-01 | 257,454 |
2007-09-08 | 245,526 |
2007-09-15 | 261,971 |
2007-09-22 | 247,643 |
2007-09-29 | 255,431 |
2007-10-06 | 298,317 |
2007-10-13 | 306,519 |
2007-10-20 | 307,675 |
2007-10-27 | 303,357 |
2007-11-03 | 325,831 |
2007-11-10 | 351,760 |
2007-11-17 | 323,124 |
2007-11-24 | 324,047 |
2007-12-01 | 462,902 |
2007-12-08 | 423,130 |
2007-12-15 | 393,042 |
2007-12-22 | 456,280 |
2007-12-29 | 507,908 |
2008-01-05 | 522,700 |
2008-01-12 | 547,943 |
2008-01-19 | 415,397 |
2008-01-26 | 369,498 |
2008-02-02 | 380,234 |
2008-02-09 | 377,595 |
2008-02-16 | 325,886 |
2008-02-23 | 330,013 |
2008-03-01 | 345,287 |
2008-03-08 | 341,364 |
2008-03-15 | 335,909 |
2008-03-22 | 316,208 |
2008-03-29 | 342,189 |
2008-04-05 | 357,209 |
2008-04-12 | 370,960 |
2008-04-19 | 328,334 |
2008-04-26 | 337,854 |
2008-05-03 | 335,533 |
2008-05-10 | 325,479 |
2008-05-17 | 319,817 |
2008-05-24 | 326,627 |
2008-05-31 | 300,989 |
2008-06-07 | 373,033 |
2008-06-14 | 349,254 |
2008-06-21 | 358,158 |
2008-06-28 | 368,544 |
2008-07-05 | 401,672 |
2008-07-12 | 476,071 |
2008-07-19 | 403,607 |
2008-07-26 | 374,182 |
2008-08-02 | 381,887 |
2008-08-09 | 372,807 |
2008-08-16 | 342,164 |
2008-08-23 | 344,255 |
2008-08-30 | 360,485 |
2008-09-06 | 336,131 |
2008-09-13 | 381,720 |
2008-09-20 | 397,610 |
2008-09-27 | 392,121 |
2008-10-04 | 426,786 |
2008-10-11 | 454,100 |
2008-10-18 | 416,114 |
2008-10-25 | 449,429 |
2008-11-01 | 466,373 |
2008-11-08 | 539,812 |
2008-11-15 | 513,047 |
2008-11-22 | 609,128 |
2008-11-29 | 537,230 |
2008-12-06 | 760,481 |
2008-12-13 | 629,867 |
2008-12-20 | 719,691 |
2008-12-27 | 717,000 |
2009-01-03 | 731,958 |
2009-01-10 | 956,791 |
2009-01-17 | 763,987 |
2009-01-24 | 620,143 |
2009-01-31 | 682,176 |
2009-02-07 | 710,152 |
2009-02-14 | 619,951 |
2009-02-21 | 605,668 |
2009-02-28 | 645,827 |
2009-03-07 | 652,635 |
2009-03-14 | 601,192 |
2009-03-21 | 590,067 |
2009-03-28 | 599,299 |
2009-04-04 | 623,279 |
2009-04-11 | 610,522 |
2009-04-18 | 596,564 |
2009-04-25 | 583,457 |
2009-05-02 | 536,648 |
2009-05-09 | 570,412 |
2009-05-16 | 540,925 |
2009-05-23 | 538,311 |
2009-05-30 | 500,380 |
2009-06-06 | 581,092 |
2009-06-13 | 562,449 |
2009-06-20 | 572,425 |
2009-06-27 | 563,387 |
2009-07-04 | 585,963 |
2009-07-11 | 677,038 |
2009-07-18 | 590,730 |
2009-07-25 | 516,351 |
2009-08-01 | 470,988 |
2009-08-08 | 486,586 |
2009-08-15 | 461,780 |
2009-08-22 | 460,998 |
2009-08-29 | 460,525 |
2009-09-05 | 470,079 |
2009-09-12 | 414,557 |
2009-09-19 | 441,311 |
2009-09-26 | 449,620 |
2009-10-03 | 456,233 |
2009-10-10 | 513,852 |
2009-10-17 | 464,985 |
2009-10-24 | 499,374 |
2009-10-31 | 487,714 |
2009-11-07 | 537,230 |
2009-11-14 | 479,350 |
2009-11-21 | 547,022 |
2009-11-28 | 462,090 |
2009-12-05 | 673,097 |
2009-12-12 | 561,655 |
2009-12-19 | 571,378 |
2009-12-26 | 561,852 |
2010-01-02 | 651,215 |
2010-01-09 | 825,891 |
2010-01-16 | 659,173 |
2010-01-23 | 507,651 |
2010-01-30 | 538,617 |
2010-02-06 | 512,463 |
2010-02-13 | 482,078 |
2010-02-20 | 458,160 |
2010-02-27 | 474,662 |
2010-03-06 | 462,679 |
2010-03-13 | 439,061 |
2010-03-20 | 413,067 |
2010-03-27 | 412,710 |
2010-04-03 | 421,130 |
2010-04-10 | 514,136 |
2010-04-17 | 436,814 |
2010-04-24 | 429,196 |
2010-05-01 | 399,350 |
2010-05-08 | 414,327 |
2010-05-15 | 414,572 |
2010-05-22 | 410,778 |
2010-05-29 | 418,873 |
2010-06-05 | 398,864 |
2010-06-12 | 448,305 |
2010-06-19 | 427,080 |
2010-06-26 | 444,712 |
2010-07-03 | 470,366 |
2010-07-10 | 515,991 |
2010-07-17 | 502,065 |
2010-07-24 | 413,679 |
2010-07-31 | 402,140 |
2010-08-07 | 425,471 |
2010-08-14 | 405,484 |
2010-08-21 | 384,955 |
2010-08-28 | 383,135 |
2010-09-04 | 381,863 |
2010-09-11 | 341,791 |
2010-09-18 | 382,341 |
2010-09-25 | 372,551 |
2010-10-02 | 373,681 |
2010-10-09 | 462,667 |
2010-10-16 | 394,016 |
2010-10-23 | 408,489 |
2010-10-30 | 421,097 |
2010-11-06 | 452,657 |
2010-11-13 | 409,548 |
2010-11-20 | 464,817 |
2010-11-27 | 412,922 |
2010-12-04 | 585,711 |
2010-12-11 | 491,776 |
2010-12-18 | 495,548 |
2010-12-25 | 525,710 |
2011-01-01 | 578,904 |
2011-01-08 | 773,499 |
2011-01-15 | 549,688 |
2011-01-22 | 485,950 |
2011-01-29 | 464,775 |
2011-02-05 | 440,706 |
2011-02-12 | 424,400 |
2011-02-19 | 380,985 |
2011-02-26 | 353,797 |
2011-03-05 | 407,299 |
2011-03-12 | 371,721 |
2011-03-19 | 354,457 |
2011-03-26 | 357,457 |
2011-04-02 | 353,817 |
2011-04-09 | 448,029 |
2011-04-16 | 381,834 |
2011-04-23 | 387,867 |
2011-04-30 | 415,974 |
2011-05-07 | 397,737 |
2011-05-14 | 361,573 |
2011-05-21 | 376,632 |
2011-05-28 | 381,497 |
2011-06-04 | 366,816 |
2011-06-11 | 400,608 |
2011-06-18 | 394,286 |
2011-06-25 | 406,633 |
2011-07-02 | 425,640 |
2011-07-09 | 473,963 |
2011-07-16 | 470,086 |
2011-07-23 | 369,207 |
2011-07-30 | 341,103 |
2011-08-06 | 354,408 |
2011-08-13 | 346,014 |
2011-08-20 | 344,870 |
2011-08-27 | 336,761 |
2011-09-03 | 348,582 |
2011-09-10 | 328,868 |
2011-09-17 | 353,820 |
2011-09-24 | 328,073 |
2011-10-01 | 332,394 |
2011-10-08 | 405,906 |
2011-10-15 | 357,562 |
2011-10-22 | 377,156 |
2011-10-29 | 369,647 |
2011-11-05 | 402,532 |
2011-11-12 | 363,016 |
2011-11-19 | 440,157 |
2011-11-26 | 372,640 |
2011-12-03 | 528,793 |
2011-12-10 | 435,863 |
2011-12-17 | 421,103 |
2011-12-24 | 497,689 |
2011-12-31 | 540,057 |
2012-01-07 | 646,219 |
2012-01-14 | 525,422 |
2012-01-21 | 416,880 |
2012-01-28 | 422,287 |
2012-02-04 | 401,365 |
2012-02-11 | 365,014 |
2012-02-18 | 346,659 |
2012-02-25 | 334,242 |
2012-03-03 | 368,433 |
2012-03-10 | 340,102 |
2012-03-17 | 319,498 |
2012-03-24 | 323,373 |
2012-03-31 | 315,800 |
2012-04-07 | 390,064 |
2012-04-14 | 370,482 |
2012-04-21 | 370,632 |
2012-04-28 | 333,476 |
2012-05-05 | 341,080 |
2012-05-12 | 325,094 |
2012-05-19 | 330,427 |
2012-05-26 | 346,260 |
2012-06-02 | 324,385 |
2012-06-09 | 376,610 |
2012-06-16 | 364,548 |
2012-06-23 | 370,521 |
2012-06-30 | 369,826 |
2012-07-07 | 442,192 |
2012-07-14 | 455,260 |
2012-07-21 | 340,780 |
2012-07-28 | 312,931 |
2012-08-04 | 320,219 |
2012-08-11 | 317,680 |
2012-08-18 | 311,857 |
2012-08-25 | 312,542 |
2012-09-01 | 309,537 |
2012-09-08 | 299,729 |
2012-09-15 | 330,454 |
2012-09-22 | 303,685 |
2012-09-29 | 301,046 |
2012-10-06 | 329,925 |
2012-10-13 | 362,730 |
2012-10-20 | 345,227 |
2012-10-27 | 339,924 |
2012-11-03 | 361,823 |
2012-11-10 | 478,551 |
2012-11-17 | 403,636 |
2012-11-24 | 358,865 |
2012-12-01 | 500,163 |
2012-12-08 | 429,191 |
2012-12-15 | 401,431 |
2012-12-22 | 457,584 |
2012-12-29 | 490,126 |
2013-01-05 | 557,424 |
2013-01-12 | 558,047 |
2013-01-19 | 437,360 |
2013-01-26 | 369,567 |
2013-02-02 | 388,708 |
2013-02-09 | 361,759 |
2013-02-16 | 351,087 |
2013-02-23 | 310,512 |
2013-03-02 | 335,794 |
2013-03-09 | 317,661 |
2013-03-16 | 301,471 |
2013-03-23 | 316,133 |
2013-03-30 | 317,494 |
2013-04-06 | 356,935 |
2013-04-13 | 359,415 |
2013-04-20 | 326,264 |
2013-04-27 | 301,622 |
2013-05-04 | 301,602 |
2013-05-11 | 320,253 |
2013-05-18 | 303,357 |
2013-05-25 | 319,508 |
2013-06-01 | 294,608 |
2013-06-08 | 332,964 |
2013-06-15 | 336,970 |
2013-06-22 | 336,901 |
2013-06-29 | 335,424 |
2013-07-06 | 383,811 |
2013-07-13 | 410,974 |
2013-07-20 | 340,457 |
2013-07-27 | 281,692 |
2013-08-03 | 288,861 |
2013-08-10 | 282,756 |
2013-08-17 | 281,164 |
2013-08-24 | 279,803 |
2013-08-31 | 269,359 |
2013-09-07 | 229,648 |
2013-09-14 | 272,946 |
2013-09-21 | 255,087 |
2013-09-28 | 252,196 |
2013-10-05 | 335,937 |
2013-10-12 | 360,957 |
2013-10-19 | 312,037 |
2013-10-26 | 325,326 |
2013-11-02 | 331,867 |
2013-11-09 | 364,167 |
2013-11-16 | 327,053 |
2013-11-23 | 369,197 |
2013-11-30 | 321,896 |
2013-12-07 | 463,413 |
2013-12-14 | 414,613 |
2013-12-21 | 418,272 |
2013-12-28 | 452,664 |
2014-01-04 | 488,537 |
2014-01-11 | 534,966 |
2014-01-18 | 416,116 |
2014-01-25 | 357,806 |
2014-02-01 | 357,742 |
2014-02-08 | 360,338 |
2014-02-15 | 322,761 |
2014-02-22 | 312,665 |
2014-03-01 | 317,832 |
2014-03-08 | 302,311 |
2014-03-15 | 285,970 |
2014-03-22 | 274,072 |
2014-03-29 | 294,862 |
2014-04-05 | 299,162 |
2014-04-12 | 318,793 |
2014-04-19 | 299,182 |
2014-04-26 | 318,127 |
2014-05-03 | 288,748 |
2014-05-10 | 270,738 |
2014-05-17 | 287,398 |
2014-05-24 | 275,412 |
2014-05-31 | 264,133 |
2014-06-07 | 313,371 |
2014-06-14 | 301,195 |
2014-06-21 | 305,029 |
2014-06-28 | 305,791 |
2014-07-05 | 322,753 |
2014-07-12 | 370,559 |
2014-07-19 | 287,049 |
2014-07-26 | 257,625 |
2014-08-02 | 247,877 |
2014-08-09 | 269,468 |
2014-08-16 | 249,463 |
2014-08-23 | 249,006 |
2014-08-30 | 249,780 |
2014-09-06 | 234,755 |
2014-09-13 | 242,318 |
2014-09-20 | 239,780 |
2014-09-27 | 227,571 |
2014-10-04 | 257,545 |
2014-10-11 | 273,756 |
2014-10-18 | 256,166 |
2014-10-25 | 271,331 |
2014-11-01 | 266,921 |
2014-11-08 | 309,338 |
2014-11-15 | 286,115 |
2014-11-22 | 357,202 |
2014-11-29 | 294,389 |
2014-12-06 | 389,284 |
2014-12-13 | 327,827 |
2014-12-20 | 340,827 |
2014-12-27 | 389,757 |
2015-01-03 | 439,342 |
2015-01-10 | 529,685 |
2015-01-17 | 383,538 |
2015-01-24 | 281,885 |
2015-01-31 | 306,643 |
2015-02-07 | 324,158 |
2015-02-14 | 277,904 |
2015-02-21 | 280,639 |
2015-02-28 | 315,566 |
2015-03-07 | 277,925 |
2015-03-14 | 260,242 |
2015-03-21 | 248,032 |
2015-03-28 | 239,748 |
2015-04-04 | 253,533 |
2015-04-11 | 308,173 |
2015-04-18 | 279,797 |
2015-04-25 | 250,780 |
2015-05-02 | 236,421 |
2015-05-09 | 242,882 |
2015-05-16 | 243,612 |
2015-05-23 | 253,454 |
2015-05-30 | 230,676 |
2015-06-06 | 275,619 |
2015-06-13 | 258,764 |
2015-06-20 | 263,199 |
2015-06-27 | 274,646 |
2015-07-04 | 303,585 |
2015-07-11 | 344,471 |
2015-07-18 | 262,949 |
2015-07-25 | 230,314 |
2015-08-01 | 224,104 |
2015-08-08 | 239,326 |
2015-08-15 | 229,251 |
2015-08-22 | 226,649 |
2015-08-29 | 230,079 |
2015-09-05 | 232,507 |
2015-09-12 | 198,903 |
2015-09-19 | 219,342 |
2015-09-26 | 215,116 |
2015-10-03 | 227,176 |
2015-10-10 | 256,522 |
2015-10-17 | 232,860 |
2015-10-24 | 245,365 |
2015-10-31 | 258,440 |
2015-11-07 | 291,098 |
2015-11-14 | 264,816 |
2015-11-21 | 305,424 |
2015-11-28 | 262,628 |
2015-12-05 | 384,491 |
2015-12-12 | 313,276 |
2015-12-19 | 319,641 |
2015-12-26 | 346,542 |
2016-01-02 | 405,368 |
2016-01-09 | 502,904 |
2016-01-16 | 378,747 |
2016-01-23 | 295,936 |
2016-01-30 | 311,940 |
2016-02-06 | 290,796 |
2016-02-13 | 258,380 |
2016-02-20 | 248,870 |
2016-02-27 | 265,802 |
2016-03-05 | 247,628 |
2016-03-12 | 236,888 |
2016-03-19 | 230,882 |
2016-03-26 | 235,716 |
2016-04-02 | 245,035 |
2016-04-09 | 270,419 |
2016-04-16 | 242,400 |
2016-04-23 | 245,040 |
2016-04-30 | 243,392 |
2016-05-07 | 261,899 |
2016-05-14 | 244,869 |
2016-05-21 | 240,798 |
2016-05-28 | 246,740 |
2016-06-04 | 232,300 |
2016-06-11 | 266,277 |
2016-06-18 | 247,968 |
2016-06-25 | 263,662 |
2016-07-02 | 267,437 |
2016-07-09 | 298,673 |
2016-07-16 | 268,526 |
2016-07-23 | 231,925 |
2016-07-30 | 219,202 |
2016-08-06 | 231,542 |
2016-08-13 | 219,570 |
2016-08-20 | 217,011 |
2016-08-27 | 215,688 |
2016-09-03 | 217,715 |
2016-09-10 | 193,291 |
2016-09-17 | 205,649 |
2016-09-24 | 198,455 |
2016-10-01 | 200,456 |
2016-10-08 | 238,581 |
2016-10-15 | 233,633 |
2016-10-22 | 237,314 |
2016-10-29 | 245,751 |
2016-11-05 | 258,608 |
2016-11-12 | 223,770 |
2016-11-19 | 287,794 |
2016-11-26 | 249,774 |
2016-12-03 | 351,580 |
2016-12-10 | 305,268 |
2016-12-17 | 315,068 |
2016-12-24 | 343,213 |
2016-12-31 | 350,561 |
2017-01-07 | 414,742 |
2017-01-14 | 352,799 |
2017-01-21 | 284,030 |
2017-01-28 | 280,983 |
2017-02-04 | 259,713 |
2017-02-11 | 245,886 |
2017-02-18 | 239,322 |
2017-02-25 | 212,829 |
2017-03-04 | 243,959 |
2017-03-11 | 222,227 |
2017-03-18 | 224,693 |
2017-03-25 | 228,269 |
2017-04-01 | 208,347 |
2017-04-08 | 239,823 |
2017-04-15 | 225,864 |
2017-04-22 | 241,611 |
2017-04-29 | 210,955 |
2017-05-06 | 215,040 |
2017-05-13 | 206,905 |
2017-05-20 | 210,544 |
2017-05-27 | 232,138 |
2017-06-03 | 212,696 |
2017-06-10 | 234,652 |
2017-06-17 | 228,883 |
2017-06-24 | 239,635 |
2017-07-01 | 252,886 |
2017-07-08 | 284,329 |
2017-07-15 | 257,763 |
2017-07-22 | 220,455 |
2017-07-29 | 198,776 |
2017-08-05 | 211,924 |
2017-08-12 | 198,280 |
2017-08-19 | 195,130 |
2017-08-26 | 196,227 |
2017-09-02 | 250,627 |
2017-09-09 | 211,923 |
2017-09-16 | 212,313 |
2017-09-23 | 212,987 |
2017-09-30 | 204,180 |
2017-10-07 | 229,241 |
2017-10-14 | 205,592 |
2017-10-21 | 216,004 |
2017-10-28 | 215,977 |
2017-11-04 | 242,111 |
2017-11-11 | 236,654 |
2017-11-18 | 275,004 |
2017-11-25 | 224,851 |
2017-12-02 | 326,052 |
2017-12-09 | 282,055 |
2017-12-16 | 287,479 |
2017-12-23 | 325,180 |
2017-12-30 | 351,500 |
2018-01-06 | 403,930 |
2018-01-13 | 354,708 |
2018-01-20 | 260,432 |
2018-01-27 | 268,197 |
2018-02-03 | 243,422 |
2018-02-10 | 233,252 |
2018-02-17 | 212,609 |
2018-02-24 | 196,294 |
2018-03-03 | 225,893 |
2018-03-10 | 205,185 |
2018-03-17 | 198,649 |
2018-03-24 | 195,433 |
2018-03-31 | 201,057 |
2018-04-07 | 231,759 |
2018-04-14 | 226,090 |
2018-04-21 | 200,139 |
2018-04-28 | 186,451 |
2018-05-05 | 190,262 |
2018-05-12 | 195,214 |
2018-05-19 | 207,043 |
2018-05-26 | 202,846 |
2018-06-02 | 191,523 |
2018-06-09 | 217,289 |
2018-06-16 | 206,023 |
2018-06-23 | 222,766 |
2018-06-30 | 231,539 |
2018-07-07 | 264,869 |
2018-07-14 | 232,238 |
2018-07-21 | 201,288 |
2018-07-28 | 179,880 |
2018-08-04 | 185,174 |
2018-08-11 | 180,038 |
2018-08-18 | 173,331 |
2018-08-25 | 175,745 |
2018-09-01 | 173,607 |
2018-09-08 | 162,640 |
2018-09-15 | 173,624 |
2018-09-22 | 172,930 |
2018-09-29 | 171,816 |
2018-10-06 | 193,936 |
2018-10-13 | 190,501 |
2018-10-20 | 198,733 |
2018-10-27 | 198,530 |
2018-11-03 | 214,814 |
2018-11-10 | 235,981 |
2018-11-17 | 226,576 |
2018-11-24 | 218,658 |
2018-12-01 | 317,936 |
2018-12-08 | 261,525 |
2018-12-15 | 255,195 |
2018-12-22 | 291,581 |
2018-12-29 | 327,388 |
2019-01-05 | 350,681 |
2019-01-12 | 343,678 |
2019-01-19 | 269,369 |
2019-01-26 | 250,580 |
2019-02-02 | 254,263 |
2019-02-09 | 242,762 |
2019-02-16 | 210,679 |
2019-02-23 | 203,049 |
2019-03-02 | 220,540 |
2019-03-09 | 209,302 |
2019-03-16 | 194,335 |
2019-03-23 | 190,023 |
2019-03-30 | 183,775 |
2019-04-06 | 196,071 |
2019-04-13 | 196,364 |
2019-04-20 | 211,762 |
2019-04-27 | 204,755 |
2019-05-04 | 204,033 |
2019-05-11 | 188,264 |
2019-05-18 | 191,931 |
2019-05-25 | 198,194 |
2019-06-01 | 189,577 |
2019-06-08 | 220,186 |
2019-06-15 | 205,921 |
2019-06-22 | 225,819 |
2019-06-29 | 224,565 |
2019-07-06 | 231,995 |
2019-07-13 | 243,621 |
2019-07-20 | 196,382 |
2019-07-27 | 178,897 |
2019-08-03 | 179,879 |
2019-08-10 | 186,914 |
2019-08-17 | 171,386 |
2019-08-24 | 176,867 |
2019-08-31 | 179,516 |
2019-09-07 | 160,342 |
2019-09-14 | 173,134 |
2019-09-21 | 175,394 |
2019-09-28 | 172,968 |
2019-10-05 | 188,106 |
2019-10-12 | 201,677 |
2019-10-19 | 186,748 |
2019-10-26 | 198,733 |
2019-11-02 | 205,625 |
2019-11-09 | 238,996 |
2019-11-16 | 227,892 |
2019-11-23 | 252,428 |
2019-11-30 | 216,827 |
2019-12-07 | 317,866 |
2019-12-14 | 270,547 |
2019-12-21 | 287,243 |
2019-12-28 | 312,524 |
2020-01-04 | 335,480 |
2020-01-11 | 338,550 |
2020-01-18 | 282,088 |
2020-01-25 | 229,002 |
2020-02-01 | 224,664 |
2020-02-08 | 219,601 |
2020-02-15 | 209,336 |
2020-02-22 | 199,278 |
2020-02-29 | 216,982 |
2020-03-07 | 200,382 |
2020-03-14 | 251,416 |
2020-03-21 | 2,920,162 |
2020-03-28 | 6,015,821 |
2020-04-04 | 6,211,406 |
2020-04-11 | 4,965,046 |
2020-04-18 | 4,281,648 |
2020-04-25 | 3,515,439 |
2020-05-02 | 2,855,560 |
2020-05-09 | 2,614,093 |
Note: Due to the scale of the chart and rapid increase in initial unemployment insurance (UI) claims, the initial UI claims for the last eight weeks appear to align vertically. These reports only include regular state unemployment insurance claims and do not include claims from the federal Pandemic Unemployment Assistance Program. Shaded areas denote recessions.
Source: U.S. Employment and Training Administration, Initial Claims [ICSA], retrieved from Department of Labor (DOL), https://www.dol.gov/ui/data.pdf and https://oui.doleta.gov/unemploy/claims.asp, May 14, 2020
Some good news is that regular state UI claims have declined in each of the last five weeks. Though last week’s number is still close to three times the worst week of the Great Recession, the improvement is welcome. However, regular state UI claims do not include people who applied for Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA), the federal program that extends unemployment compensation coverage to many workers who are out of work because of the coronavirus but are not eligible for regular UI—people like independent contractors, gig workers, and people who had to leave their job to take care of a child whose school closed. It took quite some time for the PUA programs to get set up in most states, but they are now largely operational. The Department of Labor (DOL) reports that 3.4 million people had had PUA claims processed by April 25, and another 2.6 million have filed initial PUA claims on top of that.
Last Friday, the monthly employment situation report showed that the U.S. labor market saw a net decline of 20.5 million jobs between mid-March and mid-April. (Note, that number is not just layoffs where people filed for UI—it also accounts for a drop in hires, job losses where people didn’t file for UI, quits, and worker deaths.) The monthly employment numbers are from a survey that is taken mid-month. Today’s weekly UI claims numbers show that things have further deteriorated—drastically—since mid-April. An additional roughly 9.0 million people have applied for regular UI and 2.6 million have applied for PUA since that time. The May jobs number is going to be grim. And of course, workers aren’t just losing their jobs. Our health care system ties health insurance to work, so millions of workers have likely already lost their employer-provided health insurance.
As economic forecasts worsen, up to $1 trillion in federal aid to state and local governments could be needed by the end of 2021
Key takeaways:
- Congress should prioritize federal aid to state and local governments in the next relief and recovery legislation.
- New estimates show that the economic shock of the coronavirus could lead to a revenue shortfall of nearly $1 trillion by 2021 for state and local governments.
- Unemployment is forecast to be quite elevated even by the end of 2021, and so federal aid should continue as long as economic conditions warrant and not be set by arbitrary timelines.
As the next round of legislative relief and recovery packages are debated, federal aid to state and local governments has emerged as a high priority. This aid is absolutely crucial for avoiding a deep and prolonged recession.
The revenue shortfall facing state and local governments stemming from the collapse in economic activity—driven by the shock of the coronavirus—could reach nearly $1 trillion by the end of 2021. And even at the end of 2021, recent economic projections indicate that unless more relief and recovery is passed, the unemployment rate could still sit at just under 10%. In short, all facets of relief and recovery—including substantial aid to state and local governments—could well be needed for a long time, and their continuation should be tied explicitly to economic conditions and not to arbitrary timelines.
Tim Bartik at the Upjohn Institute has released updated projections of the revenue shortfall facing state and local governments. His projections are transparent and are largely based on estimated parameters from publicly available academic research. Bartik finds that if the recent projections for the path of the unemployment rate estimated by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) come to pass, state and local governments will be facing a revenue shortfall of nearly $1 trillion by the end of 2021.*
Updated state unemployment numbers: Large shares of the labor force have filed for unemployment in every state
The Department of Labor released the most recent unemployment insurance (UI) claims data yesterday, showing that another 2.8 million people filed for unemployment last week (not seasonally adjusted). In the past seven weeks, more than 30 million workers applied for UI benefits across the country, or nearly one in five workers.
Despite most states seeing a decline in UI claims filed relative to last week, six states saw increases in UI claims. Maine saw the largest percent increase in claims (111.1%) compared with the prior week, followed by Maryland (72.1%), New Mexico (38.9%), Oklahoma (30.0%), New Jersey (21.6%), and Connecticut (9.5%).
After California, Texas residents filed the second most UI claims last week, followed by Georgia. This comes after several states have allowed restaurants and similar businesses to reopen, including many in the South and Midwest, indicating that state policymakers are risking a greater outbreak with very little of the economic benefits they had expected.
Figure A and Table 1 below compare UI claims filed last week with the prior week and the pre-virus period, in both level and percent terms. It also shows the cumulative number of unemployment claims since March 7 and that number as a share of each state’s labor force. In three states, almost a third of the workforce filed an initial claim during the past two months: Kentucky (32.3%), Hawaii (31.7%), and Georgia (31.1%).
The pandemic sparked more appreciation for teachers, but will it give them a voice in education and their working conditions?
This year’s National Teacher Appreciation Week is happening under the unprecedented hardships that the COVID-19 pandemic has imposed on us. The health emergency forced the closing of schools all over the country, sending over 55 million K-12 students and about four million teachers home for the remainder of the school year.
But amidst the pain so many are enduring is a bright spot: Some teachers feel the appreciation is deeper than ever before.
With so much at stakes in the aftermath of this crisis, this can be an opportunity to turn that appreciation into the fuel that will finally restore the prestige of the teaching profession and improve teachers’ working conditions.
Overnight, the pandemic imposed a radical switch to remote teaching and learning that many hoped would be temporary. We soon learned, however, the school closings would last indefinitely as the country coped with the most severe worldwide public health crisis of our lifetimes complete with dramatic economic consequences.
With the support from parents and communities, teachers and students are carrying on with their respective endeavors as well as they can. In watching them, we’re all reminded of what learning and teaching entails: the mysteries embedded in each of the subjects, the lectures, the assignments, the projects, the questions, among so many others. But we’ve also realized that teaching goes beyond these day-in-and-day-out activities in the countless moments when we saw teachers go beyond the call of duty.Read more
What to watch on jobs day: Job losses in April may set U.S. employment levels back 20 years
- Job losses in the last two months likely set us back two decades.
- Aggregate weekly work hours will continue to fall precipitously.
- Don’t be misled by stronger-than-expected nominal wage growth.
- The unemployment rate will exceed the high-water mark in the Great Recession. Black unemployment could hit 20% in April.
- The employment-to-population ratio, or the share of the population with a job, will drop sharply.
On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) will release the latest monthly employment situation report for April and, based on the weekly numbers of workers who’ve applied for unemployment insurance, the labor market losses will be enormous. Last month’s report was just the tip of the iceberg of the labor market devastation experienced across the country over the last several weeks. By the reference week for the April report, an astounding 24.4 million workers had applied for claims. At the same time, millions more have been unsuccessful at filing claims either because they couldn’t get through or found the process too difficult.
Workers have been laid off, furloughed, or have needed to leave their jobs for COVID-19-related reasons. Because of the uncertainty in how many workers have lost their jobs and how they will be counted in the latest statistics—and uncertainty about how many workers have not been hired because job openings have dried up in this crisis—there are a wide range of projections for what we will see on Friday.
Here, I’m going to unpack a few of the key statistics and speculate on just how deep and wide-reaching this recession already is for workers across the economy.
Nearly one in five workers applied for state unemployment insurance benefits in the last seven weeks: Congress must act to mitigate harm from unprecedented joblessness
A previously unimaginable number of workers have applied for state unemployment insurance (UI) benefits as a result of the coronavirus shock. In the last seven weeks alone, more than 30 million workers have applied for unemployment compensation. That is nearly one in five workers. And it is nearly five times the worst seven-week stretch of the Great Recession.
These figures do not include people who applied for Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA), the new federal program that extends unemployment compensation coverage to many workers who are not eligible for regular UI but are nevertheless out of work as a result of the virus—people like independent contractors, gig workers, and people who had to leave their job to take care of a child whose school closed. It took a while for the PUA programs to get set up, but they are now operational in many states. With today’s data release, the Department of Labor (DOL) began providing PUA claims numbers, reporting that nearly a million people had had PUA claims processed by April 18, and at least another 1.4 million had filed PUA claims since that time.
It is worth noting that the DOL reports that 33.5 million workers applied for regular state unemployment compensation during the last seven weeks on a “seasonally adjusted” basis, compared with 30.7 million on an unadjusted basis. Seasonal adjustments are usually helpful—they are used to even out seasonal changes in claims that have nothing to do with the underlying strength or weakness of the labor market, typically providing a clearer picture of underlying trends. However, the way DOL does seasonal adjustments is distortionary at a time like this, so I focus on unadjusted numbers here.
Congress must include worker protections in the next coronavirus relief bill: We need an Essential Workers Bill of Rights
In response to the coronavirus pandemic, Congress has now passed four separate relief and recovery measures allocating trillions of dollars in aid, but none have provided meaningful protections to working people. Workers continue to be required to work without protective gear. Sick workers continue to lack access to paid sick leave. And when workers try and speak up for themselves and each other, they are fired. Workers are dying as a result.
Even a global pandemic has not been enough for policymakers to place the needs of working people ahead of corporate interests. As Congress turns its attention to another relief and recovery package, it must prioritize policies and investments that help working families mitigate the economic and public health disaster they are experiencing.
In the last six weeks, nearly 28 million workers have applied for unemployment insurance (UI). That is more than one in six workers and over five times the worst period of the Great Recession. All else equal, this level of job loss would translate into an unemployment rate of 20.5%. Further, 12.7 million workers have likely lost their employer-provided health insurance since the beginning of the pandemic.
Congress must act and pass legislation that is responsive to the magnitude of this crisis and direct assistance to the tens of millions of working families most impacted by the public health and economic emergencies.
The Essential Workers Bill of Rights, introduced by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), would provide front-line workers—including nurses, grocery and drug store workers, janitors, public transit workers, child care workers, and postal workers—the protections they need while providing essential services during the coronavirus pandemic. The following are key worker protections that should be included in the next coronavirus relief bill.
The extra $600 in unemployment insurance has been the best response yet to the economic shock of the coronavirus and should be extended
The CARES Act, the $2 trillion-plus package to provide economic relief and recovery from the coronavirus shock in early April was, for many reasons, deeply imperfect. But the modifications the CARES Act made to the nation’s unemployment insurance (UI) system are an utterly crucial lifeline for tens of millions of American workers. Besides temporarily expanding the eligibility criteria for who qualifies for unemployment benefits through the end of the year and providing an additional 13 weeks of state UI benefits, the CARES Act also provided an extra $600 per week in UI payments through the end of July.
This $600 top-up has been fiercely criticized by some since the Act passed—e.g., Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) stated that it would be extended past July only “over our dead bodies”—but the criticism is either ill-informed or in bad faith. The extra $600 has been by far the most effective part our economic policy response to the coronavirus shock. It is likely improving—not degrading—labor market efficiency, and we should build on this and make the nation’s unemployment insurance system well-resourced and far more generous even in normal times.
The history of how a flat $600 in additional UI benefits was agreed upon by policymakers is straightforward, if depressing. In normal times, these benefits are stingy, typically replacing between one-third and one-half of a typical worker’s weekly wage. For decades, too many economists and policymakers have labored under a number of wrong preconceptions about the labor market, and one of the most damaging was that decent jobs were plentiful and easy to get, and the only thing keeping potential workers out of these jobs for any stretch of time was workers’ own motivation, which could be sapped if benefits were too generous. It was the old and dumb idea that the U.S. social safety net—despite being by far the stingiest in the advanced world—had become a too-comfortable “hammock.” (For what it’s worth, the evidence from the aftermath of the Great Recession reveals that extended UI benefits had little or no effect on whether a worker found a job—meaning it wasn’t UI benefits that were keeping workers out of work—it was a lack of demand for workers.)
The economic shock of the coronavirus was an event so obviously unrelated to the motivations of individual workers that policymakers were willing to substantially (if temporarily) increase the generosity of unemployment benefits. Our preference would have been for a 100% replacement rate up to a quite generous maximum benefit. But decades of disinvestment in the administrative capacity of state UI offices left them incapable of flexibly calculating each new applicant’s benefit amount with a 100% replacement rate. (Case in point: most offices are still using the 1970s-era programming language COBOL to run their computers). State offices are capable of administering a flat-rate increase, however. So, policymakers in Congress came up with a smart and compassionate second-best solution of picking a flat-rate boost to benefits that would leave the average worker (and most workers overall) with 100% of their pre-crisis earnings.
But the necessity of the one-size-fits-all approach means that workers who earned less than the average worker before the crisis will receive benefits that are somewhat higher than 100% of their previous wage. Many conservatives claim this is somehow an economic disaster. They’re wrong—it’s actually great.
Thank you, D.C. Board of Elections, for making voting easier: I dedicate my favorite rap song to you
As I awoke today, preparing myself for another workday by listening to music, one of my favorite songs “Foldin Clothes” by J. Cole had me “feeling like best version of me so happy,” just one of the great lyrics from the rap song.
Why was I so happy? I got an email from the D.C. Board of Elections describing voting procedures that were much easier than in my home state of Louisiana, which recently passed an election plan that limits who has access to mail-in ballots. The email invited me, a new resident to Washington, to request a mail-in ballot for the 2020 election cycle which could be done one of six ways: online, email, fax, mail, phone, or in person.
Anyone who knows me knows I love to talk about voting. My dissertation examined the history of voting in America, including how the ghosts of lynchings still suppress the black vote in this country today. With all that’s going on to suppress minorities from voting—most recently the outrage of the Supreme Court’s refusal to extend the deadline for mail-in voting in Wisconsin in the middle of the pandemic—it’s been exhausting to keep beating the voting rights drum.
Every time I mention the importance of updating our voting methods, I am met with opposition. “You want people to vote by mail?! ONLINE?! There is no way it can be done securely,” many say. Regardless of the evidence I’ve provided that it has already been done securely in several states, people still resist the idea of adding more voting options nationally.
Well, turns out it’s not that difficult after all. D.C., which has had its own voting issues, is trying to make the process easier.
So, I’m dedicating “Foldin Clothes” to the D.C. elections leadership because they’re “doing the right thing.” I was able to download the Vote 4 DC app and it “felt so much better than doing the wrong thing” of not using the latest technology to make voting more accessible. To my surprise, this app allowed me to request a mail-in-ballot in less than two minutes! Having several options to request a ballot, including online options, “saved me some time and alleviated stress from my mind” of having to vote in person during a pandemic.
Updated state unemployment numbers: More than a quarter of the workforce has filed for unemployment in six states
Another 3.5 million U.S. workers filed for unemployment insurance (UI) benefits last week, according to the Department of Labor’s most recent data released this morning (not seasonally adjusted). In the past six weeks, nearly 28 million, or one in six, workers applied for UI benefits across the country.
Despite most states seeing a decline in UI claims filed relative to last week, eight states continued to see increases in UI claims. Last week, Washington saw the largest percent increase in claims (74.6%) compared with the prior week, followed by Oregon (25.6%) and Nevada (14.0%).
Figure A and Table 1 allow you to compare state UI claims filed last week with the prior week and the pre-virus period, in both level and percent terms. It also shows the cumulative number of unemployment claims since March 7 and that number as a share of each state’s labor force.
New and cumulative jobless claims by state: Unemployment insurance (UI) claims filed during the week ending April 25, change in claims , and total claims as share of state labor force
State | Initial claims filed | % change from the prior week | Level change from the prior week | % change from pre-virus period | Level change from pre-virus period | Sum of initial claims for the seven weeks ending April 25 | Sum of initial claims as a share of labor force |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | 64,170 | -3.4% | -2,262 | 2,944% | 62,062 | 408,551 | 18.2% |
Alaska | 11,187 | -8.3% | -1,014 | 1,225% | 10,343 | 72,726 | 21.1% |
Arizona | 52,098 | -28.1% | -20,359 | 1,487% | 48,815 | 477,646 | 13.2% |
Arkansas | 16,745 | -34.1% | -8,659 | 1,032% | 15,266 | 178,277 | 13.0% |
California | 328,042 | -37.9% | -200,318 | 703% | 287,170 | 3,732,952 | 19.1% |
Colorado | 38,367 | -43.3% | -29,272 | 1,915% | 36,463 | 340,837 | 10.7% |
Connecticut | 33,037 | -67.9% | -69,771 | 1,180% | 30,456 | 265,126 | 13.7% |
Delaware | 7,754 | -17.9% | -1,692 | 1,258% | 7,183 | 79,694 | 16.3% |
Washington D.C. | 8,158 | -5.6% | -481 | 1,695% | 7,704 | 73,644 | 17.8% |
Florida | 432,465 | -14.6% | -74,205 | 8,435% | 427,398 | 1,598,699 | 15.3% |
Georgia | 264,818 | 7.2% | 17,815 | 4,847% | 259,465 | 1,372,939 | 26.6% |
Hawaii | 22,615 | -15.0% | -3,976 | 1,891% | 21,479 | 196,024 | 29.3% |
Idaho | 8,268 | -36.5% | -4,755 | 651% | 7,167 | 118,284 | 13.3% |
Illinois | 81,245 | -21.1% | -21,691 | 765% | 71,854 | 829,787 | 13.0% |
Indiana | 57,397 | -21.1% | -15,359 | 2,188% | 54,889 | 572,443 | 16.9% |
Iowa | 28,827 | 7.2% | 1,926 | 1,136% | 26,494 | 262,958 | 15.0% |
Kansas | 28,054 | -8.3% | -2,542 | 1,639% | 26,441 | 217,477 | 14.5% |
Kentucky | 90,824 | -12.7% | -13,157 | 3,530% | 88,322 | 593,614 | 28.5% |
Louisiana | 66,167 | -28.0% | -25,756 | 3,824% | 64,481 | 510,457 | 24.2% |
Maine | 7,478 | -36.5% | -4,291 | 864% | 6,702 | 109,508 | 15.8% |
Maryland | 36,471 | -24.8% | -12,024 | 1,221% | 33,711 | 389,521 | 11.9% |
Massachusetts | 70,714 | -12.7% | -10,255 | 1,067% | 64,656 | 732,467 | 19.1% |
Michigan | 81,312 | -40.5% | -55,395 | 1,372% | 75,788 | 1,266,459 | 25.6% |
Minnesota | 53,561 | -28.4% | -21,268 | 1,422% | 50,042 | 560,661 | 18.0% |
Mississippi | 35,843 | -2.9% | -1,070 | 4,230% | 35,015 | 203,037 | 15.9% |
Missouri | 52,403 | -12.1% | -7,199 | 1,625% | 49,365 | 456,142 | 14.7% |
Montana | 6,619 | -40.8% | -4,557 | 747% | 5,838 | 90,243 | 16.8% |
Nebraska | 8,197 | -32.9% | -4,025 | 1,513% | 7,689 | 104,972 | 10.1% |
Nevada | 45,043 | 14.0% | 5,547 | 1,852% | 42,736 | 393,061 | 25.2% |
New Hampshire | 14,347 | -29.7% | -6,067 | 2,443% | 13,783 | 160,635 | 20.6% |
New Jersey | 71,017 | -49.3% | -69,122 | 768% | 62,838 | 898,947 | 19.7% |
New Mexico | 13,712 | 0.7% | 91 | 1,836% | 13,004 | 119,331 | 12.4% |
New York | 218,912 | 6.7% | 13,728 | 1,088% | 200,482 | 1,624,114 | 17.0% |
North Carolina | 97,232 | -8.5% | -9,034 | 3,680% | 94,660 | 750,836 | 14.7% |
North Dakota | 6,996 | -13.3% | -1,069 | 1,568% | 6,577 | 57,583 | 14.2% |
Ohio | 90,760 | -17.4% | -19,070 | 1,143% | 83,460 | 1,063,741 | 18.2% |
Oklahoma | 42,577 | -8.8% | -4,119 | 2,661% | 41,035 | 275,794 | 15.0% |
Oregon | 46,722 | 25.6% | 9,513 | 1,076% | 42,750 | 283,121 | 13.4% |
Pennsylvania | 131,282 | -32.5% | -63,312 | 940% | 118,661 | 1,635,951 | 24.9% |
Rhode Island | 13,138 | -27.3% | -4,940 | 1,070% | 12,015 | 146,723 | 26.3% |
South Carolina | 65,159 | -12.4% | -9,203 | 3,251% | 63,215 | 415,635 | 17.4% |
South Dakota | 5,389 | 1.8% | 94 | 2,857% | 5,207 | 33,933 | 7.3% |
Tennessee | 43,792 | -34.9% | -23,434 | 2,078% | 41,782 | 428,370 | 12.7% |
Texas | 254,199 | -9.5% | -26,562 | 1,860% | 241,228 | 1,572,171 | 11.1% |
Utah | 11,830 | -39.8% | -7,819 | 1,082% | 10,829 | 138,561 | 8.5% |
Vermont | 4,971 | -24.7% | -1,627 | 708% | 4,356 | 56,781 | 16.7% |
Virginia | 74,043 | -10.5% | -8,686 | 2,703% | 71,402 | 570,240 | 12.8% |
Washington | 145,757 | 74.6% | 62,282 | 2,301% | 139,687 | 871,937 | 22.0% |
West Virginia | 29,576 | -36.7% | -17,179 | 2,517% | 28,446 | 124,693 | 15.5% |
Wisconsin | 49,910 | -10.7% | -5,973 | 783% | 44,256 | 447,771 | 14.4% |
Wyoming | 2,886 | -34.1% | -1,495 | 480% | 2,388 | 30,170 | 10.3% |
Notes: Initial claims for the week ending April 25 reflect advance state claims, not seasonally adjusted. For comparisons with the “pre-virus period,” we use a four-week average of initial claims for the weeks ending February 15–March 7, 2020. For comparisons to the size of the labor force, we use February 2020 levels.
Source: U.S. Employment and Training Administration, Initial Claims [ICSA], retrieved from Department of Labor (DOL), https://www.dol.gov/ui/data.pdf and https://oui.doleta.gov/unemploy/claims.asp, April 30, 2020
12.7 million workers have likely lost employer-provided health insurance since the coronavirus shock began
These estimates were updated on May 14, 2020. See the updated estimates.
Since the economic fallout of the coronavirus shock began in early March, the number of workers laid-off or furloughed—as measured by new claims for unemployment insurance (UI)—has skyrocketed. We have used data from states that track UI claims by industry to get a rough estimate of how many workers are at high risk of losing their employer-provided health insurance (EPHI) over this as well.
The methodology is described in this blog post, and the underlying data (which has begun to include more and more states tracking UI claims by industry) can be found here. Table 1 below shows UI claims by industry across states that collect this data, and also shows employer-provided health insurance (EPHI) coverage rates in those industries in 2018. As of April 30, just under 28 million workers had been laid off or furloughed since early March. We find that this translates into likely EPHI losses of 12.7 million.
Because the United States is unique among rich countries in tying health insurance benefits to employment, many of the newly unemployed will suddenly face prohibitively costly insurance options. A comprehensive policy solution would be to extend Medicare and Medicaid to all those suffering job losses during the pandemic period, with the federal government funding this expansion. It has been proposed that the federal government pay for all of COBRA coverage so that workers who are laid off or furloughed may continue their employer-provided coverage. While this policy proposal will help many workers continue coverage, in some states it will not help workers from small businesses with fewer than 20 employees, who are not eligible for COBRA.
The linkage between specific jobs and the availability of health insurance is a prime source of inefficiency and inequity in the U.S. health system. It is especially terrifying for workers to lose their health insurance as a result of, and during, an ongoing pandemic.
Nearly 28 million workers applied for unemployment insurance benefits in the last six weeks: Congress must act to mitigate harm from unprecedented joblessness
The number of workers applying for unemployment insurance (UI) benefits has risen to never-before-seen levels as a result of the coronavirus shock. In the last six weeks, nearly 28 million workers have applied for unemployment compensation. That is more than one in six workers, and over five times the worst period of the Great Recession.
I should note that the Department of Labor (DOL) reports that 30.3 million workers applied for UI during the last six weeks on a “seasonally adjusted” basis, compared with 27.9 million on an unadjusted basis. Seasonal adjustments are typically helpful—they are used to even out seasonal changes in claims that have nothing to do with the underlying strength or weakness of the labor market, providing a clearer picture of underlying trends. However, the way DOL does seasonal adjustments is distortionary at a time like this, so I focus on unadjusted numbers here.
All else equal, job loss of the magnitude reflected in the UI claims of the last six weeks would translate into an unemployment rate of 20.5%. It’s worth remembering that unemployment hits different racial groups differently as a result of things like occupational segregation, differences in access to educational credentials, discrimination, and other labor market disparities related to race. In our economy, in good times and bad, the white unemployment rate tends to be about 0.9 times the overall unemployment rate, and the black unemployment rate tends to be about 1.8 times the overall unemployment rate. That means that an overall unemployment rate of 20.5% would translate into a white unemployment rate of 18.4% and a black unemployment rate of 36.8%.
However, the official unemployment rates, when they are released, will likely not reflect all coronavirus-related layoffs. This is due to the fact that jobless workers are only counted as unemployed if they are available to work and actively seeking work. That means many workers who lose their job as a result of the virus will be counted as dropping out of the labor force instead of as unemployed, because they are unable to search for work due to the lockdown, or because they are not available to work because they are, for example, caring for children whose day care has closed. March data suggest that roughly half of workers who are out of work as a result of the virus will be counted as unemployed, and half are being counted as dropping out of the labor force.
Unemployment filing failures: New survey confirms that millions of jobless were unable to file an unemployment insurance claim
Millions of the newly jobless are going without benefits as the unemployment system buckles under the weight of new claims, according to our new national survey, conducted in mid-April.
For every 10 people who said they successfully filed for unemployment benefits during the previous four weeks:
- Three to four additional people tried to apply but could not get through the system to make a claim.
- Two additional people did not try to apply because it was too difficult to do so.
These findings imply the official count of unemployment insurance claims likely drastically understates the extent of employment reductions and the need for economic relief during the coronavirus crisis. To quantify the undercount, we look at the 21.5 million workers who filed for unemployment benefits from March 22 to April 18. Our results suggest:
- An additional 7.8 to 12.2 million people could have filed for benefits had the process been easier.
- After accounting for these workers—who applied but could not get through or did not try because of the difficult process—about half of potential UI applicants are actually receiving benefits.
When we extrapolate our survey findings to the full five weeks of UI claims since March 15, we estimate that an additional 8.9–13.9 million people could have filed for benefits had the process been easier.
These findings on the millions of frustrated filers and the UI system’s low payment rate highlight the need for policies to improve rather than hinder the UI application process. At a minimum, states should presume everyone is eligible and immediately pay benefits, only verifying eligibility and reviewing claims after the unprecedented wave of claims slows down.
The next coronavirus relief package should provide aid to state and local governments, protect employed and unemployed workers, and invest in our democracy
Key takeaways:
- Congress has passed a series of bills to mitigate the harm of the coronavirus. However, they haven’t been enough to help working people. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that, without additional relief, the unemployment rate will average 16% in the third quarter of 2020 and 10.1% in 2021.
- The next recovery and relief bill should include $500 billion in aid to state and local governments, make additional investments in unemployment compensation, protect workers’ paychecks, include worker protections, invest in our democracy, and more.
In response to the coronavirus, Congress has passed a series of bills allocating more than $2 trillion to relief and recovery programs. However, these measures have been insufficient in scope and magnitude to address the severity of the economic and public health crisis we are experiencing. Further, lawmakers have failed to include key provisions that would address the needs of working families in this crisis. As a result of these policy missteps, the relief and recovery measures have not done nearly enough to mitigate the level of pain working people are experiencing or to ensure that the economy can get back on track after the shutdown period is over. It is critical that Congress correct its failures in future relief packages. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that without additional relief, the unemployment rate will average 16% in the third quarter of this year. As a point of comparison, the highest the unemployment rate reached in the Great Recession was 10%, and it reached that level for only one month. CBO projects that without additional relief, the unemployment rate will average 10.1% for the entire calendar year 2021.
Trump executive order to suspend immigration would reduce green cards by nearly one-third if extended for a full year
President Trump’s April 22 executive order to “suspend immigration” has the potential to reduce the number of migrants who can obtain green cards, i.e., become lawful permanent residents (LPRs), by hundreds of thousands if it remains in place for a substantial period of time beyond its initial 60-day duration.
Table 1 lists the categories of green cards that are affected by Trump’s executive order, along with the number of green cards that were issued in 2019 in each of those categories to applicants who were “new arrivals,” meaning they applied for their green cards from abroad. (The executive order does not suspend green cards for applicants who already reside in the United States.)
As Table 1 shows, there were one million total green cards issued during all of 2019, and 316,000 green cards issued under the categories suspended by Trump’s new executive order. The executive order is initially valid for 60 days (two months); a 60-day suspension of these categories would result in an estimated reduction of 52,600 green cards, or a reduction of 5.1% of all green cards relative to the total number issued in 2019.
However, it is impossible to know whether the executive order will remain in place for just two months, multiple years, or somewhere in between. Each additional 60 days would reduce the number by an additional 52,600, or an additional 5.1% of the annual green card total. If the executive order remains in force for one full year, it would result in a reduction of 316,000 green cards, or 31%, nearly one-third, of the one million green cards issued in 2019.
Green cards would fall by 31% under Trump’s executive order: Number of people applying from abroad who became U.S. lawful permanent residents in 2019 in the categories suspended by Trump’s April 2020 executive order
Immigrant class of admission, new arrivals only | Number in 2019 |
---|---|
Immediate relatives of U.S. citizens | |
Parents | 66,782 |
Family-sponsored preferences | |
First: Unmarried sons/daughters of U.S. citizens and their children | 20,866 |
Second: Spouses, children, and unmarried sons/daughters of alien residents; children of spouses of alien residents | 85,089 |
Third: Married sons/daughters of U.S. citizens and their spouses and children | 22,874 |
Fourth: Brothers/sisters of U.S. citizens (at least 21 years of age) and their spouses and children | 56,083 |
Employment-based preferences | |
First: Priority workers, and their spouses and children | 2,238 |
Second: Professionals with advanced degrees or aliens of exceptional ability, and their spouses and children | 3,432 |
Third: Skilled workers, professionals, and unskilled workers, and their spouses and children | 13,522 |
Fourth: Certain special immigrants, and their spouses and children | 2,080 |
Diversity Immigrant Visa program | 42,437 |
Children born abroad to alien residents | 59 |
Other | 356 |
Total in suspended categories | 315,818 |
Total green cards issued, all categories | 1,030,990 |
Suspended categories as a percentage of total green cards | 31% |
Notes: New arrivals represents applicants for lawful permanent resident status who are residing outside of the United States, usually in the country of origin. “Other” category primarily consists of those admitted under special legislation.
Source: Author’s analysis of U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Legal Immigration and Adjustment of Status Report Fiscal Year 2019, Quarter 4, Table 1B.
New state unemployment numbers show workers continue to file unemployment claims in daunting numbers
Correction: This blog post was updated on 4/24/20 with the correct data in Figure A and Table 1. The figure and table initially had the wrong data for the percent change from the previous week. We regret the error.
The Department of Labor released the most recent unemployment insurance (UI) claims data this morning, which shows that another 4.3 million people filed for UI benefits last week (not seasonally adjusted). More people filed for UI in the last week alone than during the worst five-week stretch of the Great Recession. In the past five weeks, more than 24 million workers have applied for UI benefits across the country.
Last week, Connecticut (102,757), Florida (505,137), and West Virginia (46,251) experienced their highest level of initial UI claims filings ever, each seeing the number of claims approximately triple over the week. Last week, Florida saw the largest percent increase in claims (9,869%) relative to the pre-virus period of any state. Florida residents also filed the second most UI claims last week, followed by Texas and Georgia.
Figure A compares UI claims filed last week with filings in the pre-virus period, showing that all states, especially many in the South, continue to struggle. Eight of the 10 states that had the highest percent change in initial UI claims relative to the pre-virus period are in the South: Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, and West Virginia.
Initial unemployment insurance claims filed during the week ending April 18, by state
State | Initial claims filed | Percent change from the prior week | Level change from the prior week | Percent change from pre-virus period | Level change from pre-virus period | Sum of initial claims for the six weeks ending April 18 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | 65,431 | -14.3% | -11,083 | 3,004% | 63,323 | 344,381 |
Alaska | 13,027 | 1.6% | 194 | 1,443% | 12,183 | 61,539 |
Arizona | 71,843 | -26.5% | -26,074 | 2,088% | 68,560 | 425,548 |
Arkansas | 24,236 | -28.7% | -10,225 | 1,538% | 22,757 | 161,532 |
California | 533,568 | -19.4% | -127,112 | 1,205% | 492,696 | 3,404,910 |
Colorado | 68,667 | -35.3% | -36,933 | 3,506% | 66,763 | 302,470 |
Connecticut | 102,757 | 201.9% | 68,758 | 3,881% | 100,176 | 232,089 |
Delaware | 9,294 | -28.8% | -3,812 | 1,528% | 8,723 | 71,940 |
Washington D.C. | 8,591 | -13.4% | -1,335 | 1,790% | 8,137 | 65,486 |
Florida | 505,137 | 180.8% | 326,251 | 9,869% | 500,070 | 1,166,234 |
Georgia | 243,677 | -22.7% | -72,578 | 4,452% | 238,324 | 1,108,121 |
Hawaii | 26,477 | -23.4% | -8,126 | 2,231% | 25,341 | 173,409 |
Idaho | 12,456 | -29.7% | -5,508 | 1,031% | 11,355 | 110,016 |
Illinois | 102,736 | -27.1% | -38,224 | 994% | 93,345 | 748,542 |
Indiana | 75,483 | -36.0% | -40,999 | 2,909% | 72,975 | 515,046 |
Iowa | 27,912 | -38.7% | -16,988 | 1,097% | 25,579 | 234,131 |
Kansas | 31,920 | 2.4% | 723 | 1,879% | 30,307 | 189,423 |
Kentucky | 103,548 | -10.6% | -12,296 | 4,039% | 101,046 | 502,790 |
Louisiana | 92,039 | 15.4% | 12,270 | 5,359% | 90,353 | 444,290 |
Maine | 11,446 | -12.7% | -1,719 | 1,375% | 10,670 | 102,030 |
Maryland | 46,676 | -22.9% | -14,409 | 1,591% | 43,916 | 353,050 |
Massachusetts | 80,345 | -22.0% | -22,844 | 1,226% | 74,287 | 661,753 |
Michigan | 134,119 | -38.5% | -85,500 | 2,328% | 128,595 | 1,185,147 |
Minnesota | 74,873 | -19.7% | -18,304 | 2,027% | 71,354 | 507,100 |
Mississippi | 35,843 | -19.3% | -8,835 | 4,230% | 35,015 | 167,194 |
Missouri | 52,678 | -41.6% | -42,524 | 1,634% | 49,640 | 403,739 |
Montana | 10,509 | -21.7% | -3,099 | 1,245% | 9,728 | 83,624 |
Nebraska | 12,340 | -24.9% | -4,057 | 2,328% | 11,832 | 96,775 |
Nevada | 40,909 | -32.6% | -19,145 | 1,673% | 38,602 | 348,018 |
New Hampshire | 19,110 | -19.2% | -4,859 | 3,287% | 18,546 | 146,288 |
New Jersey | 139,277 | -0.9% | -1,281 | 1,603% | 131,098 | 827,930 |
New Mexico | 13,338 | -28.5% | -5,422 | 1,783% | 12,630 | 105,619 |
New York | 204,716 | -48.0% | -189,517 | 1,011% | 186,286 | 1,405,202 |
North Carolina | 104,515 | -24.2% | -33,889 | 3,964% | 101,943 | 653,604 |
North Dakota | 9,042 | -15.1% | -1,437 | 2,055% | 8,623 | 50,587 |
Ohio | 108,801 | -31.1% | -49,487 | 1,390% | 101,501 | 972,981 |
Oklahoma | 40,297 | -14.3% | -7,785 | 2,513% | 38,755 | 233,217 |
Oregon | 35,101 | -31.8% | -17,372 | 784% | 31,129 | 236,399 |
Pennsylvania | 198,081 | -17.1% | -40,274 | 1,469% | 185,460 | 1,504,669 |
Rhode Island | 17,578 | -22.4% | -5,031 | 1,466% | 16,455 | 132,985 |
South Carolina | 73,116 | -16.6% | -14,785 | 3,660% | 71,172 | 350,476 |
South Dakota | 5,128 | -16.7% | -1,064 | 2,714% | 4,946 | 28,544 |
Tennessee | 68,968 | -6.5% | -4,661 | 3,331% | 66,958 | 384,578 |
Texas | 280,406 | 2.4% | 6,504 | 2,062% | 267,435 | 1,317,972 |
Utah | 19,751 | -19.8% | -4,866 | 1,873% | 18,750 | 126,731 |
Vermont | 6,434 | -31.7% | -3,064 | 945% | 5,819 | 51,810 |
Virginia | 84,387 | -20.9% | -21,890 | 3,095% | 81,746 | 496,197 |
Washington | 89,105 | -42.2% | -60,980 | 1,368% | 83,035 | 726,180 |
West Virginia | 46,251 | 212.9% | 31,811 | 3,993% | 45,121 | 95,117 |
Wisconsin | 55,886 | -20.2% | -14,117 | 888% | 50,232 | 397,861 |
Wyoming | 3,321 | -24.4% | -1,413 | 567% | 2,823 | 27,284 |
Notes: Initial claims for the week ending April 18 reflect advance state claims, not seasonally adjusted. For comparisons with the “pre-virus period,” we use a four-week average of initial claims for the weeks ending February 15–March 7, 2020.
Source: U.S. Employment and Training Administration, Initial Claims [ICSA], retrieved from Department of Labor (DOL), https://www.dol.gov/ui/data.pdf and https://oui.doleta.gov/unemploy/claims.asp, April 23, 2020
In the last five weeks, more than 24 million workers applied for unemployment insurance benefits
In the last five weeks, the number of workers applying for unemployment insurance (UI) benefits has skyrocketed to well over 20 times what it was in the pre-coronavirus period, and over five times the worst five-week stretch of the Great Recession. For comparison, in the period before the coronavirus hit, just over a million workers would apply for UI in a typical five-week span, and in the worst five-week stretch of the Great Recession, it was less than four million. In the last five weeks, it was more than 24 million. That means more than one in seven workers applied for UI. (It should be noted that using seasonally adjusted numbers, the Department of Labor [DOL] reports that 26.5 million workers applied for UI during the last five weeks, and using unadjusted numbers, they report that 24.4 million workers applied for benefits. I focus on the unadjusted numbers because, while seasonal adjustments are typically helpful—they are used to even out seasonal changes in claims that have nothing to do with the underlying strength or weakness of the labor market—the way DOL does seasonal adjustments is somewhat distortionary at a time like this).
Weekly initial unemployment insurance claims: Not seasonally adjusted, 1967–present
Week ending | Initial claims |
---|---|
1967-01-07 | 346,000 |
1967-01-14 | 334,000 |
1967-01-21 | 277,000 |
1967-01-28 | 252,000 |
1967-02-04 | 274,000 |
1967-02-11 | 276,000 |
1967-02-18 | 247,000 |
1967-02-25 | 248,000 |
1967-03-04 | 326,000 |
1967-03-11 | 240,000 |
1967-03-18 | 225,000 |
1967-03-25 | 215,000 |
1967-04-01 | 223,000 |
1967-04-08 | 251,000 |
1967-04-15 | 289,000 |
1967-04-22 | 218,000 |
1967-04-29 | 216,000 |
1967-05-06 | 221,000 |
1967-05-13 | 188,000 |
1967-05-20 | 177,000 |
1967-05-27 | 170,000 |
1967-06-03 | 175,000 |
1967-06-10 | 188,000 |
1967-06-17 | 176,000 |
1967-06-24 | 178,000 |
1967-07-01 | 206,000 |
1967-07-08 | 322,000 |
1967-07-15 | 309,000 |
1967-07-22 | 282,000 |
1967-07-29 | 243,000 |
1967-08-05 | 250,000 |
1967-08-12 | 193,000 |
1967-08-19 | 174,000 |
1967-08-26 | 160,000 |
1967-09-02 | 163,000 |
1967-09-09 | 156,000 |
1967-09-16 | 165,000 |
1967-09-23 | 155,000 |
1967-09-30 | 154,000 |
1967-10-07 | 195,000 |
1967-10-14 | 159,000 |
1967-10-21 | 181,000 |
1967-10-28 | 174,000 |
1967-11-04 | 204,000 |
1967-11-11 | 201,000 |
1967-11-18 | 209,000 |
1967-11-25 | 200,000 |
1967-12-02 | 228,000 |
1967-12-09 | 258,000 |
1967-12-16 | 241,000 |
1967-12-23 | 289,000 |
1967-12-30 | 332,000 |
1968-01-06 | 357,000 |
1968-01-13 | 373,000 |
1968-01-20 | 293,000 |
1968-01-27 | 242,000 |
1968-02-03 | 308,000 |
1968-02-10 | 257,000 |
1968-02-17 | 214,000 |
1968-02-24 | 199,000 |
1968-03-02 | 198,000 |
1968-03-09 | 208,000 |
1968-03-16 | 179,000 |
1968-03-23 | 175,000 |
1968-03-30 | 165,000 |
1968-04-06 | 184,000 |
1968-04-13 | 167,000 |
1968-04-20 | 165,000 |
1968-04-27 | 216,000 |
1968-05-04 | 180,000 |
1968-05-11 | 164,000 |
1968-05-18 | 156,000 |
1968-05-25 | 148,000 |
1968-06-01 | 139,000 |
1968-06-08 | 149,000 |
1968-06-15 | 154,000 |
1968-06-22 | 152,000 |
1968-06-29 | 173,000 |
1968-07-06 | 266,000 |
1968-07-13 | 242,000 |
1968-07-20 | 216,000 |
1968-07-27 | 238,000 |
1968-08-03 | 235,000 |
1968-08-10 | 222,000 |
1968-08-17 | 160,000 |
1968-08-24 | 148,000 |
1968-08-31 | 139,000 |
1968-09-07 | 135,000 |
1968-09-14 | 141,000 |
1968-09-21 | 142,000 |
1968-09-28 | 143,000 |
1968-10-05 | 153,000 |
1968-10-12 | 151,000 |
1968-10-19 | 151,000 |
1968-10-26 | 152,000 |
1968-11-02 | 161,000 |
1968-11-09 | 174,000 |
1968-11-16 | 196,000 |
1968-11-23 | 211,000 |
1968-11-30 | 180,000 |
1968-12-07 | 223,000 |
1968-12-14 | 233,000 |
1968-12-21 | 243,000 |
1968-12-28 | 333,000 |
1969-01-04 | 290,000 |
1969-01-11 | 337,000 |
1969-01-18 | 265,000 |
1969-01-25 | 236,000 |
1969-02-01 | 250,000 |
1969-02-08 | 248,000 |
1969-02-15 | 219,000 |
1969-02-22 | 199,000 |
1969-03-01 | 206,000 |
1969-03-08 | 195,000 |
1969-03-15 | 179,000 |
1969-03-22 | 158,000 |
1969-03-29 | 157,000 |
1969-04-05 | 170,000 |
1969-04-12 | 187,000 |
1969-04-19 | 168,000 |
1969-04-26 | 151,000 |
1969-05-03 | 150,000 |
1969-05-10 | 157,000 |
1969-05-17 | 141,000 |
1969-05-24 | 138,000 |
1969-05-31 | 135,000 |
1969-06-07 | 148,000 |
1969-06-14 | 145,000 |
1969-06-21 | 155,000 |
1969-06-28 | 177,000 |
1969-07-05 | 267,000 |
1969-07-12 | 271,000 |
1969-07-19 | 246,000 |
1969-07-26 | 221,000 |
1969-08-02 | 223,000 |
1969-08-09 | 210,000 |
1969-08-16 | 168,000 |
1969-08-23 | 154,000 |
1969-08-30 | 144,000 |
1969-09-06 | 133,000 |
1969-09-13 | 149,000 |
1969-09-20 | 147,000 |
1969-09-27 | 147,000 |
1969-10-04 | 159,000 |
1969-10-11 | 168,000 |
1969-10-18 | 155,000 |
1969-10-25 | 171,000 |
1969-11-01 | 174,000 |
1969-11-08 | 206,000 |
1969-11-15 | 196,000 |
1969-11-22 | 230,000 |
1969-11-29 | 219,000 |
1969-12-06 | 247,000 |
1969-12-13 | 264,000 |
1969-12-20 | 289,000 |
1969-12-27 | 320,000 |
1970-01-03 | 344,000 |
1970-01-10 | 429,000 |
1970-01-17 | 386,000 |
1970-01-24 | 316,000 |
1970-01-31 | 293,000 |
1970-02-07 | 324,000 |
1970-02-14 | 308,000 |
1970-02-21 | 285,000 |
1970-02-28 | 241,000 |
1970-03-07 | 270,000 |
1970-03-14 | 258,000 |
1970-03-21 | 233,000 |
1970-03-28 | 236,000 |
1970-04-04 | 250,000 |
1970-04-11 | 300,000 |
1970-04-18 | 339,000 |
1970-04-25 | 299,000 |
1970-05-02 | 278,000 |
1970-05-09 | 279,000 |
1970-05-16 | 242,000 |
1970-05-23 | 231,000 |
1970-05-30 | 224,000 |
1970-06-06 | 234,000 |
1970-06-13 | 242,000 |
1970-06-20 | 245,000 |
1970-06-27 | 247,000 |
1970-07-04 | 309,000 |
1970-07-11 | 369,000 |
1970-07-18 | 353,000 |
1970-07-25 | 329,000 |
1970-08-01 | 293,000 |
1970-08-08 | 278,000 |
1970-08-15 | 257,000 |
1970-08-22 | 238,000 |
1970-08-29 | 220,000 |
1970-09-05 | 240,000 |
1970-09-12 | 207,000 |
1970-09-19 | 247,000 |
1970-09-26 | 256,000 |
1970-10-03 | 284,000 |
1970-10-10 | 287,000 |
1970-10-17 | 259,000 |
1970-10-24 | 280,000 |
1970-10-31 | 283,000 |
1970-11-07 | 333,000 |
1970-11-14 | 307,000 |
1970-11-21 | 333,000 |
1970-11-28 | 354,000 |
1970-12-05 | 378,000 |
1970-12-12 | 370,000 |
1970-12-19 | 354,000 |
1970-12-26 | 451,000 |
1971-01-02 | 443,000 |
1971-01-09 | 500,000 |
1971-01-16 | 452,000 |
1971-01-23 | 399,000 |
1971-01-30 | 353,000 |
1971-02-06 | 375,000 |
1971-02-13 | 333,000 |
1971-02-20 | 286,000 |
1971-02-27 | 289,000 |
1971-03-06 | 306,000 |
1971-03-13 | 275,000 |
1971-03-20 | 260,000 |
1971-03-27 | 261,000 |
1971-04-03 | 267,000 |
1971-04-10 | 278,000 |
1971-04-17 | 257,000 |
1971-04-24 | 248,000 |
1971-05-01 | 237,000 |
1971-05-08 | 260,000 |
1971-05-15 | 230,000 |
1971-05-22 | 231,000 |
1971-05-29 | 231,000 |
1971-06-05 | 232,000 |
1971-06-12 | 244,000 |
1971-06-19 | 249,000 |
1971-06-26 | 247,000 |
1971-07-03 | 288,000 |
1971-07-10 | 335,000 |
1971-07-17 | 367,000 |
1971-07-24 | 342,000 |
1971-07-31 | 340,000 |
1971-08-07 | 362,000 |
1971-08-14 | 282,000 |
1971-08-21 | 252,000 |
1971-08-28 | 228,000 |
1971-09-04 | 268,000 |
1971-09-11 | 219,000 |
1971-09-18 | 230,000 |
1971-09-25 | 236,000 |
1971-10-02 | 238,000 |
1971-10-09 | 280,000 |
1971-10-16 | 233,000 |
1971-10-23 | 251,000 |
1971-10-30 | 241,000 |
1971-11-06 | 297,000 |
1971-11-13 | 289,000 |
1971-11-20 | 291,000 |
1971-11-27 | 284,000 |
1971-12-04 | 372,000 |
1971-12-11 | 348,000 |
1971-12-18 | 329,000 |
1971-12-25 | 340,000 |
1972-01-01 | 405,000 |
1972-01-08 | 479,000 |
1972-01-15 | 395,000 |
1972-01-22 | 347,000 |
1972-01-29 | 326,000 |
1972-02-05 | 342,000 |
1972-02-12 | 318,000 |
1972-02-19 | 279,000 |
1972-02-26 | 252,000 |
1972-03-04 | 263,000 |
1972-03-11 | 257,000 |
1972-03-18 | 241,000 |
1972-03-25 | 231,000 |
1972-04-01 | 224,000 |
1972-04-08 | 271,000 |
1972-04-15 | 237,000 |
1972-04-22 | 223,000 |
1972-04-29 | 214,000 |
1972-05-06 | 234,000 |
1972-05-13 | 218,000 |
1972-05-20 | 210,000 |
1972-05-27 | 209,000 |
1972-06-03 | 198,000 |
1972-06-10 | 224,000 |
1972-06-17 | 227,000 |
1972-06-24 | 240,000 |
1972-07-01 | 327,000 |
1972-07-08 | 364,000 |
1972-07-15 | 367,000 |
1972-07-22 | 299,000 |
1972-07-29 | 266,000 |
1972-08-05 | 256,000 |
1972-08-12 | 220,000 |
1972-08-19 | 203,000 |
1972-08-26 | 195,000 |
1972-09-02 | 192,000 |
1972-09-09 | 178,000 |
1972-09-16 | 196,000 |
1972-09-23 | 193,000 |
1972-09-30 | 192,000 |
1972-10-07 | 233,000 |
1972-10-14 | 202,000 |
1972-10-21 | 214,000 |
1972-10-28 | 196,000 |
1972-11-04 | 242,000 |
1972-11-11 | 236,000 |
1972-11-18 | 280,000 |
1972-11-25 | 238,000 |
1972-12-02 | 268,000 |
1972-12-09 | 317,000 |
1972-12-16 | 323,000 |
1972-12-23 | 327,000 |
1972-12-30 | 338,000 |
1973-01-06 | 345,000 |
1973-01-13 | 412,000 |
1973-01-20 | 324,000 |
1973-01-27 | 267,000 |
1973-02-03 | 285,000 |
1973-02-10 | 276,000 |
1973-02-17 | 242,000 |
1973-02-24 | 220,000 |
1973-03-03 | 233,000 |
1973-03-10 | 227,000 |
1973-03-17 | 212,000 |
1973-03-24 | 209,000 |
1973-03-31 | 193,000 |
1973-04-07 | 244,000 |
1973-04-14 | 212,000 |
1973-04-21 | 211,000 |
1973-04-28 | 194,000 |
1973-05-05 | 214,000 |
1973-05-12 | 198,000 |
1973-05-19 | 189,000 |
1973-05-26 | 190,000 |
1973-06-02 | 173,000 |
1973-06-09 | 210,000 |
1973-06-16 | 198,000 |
1973-06-23 | 206,000 |
1973-06-30 | 215,000 |
1973-07-07 | 309,000 |
1973-07-14 | 270,000 |
1973-07-21 | 259,000 |
1973-07-28 | 265,000 |
1973-08-04 | 262,000 |
1973-08-11 | 238,000 |
1973-08-18 | 207,000 |
1973-08-25 | 190,000 |
1973-09-01 | 180,000 |
1973-09-08 | 177,000 |
1973-09-15 | 186,000 |
1973-09-22 | 187,000 |
1973-09-29 | 191,000 |
1973-10-06 | 210,000 |
1973-10-13 | 207,000 |
1973-10-20 | 208,000 |
1973-10-27 | 200,000 |
1973-11-03 | 230,000 |
1973-11-10 | 277,000 |
1973-11-17 | 261,000 |
1973-11-24 | 237,000 |
1973-12-01 | 299,000 |
1973-12-08 | 345,000 |
1973-12-15 | 340,000 |
1973-12-22 | 429,000 |
1973-12-29 | 461,000 |
1974-01-05 | 405,000 |
1974-01-12 | 584,000 |
1974-01-19 | 465,000 |
1974-01-26 | 373,000 |
1974-02-02 | 381,000 |
1974-02-09 | 459,000 |
1974-02-16 | 352,000 |
1974-02-23 | 296,000 |
1974-03-02 | 313,000 |
1974-03-09 | 310,000 |
1974-03-16 | 293,000 |
1974-03-23 | 285,000 |
1974-03-30 | 279,000 |
1974-04-06 | 288,000 |
1974-04-13 | 278,000 |
1974-04-20 | 256,000 |
1974-04-27 | 235,000 |
1974-05-04 | 243,000 |
1974-05-11 | 249,000 |
1974-05-18 | 238,000 |
1974-05-25 | 246,000 |
1974-06-01 | 209,000 |
1974-06-08 | 267,000 |
1974-06-15 | 255,000 |
1974-06-22 | 266,000 |
1974-06-29 | 285,000 |
1974-07-06 | 350,000 |
1974-07-13 | 351,000 |
1974-07-20 | 325,000 |
1974-07-27 | 333,000 |
1974-08-03 | 340,000 |
1974-08-10 | 318,000 |
1974-08-17 | 269,000 |
1974-08-24 | 260,000 |
1974-08-31 | 259,000 |
1974-09-07 | 253,000 |
1974-09-14 | 271,000 |
1974-09-21 | 283,000 |
1974-09-28 | 279,000 |
1974-10-05 | 325,000 |
1974-10-12 | 358,000 |
1974-10-19 | 324,000 |
1974-10-26 | 357,000 |
1974-11-02 | 375,000 |
1974-11-09 | 435,000 |
1974-11-16 | 450,000 |
1974-11-23 | 532,000 |
1974-11-30 | 524,000 |
1974-12-07 | 693,000 |
1974-12-14 | 637,000 |
1974-12-21 | 677,000 |
1974-12-28 | 813,000 |
1975-01-04 | 681,000 |
1975-01-11 | 969,000 |
1975-01-18 | 850,000 |
1975-01-25 | 729,000 |
1975-02-01 | 699,000 |
1975-02-08 | 691,000 |
1975-02-15 | 608,000 |
1975-02-22 | 567,000 |
1975-03-01 | 568,000 |
1975-03-08 | 569,000 |
1975-03-15 | 494,000 |
1975-03-22 | 499,000 |
1975-03-29 | 477,000 |
1975-04-05 | 505,000 |
1975-04-12 | 496,000 |
1975-04-19 | 456,000 |
1975-04-26 | 429,000 |
1975-05-03 | 420,000 |
1975-05-10 | 432,000 |
1975-05-17 | 410,000 |
1975-05-24 | 391,000 |
1975-05-31 | 360,000 |
1975-06-07 | 443,000 |
1975-06-14 | 422,000 |
1975-06-21 | 428,000 |
1975-06-28 | 407,000 |
1975-07-05 | 460,000 |
1975-07-12 | 517,000 |
1975-07-19 | 481,000 |
1975-07-26 | 471,000 |
1975-08-02 | 462,000 |
1975-08-09 | 429,000 |
1975-08-16 | 367,000 |
1975-08-23 | 353,000 |
1975-08-30 | 332,000 |
1975-09-06 | 331,000 |
1975-09-13 | 341,000 |
1975-09-20 | 336,000 |
1975-09-27 | 342,000 |
1975-10-04 | 365,000 |
1975-10-11 | 385,000 |
1975-10-18 | 332,000 |
1975-10-25 | 372,000 |
1975-11-01 | 378,000 |
1975-11-08 | 414,000 |
1975-11-15 | 371,000 |
1975-11-22 | 419,000 |
1975-11-29 | 403,000 |
1975-12-06 | 487,000 |
1975-12-13 | 456,000 |
1975-12-20 | 463,000 |
1975-12-27 | 573,000 |
1976-01-03 | 540,000 |
1976-01-10 | 708,000 |
1976-01-17 | 563,000 |
1976-01-24 | 486,000 |
1976-01-31 | 450,000 |
1976-02-07 | 452,000 |
1976-02-14 | 391,000 |
1976-02-21 | 367,000 |
1976-02-28 | 353,000 |
1976-03-06 | 366,000 |
1976-03-13 | 343,000 |
1976-03-20 | 330,000 |
1976-03-27 | 314,000 |
1976-04-03 | 334,000 |
1976-04-10 | 366,000 |
1976-04-17 | 316,000 |
1976-04-24 | 311,000 |
1976-05-01 | 313,000 |
1976-05-08 | 345,000 |
1976-05-15 | 308,000 |
1976-05-22 | 311,000 |
1976-05-29 | 310,000 |
1976-06-05 | 307,000 |
1976-06-12 | 351,000 |
1976-06-19 | 342,000 |
1976-06-26 | 339,000 |
1976-07-03 | 401,000 |
1976-07-10 | 445,000 |
1976-07-17 | 455,000 |
1976-07-24 | 418,000 |
1976-07-31 | 401,000 |
1976-08-07 | 373,000 |
1976-08-14 | 329,000 |
1976-08-21 | 320,000 |
1976-08-28 | 301,000 |
1976-09-04 | 321,000 |
1976-09-11 | 280,000 |
1976-09-18 | 320,000 |
1976-09-25 | 327,000 |
1976-10-02 | 332,000 |
1976-10-09 | 388,000 |
1976-10-16 | 325,000 |
1976-10-23 | 361,000 |
1976-10-30 | 370,000 |
1976-11-06 | 387,000 |
1976-11-13 | 363,000 |
1976-11-20 | 430,000 |
1976-11-27 | 369,000 |
1976-12-04 | 500,000 |
1976-12-11 | 494,000 |
1976-12-18 | 434,000 |
1976-12-25 | 466,000 |
1977-01-01 | 558,000 |
1977-01-08 | 685,000 |
1977-01-15 | 597,000 |
1977-01-22 | 589,000 |
1977-01-29 | 518,000 |
1977-02-05 | 704,000 |
1977-02-12 | 552,000 |
1977-02-19 | 422,000 |
1977-02-26 | 360,000 |
1977-03-05 | 367,000 |
1977-03-12 | 335,000 |
1977-03-19 | 321,000 |
1977-03-26 | 298,000 |
1977-04-02 | 296,000 |
1977-04-09 | 367,000 |
1977-04-16 | 316,000 |
1977-04-23 | 314,000 |
1977-04-30 | 305,000 |
1977-05-07 | 333,000 |
1977-05-14 | 309,000 |
1977-05-21 | 293,000 |
1977-05-28 | 298,000 |
1977-06-04 | 283,000 |
1977-06-11 | 308,000 |
1977-06-18 | 310,000 |
1977-06-25 | 321,000 |
1977-07-02 | 348,000 |
1977-07-09 | 431,000 |
1977-07-16 | 424,000 |
1977-07-23 | 391,000 |
1977-07-30 | 380,000 |
1977-08-06 | 379,000 |
1977-08-13 | 319,000 |
1977-08-20 | 298,000 |
1977-08-27 | 282,000 |
1977-09-03 | 289,000 |
1977-09-10 | 260,000 |
1977-09-17 | 289,000 |
1977-09-24 | 293,000 |
1977-10-01 | 275,000 |
1977-10-08 | 345,000 |
1977-10-15 | 287,000 |
1977-10-22 | 322,000 |
1977-10-29 | 309,000 |
1977-11-05 | 352,000 |
1977-11-12 | 310,000 |
1977-11-19 | 367,000 |
1977-11-26 | 342,000 |
1977-12-03 | 430,000 |
1977-12-10 | 448,000 |
1977-12-17 | 412,000 |
1977-12-24 | 450,000 |
1977-12-31 | 535,000 |
1978-01-07 | 559,000 |
1978-01-14 | 579,000 |
1978-01-21 | 500,000 |
1978-01-28 | 445,000 |
1978-02-04 | 447,000 |
1978-02-11 | 438,000 |
1978-02-18 | 455,000 |
1978-02-25 | 372,000 |
1978-03-04 | 360,000 |
1978-03-11 | 342,000 |
1978-03-18 | 302,000 |
1978-03-25 | 280,000 |
1978-04-01 | 278,000 |
1978-04-08 | 338,000 |
1978-04-15 | 279,000 |
1978-04-22 | 277,000 |
1978-04-29 | 269,000 |
1978-05-06 | 291,000 |
1978-05-13 | 268,000 |
1978-05-20 | 266,000 |
1978-05-27 | 256,000 |
1978-06-03 | 242,000 |
1978-06-10 | 292,000 |
1978-06-17 | 287,000 |
1978-06-24 | 297,000 |
1978-07-01 | 347,000 |
1978-07-08 | 428,000 |
1978-07-15 | 421,000 |
1978-07-22 | 387,000 |
1978-07-29 | 371,000 |
1978-08-05 | 376,000 |
1978-08-12 | 326,000 |
1978-08-19 | 287,000 |
1978-08-26 | 264,000 |
1978-09-02 | 249,000 |
1978-09-09 | 246,000 |
1978-09-16 | 262,000 |
1978-09-23 | 254,000 |
1978-09-30 | 249,000 |
1978-10-07 | 323,000 |
1978-10-14 | 262,000 |
1978-10-21 | 287,000 |
1978-10-28 | 280,000 |
1978-11-04 | 302,000 |
1978-11-11 | 286,000 |
1978-11-18 | 345,000 |
1978-11-25 | 350,000 |
1978-12-02 | 427,000 |
1978-12-09 | 427,000 |
1978-12-16 | 390,000 |
1978-12-23 | 447,000 |
1978-12-30 | 515,000 |
1979-01-06 | 559,000 |
1979-01-13 | 680,000 |
1979-01-20 | 488,000 |
1979-01-27 | 423,000 |
1979-02-03 | 424,000 |
1979-02-10 | 418,000 |
1979-02-17 | 384,000 |
1979-02-24 | 364,000 |
1979-03-03 | 358,000 |
1979-03-10 | 346,000 |
1979-03-17 | 315,000 |
1979-03-24 | 296,000 |
1979-03-31 | 300,000 |
1979-04-07 | 449,000 |
1979-04-14 | 424,000 |
1979-04-21 | 340,000 |
1979-04-28 | 303,000 |
1979-05-05 | 307,000 |
1979-05-12 | 290,000 |
1979-05-19 | 280,000 |
1979-05-26 | 287,000 |
1979-06-02 | 262,000 |
1979-06-09 | 322,000 |
1979-06-16 | 312,000 |
1979-06-23 | 343,000 |
1979-06-30 | 366,000 |
1979-07-07 | 458,000 |
1979-07-14 | 446,000 |
1979-07-21 | 445,000 |
1979-07-28 | 417,000 |
1979-08-04 | 428,000 |
1979-08-11 | 360,000 |
1979-08-18 | 329,000 |
1979-08-25 | 313,000 |
1979-09-01 | 312,000 |
1979-09-08 | 285,000 |
1979-09-15 | 311,000 |
1979-09-22 | 309,000 |
1979-09-29 | 303,000 |
1979-10-06 | 379,000 |
1979-10-13 | 335,000 |
1979-10-20 | 342,000 |
1979-10-27 | 353,000 |
1979-11-03 | 372,000 |
1979-11-10 | 392,000 |
1979-11-17 | 401,000 |
1979-11-24 | 379,000 |
1979-12-01 | 513,000 |
1979-12-08 | 521,000 |
1979-12-15 | 455,000 |
1979-12-22 | 580,000 |
1979-12-29 | 596,000 |
1980-01-05 | 574,000 |
1980-01-12 | 804,000 |
1980-01-19 | 648,000 |
1980-01-26 | 515,000 |
1980-02-02 | 471,000 |
1980-02-09 | 493,000 |
1980-02-16 | 418,000 |
1980-02-23 | 415,000 |
1980-03-01 | 407,000 |
1980-03-08 | 413,000 |
1980-03-15 | 398,000 |
1980-03-22 | 392,000 |
1980-03-29 | 399,000 |
1980-04-05 | 451,000 |
1980-04-12 | 535,000 |
1980-04-19 | 495,000 |
1980-04-26 | 482,000 |
1980-05-03 | 491,000 |
1980-05-10 | 526,000 |
1980-05-17 | 539,000 |
1980-05-24 | 525,000 |
1980-05-31 | 477,000 |
1980-06-07 | 562,000 |
1980-06-14 | 511,000 |
1980-06-21 | 529,000 |
1980-06-28 | 563,000 |
1980-07-05 | 584,000 |
1980-07-12 | 643,000 |
1980-07-19 | 628,000 |
1980-07-26 | 569,000 |
1980-08-02 | 536,000 |
1980-08-09 | 494,000 |
1980-08-16 | 435,000 |
1980-08-23 | 410,000 |
1980-08-30 | 397,000 |
1980-09-06 | 374,000 |
1980-09-13 | 414,000 |
1980-09-20 | 381,000 |
1980-09-27 | 363,000 |
1980-10-04 | 410,000 |
1980-10-11 | 417,000 |
1980-10-18 | 355,000 |
1980-10-25 | 384,000 |
1980-11-01 | 395,000 |
1980-11-08 | 416,000 |
1980-11-15 | 403,000 |
1980-11-22 | 440,000 |
1980-11-29 | 407,000 |
1980-12-06 | 534,000 |
1980-12-13 | 481,000 |
1980-12-20 | 499,000 |
1980-12-27 | 546,000 |
1981-01-03 | 580,000 |
1981-01-10 | 839,000 |
1981-01-17 | 638,000 |
1981-01-24 | 521,000 |
1981-01-31 | 490,000 |
1981-02-07 | 500,000 |
1981-02-14 | 439,000 |
1981-02-21 | 430,000 |
1981-02-28 | 432,000 |
1981-03-07 | 414,000 |
1981-03-14 | 385,000 |
1981-03-21 | 365,000 |
1981-03-28 | 356,000 |
1981-04-04 | 383,000 |
1981-04-11 | 401,000 |
1981-04-18 | 350,000 |
1981-04-25 | 379,000 |
1981-05-02 | 342,000 |
1981-05-09 | 369,000 |
1981-05-16 | 340,000 |
1981-05-23 | 342,000 |
1981-05-30 | 301,000 |
1981-06-06 | 384,000 |
1981-06-13 | 367,000 |
1981-06-20 | 376,000 |
1981-06-27 | 387,000 |
1981-07-04 | 430,000 |
1981-07-11 | 516,000 |
1981-07-18 | 481,000 |
1981-07-25 | 429,000 |
1981-08-01 | 444,000 |
1981-08-08 | 419,000 |
1981-08-15 | 369,000 |
1981-08-22 | 351,000 |
1981-08-29 | 352,000 |
1981-09-05 | 396,000 |
1981-09-12 | 331,000 |
1981-09-19 | 392,000 |
1981-09-26 | 392,000 |
1981-10-03 | 416,000 |
1981-10-10 | 476,000 |
1981-10-17 | 408,000 |
1981-10-24 | 450,000 |
1981-10-31 | 479,000 |
1981-11-07 | 534,000 |
1981-11-14 | 483,000 |
1981-11-21 | 522,000 |
1981-11-28 | 535,000 |
1981-12-05 | 726,000 |
1981-12-12 | 657,000 |
1981-12-19 | 644,000 |
1981-12-26 | 702,000 |
1982-01-02 | 694,300 |
1982-01-09 | 1,073,500 |
1982-01-16 | 761,700 |
1982-01-23 | 771,200 |
1982-01-30 | 692,300 |
1982-02-06 | 671,000 |
1982-02-13 | 532,800 |
1982-02-20 | 522,900 |
1982-02-27 | 536,300 |
1982-03-06 | 566,300 |
1982-03-13 | 515,100 |
1982-03-20 | 510,500 |
1982-03-27 | 501,500 |
1982-04-03 | 516,600 |
1982-04-10 | 606,300 |
1982-04-17 | 540,300 |
1982-04-24 | 518,600 |
1982-05-01 | 475,600 |
1982-05-08 | 516,500 |
1982-05-15 | 486,500 |
1982-05-22 | 486,300 |
1982-05-29 | 485,800 |
1982-06-05 | 478,600 |
1982-06-12 | 541,600 |
1982-06-19 | 508,100 |
1982-06-26 | 507,700 |
1982-07-03 | 594,400 |
1982-07-10 | 631,400 |
1982-07-17 | 647,000 |
1982-07-24 | 576,100 |
1982-07-31 | 562,600 |
1982-08-07 | 569,200 |
1982-08-14 | 536,400 |
1982-08-21 | 510,400 |
1982-08-28 | 502,300 |
1982-09-04 | 537,600 |
1982-09-11 | 467,700 |
1982-09-18 | 559,500 |
1982-09-25 | 535,000 |
1982-10-02 | 565,600 |
1982-10-09 | 638,100 |
1982-10-16 | 540,300 |
1982-10-23 | 577,600 |
1982-10-30 | 576,800 |
1982-11-06 | 604,800 |
1982-11-13 | 546,700 |
1982-11-20 | 650,400 |
1982-11-27 | 574,100 |
1982-12-04 | 709,400 |
1982-12-11 | 638,200 |
1982-12-18 | 598,000 |
1982-12-25 | 653,600 |
1983-01-01 | 745,100 |
1983-01-08 | 976,600 |
1983-01-15 | 773,600 |
1983-01-22 | 650,600 |
1983-01-29 | 597,700 |
1983-02-05 | 594,200 |
1983-02-12 | 525,100 |
1983-02-19 | 506,300 |
1983-02-26 | 448,700 |
1983-03-05 | 497,400 |
1983-03-12 | 459,700 |
1983-03-19 | 427,500 |
1983-03-26 | 422,100 |
1983-04-02 | 423,000 |
1983-04-09 | 509,700 |
1983-04-16 | 464,800 |
1983-04-23 | 431,300 |
1983-04-30 | 399,900 |
1983-05-07 | 435,000 |
1983-05-14 | 385,200 |
1983-05-21 | 380,300 |
1983-05-28 | 373,000 |
1983-06-04 | 351,100 |
1983-06-11 | 390,100 |
1983-06-18 | 369,200 |
1983-06-25 | 383,500 |
1983-07-02 | 397,400 |
1983-07-09 | 451,900 |
1983-07-16 | 459,400 |
1983-07-23 | 428,300 |
1983-07-30 | 383,400 |
1983-08-06 | 382,500 |
1983-08-13 | 382,300 |
1983-08-20 | 356,900 |
1983-08-27 | 323,600 |
1983-09-03 | 328,800 |
1983-09-10 | 288,700 |
1983-09-17 | 326,900 |
1983-09-24 | 324,700 |
1983-10-01 | 318,500 |
1983-10-08 | 390,500 |
1983-10-15 | 319,900 |
1983-10-22 | 354,900 |
1983-10-29 | 356,400 |
1983-11-05 | 398,200 |
1983-11-12 | 347,300 |
1983-11-19 | 431,900 |
1983-11-26 | 362,900 |
1983-12-03 | 458,400 |
1983-12-10 | 442,900 |
1983-12-17 | 414,600 |
1983-12-24 | 496,800 |
1983-12-31 | 558,900 |
1984-01-07 | 621,600 |
1984-01-14 | 637,900 |
1984-01-21 | 475,100 |
1984-01-28 | 448,500 |
1984-02-04 | 408,400 |
1984-02-11 | 381,500 |
1984-02-18 | 349,300 |
1984-02-25 | 329,100 |
1984-03-03 | 350,500 |
1984-03-10 | 344,000 |
1984-03-17 | 323,500 |
1984-03-24 | 317,600 |
1984-03-31 | 291,400 |
1984-04-07 | 390,300 |
1984-04-14 | 330,800 |
1984-04-21 | 326,500 |
1984-04-28 | 309,300 |
1984-05-05 | 318,900 |
1984-05-12 | 312,100 |
1984-05-19 | 294,200 |
1984-05-26 | 292,700 |
1984-06-02 | 268,700 |
1984-06-09 | 333,800 |
1984-06-16 | 309,900 |
1984-06-23 | 316,800 |
1984-06-30 | 329,000 |
1984-07-07 | 432,500 |
1984-07-14 | 435,900 |
1984-07-21 | 396,200 |
1984-07-28 | 343,800 |
1984-08-04 | 348,100 |
1984-08-11 | 328,100 |
1984-08-18 | 321,000 |
1984-08-25 | 303,300 |
1984-09-01 | 303,500 |
1984-09-08 | 289,300 |
1984-09-15 | 320,700 |
1984-09-22 | 313,200 |
1984-09-29 | 304,700 |
1984-10-06 | 373,300 |
1984-10-13 | 353,200 |
1984-10-20 | 378,700 |
1984-10-27 | 380,500 |
1984-11-03 | 413,400 |
1984-11-10 | 397,500 |
1984-11-17 | 370,800 |
1984-11-24 | 387,000 |
1984-12-01 | 494,700 |
1984-12-08 | 477,900 |
1984-12-15 | 443,700 |
1984-12-22 | 482,300 |
1984-12-29 | 527,500 |
1985-01-05 | 568,300 |
1985-01-12 | 770,000 |
1985-01-19 | 537,700 |
1985-01-26 | 478,300 |
1985-02-02 | 452,400 |
1985-02-09 | 473,300 |
1985-02-16 | 404,700 |
1985-02-23 | 379,000 |
1985-03-02 | 377,300 |
1985-03-09 | 389,200 |
1985-03-16 | 360,500 |
1985-03-23 | 346,700 |
1985-03-30 | 329,100 |
1985-04-06 | 398,000 |
1985-04-13 | 397,500 |
1985-04-20 | 351,800 |
1985-04-27 | 324,700 |
1985-05-04 | 335,600 |
1985-05-11 | 339,100 |
1985-05-18 | 324,900 |
1985-05-25 | 328,500 |
1985-06-01 | 293,500 |
1985-06-08 | 368,900 |
1985-06-15 | 339,200 |
1985-06-22 | 339,500 |
1985-06-29 | 349,800 |
1985-07-06 | 409,500 |
1985-07-13 | 481,500 |
1985-07-20 | 413,700 |
1985-07-27 | 358,700 |
1985-08-03 | 365,800 |
1985-08-10 | 358,200 |
1985-08-17 | 319,400 |
1985-08-24 | 314,800 |
1985-08-31 | 317,600 |
1985-09-07 | 304,700 |
1985-09-14 | 332,900 |
1985-09-21 | 317,600 |
1985-09-28 | 301,600 |
1985-10-05 | 355,600 |
1985-10-12 | 358,000 |
1985-10-19 | 331,000 |
1985-10-26 | 375,700 |
1985-11-02 | 375,300 |
1985-11-09 | 404,100 |
1985-11-16 | 380,300 |
1985-11-23 | 423,100 |
1985-11-30 | 384,700 |
1985-12-07 | 504,200 |
1985-12-14 | 443,400 |
1985-12-21 | 458,200 |
1985-12-28 | 548,200 |
1986-01-04 | 547,500 |
1986-01-11 | 803,900 |
1986-01-18 | 568,800 |
1986-01-25 | 395,700 |
1986-02-01 | 425,400 |
1986-02-08 | 438,100 |
1986-02-15 | 374,200 |
1986-02-22 | 382,200 |
1986-03-01 | 381,200 |
1986-03-08 | 371,700 |
1986-03-15 | 361,600 |
1986-03-22 | 363,100 |
1986-03-29 | 333,300 |
1986-04-05 | 366,100 |
1986-04-12 | 386,100 |
1986-04-19 | 348,700 |
1986-04-26 | 335,100 |
1986-05-03 | 333,600 |
1986-05-10 | 343,800 |
1986-05-17 | 319,000 |
1986-05-24 | 321,700 |
1986-05-31 | 278,700 |
1986-06-07 | 342,200 |
1986-06-14 | 324,700 |
1986-06-21 | 327,400 |
1986-06-28 | 336,100 |
1986-07-05 | 377,400 |
1986-07-12 | 456,200 |
1986-07-19 | 402,400 |
1986-07-26 | 370,700 |
1986-08-02 | 370,900 |
1986-08-09 | 376,900 |
1986-08-16 | 326,000 |
1986-08-23 | 310,200 |
1986-08-30 | 307,100 |
1986-09-06 | 283,700 |
1986-09-13 | 320,800 |
1986-09-20 | 315,800 |
1986-09-27 | 294,200 |
1986-10-04 | 328,900 |
1986-10-11 | 357,700 |
1986-10-18 | 313,000 |
1986-10-25 | 332,400 |
1986-11-01 | 334,100 |
1986-11-08 | 357,600 |
1986-11-15 | 347,400 |
1986-11-22 | 410,600 |
1986-11-29 | 350,900 |
1986-12-06 | 462,700 |
1986-12-13 | 438,600 |
1986-12-20 | 423,800 |
1986-12-27 | 483,900 |
1987-01-03 | 483,977 |
1987-01-10 | 710,493 |
1987-01-17 | 545,768 |
1987-01-24 | 412,977 |
1987-01-31 | 435,743 |
1987-02-07 | 444,240 |
1987-02-14 | 359,219 |
1987-02-21 | 332,930 |
1987-02-28 | 355,357 |
1987-03-07 | 343,065 |
1987-03-14 | 321,153 |
1987-03-21 | 313,104 |
1987-03-28 | 288,648 |
1987-04-04 | 308,940 |
1987-04-11 | 344,364 |
1987-04-18 | 305,201 |
1987-04-25 | 285,566 |
1987-05-02 | 277,726 |
1987-05-09 | 276,773 |
1987-05-16 | 283,832 |
1987-05-23 | 286,150 |
1987-05-30 | 242,793 |
1987-06-06 | 299,672 |
1987-06-13 | 281,043 |
1987-06-20 | 285,191 |
1987-06-27 | 294,288 |
1987-07-04 | 321,855 |
1987-07-11 | 402,706 |
1987-07-18 | 361,491 |
1987-07-25 | 339,756 |
1987-08-01 | 309,433 |
1987-08-08 | 296,403 |
1987-08-15 | 256,647 |
1987-08-22 | 245,058 |
1987-08-29 | 243,829 |
1987-09-05 | 255,589 |
1987-09-12 | 210,375 |
1987-09-19 | 243,651 |
1987-09-26 | 242,206 |
1987-10-03 | 244,736 |
1987-10-10 | 291,075 |
1987-10-17 | 242,157 |
1987-10-24 | 271,190 |
1987-10-31 | 261,036 |
1987-11-07 | 306,340 |
1987-11-14 | 286,334 |
1987-11-21 | 354,037 |
1987-11-28 | 288,614 |
1987-12-05 | 412,297 |
1987-12-12 | 372,869 |
1987-12-19 | 384,763 |
1987-12-26 | 397,287 |
1988-01-02 | 465,503 |
1988-01-09 | 654,620 |
1988-01-16 | 577,975 |
1988-01-23 | 412,685 |
1988-01-30 | 394,776 |
1988-02-06 | 380,906 |
1988-02-13 | 334,833 |
1988-02-20 | 315,497 |
1988-02-27 | 324,517 |
1988-03-05 | 312,409 |
1988-03-12 | 294,321 |
1988-03-19 | 275,545 |
1988-03-26 | 269,000 |
1988-04-02 | 256,607 |
1988-04-09 | 319,713 |
1988-04-16 | 273,160 |
1988-04-23 | 272,440 |
1988-04-30 | 247,619 |
1988-05-07 | 267,315 |
1988-05-14 | 257,101 |
1988-05-21 | 259,640 |
1988-05-28 | 255,852 |
1988-06-04 | 235,308 |
1988-06-11 | 268,052 |
1988-06-18 | 264,100 |
1988-06-25 | 268,770 |
1988-07-02 | 290,079 |
1988-07-09 | 335,780 |
1988-07-16 | 377,872 |
1988-07-23 | 384,920 |
1988-07-30 | 311,475 |
1988-08-06 | 293,718 |
1988-08-13 | 261,066 |
1988-08-20 | 253,359 |
1988-08-27 | 241,809 |
1988-09-03 | 243,944 |
1988-09-10 | 220,226 |
1988-09-17 | 247,250 |
1988-09-24 | 236,230 |
1988-10-01 | 226,453 |
1988-10-08 | 276,732 |
1988-10-15 | 237,722 |
1988-10-22 | 264,201 |
1988-10-29 | 265,794 |
1988-11-05 | 293,412 |
1988-11-12 | 257,201 |
1988-11-19 | 335,818 |
1988-11-26 | 281,841 |
1988-12-03 | 391,406 |
1988-12-10 | 354,028 |
1988-12-17 | 354,768 |
1988-12-24 | 413,175 |
1988-12-31 | 474,226 |
1989-01-07 | 544,138 |
1989-01-14 | 519,727 |
1989-01-21 | 364,499 |
1989-01-28 | 361,331 |
1989-02-04 | 340,647 |
1989-02-11 | 365,301 |
1989-02-18 | 317,676 |
1989-02-25 | 288,690 |
1989-03-04 | 333,669 |
1989-03-11 | 325,019 |
1989-03-18 | 291,112 |
1989-03-25 | 276,369 |
1989-04-01 | 275,799 |
1989-04-08 | 321,723 |
1989-04-15 | 275,240 |
1989-04-22 | 271,002 |
1989-04-29 | 247,646 |
1989-05-06 | 275,425 |
1989-05-13 | 275,507 |
1989-05-20 | 260,543 |
1989-05-27 | 266,146 |
1989-06-03 | 243,246 |
1989-06-10 | 295,499 |
1989-06-17 | 285,589 |
1989-06-24 | 295,338 |
1989-07-01 | 319,577 |
1989-07-08 | 364,594 |
1989-07-15 | 423,847 |
1989-07-22 | 365,026 |
1989-07-29 | 320,773 |
1989-08-05 | 311,584 |
1989-08-12 | 291,429 |
1989-08-19 | 261,419 |
1989-08-26 | 254,488 |
1989-09-02 | 259,540 |
1989-09-09 | 239,989 |
1989-09-16 | 271,903 |
1989-09-23 | 262,895 |
1989-09-30 | 265,310 |
1989-10-07 | 375,972 |
1989-10-14 | 284,584 |
1989-10-21 | 315,473 |
1989-10-28 | 317,538 |
1989-11-04 | 336,759 |
1989-11-11 | 303,556 |
1989-11-18 | 377,814 |
1989-11-25 | 316,458 |
1989-12-02 | 443,684 |
1989-12-09 | 426,514 |
1989-12-16 | 420,795 |
1989-12-23 | 534,261 |
1989-12-30 | 515,926 |
1990-01-06 | 581,679 |
1990-01-13 | 730,995 |
1990-01-20 | 485,424 |
1990-01-27 | 440,748 |
1990-02-03 | 432,922 |
1990-02-10 | 429,764 |
1990-02-17 | 364,616 |
1990-02-24 | 341,969 |
1990-03-03 | 361,937 |
1990-03-10 | 355,935 |
1990-03-17 | 325,164 |
1990-03-24 | 306,391 |
1990-03-31 | 297,117 |
1990-04-07 | 372,079 |
1990-04-14 | 315,624 |
1990-04-21 | 324,936 |
1990-04-28 | 294,785 |
1990-05-05 | 304,160 |
1990-05-12 | 299,266 |
1990-05-19 | 287,082 |
1990-05-26 | 295,476 |
1990-06-02 | 273,910 |
1990-06-09 | 321,727 |
1990-06-16 | 305,690 |
1990-06-23 | 316,999 |
1990-06-30 | 326,407 |
1990-07-07 | 419,256 |
1990-07-14 | 448,952 |
1990-07-21 | 407,676 |
1990-07-28 | 353,149 |
1990-08-04 | 336,997 |
1990-08-11 | 330,678 |
1990-08-18 | 313,804 |
1990-08-25 | 302,267 |
1990-09-01 | 305,510 |
1990-09-08 | 277,768 |
1990-09-15 | 323,246 |
1990-09-22 | 306,549 |
1990-09-29 | 308,080 |
1990-10-06 | 361,538 |
1990-10-13 | 356,203 |
1990-10-20 | 387,444 |
1990-10-27 | 394,598 |
1990-11-03 | 424,771 |
1990-11-10 | 463,874 |
1990-11-17 | 433,003 |
1990-11-24 | 422,676 |
1990-12-01 | 568,583 |
1990-12-08 | 574,323 |
1990-12-15 | 523,403 |
1990-12-22 | 637,449 |
1990-12-29 | 649,471 |
1991-01-05 | 651,775 |
1991-01-12 | 872,742 |
1991-01-19 | 691,092 |
1991-01-26 | 511,360 |
1991-02-02 | 563,060 |
1991-02-09 | 574,760 |
1991-02-16 | 498,200 |
1991-02-23 | 492,325 |
1991-03-02 | 504,023 |
1991-03-09 | 514,410 |
1991-03-16 | 470,801 |
1991-03-23 | 477,877 |
1991-03-30 | 412,904 |
1991-04-06 | 448,082 |
1991-04-13 | 459,364 |
1991-04-20 | 433,912 |
1991-04-27 | 385,153 |
1991-05-04 | 384,458 |
1991-05-11 | 382,113 |
1991-05-18 | 366,492 |
1991-05-25 | 365,117 |
1991-06-01 | 320,632 |
1991-06-08 | 397,682 |
1991-06-15 | 369,074 |
1991-06-22 | 371,232 |
1991-06-29 | 370,372 |
1991-07-06 | 427,161 |
1991-07-13 | 517,888 |
1991-07-20 | 454,655 |
1991-07-27 | 408,098 |
1991-08-03 | 397,522 |
1991-08-10 | 385,740 |
1991-08-17 | 344,969 |
1991-08-24 | 329,287 |
1991-08-31 | 328,040 |
1991-09-07 | 302,187 |
1991-09-14 | 342,419 |
1991-09-21 | 333,110 |
1991-09-28 | 334,206 |
1991-10-05 | 366,862 |
1991-10-12 | 388,370 |
1991-10-19 | 344,189 |
1991-10-26 | 380,253 |
1991-11-02 | 427,789 |
1991-11-09 | 473,432 |
1991-11-16 | 417,766 |
1991-11-23 | 503,032 |
1991-11-30 | 433,180 |
1991-12-07 | 610,113 |
1991-12-14 | 554,059 |
1991-12-21 | 555,747 |
1991-12-28 | 625,772 |
1992-01-04 | 652,046 |
1992-01-11 | 882,118 |
1992-01-18 | 687,914 |
1992-01-25 | 504,838 |
1992-02-01 | 508,594 |
1992-02-08 | 537,238 |
1992-02-15 | 469,794 |
1992-02-22 | 429,723 |
1992-02-29 | 454,987 |
1992-03-07 | 434,426 |
1992-03-14 | 417,282 |
1992-03-21 | 413,180 |
1992-03-28 | 370,883 |
1992-04-04 | 393,384 |
1992-04-11 | 412,948 |
1992-04-18 | 366,621 |
1992-04-25 | 364,454 |
1992-05-02 | 363,794 |
1992-05-09 | 364,100 |
1992-05-16 | 341,425 |
1992-05-23 | 343,432 |
1992-05-30 | 305,080 |
1992-06-06 | 374,978 |
1992-06-13 | 369,067 |
1992-06-20 | 369,995 |
1992-06-27 | 370,373 |
1992-07-04 | 395,505 |
1992-07-11 | 506,050 |
1992-07-18 | 452,468 |
1992-07-25 | 554,590 |
1992-08-01 | 382,138 |
1992-08-08 | 366,092 |
1992-08-15 | 322,729 |
1992-08-22 | 312,436 |
1992-08-29 | 309,806 |
1992-09-05 | 339,006 |
1992-09-12 | 299,189 |
1992-09-19 | 345,093 |
1992-09-26 | 315,455 |
1992-10-03 | 326,938 |
1992-10-10 | 353,504 |
1992-10-17 | 310,235 |
1992-10-24 | 333,005 |
1992-10-31 | 331,922 |
1992-11-07 | 392,213 |
1992-11-14 | 348,011 |
1992-11-21 | 401,972 |
1992-11-28 | 317,218 |
1992-12-05 | 449,726 |
1992-12-12 | 424,677 |
1992-12-19 | 396,619 |
1992-12-26 | 392,612 |
1993-01-02 | 487,466 |
1993-01-09 | 704,930 |
1993-01-16 | 558,516 |
1993-01-23 | 410,944 |
1993-01-30 | 397,000 |
1993-02-06 | 384,707 |
1993-02-13 | 344,520 |
1993-02-20 | 345,116 |
1993-02-27 | 367,412 |
1993-03-06 | 364,185 |
1993-03-13 | 335,154 |
1993-03-20 | 315,473 |
1993-03-27 | 330,512 |
1993-04-03 | 331,871 |
1993-04-10 | 346,648 |
1993-04-17 | 321,564 |
1993-04-24 | 310,916 |
1993-05-01 | 285,098 |
1993-05-08 | 301,906 |
1993-05-15 | 287,944 |
1993-05-22 | 285,444 |
1993-05-29 | 291,206 |
1993-06-05 | 273,411 |
1993-06-12 | 308,535 |
1993-06-19 | 304,843 |
1993-06-26 | 301,549 |
1993-07-03 | 334,335 |
1993-07-10 | 362,425 |
1993-07-17 | 402,348 |
1993-07-24 | 418,260 |
1993-07-31 | 320,155 |
1993-08-07 | 314,579 |
1993-08-14 | 277,263 |
1993-08-21 | 270,913 |
1993-08-28 | 254,231 |
1993-09-04 | 270,528 |
1993-09-11 | 238,902 |
1993-09-18 | 280,903 |
1993-09-25 | 265,510 |
1993-10-02 | 263,636 |
1993-10-09 | 338,726 |
1993-10-16 | 288,699 |
1993-10-23 | 321,509 |
1993-10-30 | 309,359 |
1993-11-06 | 365,280 |
1993-11-13 | 310,455 |
1993-11-20 | 377,935 |
1993-11-27 | 306,788 |
1993-12-04 | 431,210 |
1993-12-11 | 398,560 |
1993-12-18 | 382,583 |
1993-12-25 | 398,084 |
1994-01-01 | 481,735 |
1994-01-08 | 676,076 |
1994-01-15 | 571,816 |
1994-01-22 | 427,570 |
1994-01-29 | 481,458 |
1994-02-05 | 429,800 |
1994-02-12 | 385,594 |
1994-02-19 | 368,626 |
1994-02-26 | 307,194 |
1994-03-05 | 355,250 |
1994-03-12 | 331,023 |
1994-03-19 | 308,038 |
1994-03-26 | 292,661 |
1994-04-02 | 289,631 |
1994-04-09 | 361,348 |
1994-04-16 | 327,166 |
1994-04-23 | 298,620 |
1994-04-30 | 285,837 |
1994-05-07 | 332,414 |
1994-05-14 | 303,190 |
1994-05-21 | 299,324 |
1994-05-28 | 291,797 |
1994-06-04 | 273,849 |
1994-06-11 | 309,033 |
1994-06-18 | 298,198 |
1994-06-25 | 305,863 |
1994-07-02 | 327,262 |
1994-07-09 | 394,428 |
1994-07-16 | 443,698 |
1994-07-23 | 354,495 |
1994-07-30 | 295,979 |
1994-08-06 | 304,363 |
1994-08-13 | 277,614 |
1994-08-20 | 262,131 |
1994-08-27 | 257,299 |
1994-09-03 | 270,561 |
1994-09-10 | 237,526 |
1994-09-17 | 264,553 |
1994-09-24 | 251,191 |
1994-10-01 | 255,588 |
1994-10-08 | 322,522 |
1994-10-15 | 272,742 |
1994-10-22 | 296,646 |
1994-10-29 | 291,557 |
1994-11-05 | 338,561 |
1994-11-12 | 298,030 |
1994-11-19 | 366,719 |
1994-11-26 | 295,729 |
1994-12-03 | 412,824 |
1994-12-10 | 397,238 |
1994-12-17 | 376,210 |
1994-12-24 | 423,387 |
1994-12-31 | 482,735 |
1995-01-07 | 612,648 |
1995-01-14 | 608,872 |
1995-01-21 | 400,772 |
1995-01-28 | 396,457 |
1995-02-04 | 381,813 |
1995-02-11 | 387,408 |
1995-02-18 | 356,237 |
1995-02-25 | 316,927 |
1995-03-04 | 342,015 |
1995-03-11 | 339,580 |
1995-03-18 | 319,218 |
1995-03-25 | 305,471 |
1995-04-01 | 294,031 |
1995-04-08 | 356,914 |
1995-04-15 | 318,030 |
1995-04-22 | 317,072 |
1995-04-29 | 305,594 |
1995-05-06 | 325,398 |
1995-05-13 | 311,646 |
1995-05-20 | 316,305 |
1995-05-27 | 314,442 |
1995-06-03 | 286,566 |
1995-06-10 | 340,606 |
1995-06-17 | 337,812 |
1995-06-24 | 324,411 |
1995-07-01 | 341,207 |
1995-07-08 | 428,632 |
1995-07-15 | 491,891 |
1995-07-22 | 409,319 |
1995-07-29 | 311,708 |
1995-08-05 | 310,703 |
1995-08-12 | 296,712 |
1995-08-19 | 286,017 |
1995-08-26 | 272,182 |
1995-09-02 | 278,703 |
1995-09-09 | 266,145 |
1995-09-16 | 304,323 |
1995-09-23 | 272,431 |
1995-09-30 | 269,067 |
1995-10-07 | 345,311 |
1995-10-14 | 306,465 |
1995-10-21 | 322,856 |
1995-10-28 | 332,061 |
1995-11-04 | 383,687 |
1995-11-11 | 335,181 |
1995-11-18 | 425,889 |
1995-11-25 | 336,269 |
1995-12-02 | 474,548 |
1995-12-09 | 421,109 |
1995-12-16 | 423,450 |
1995-12-23 | 490,349 |
1995-12-30 | 513,686 |
1996-01-06 | 596,010 |
1996-01-13 | 637,910 |
1996-01-20 | 510,820 |
1996-01-27 | 492,966 |
1996-02-03 | 433,693 |
1996-02-10 | 440,961 |
1996-02-17 | 395,332 |
1996-02-24 | 347,053 |
1996-03-02 | 368,044 |
1996-03-09 | 355,818 |
1996-03-16 | 357,070 |
1996-03-23 | 396,731 |
1996-03-30 | 342,023 |
1996-04-06 | 353,032 |
1996-04-13 | 343,654 |
1996-04-20 | 336,033 |
1996-04-27 | 291,957 |
1996-05-04 | 298,195 |
1996-05-11 | 303,532 |
1996-05-18 | 287,891 |
1996-05-25 | 287,622 |
1996-06-01 | 266,116 |
1996-06-08 | 329,099 |
1996-06-15 | 307,141 |
1996-06-22 | 312,226 |
1996-06-29 | 315,615 |
1996-07-06 | 382,989 |
1996-07-13 | 449,510 |
1996-07-20 | 360,385 |
1996-07-27 | 294,762 |
1996-08-03 | 283,216 |
1996-08-10 | 285,795 |
1996-08-17 | 265,742 |
1996-08-24 | 259,677 |
1996-08-31 | 251,425 |
1996-09-07 | 238,893 |
1996-09-14 | 272,464 |
1996-09-21 | 273,232 |
1996-09-28 | 261,251 |
1996-10-05 | 292,029 |
1996-10-12 | 306,521 |
1996-10-19 | 271,934 |
1996-10-26 | 311,965 |
1996-11-02 | 320,827 |
1996-11-09 | 340,240 |
1996-11-16 | 330,730 |
1996-11-23 | 383,512 |
1996-11-30 | 328,186 |
1996-12-07 | 444,305 |
1996-12-14 | 404,436 |
1996-12-21 | 429,566 |
1996-12-28 | 520,650 |
1997-01-04 | 541,210 |
1997-01-11 | 654,473 |
1997-01-18 | 513,913 |
1997-01-25 | 385,310 |
1997-02-01 | 380,099 |
1997-02-08 | 370,766 |
1997-02-15 | 320,374 |
1997-02-22 | 309,202 |
1997-03-01 | 317,339 |
1997-03-08 | 314,787 |
1997-03-15 | 296,698 |
1997-03-22 | 291,463 |
1997-03-29 | 268,823 |
1997-04-05 | 311,186 |
1997-04-12 | 329,663 |
1997-04-19 | 286,593 |
1997-04-26 | 295,166 |
1997-05-03 | 295,629 |
1997-05-10 | 278,052 |
1997-05-17 | 267,251 |
1997-05-24 | 264,697 |
1997-05-31 | 248,167 |
1997-06-07 | 309,928 |
1997-06-14 | 302,577 |
1997-06-21 | 290,720 |
1997-06-28 | 298,299 |
1997-07-05 | 372,574 |
1997-07-12 | 434,598 |
1997-07-19 | 339,250 |
1997-07-26 | 281,794 |
1997-08-02 | 273,471 |
1997-08-09 | 289,083 |
1997-08-16 | 272,910 |
1997-08-23 | 255,236 |
1997-08-30 | 250,205 |
1997-09-06 | 224,948 |
1997-09-13 | 253,456 |
1997-09-20 | 246,061 |
1997-09-27 | 237,214 |
1997-10-04 | 260,705 |
1997-10-11 | 286,436 |
1997-10-18 | 255,634 |
1997-10-25 | 272,593 |
1997-11-01 | 293,086 |
1997-11-08 | 322,842 |
1997-11-15 | 311,499 |
1997-11-22 | 341,845 |
1997-11-29 | 309,788 |
1997-12-06 | 402,699 |
1997-12-13 | 374,107 |
1997-12-20 | 368,823 |
1997-12-27 | 445,345 |
1998-01-03 | 479,854 |
1998-01-10 | 682,016 |
1998-01-17 | 512,837 |
1998-01-24 | 355,092 |
1998-01-31 | 357,976 |
1998-02-07 | 368,113 |
1998-02-14 | 328,354 |
1998-02-21 | 313,367 |
1998-02-28 | 313,480 |
1998-03-07 | 305,542 |
1998-03-14 | 298,302 |
1998-03-21 | 293,692 |
1998-03-28 | 272,808 |
1998-04-04 | 288,484 |
1998-04-11 | 294,014 |
1998-04-18 | 288,059 |
1998-04-25 | 278,220 |
1998-05-02 | 261,089 |
1998-05-09 | 270,108 |
1998-05-16 | 262,107 |
1998-05-23 | 259,125 |
1998-05-30 | 248,550 |
1998-06-06 | 289,495 |
1998-06-13 | 293,195 |
1998-06-20 | 322,017 |
1998-06-27 | 348,842 |
1998-07-04 | 379,734 |
1998-07-11 | 428,977 |
1998-07-18 | 364,767 |
1998-07-25 | 314,782 |
1998-08-01 | 277,621 |
1998-08-08 | 279,621 |
1998-08-15 | 246,823 |
1998-08-22 | 237,999 |
1998-08-29 | 233,516 |
1998-09-05 | 255,938 |
1998-09-12 | 217,454 |
1998-09-19 | 237,609 |
1998-09-26 | 220,668 |
1998-10-03 | 246,284 |
1998-10-10 | 300,862 |
1998-10-17 | 257,172 |
1998-10-24 | 275,574 |
1998-10-31 | 281,932 |
1998-11-07 | 332,611 |
1998-11-14 | 315,504 |
1998-11-21 | 338,501 |
1998-11-28 | 295,041 |
1998-12-05 | 421,605 |
1998-12-12 | 355,872 |
1998-12-19 | 344,452 |
1998-12-26 | 442,200 |
1999-01-02 | 508,983 |
1999-01-09 | 713,805 |
1999-01-16 | 514,082 |
1999-01-23 | 364,737 |
1999-01-30 | 349,733 |
1999-02-06 | 344,947 |
1999-02-13 | 320,679 |
1999-02-20 | 286,130 |
1999-02-27 | 297,918 |
1999-03-06 | 297,325 |
1999-03-13 | 289,813 |
1999-03-20 | 275,453 |
1999-03-27 | 260,817 |
1999-04-03 | 263,516 |
1999-04-10 | 327,621 |
1999-04-17 | 286,018 |
1999-04-24 | 263,835 |
1999-05-01 | 252,190 |
1999-05-08 | 274,268 |
1999-05-15 | 251,063 |
1999-05-22 | 250,360 |
1999-05-29 | 260,517 |
1999-06-05 | 256,922 |
1999-06-12 | 267,582 |
1999-06-19 | 267,825 |
1999-06-26 | 269,755 |
1999-07-03 | 303,758 |
1999-07-10 | 364,078 |
1999-07-17 | 369,123 |
1999-07-24 | 293,348 |
1999-07-31 | 254,195 |
1999-08-07 | 259,805 |
1999-08-14 | 236,658 |
1999-08-21 | 226,061 |
1999-08-28 | 219,278 |
1999-09-04 | 235,849 |
1999-09-11 | 204,302 |
1999-09-18 | 219,070 |
1999-09-25 | 232,486 |
1999-10-02 | 246,445 |
1999-10-09 | 278,925 |
1999-10-16 | 234,580 |
1999-10-23 | 250,864 |
1999-10-30 | 257,767 |
1999-11-06 | 297,136 |
1999-11-13 | 262,607 |
1999-11-20 | 309,248 |
1999-11-27 | 268,255 |
1999-12-04 | 378,735 |
1999-12-11 | 318,175 |
1999-12-18 | 329,649 |
1999-12-25 | 377,695 |
2000-01-01 | 439,912 |
2000-01-08 | 606,897 |
2000-01-15 | 442,494 |
2000-01-22 | 328,841 |
2000-01-29 | 332,740 |
2000-02-05 | 365,245 |
2000-02-12 | 311,897 |
2000-02-19 | 281,256 |
2000-02-26 | 258,962 |
2000-03-04 | 283,024 |
2000-03-11 | 255,109 |
2000-03-18 | 242,139 |
2000-03-25 | 239,835 |
2000-04-01 | 229,520 |
2000-04-08 | 274,130 |
2000-04-15 | 237,218 |
2000-04-22 | 240,266 |
2000-04-29 | 249,458 |
2000-05-06 | 259,546 |
2000-05-13 | 231,706 |
2000-05-20 | 234,599 |
2000-05-27 | 239,836 |
2000-06-03 | 242,991 |
2000-06-10 | 267,752 |
2000-06-17 | 265,617 |
2000-06-24 | 273,344 |
2000-07-01 | 280,979 |
2000-07-08 | 363,793 |
2000-07-15 | 377,982 |
2000-07-22 | 296,255 |
2000-07-29 | 253,466 |
2000-08-05 | 266,151 |
2000-08-12 | 261,358 |
2000-08-19 | 251,844 |
2000-08-26 | 239,030 |
2000-09-02 | 242,375 |
2000-09-09 | 229,954 |
2000-09-16 | 245,991 |
2000-09-23 | 222,219 |
2000-09-30 | 227,249 |
2000-10-07 | 292,784 |
2000-10-14 | 255,082 |
2000-10-21 | 263,445 |
2000-10-28 | 269,489 |
2000-11-04 | 342,414 |
2000-11-11 | 294,727 |
2000-11-18 | 374,160 |
2000-11-25 | 321,859 |
2000-12-02 | 447,262 |
2000-12-09 | 390,088 |
2000-12-16 | 402,476 |
2000-12-23 | 481,720 |
2000-12-30 | 568,973 |
2001-01-06 | 558,768 |
2001-01-13 | 599,562 |
2001-01-20 | 398,188 |
2001-01-27 | 447,386 |
2001-02-03 | 424,696 |
2001-02-10 | 396,151 |
2001-02-17 | 345,841 |
2001-02-24 | 357,591 |
2001-03-03 | 379,286 |
2001-03-10 | 377,210 |
2001-03-17 | 351,497 |
2001-03-24 | 334,747 |
2001-03-31 | 328,576 |
2001-04-07 | 397,282 |
2001-04-14 | 346,981 |
2001-04-21 | 369,745 |
2001-04-28 | 353,831 |
2001-05-05 | 336,319 |
2001-05-12 | 331,765 |
2001-05-19 | 338,374 |
2001-05-26 | 346,231 |
2001-06-02 | 335,765 |
2001-06-09 | 397,015 |
2001-06-16 | 354,526 |
2001-06-23 | 351,770 |
2001-06-30 | 375,885 |
2001-07-07 | 526,826 |
2001-07-14 | 524,139 |
2001-07-21 | 406,038 |
2001-07-28 | 332,957 |
2001-08-04 | 341,660 |
2001-08-11 | 333,042 |
2001-08-18 | 317,046 |
2001-08-25 | 307,850 |
2001-09-01 | 319,016 |
2001-09-08 | 309,567 |
2001-09-15 | 317,245 |
2001-09-22 | 353,611 |
2001-09-29 | 400,400 |
2001-10-06 | 441,754 |
2001-10-13 | 426,881 |
2001-10-20 | 429,542 |
2001-10-27 | 436,901 |
2001-11-03 | 443,971 |
2001-11-10 | 456,366 |
2001-11-17 | 420,259 |
2001-11-24 | 438,893 |
2001-12-01 | 605,916 |
2001-12-08 | 491,836 |
2001-12-15 | 440,906 |
2001-12-22 | 529,570 |
2001-12-29 | 647,045 |
2002-01-05 | 637,343 |
2002-01-12 | 799,246 |
2002-01-19 | 558,297 |
2002-01-26 | 431,690 |
2002-02-02 | 445,552 |
2002-02-09 | 438,611 |
2002-02-16 | 376,573 |
2002-02-23 | 367,504 |
2002-03-02 | 385,272 |
2002-03-09 | 386,992 |
2002-03-16 | 352,045 |
2002-03-23 | 366,372 |
2002-03-30 | 386,296 |
2002-04-06 | 432,384 |
2002-04-13 | 428,834 |
2002-04-20 | 385,151 |
2002-04-27 | 367,350 |
2002-05-04 | 362,681 |
2002-05-11 | 358,286 |
2002-05-18 | 348,887 |
2002-05-25 | 346,439 |
2002-06-01 | 309,183 |
2002-06-08 | 378,613 |
2002-06-15 | 356,096 |
2002-06-22 | 358,959 |
2002-06-29 | 358,658 |
2002-07-06 | 456,716 |
2002-07-13 | 506,718 |
2002-07-20 | 394,586 |
2002-07-27 | 338,441 |
2002-08-03 | 326,356 |
2002-08-10 | 332,673 |
2002-08-17 | 313,869 |
2002-08-24 | 314,852 |
2002-08-31 | 310,864 |
2002-09-07 | 318,361 |
2002-09-14 | 337,577 |
2002-09-21 | 317,264 |
2002-09-28 | 319,063 |
2002-10-05 | 365,613 |
2002-10-12 | 385,689 |
2002-10-19 | 349,927 |
2002-10-26 | 375,591 |
2002-11-02 | 397,346 |
2002-11-09 | 427,078 |
2002-11-16 | 372,829 |
2002-11-23 | 436,549 |
2002-11-30 | 385,788 |
2002-12-07 | 547,430 |
2002-12-14 | 486,258 |
2002-12-21 | 483,449 |
2002-12-28 | 620,929 |
2003-01-04 | 620,004 |
2003-01-11 | 724,111 |
2003-01-18 | 542,563 |
2003-01-25 | 434,888 |
2003-02-01 | 449,286 |
2003-02-08 | 439,520 |
2003-02-15 | 398,291 |
2003-02-22 | 387,536 |
2003-03-01 | 429,782 |
2003-03-08 | 414,568 |
2003-03-15 | 389,909 |
2003-03-22 | 361,492 |
2003-03-29 | 371,692 |
2003-04-05 | 394,160 |
2003-04-12 | 434,911 |
2003-04-19 | 399,180 |
2003-04-26 | 401,342 |
2003-05-03 | 377,383 |
2003-05-10 | 364,287 |
2003-05-17 | 362,276 |
2003-05-24 | 359,500 |
2003-05-31 | 351,890 |
2003-06-07 | 421,190 |
2003-06-14 | 383,371 |
2003-06-21 | 376,560 |
2003-06-28 | 394,214 |
2003-07-05 | 483,401 |
2003-07-12 | 552,621 |
2003-07-19 | 429,381 |
2003-07-26 | 348,382 |
2003-08-02 | 333,770 |
2003-08-09 | 348,207 |
2003-08-16 | 312,087 |
2003-08-23 | 313,058 |
2003-08-30 | 319,362 |
2003-09-06 | 322,501 |
2003-09-13 | 328,414 |
2003-09-20 | 301,217 |
2003-09-27 | 304,968 |
2003-10-04 | 337,880 |
2003-10-11 | 368,876 |
2003-10-18 | 328,572 |
2003-10-25 | 352,117 |
2003-11-01 | 345,573 |
2003-11-08 | 397,387 |
2003-11-15 | 347,719 |
2003-11-22 | 397,990 |
2003-11-29 | 357,811 |
2003-12-06 | 486,202 |
2003-12-13 | 412,627 |
2003-12-20 | 424,192 |
2003-12-27 | 516,493 |
2004-01-03 | 552,815 |
2004-01-10 | 677,897 |
2004-01-17 | 490,763 |
2004-01-24 | 382,262 |
2004-01-31 | 406,298 |
2004-02-07 | 433,234 |
2004-02-14 | 341,634 |
2004-02-21 | 328,171 |
2004-02-28 | 342,140 |
2004-03-06 | 339,007 |
2004-03-13 | 312,067 |
2004-03-20 | 304,462 |
2004-03-27 | 296,776 |
2004-04-03 | 304,249 |
2004-04-10 | 350,739 |
2004-04-17 | 334,965 |
2004-04-24 | 313,686 |
2004-05-01 | 283,236 |
2004-05-08 | 292,754 |
2004-05-15 | 297,061 |
2004-05-22 | 293,974 |
2004-05-29 | 304,067 |
2004-06-05 | 308,229 |
2004-06-12 | 313,930 |
2004-06-19 | 322,481 |
2004-06-26 | 318,746 |
2004-07-03 | 349,920 |
2004-07-10 | 444,531 |
2004-07-17 | 394,372 |
2004-07-24 | 313,225 |
2004-07-31 | 282,128 |
2004-08-07 | 291,611 |
2004-08-14 | 262,936 |
2004-08-21 | 274,433 |
2004-08-28 | 276,308 |
2004-09-04 | 274,930 |
2004-09-11 | 250,568 |
2004-09-18 | 275,846 |
2004-09-25 | 282,729 |
2004-10-02 | 279,591 |
2004-10-09 | 338,711 |
2004-10-16 | 279,846 |
2004-10-23 | 317,573 |
2004-10-30 | 305,546 |
2004-11-06 | 351,404 |
2004-11-13 | 311,901 |
2004-11-20 | 355,954 |
2004-11-27 | 320,690 |
2004-12-04 | 473,570 |
2004-12-11 | 370,604 |
2004-12-18 | 374,749 |
2004-12-25 | 446,699 |
2005-01-01 | 540,927 |
2005-01-08 | 693,776 |
2005-01-15 | 467,862 |
2005-01-22 | 360,583 |
2005-01-29 | 364,704 |
2005-02-05 | 347,391 |
2005-02-12 | 309,290 |
2005-02-19 | 303,814 |
2005-02-26 | 290,776 |
2005-03-05 | 332,067 |
2005-03-12 | 307,061 |
2005-03-19 | 290,719 |
2005-03-26 | 291,378 |
2005-04-02 | 294,994 |
2005-04-09 | 339,709 |
2005-04-16 | 285,657 |
2005-04-23 | 299,891 |
2005-04-30 | 290,824 |
2005-05-07 | 297,347 |
2005-05-14 | 275,524 |
2005-05-21 | 276,761 |
2005-05-28 | 304,306 |
2005-06-04 | 289,914 |
2005-06-11 | 315,938 |
2005-06-18 | 289,831 |
2005-06-25 | 286,681 |
2005-07-02 | 327,268 |
2005-07-09 | 427,323 |
2005-07-16 | 374,665 |
2005-07-23 | 295,026 |
2005-07-30 | 261,906 |
2005-08-06 | 269,746 |
2005-08-13 | 257,151 |
2005-08-20 | 252,016 |
2005-08-27 | 251,642 |
2005-09-03 | 271,613 |
2005-09-10 | 322,387 |
2005-09-17 | 346,204 |
2005-09-24 | 292,435 |
2005-10-01 | 313,847 |
2005-10-08 | 380,093 |
2005-10-15 | 303,158 |
2005-10-22 | 304,733 |
2005-10-29 | 294,376 |
2005-11-05 | 340,491 |
2005-11-12 | 283,564 |
2005-11-19 | 368,859 |
2005-11-26 | 290,730 |
2005-12-03 | 444,600 |
2005-12-10 | 391,961 |
2005-12-17 | 359,108 |
2005-12-24 | 433,397 |
2005-12-31 | 475,889 |
2006-01-07 | 555,114 |
2006-01-14 | 439,873 |
2006-01-21 | 317,926 |
2006-01-28 | 318,805 |
2006-02-04 | 321,527 |
2006-02-11 | 310,078 |
2006-02-18 | 269,571 |
2006-02-25 | 272,478 |
2006-03-04 | 301,867 |
2006-03-11 | 294,764 |
2006-03-18 | 269,237 |
2006-03-25 | 265,370 |
2006-04-01 | 253,985 |
2006-04-08 | 314,696 |
2006-04-15 | 268,472 |
2006-04-22 | 291,349 |
2006-04-29 | 279,715 |
2006-05-06 | 317,239 |
2006-05-13 | 288,972 |
2006-05-20 | 277,168 |
2006-05-27 | 292,714 |
2006-06-03 | 260,263 |
2006-06-10 | 285,892 |
2006-06-17 | 277,441 |
2006-06-24 | 287,503 |
2006-07-01 | 304,638 |
2006-07-08 | 418,363 |
2006-07-15 | 377,115 |
2006-07-22 | 288,875 |
2006-07-29 | 259,974 |
2006-08-05 | 275,430 |
2006-08-12 | 256,259 |
2006-08-19 | 252,357 |
2006-08-26 | 251,275 |
2006-09-02 | 259,539 |
2006-09-09 | 240,231 |
2006-09-16 | 267,036 |
2006-09-23 | 261,396 |
2006-09-30 | 249,288 |
2006-10-07 | 307,646 |
2006-10-14 | 271,863 |
2006-10-21 | 291,372 |
2006-10-28 | 301,079 |
2006-11-04 | 326,711 |
2006-11-11 | 286,151 |
2006-11-18 | 367,690 |
2006-11-25 | 323,509 |
2006-12-02 | 448,898 |
2006-12-09 | 384,123 |
2006-12-16 | 361,672 |
2006-12-23 | 425,357 |
2006-12-30 | 499,979 |
2007-01-06 | 506,059 |
2007-01-13 | 506,709 |
2007-01-20 | 367,583 |
2007-01-27 | 359,959 |
2007-02-03 | 339,018 |
2007-02-10 | 363,018 |
2007-02-17 | 305,945 |
2007-02-24 | 299,000 |
2007-03-03 | 320,194 |
2007-03-10 | 298,927 |
2007-03-17 | 277,187 |
2007-03-24 | 273,432 |
2007-03-31 | 268,218 |
2007-04-07 | 328,266 |
2007-04-14 | 317,917 |
2007-04-21 | 303,984 |
2007-04-28 | 267,672 |
2007-05-05 | 274,801 |
2007-05-12 | 258,516 |
2007-05-19 | 270,446 |
2007-05-26 | 273,397 |
2007-06-02 | 263,527 |
2007-06-09 | 302,368 |
2007-06-16 | 290,951 |
2007-06-23 | 292,583 |
2007-06-30 | 300,348 |
2007-07-07 | 417,554 |
2007-07-14 | 383,839 |
2007-07-21 | 298,366 |
2007-07-28 | 257,426 |
2007-08-04 | 270,563 |
2007-08-11 | 266,420 |
2007-08-18 | 257,573 |
2007-08-25 | 266,179 |
2007-09-01 | 257,454 |
2007-09-08 | 245,526 |
2007-09-15 | 261,971 |
2007-09-22 | 247,643 |
2007-09-29 | 255,431 |
2007-10-06 | 298,317 |
2007-10-13 | 306,519 |
2007-10-20 | 307,675 |
2007-10-27 | 303,357 |
2007-11-03 | 325,831 |
2007-11-10 | 351,760 |
2007-11-17 | 323,124 |
2007-11-24 | 324,047 |
2007-12-01 | 462,902 |
2007-12-08 | 423,130 |
2007-12-15 | 393,042 |
2007-12-22 | 456,280 |
2007-12-29 | 507,908 |
2008-01-05 | 522,700 |
2008-01-12 | 547,943 |
2008-01-19 | 415,397 |
2008-01-26 | 369,498 |
2008-02-02 | 380,234 |
2008-02-09 | 377,595 |
2008-02-16 | 325,886 |
2008-02-23 | 330,013 |
2008-03-01 | 345,287 |
2008-03-08 | 341,364 |
2008-03-15 | 335,909 |
2008-03-22 | 316,208 |
2008-03-29 | 342,189 |
2008-04-05 | 357,209 |
2008-04-12 | 370,960 |
2008-04-19 | 328,334 |
2008-04-26 | 337,854 |
2008-05-03 | 335,533 |
2008-05-10 | 325,479 |
2008-05-17 | 319,817 |
2008-05-24 | 326,627 |
2008-05-31 | 300,989 |
2008-06-07 | 373,033 |
2008-06-14 | 349,254 |
2008-06-21 | 358,158 |
2008-06-28 | 368,544 |
2008-07-05 | 401,672 |
2008-07-12 | 476,071 |
2008-07-19 | 403,607 |
2008-07-26 | 374,182 |
2008-08-02 | 381,887 |
2008-08-09 | 372,807 |
2008-08-16 | 342,164 |
2008-08-23 | 344,255 |
2008-08-30 | 360,485 |
2008-09-06 | 336,131 |
2008-09-13 | 381,720 |
2008-09-20 | 397,610 |
2008-09-27 | 392,121 |
2008-10-04 | 426,786 |
2008-10-11 | 454,100 |
2008-10-18 | 416,114 |
2008-10-25 | 449,429 |
2008-11-01 | 466,373 |
2008-11-08 | 539,812 |
2008-11-15 | 513,047 |
2008-11-22 | 609,128 |
2008-11-29 | 537,230 |
2008-12-06 | 760,481 |
2008-12-13 | 629,867 |
2008-12-20 | 719,691 |
2008-12-27 | 717,000 |
2009-01-03 | 731,958 |
2009-01-10 | 956,791 |
2009-01-17 | 763,987 |
2009-01-24 | 620,143 |
2009-01-31 | 682,176 |
2009-02-07 | 710,152 |
2009-02-14 | 619,951 |
2009-02-21 | 605,668 |
2009-02-28 | 645,827 |
2009-03-07 | 652,635 |
2009-03-14 | 601,192 |
2009-03-21 | 590,067 |
2009-03-28 | 599,299 |
2009-04-04 | 623,279 |
2009-04-11 | 610,522 |
2009-04-18 | 596,564 |
2009-04-25 | 583,457 |
2009-05-02 | 536,648 |
2009-05-09 | 570,412 |
2009-05-16 | 540,925 |
2009-05-23 | 538,311 |
2009-05-30 | 500,380 |
2009-06-06 | 581,092 |
2009-06-13 | 562,449 |
2009-06-20 | 572,425 |
2009-06-27 | 563,387 |
2009-07-04 | 585,963 |
2009-07-11 | 677,038 |
2009-07-18 | 590,730 |
2009-07-25 | 516,351 |
2009-08-01 | 470,988 |
2009-08-08 | 486,586 |
2009-08-15 | 461,780 |
2009-08-22 | 460,998 |
2009-08-29 | 460,525 |
2009-09-05 | 470,079 |
2009-09-12 | 414,557 |
2009-09-19 | 441,311 |
2009-09-26 | 449,620 |
2009-10-03 | 456,233 |
2009-10-10 | 513,852 |
2009-10-17 | 464,985 |
2009-10-24 | 499,374 |
2009-10-31 | 487,714 |
2009-11-07 | 537,230 |
2009-11-14 | 479,350 |
2009-11-21 | 547,022 |
2009-11-28 | 462,090 |
2009-12-05 | 673,097 |
2009-12-12 | 561,655 |
2009-12-19 | 571,378 |
2009-12-26 | 561,852 |
2010-01-02 | 651,215 |
2010-01-09 | 825,891 |
2010-01-16 | 659,173 |
2010-01-23 | 507,651 |
2010-01-30 | 538,617 |
2010-02-06 | 512,463 |
2010-02-13 | 482,078 |
2010-02-20 | 458,160 |
2010-02-27 | 474,662 |
2010-03-06 | 462,679 |
2010-03-13 | 439,061 |
2010-03-20 | 413,067 |
2010-03-27 | 412,710 |
2010-04-03 | 421,130 |
2010-04-10 | 514,136 |
2010-04-17 | 436,814 |
2010-04-24 | 429,196 |
2010-05-01 | 399,350 |
2010-05-08 | 414,327 |
2010-05-15 | 414,572 |
2010-05-22 | 410,778 |
2010-05-29 | 418,873 |
2010-06-05 | 398,864 |
2010-06-12 | 448,305 |
2010-06-19 | 427,080 |
2010-06-26 | 444,712 |
2010-07-03 | 470,366 |
2010-07-10 | 515,991 |
2010-07-17 | 502,065 |
2010-07-24 | 413,679 |
2010-07-31 | 402,140 |
2010-08-07 | 425,471 |
2010-08-14 | 405,484 |
2010-08-21 | 384,955 |
2010-08-28 | 383,135 |
2010-09-04 | 381,863 |
2010-09-11 | 341,791 |
2010-09-18 | 382,341 |
2010-09-25 | 372,551 |
2010-10-02 | 373,681 |
2010-10-09 | 462,667 |
2010-10-16 | 394,016 |
2010-10-23 | 408,489 |
2010-10-30 | 421,097 |
2010-11-06 | 452,657 |
2010-11-13 | 409,548 |
2010-11-20 | 464,817 |
2010-11-27 | 412,922 |
2010-12-04 | 585,711 |
2010-12-11 | 491,776 |
2010-12-18 | 495,548 |
2010-12-25 | 525,710 |
2011-01-01 | 578,904 |
2011-01-08 | 773,499 |
2011-01-15 | 549,688 |
2011-01-22 | 485,950 |
2011-01-29 | 464,775 |
2011-02-05 | 440,706 |
2011-02-12 | 424,400 |
2011-02-19 | 380,985 |
2011-02-26 | 353,797 |
2011-03-05 | 407,299 |
2011-03-12 | 371,721 |
2011-03-19 | 354,457 |
2011-03-26 | 357,457 |
2011-04-02 | 353,817 |
2011-04-09 | 448,029 |
2011-04-16 | 381,834 |
2011-04-23 | 387,867 |
2011-04-30 | 415,974 |
2011-05-07 | 397,737 |
2011-05-14 | 361,573 |
2011-05-21 | 376,632 |
2011-05-28 | 381,497 |
2011-06-04 | 366,816 |
2011-06-11 | 400,608 |
2011-06-18 | 394,286 |
2011-06-25 | 406,633 |
2011-07-02 | 425,640 |
2011-07-09 | 473,963 |
2011-07-16 | 470,086 |
2011-07-23 | 369,207 |
2011-07-30 | 341,103 |
2011-08-06 | 354,408 |
2011-08-13 | 346,014 |
2011-08-20 | 344,870 |
2011-08-27 | 336,761 |
2011-09-03 | 348,582 |
2011-09-10 | 328,868 |
2011-09-17 | 353,820 |
2011-09-24 | 328,073 |
2011-10-01 | 332,394 |
2011-10-08 | 405,906 |
2011-10-15 | 357,562 |
2011-10-22 | 377,156 |
2011-10-29 | 369,647 |
2011-11-05 | 402,532 |
2011-11-12 | 363,016 |
2011-11-19 | 440,157 |
2011-11-26 | 372,640 |
2011-12-03 | 528,793 |
2011-12-10 | 435,863 |
2011-12-17 | 421,103 |
2011-12-24 | 497,689 |
2011-12-31 | 540,057 |
2012-01-07 | 646,219 |
2012-01-14 | 525,422 |
2012-01-21 | 416,880 |
2012-01-28 | 422,287 |
2012-02-04 | 401,365 |
2012-02-11 | 365,014 |
2012-02-18 | 346,659 |
2012-02-25 | 334,242 |
2012-03-03 | 368,433 |
2012-03-10 | 340,102 |
2012-03-17 | 319,498 |
2012-03-24 | 323,373 |
2012-03-31 | 315,800 |
2012-04-07 | 390,064 |
2012-04-14 | 370,482 |
2012-04-21 | 370,632 |
2012-04-28 | 333,476 |
2012-05-05 | 341,080 |
2012-05-12 | 325,094 |
2012-05-19 | 330,427 |
2012-05-26 | 346,260 |
2012-06-02 | 324,385 |
2012-06-09 | 376,610 |
2012-06-16 | 364,548 |
2012-06-23 | 370,521 |
2012-06-30 | 369,826 |
2012-07-07 | 442,192 |
2012-07-14 | 455,260 |
2012-07-21 | 340,780 |
2012-07-28 | 312,931 |
2012-08-04 | 320,219 |
2012-08-11 | 317,680 |
2012-08-18 | 311,857 |
2012-08-25 | 312,542 |
2012-09-01 | 309,537 |
2012-09-08 | 299,729 |
2012-09-15 | 330,454 |
2012-09-22 | 303,685 |
2012-09-29 | 301,046 |
2012-10-06 | 329,925 |
2012-10-13 | 362,730 |
2012-10-20 | 345,227 |
2012-10-27 | 339,924 |
2012-11-03 | 361,823 |
2012-11-10 | 478,551 |
2012-11-17 | 403,636 |
2012-11-24 | 358,865 |
2012-12-01 | 500,163 |
2012-12-08 | 429,191 |
2012-12-15 | 401,431 |
2012-12-22 | 457,584 |
2012-12-29 | 490,126 |
2013-01-05 | 557,424 |
2013-01-12 | 558,047 |
2013-01-19 | 437,360 |
2013-01-26 | 369,567 |
2013-02-02 | 388,708 |
2013-02-09 | 361,759 |
2013-02-16 | 351,087 |
2013-02-23 | 310,512 |
2013-03-02 | 335,794 |
2013-03-09 | 317,661 |
2013-03-16 | 301,471 |
2013-03-23 | 316,133 |
2013-03-30 | 317,494 |
2013-04-06 | 356,935 |
2013-04-13 | 359,415 |
2013-04-20 | 326,264 |
2013-04-27 | 301,622 |
2013-05-04 | 301,602 |
2013-05-11 | 320,253 |
2013-05-18 | 303,357 |
2013-05-25 | 319,508 |
2013-06-01 | 294,608 |
2013-06-08 | 332,964 |
2013-06-15 | 336,970 |
2013-06-22 | 336,901 |
2013-06-29 | 335,424 |
2013-07-06 | 383,811 |
2013-07-13 | 410,974 |
2013-07-20 | 340,457 |
2013-07-27 | 281,692 |
2013-08-03 | 288,861 |
2013-08-10 | 282,756 |
2013-08-17 | 281,164 |
2013-08-24 | 279,803 |
2013-08-31 | 269,359 |
2013-09-07 | 229,648 |
2013-09-14 | 272,946 |
2013-09-21 | 255,087 |
2013-09-28 | 252,196 |
2013-10-05 | 335,937 |
2013-10-12 | 360,957 |
2013-10-19 | 312,037 |
2013-10-26 | 325,326 |
2013-11-02 | 331,867 |
2013-11-09 | 364,167 |
2013-11-16 | 327,053 |
2013-11-23 | 369,197 |
2013-11-30 | 321,896 |
2013-12-07 | 463,413 |
2013-12-14 | 414,613 |
2013-12-21 | 418,272 |
2013-12-28 | 452,664 |
2014-01-04 | 488,537 |
2014-01-11 | 534,966 |
2014-01-18 | 416,116 |
2014-01-25 | 357,806 |
2014-02-01 | 357,742 |
2014-02-08 | 360,338 |
2014-02-15 | 322,761 |
2014-02-22 | 312,665 |
2014-03-01 | 317,832 |
2014-03-08 | 302,311 |
2014-03-15 | 285,970 |
2014-03-22 | 274,072 |
2014-03-29 | 294,862 |
2014-04-05 | 299,162 |
2014-04-12 | 318,793 |
2014-04-19 | 299,182 |
2014-04-26 | 318,127 |
2014-05-03 | 288,748 |
2014-05-10 | 270,738 |
2014-05-17 | 287,398 |
2014-05-24 | 275,412 |
2014-05-31 | 264,133 |
2014-06-07 | 313,371 |
2014-06-14 | 301,195 |
2014-06-21 | 305,029 |
2014-06-28 | 305,791 |
2014-07-05 | 322,753 |
2014-07-12 | 370,559 |
2014-07-19 | 287,049 |
2014-07-26 | 257,625 |
2014-08-02 | 247,877 |
2014-08-09 | 269,468 |
2014-08-16 | 249,463 |
2014-08-23 | 249,006 |
2014-08-30 | 249,780 |
2014-09-06 | 234,755 |
2014-09-13 | 242,318 |
2014-09-20 | 239,780 |
2014-09-27 | 227,571 |
2014-10-04 | 257,545 |
2014-10-11 | 273,756 |
2014-10-18 | 256,166 |
2014-10-25 | 271,331 |
2014-11-01 | 266,921 |
2014-11-08 | 309,338 |
2014-11-15 | 286,115 |
2014-11-22 | 357,202 |
2014-11-29 | 294,389 |
2014-12-06 | 389,284 |
2014-12-13 | 327,827 |
2014-12-20 | 340,827 |
2014-12-27 | 389,757 |
2015-01-03 | 439,342 |
2015-01-10 | 529,685 |
2015-01-17 | 383,538 |
2015-01-24 | 281,885 |
2015-01-31 | 306,643 |
2015-02-07 | 324,158 |
2015-02-14 | 277,904 |
2015-02-21 | 280,639 |
2015-02-28 | 315,566 |
2015-03-07 | 277,925 |
2015-03-14 | 260,242 |
2015-03-21 | 248,032 |
2015-03-28 | 239,748 |
2015-04-04 | 253,533 |
2015-04-11 | 308,173 |
2015-04-18 | 279,797 |
2015-04-25 | 250,780 |
2015-05-02 | 236,421 |
2015-05-09 | 242,882 |
2015-05-16 | 243,612 |
2015-05-23 | 253,454 |
2015-05-30 | 230,676 |
2015-06-06 | 275,619 |
2015-06-13 | 258,764 |
2015-06-20 | 263,199 |
2015-06-27 | 274,646 |
2015-07-04 | 303,585 |
2015-07-11 | 344,471 |
2015-07-18 | 262,949 |
2015-07-25 | 230,314 |
2015-08-01 | 224,104 |
2015-08-08 | 239,326 |
2015-08-15 | 229,251 |
2015-08-22 | 226,649 |
2015-08-29 | 230,079 |
2015-09-05 | 232,507 |
2015-09-12 | 198,903 |
2015-09-19 | 219,342 |
2015-09-26 | 215,116 |
2015-10-03 | 227,176 |
2015-10-10 | 256,522 |
2015-10-17 | 232,860 |
2015-10-24 | 245,365 |
2015-10-31 | 258,440 |
2015-11-07 | 291,098 |
2015-11-14 | 264,816 |
2015-11-21 | 305,424 |
2015-11-28 | 262,628 |
2015-12-05 | 384,491 |
2015-12-12 | 313,276 |
2015-12-19 | 319,641 |
2015-12-26 | 346,542 |
2016-01-02 | 405,368 |
2016-01-09 | 502,904 |
2016-01-16 | 378,747 |
2016-01-23 | 295,936 |
2016-01-30 | 311,940 |
2016-02-06 | 290,796 |
2016-02-13 | 258,380 |
2016-02-20 | 248,870 |
2016-02-27 | 265,802 |
2016-03-05 | 247,628 |
2016-03-12 | 236,888 |
2016-03-19 | 230,882 |
2016-03-26 | 235,716 |
2016-04-02 | 245,035 |
2016-04-09 | 270,419 |
2016-04-16 | 242,400 |
2016-04-23 | 245,040 |
2016-04-30 | 243,392 |
2016-05-07 | 261,899 |
2016-05-14 | 244,869 |
2016-05-21 | 240,798 |
2016-05-28 | 246,740 |
2016-06-04 | 232,300 |
2016-06-11 | 266,277 |
2016-06-18 | 247,968 |
2016-06-25 | 263,662 |
2016-07-02 | 267,437 |
2016-07-09 | 298,673 |
2016-07-16 | 268,526 |
2016-07-23 | 231,925 |
2016-07-30 | 219,202 |
2016-08-06 | 231,542 |
2016-08-13 | 219,570 |
2016-08-20 | 217,011 |
2016-08-27 | 215,688 |
2016-09-03 | 217,715 |
2016-09-10 | 193,291 |
2016-09-17 | 205,649 |
2016-09-24 | 198,455 |
2016-10-01 | 200,456 |
2016-10-08 | 238,581 |
2016-10-15 | 233,633 |
2016-10-22 | 237,314 |
2016-10-29 | 245,751 |
2016-11-05 | 258,608 |
2016-11-12 | 223,770 |
2016-11-19 | 287,794 |
2016-11-26 | 249,774 |
2016-12-03 | 351,580 |
2016-12-10 | 305,268 |
2016-12-17 | 315,068 |
2016-12-24 | 343,213 |
2016-12-31 | 350,561 |
2017-01-07 | 414,742 |
2017-01-14 | 352,799 |
2017-01-21 | 284,030 |
2017-01-28 | 280,983 |
2017-02-04 | 259,713 |
2017-02-11 | 245,886 |
2017-02-18 | 239,322 |
2017-02-25 | 212,829 |
2017-03-04 | 243,959 |
2017-03-11 | 222,227 |
2017-03-18 | 224,693 |
2017-03-25 | 228,269 |
2017-04-01 | 208,347 |
2017-04-08 | 239,823 |
2017-04-15 | 225,864 |
2017-04-22 | 241,611 |
2017-04-29 | 210,955 |
2017-05-06 | 215,040 |
2017-05-13 | 206,905 |
2017-05-20 | 210,544 |
2017-05-27 | 232,138 |
2017-06-03 | 212,696 |
2017-06-10 | 234,652 |
2017-06-17 | 228,883 |
2017-06-24 | 239,635 |
2017-07-01 | 252,886 |
2017-07-08 | 284,329 |
2017-07-15 | 257,763 |
2017-07-22 | 220,455 |
2017-07-29 | 198,776 |
2017-08-05 | 211,924 |
2017-08-12 | 198,280 |
2017-08-19 | 195,130 |
2017-08-26 | 196,227 |
2017-09-02 | 250,627 |
2017-09-09 | 211,923 |
2017-09-16 | 212,313 |
2017-09-23 | 212,987 |
2017-09-30 | 204,180 |
2017-10-07 | 229,241 |
2017-10-14 | 205,592 |
2017-10-21 | 216,004 |
2017-10-28 | 215,977 |
2017-11-04 | 242,111 |
2017-11-11 | 236,654 |
2017-11-18 | 275,004 |
2017-11-25 | 224,851 |
2017-12-02 | 326,052 |
2017-12-09 | 282,055 |
2017-12-16 | 287,479 |
2017-12-23 | 325,180 |
2017-12-30 | 351,500 |
2018-01-06 | 403,930 |
2018-01-13 | 354,708 |
2018-01-20 | 260,432 |
2018-01-27 | 268,197 |
2018-02-03 | 243,422 |
2018-02-10 | 233,252 |
2018-02-17 | 212,609 |
2018-02-24 | 196,294 |
2018-03-03 | 225,893 |
2018-03-10 | 205,185 |
2018-03-17 | 198,649 |
2018-03-24 | 195,433 |
2018-03-31 | 201,057 |
2018-04-07 | 231,759 |
2018-04-14 | 226,090 |
2018-04-21 | 200,139 |
2018-04-28 | 186,451 |
2018-05-05 | 190,262 |
2018-05-12 | 195,214 |
2018-05-19 | 207,043 |
2018-05-26 | 202,846 |
2018-06-02 | 191,523 |
2018-06-09 | 217,289 |
2018-06-16 | 206,023 |
2018-06-23 | 222,766 |
2018-06-30 | 231,539 |
2018-07-07 | 264,869 |
2018-07-14 | 232,238 |
2018-07-21 | 201,288 |
2018-07-28 | 179,880 |
2018-08-04 | 185,174 |
2018-08-11 | 180,038 |
2018-08-18 | 173,331 |
2018-08-25 | 175,745 |
2018-09-01 | 173,607 |
2018-09-08 | 162,640 |
2018-09-15 | 173,624 |
2018-09-22 | 172,930 |
2018-09-29 | 171,816 |
2018-10-06 | 193,936 |
2018-10-13 | 190,501 |
2018-10-20 | 198,733 |
2018-10-27 | 198,530 |
2018-11-03 | 214,814 |
2018-11-10 | 235,981 |
2018-11-17 | 226,576 |
2018-11-24 | 218,658 |
2018-12-01 | 317,936 |
2018-12-08 | 261,525 |
2018-12-15 | 255,195 |
2018-12-22 | 291,581 |
2018-12-29 | 327,388 |
2019-01-05 | 350,681 |
2019-01-12 | 343,678 |
2019-01-19 | 269,369 |
2019-01-26 | 250,580 |
2019-02-02 | 254,263 |
2019-02-09 | 242,762 |
2019-02-16 | 210,679 |
2019-02-23 | 203,049 |
2019-03-02 | 220,540 |
2019-03-09 | 209,302 |
2019-03-16 | 194,335 |
2019-03-23 | 190,023 |
2019-03-30 | 183,775 |
2019-04-06 | 196,071 |
2019-04-13 | 196,364 |
2019-04-20 | 211,762 |
2019-04-27 | 204,755 |
2019-05-04 | 204,033 |
2019-05-11 | 188,264 |
2019-05-18 | 191,931 |
2019-05-25 | 198,194 |
2019-06-01 | 189,577 |
2019-06-08 | 220,186 |
2019-06-15 | 205,921 |
2019-06-22 | 225,819 |
2019-06-29 | 224,565 |
2019-07-06 | 231,995 |
2019-07-13 | 243,621 |
2019-07-20 | 196,382 |
2019-07-27 | 178,897 |
2019-08-03 | 179,879 |
2019-08-10 | 186,914 |
2019-08-17 | 171,386 |
2019-08-24 | 176,867 |
2019-08-31 | 179,516 |
2019-09-07 | 160,342 |
2019-09-14 | 173,134 |
2019-09-21 | 175,394 |
2019-09-28 | 172,968 |
2019-10-05 | 188,106 |
2019-10-12 | 201,677 |
2019-10-19 | 186,748 |
2019-10-26 | 198,733 |
2019-11-02 | 205,625 |
2019-11-09 | 238,996 |
2019-11-16 | 227,892 |
2019-11-23 | 252,428 |
2019-11-30 | 216,827 |
2019-12-07 | 317,866 |
2019-12-14 | 270,547 |
2019-12-21 | 287,243 |
2019-12-28 | 312,524 |
2020-01-04 | 335,480 |
2020-01-11 | 338,550 |
2020-01-18 | 282,088 |
2020-01-25 | 229,002 |
2020-02-01 | 224,664 |
2020-02-08 | 219,601 |
2020-02-15 | 209,336 |
2020-02-22 | 199,278 |
2020-02-29 | 216,982 |
2020-03-07 | 200,382 |
2020-03-14 | 251,416 |
2020-03-21 | 2,920,162 |
2020-03-28 | 6,015,821 |
2020-04-04 | 6,211,406 |
2020-04-11 | 4,964,568 |
2020-04-18 | 4,267,395 |
Note: Due to the scale of the chart and rapid increase in initial unemployment insurance (UI) claims, the initial UI claims for the last five weeks appear to align vertically.
Source: U.S. Employment and Training Administration, Initial Claims [ICSA], retrieved from Department of Labor (DOL), https://www.dol.gov/ui/data.pdf and https://oui.doleta.gov/unemploy/claims.asp, April 23, 2020
All else equal, job losses of this magnitude would translate into an unemployment rate of 18.3%. However, the official unemployment rate, when it is released, will likely not reflect all coronavirus-related layoffs. This is due to the fact that jobless workers are only counted as unemployed if they are actively seeking work. That means many workers who lose their job as a result of the virus will be counted as dropping out of the labor force instead of as unemployed, because they are unable to search for work due to the lockdown.
Widespread reports of UI systems collapsing under the weight of so many applications raise the question not only of how many would-be applicants have been frozen out, but also of how many of those who managed to apply are actually receiving benefits. The data to get at that last question are lagged a week, but they show that roughly 71% of applicants are receiving benefits. That is calculated from noting that between March 14 and April 11, the total number of workers receiving benefits (known as “continued claims” or “insured unemployment”) increased by 14.4 million. Over the same period, 20.1 million workers filed unemployment insurance claims. That means that by April 11, only roughly 14.4 million out of 20.1 million new filers, or 71%, were receiving benefits. Applied to the current data, that would mean that roughly 7.0 million UI applicants from the coronavirus period are still waiting to receive their benefits.