Key takeaways
- Proposed state legislation to extend full, equal collective bargaining rights to all state and local government workers can help Virginia:
- reduce the state’s large public-sector pay gap
- improve public services
- reduce staff vacancies and turnover
- decrease racial and gender wage disparities
- Strong collective bargaining rights and increased unionization rates are highly correlated with numerous, widely shared benefits including higher wages, more equitable state economies, and healthier democracies.
- Virginia currently has one of the largest public-sector pay gaps in the nation. State and local government employees in Virginia earn, on average, 26.7% less than private-sector peers with similar education and experience.
- The public-sector pay gap varies across states and is largest in states like Virginia where most public employees lack collective bargaining rights. In Virginia, collective bargaining is currently banned for state employees and only recently became permitted for some local government employees.
Key takeaways
- Proposed state legislation to extend full, equal collective bargaining rights to all state and local government workers can help Virginia:
- reduce the state’s large public-sector pay gap
- improve public services
- reduce staff vacancies and turnover
- decrease racial and gender wage disparities
- Strong collective bargaining rights and increased unionization rates are highly correlated with numerous, widely shared benefits including higher wages, more equitable state economies, and healthier democracies.
- Virginia currently has one of the largest public-sector pay gaps in the nation. State and local government employees in Virginia earn, on average, 26.7% less than private-sector peers with similar education and experience.
- The public-sector pay gap varies across states and is largest in states like Virginia where most public employees lack collective bargaining rights. In Virginia, collective bargaining is currently banned for state employees and only recently became permitted for some local government employees.
In 2026, Virginia lawmakers are poised to consider transformative legislation that would extend full collective bargaining rights to public employees at all levels of state and local government. The benefits of comprehensive collective bargaining rights would extend far beyond affected public employees who would enjoy better working conditions. Stronger state collective bargaining laws can help improve the quality of public services and economic outcomes for all Virginians.
Data show that strong collective bargaining laws help states address persistent public-sector pay gaps, reduce staff vacancies and turnover, and lead to higher unionization rates (Morrissey and Sherer 2024). Increased unionization rates are highly correlated with numerous, widely shared benefits including more equitable state economies and healthier democracies (McNicholas et al. 2025).
For Virginia, expanding public-sector bargaining is a critical next step in building an economy that works for all. The expansion will reverse a long history of anti-worker state policies that have suppressed wages and limited workers’ power in the labor market by blocking pathways to unionization. Such policies have resulted in greater income inequality and persistent racial and gender wage disparities (Bivens and Shierholz 2018; Mishel and Bivens 2021). Strong, comprehensive state legislation covering public employees’ labor rights is also especially important at a moment when the federal government has been attacking the jobs, working conditions, and union contracts of over 235,000 federal civil servants residing in Virginia, and threatening long-standing federal protections of all workers’ rights (EPI 2025b; Oakford and Poydock 2025).
This report examines how public-sector workers with limited or no collective bargaining rights fare compared with public-sector workers with well-established collective bargaining rights. To do so, we estimate pay differences between state and local government workers and private-sector workers with similar education and experience. In this analysis, Virginia is among a minority of states in which state employees have no bargaining rights and only some local government employees have limited bargaining rights. By contrast, 27 states have well-established collective bargaining rights for state and local government workers (Table 1).
The right to bargain collectively over pay is associated with higher unionization rates (union membership as a share of the workforce) in a given state. This report shows that collective bargaining rights and union strength help state and local government workers narrow the pay gap with private-sector workers. We show that the pay gap for public employees is significantly larger when these workers have weak or no bargaining rights, like public employees in Virginia, which has one of the largest public-sector pay gaps in the nation (-26.7%).
Virginia public employees lack collective bargaining rights
Proposed legislation in Virginia would, for the first time in the state’s history, guarantee that all state and local government employees enjoy labor rights similar to those of their private-sector peers (whose rights to collectively bargain are covered under the federal National Labor Relations Act) (HB 1263 and SB 378). The Virginia Assembly passed similar legislation (HB 2764 and SB 917) in 2025, only to have it vetoed by then-Governor Glenn Youngkin (McGinley 2025).
Virginia is one of a handful of Southern states that for decades explicitly banned public employees and employers from entering into collective bargaining agreements. In 2020, Virginia took an important step toward making collective bargaining newly optional for local governments, but the state’s policies remain out of step compared with most states. Virginia lacks a statewide collective bargaining statute covering all local government employees and still has a ban in place barring state employees from collective bargaining (Borja 2022).
As shown in Table 1, the majority of states and Washington, D.C., already ensure collective bargaining rights for most public employees, including state workers. Many states have had statewide public-sector bargaining statutes in place for decades (Rueben 1996; Sanes and Schmitt 2014). Such laws typically set clear, uniform guidelines for union elections and contract negotiation processes and establish state labor boards charged with fostering productive labor-management relations (including timely contract settlements), ensuring broad awareness of and compliance with statutory guidelines, and mediating or adjudicating disputes as needed.
States that ban or limit collective bargaining rights for government workers have fewer union members: Collective bargaining rights and the share of full-time state and local government workers ages 18–64 belonging to a union, states ranked in order from lowest to highest by union density
| State | Teachers | Police | Firefighters | Other local |
Other state |
Public- Sector union density |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SC | B | B | B | B | B | 7.1% |
| NC | B | B | B | B | B | 7.5% |
| AR | P→B | P | P | P→B | P→B | 9.8% |
| VA | B→P | B→P | B→P | B→P | B | 14.1% |
| MS | P | P | P | P | P | 14.8% |
| LA | P | P | P | P | P | 14.9% |
| WY | P | P | R | P | P | 15.4% |
| SD | R | R | R | R | R | 15.4% |
| GA | B | B | P | B | B | 17.0% |
| ID | R | P | R | P | P | 18.7% |
| AZ | P | P | P | P | P | 19.0% |
| TX | B | R | R | B | B | 19.1% |
| TN | R | B | B | B | B | 19.4% |
| ND | R | P | P | P | P | 21.9% |
| UT | P | P | R | P | P | 22.4% |
| KY | P | R | R | P | P | 22.6% |
| CO | P | P | P | P | B→P | 23.6% |
| OK | R | R | R | P | B | 24.5% |
| AL | P | P | P | P | P | 24.6% |
| WI | B | R | R | B | B | 24.7% |
| MO | R | R | R | R | R | 25.8% |
| NM | R | R | R | R | R | 26.0% |
| WV | P | P | P | P | P | 26.1% |
| KS | R | R | R | R | R | 26.8% |
| FL | R→P | R | R | R→P | R→P | 27.7% |
| IA | P | R | R | P | P | 29.7% |
| IN | R | R | R | R | B | 31.0% |
| NE | R | R | R | R | R | 34.4% |
| DC | R | R | R | R | R | 37.9% |
| DE | R | R | R | R | R | 39.4% |
| MT | R | R | R | R | R | 45.5% |
| MD | R | P | P | P | R | 46.6% |
| NV | R | R | R | R | R | 46.8% |
| MI | R | R | R | R | R | 52.4% |
| AK | R | R | R | R | R | 52.7% |
| OH | R | R | R | R | R | 53.4% |
| NH | R | R | R | R | R | 56.6% |
| IL | R | R | R | R | R | 58.1% |
| ME | R | R | R | R | R | 59.0% |
| VT | R | R | R | R | R | 59.5% |
| WA | R | R | R | R | R | 60.5% |
| OR | R | R | R | R | R | 60.5% |
| PA | R | R | R | R | R | 61.4% |
| MN | R | R | R | R | R | 61.6% |
| CA | R | R | R | R | R | 62.4% |
| MA | R | R | R | R | R | 66.3% |
| RI | R | R | R | R | R | 69.3% |
| NJ | R | R | R | R | R | 70.1% |
| CT | R | R | R | R | R | 74.1% |
| NY | R | R | R | R | R | 75.5% |
| HI | R | R | R | R | R | 75.5% |
Note: Union density is the share of full-time (35+ hour) state and local government workers, ages 18–64, who belong to a union or are covered by a union contract. “B” (“Banned”) denotes states where the specified groups of government workers are barred from bargaining collectively over pay. “P” (“Permitted”) denotes states where these workers may engage in bargaining, but there is no statewide mandate to bargain over pay. “R” (“Required”) denotes states where employers have a duty to bargain with these workers over pay.
Sources: Union density is based on the authors’ analysis of U.S. Census Bureau Current Population Survey Outgoing Rotation Group microdata, September 2020–August 2025 (Flood et al. 2025). The strength of collective bargaining rights for this period is based on the authors’ analysis of Valletta and Freeman (1988); Rueben (1996); Dippel and Sauers (2019) Sanes and Schmitt (2014); Frandsen and Webb (2017); NCTQ (2019); Han (2019); Brannick (2019); NEA (2020); AFSCME (n.d.) cited in McNicholas et al. (2020); Commonwealth Foundation (2021); García and Han (2021); Brannick and Holman (2022); New Mexico Public Employee Labor Relations Board (2023); NCSL (n.d.(a)); IAFF (n.d.).
Who are public employees in Virginia?
In 2024, approximately 560,000 Virginians worked in state and local government occupations (BLS-CES 2020–2025). This includes teachers and school staff, firefighters, transit operators, law enforcement, administrative staff, and employees serving the state’s public safety, transportation, health care, judicial, corrections, and higher education systems. As shown in Table 2, 21.2% of Virginia state government employees and 20.4% of Virginia local government employees are Black, and 57.3% of state government employees and 64.5% of local government employees are women. Many public-sector workers in the state are highly educated. Virginia public-sector workers are more than twice as likely to have advanced degrees as private-sector workers and are much less likely to have a high-school level or less education.
Black, female, and highly educated workers are more likely to work in the public sector: Demographics of Virginia wage and salary workers, 2019–2023
| Private sector | Federal govt. | State govt. | Local govt. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | ||||
| Less than HS | 8.4% | 1.0% | 2.2% | 3.2% |
| High school | 24.2% | 14.6% | 14.2% | 15.2% |
| Some college | 28.1% | 25.3% | 24.4% | 23.1% |
| Bachelor’s degree | 24.4% | 28.1% | 25.5% | 28.5% |
| Advanced degree | 14.9% | 31.1% | 33.7% | 30.0% |
| Race and ethnicity | ||||
| White non-Hispanic | 58.5% | 57.0% | 63.7% | 66.3% |
| Black non-Hispanic | 18.1% | 19.1% | 21.2% | 20.4% |
| Hispanic | 11.5% | 11.1% | 5.7% | 6.5% |
| Other non-Hispanic | 12.0% | 12.7% | 9.4% | 6.7% |
| Female | 47.7% | 35.1% | 57.3% | 64.5% |
| Immigrant | 17.6% | 12.7% | 11.2% | 9.4% |
| Average age | 41.1% | 41.6% | 44.1% | 45.2% |
Notes: Statistics shown are for wage and salary workers, ages 18–64, working 35 or more hours per week. Hispanic refers to Hispanic workers of any race, while white, Black, and other refer to non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic Blacks, and other racial categories, respectively.
Source: Authors' analysis of American Community Survey microdata, 2019–2023 5-Year Sample (Ruggles et al. 2025)
Anti-union state policies are rooted in racism and harm all Virginia workers
Virginia’s ban on union contracts for public employees is a Jim Crow-era policy with deep roots in the history of slavery and white supremacy. After the passage of federal labor laws accelerated worker organizing in the 1930s, Virginia joined several Southern states in adopting anti-union state laws designed to prevent multiracial union organizing and suppress Black workers’ wages and power (Childers 2023). The Virginia Assembly first took an explicit stance on public-sector bargaining in response to the unionization of Black hospital employees at the University of Virginia in 1946, via a joint resolution declaring it against the public policy of the state to negotiate with public employee unions (a stance later affirmed by state supreme court decisions and codified in statute in 1993). Virginia was also among the first states to adopt anti-union so-called right-to-work legislation in 1947, an anti-labor policy jointly promoted by white supremacist organizations and industry groups intent on slowing the growth of unions to maintain access to cheap labor—especially in Southern states (The Commonwealth Institute 2022; Watts 2021; Pierce 2017, 2018; Sherer and Gould 2024).
As a result of these long-standing anti-union state policies, unionization rates in Virginia for both public- and private-sector workers are well below national averages.
Virginia has low union membership in both the public and private sectors: Private- and public-sector union density by state, full-time wage and salary workers ages 18–64, September 2020–August 2025
| State | Private sector | State & local govt. |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 5.8% | 24.6% |
| Alaska | 10.3% | 52.7% |
| Arizona | 3.5% | 19.0% |
| Arkansas | 3.9% | 9.8% |
| California | 10.5% | 62.4% |
| Colorado | 4.8% | 23.6% |
| Connecticut | 9.0% | 74.1% |
| Delaware | 5.2% | 39.4% |
| Washington D.C. | 5.9% | 37.9% |
| Florida | 3.4% | 27.7% |
| Georgia | 3.5% | 17.0% |
| Hawaii | 17.4% | 75.5% |
| Idaho | 4.0% | 18.7% |
| Illinois | 9.4% | 58.1% |
| Indiana | 7.6% | 31.0% |
| Iowa | 5.9% | 29.7% |
| Kansas | 8.0% | 26.8% |
| Kentucky | 8.5% | 22.6% |
| Louisiana | 3.6% | 14.9% |
| Maine | 7.8% | 59.0% |
| Maryland | 6.9% | 46.6% |
| Massachusetts | 8.2% | 66.3% |
| Michigan | 12.7% | 52.4% |
| Minnesota | 9.6% | 61.6% |
| Mississippi | 6.9% | 14.8% |
| Missouri | 8.6% | 25.8% |
| Montana | 7.6% | 45.5% |
| Nebraska | 5.5% | 34.4% |
| Nevada | 10.1% | 46.8% |
| New Hampshire | 5.2% | 56.6% |
| New Jersey | 10.4% | 70.1% |
| New Mexico | 5.4% | 26.0% |
| New York | 14.2% | 75.5% |
| North Carolina | 2.3% | 7.5% |
| North Dakota | 5.2% | 21.9% |
| Ohio | 8.7% | 53.4% |
| Oklahoma | 3.7% | 24.5% |
| Oregon | 9.2% | 60.5% |
| Pennsylvania | 8.6% | 61.4% |
| Rhode Island | 10.1% | 69.3% |
| South Carolina | 2.1% | 7.1% |
| South Dakota | 2.9% | 15.4% |
| Tennessee | 4.2% | 19.4% |
| Texas | 3.4% | 19.1% |
| Utah | 6.1% | 22.4% |
| Vermont | 8.3% | 59.5% |
| Virginia | 3.4% | 14.1% |
| Washington | 12.0% | 60.5% |
| West Virginia | 7.8% | 26.1% |
| Wisconsin | 6.8% | 24.7% |
| Wyoming | 4.7% | 15.4% |
Note: Union density is the share of full-time (35+ hour) wage and salary workers, ages 18–64, who belong to a union or are covered by a union contract.
Source: Union density is based on the authors’ analysis of U.S. Census Bureau Current Population Survey Outgoing Rotation Group microdata, September 2020–August 2025 (Flood et al. 2025).
Narrowing Virginia’s large public-sector pay gap
Across the country, public-sector employees earn less than their private-sector counterparts, and this pay gap has widened in recent years. In the latest available five-year period (September 2020–August 2025), state and local government employees earned, on average, 17.2% less than private-sector employees with similar education and experience. The size of the public-sector pay gap varies across states and is largest in states like Virginia where most public employees lack collective bargaining rights. Public-sector workers with strong bargaining rights experience a narrower pay gap (-14.3%) than those with weak (-19.6%) or no bargaining rights (-22.5%) (see Table 3).
Virginia currently has one of the largest public-sector pay gaps in the nation. Among all 50 states, Virginia’s -26.7% public-sector pay gap appears to be the second highest, though differences among states clustered at the bottom of the rankings are not statistically significant. (Pay gap statistics are for full-time wage and salary workers ages 18–64, based on the authors’ analysis of pooled September 2020–August 2025 Current Population Survey microdata downloaded from Flood et al. 2025 and EPI 2025a.)
Compensation packages of public employees, on average, include more robust benefits than those of private-sector workers, but Virginia’s public-sector compensation gap remains large, even when factoring in more robust benefits. Benefits are an estimated 32.0% of pay for private-sector workers in the South Atlantic region and an estimated 51.3% of pay for Virginia public-sector workers. Factoring in benefits, Virginia’s public-sector compensation gap shrinks to a still sizable 16.0% (authors’ estimate based on BLS-ECEC 2020–2025 and Public Plans Data 2020–2024; see Morrissey and Sherer 2024 for methodology).1
States like Virginia with weak public-sector collective bargaining laws have larger public-sector pay gaps: Public-sector pay gaps, full-time wage and salary workers ages 18–64, September 2020–August 2025
| US, by collective bargaining rights | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US | Virginia | Illegal | Permitted | Duty to Bargain | |
| State and local government pay gap, controlling for age, education, hours worked, and year | -17.2% | -26.7% | -22.5% | -19.6% | -14.3% |
| …adding demographic controls (female, married, immigrant, race and ethnicity) | -15.8% | -23.9% | -20.1% | -18.2% | -13.4% |
Source: Authors' analysis of pooled and merged Current Population Survey Outgoing Rotation Group microdata (Economic Policy Institute 2025a and Flood et al. 2025). USA regressions include state controls.
Addressing high staff vacancy and turnover rates in Virginia’s public sector
The growing public-sector pay gap has become a particular concern at a moment when low pay has created serious challenges to recruiting and retaining teachers and other public employees across the country (Cooper and Martinez Hickey 2022; MissionSquare Research Institute 2023; Wething 2024a, 2024b; Martinez Hickey 2025). Virginia has faced particularly acute staffing shortages in public education and in units of state government in recent years (Manzanares 2025; Cantor 2025).
The latest (2025) biennial compensation report from the state’s Department of Human Resource Management notes that “Years without any salary adjustments in the past have made it difficult for state agencies to build a proactive and sustainable approach to addressing compensation, recruitment and retention concerns” (VDHRM 2025). Between 2001 and 2023, low average salary increases for state workers (just 2.9% per year, compared with 3.4% annually in the private sector) have led to high vacancy and turnover rates. As of 2024, roughly 1 in 5 (22.4%) state jobs were unfilled, and the median salary across the state workforce was just $61,305—a full $5,000 less than the median city employee salary in Richmond, which has adopted its own collective bargaining ordinance (McGinley 2025).
Chronic state employee staffing shortages are already having direct impacts on the health, safety, and quality of life of Virginians. To take one example, in 2025 the Virginia Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) drew headlines after reporting that inability to adequately staff large facilities for incarcerated youth had led to unsafe conditions, lockdowns, increased restrictions on out-of-cell time, and a lack of rehabilitative services. DJJ directors indicated ongoing difficulty recruiting for open positions, despite participating in job fairs, college and university visits, outreach to military and veteran communities, and offering signing bonuses and referral incentives (Manzanares 2025). The root causes of understaffing identified by Virginia state agencies like DJJ—from burnout and high workloads to low starting salaries, lackluster raises, and difficult or unsafe working conditions—are precisely the topics that a structured collective bargaining process would allow state agencies to address, with direct input from frontline employees.
Addressing racial and gender pay gaps to improve recruitment and retention of workers of color and women
The public-sector pay gap disproportionately affects Black workers and women, who are more likely to be employed in public-sector jobs and who are disadvantaged in the broader labor market (Childers 2025). Strengthening collective bargaining rights for government workers in Virginia therefore promises to narrow the pay gap and reduce racial and gender inequalities in public institutions and across the labor market.
For example, a 2024 RAND report showed that Black teachers nationally receive lower average salaries and pay raises than white teachers do, a difference linked directly to the fact that Black teachers were less likely to live in states where public educators had collective bargaining rights. The inadequacy of pay is one of the main reasons teachers report for leaving the profession, further contributing to the demographic mismatch between teachers and students (e.g., nationwide over half of all students are children of color, but the teaching workforce remains around 80% white) (Steiner et al. 2024; Gopalan 2025). Likewise, data show that in states like Wisconsin where legislators have weakened formerly strong collective bargaining rights in the past two decades, resulting decreases in unionization levels and worker wages have measurably widened public-sector pay gaps and gender pay gaps (Nack et al. 2019; García and Han 2021; Biasi and Sarsons 2022).
Building on success and remedying limitations of current state law that only permits local collective bargaining
In 2020, Virginia partially lifted its long-standing ban on public-sector collective bargaining with legislation creating an “opt-in” system that has allowed local governments to set their own policies on whether and how to bargain with their own employees. While this opening fell far short of creating a consistent statewide framework for collective bargaining, it has resulted in at least 17 of Virginia’s largest cities, counties, and school boards adopting collective bargaining ordinances and creating new pathways to union contracts for substantial numbers of public employees—including, for example, 27,000 teachers and school staff and 12,000 county employees in Fairfax County; nearly 4,000 City of Richmond employees; and others (Borja 2022; Sharma 2022; Khalil 2023; Lukert 2024; Pope 2025; Walter 2026).
The local “opt-in” system was a positive step forward that has already revealed high levels of interest in collective bargaining among Virginia workers. The system resulted in new union contracts covering tens of thousands of frontline educators and civil servants, providing an initial boost to Virginia’s historically low unionization rate.
Significant limitations of the new “opt-in” system have also quickly become clear. As noted above, the major shortcoming of the current law is that it does not ensure equal collective bargaining rights for all public employees. Virginia state employees remain barred from collective bargaining, and in local government where collective bargaining is permitted (but not required), workers continue to lack collective bargaining rights, unless they are able to persuade local officials to adopt and then implement a collective bargaining ordinance. When localities do adopt such ordinances, they may vary in strength and effectiveness (Overman 2023).
As a result, Virginia’s current “opt-in” system for local collective bargaining has generated an uneven patchwork of highly variable (and potentially unstable) collective bargaining policies across the state. Some local governments have continued to block workers’ path to a union contract by rejecting appeals from their own employees to adopt local collective bargaining ordinances (Murphy 2024; Cooper 2025; Lytle 2025; Wilkinson 2025). Because current state law leaves the burden of collective bargaining policy development up to each individual local government, some jurisdictions have expressed interest in or support for collective bargaining while remaining reluctant to invest the necessary time or scarce administrative or legal resources to developing and implementing a local ordinance. Even in larger local jurisdictions with strong collective bargaining ordinances now in place, the “opt-in” system remains fragile and highly vulnerable to instability whenever turnover occurs among elected leaders or administrators with experience necessary to maintain unique local labor-management systems.
Creating a state labor board to provide efficiency and stability for all Virginia public employers and employees
A proposed state labor board equipped to administer a statewide, uniform collective bargaining framework would serve all Virginia state and local government entities and provide consistency, efficiency, stability, and economies of scale. All Virginia public employers and employees would benefit from access to a central, independent state board with capacities to advise public employers and employees about collective bargaining procedures, administer union elections, and mediate contract negotiations. The creation of such state capacities is also especially important at moment when federal labor agencies with similar capacities have been eliminated or rendered non-functional. Indeed, across the country, many states are relying more than ever on their existing state labor boards, and in some cases, are exploring paths to expanding state labor board capacities in order to ensure consistent protections of workers’ rights to unionize and collectively bargain (H.B. 3005; Walter and Madland 2025).
Conclusion
In 2026, Virginia lawmakers should seize the opportunity to enact strong, comprehensive collective bargaining legislation that covers all state and local government workers and creates a state labor board to administer the new system. Under Virginia’s current state law (where collective bargaining is banned for state employees and allowed only for some local government workers), pay for Virginia public employees has lagged far behind that of private sector counterparts with similar education and experience.
Stronger collective bargaining rights can help shrink Virginia’s large public-sector pay gap, reduce racial and gender pay gaps, and improve recruitment and retention of qualified public employees. Removing barriers to unionization for public employees is also a critical step toward reversing the impacts of long-standing anti-worker state policies in Virginia that have for decades suppressed all workers’ wages and contributed to growing income inequality. Lastly, state action to shore up public employee rights is especially important at moment when the federal government is attacking civil servants, public education, health care, and all public services. By extending full collective bargaining rights to historically excluded state and local government workers, state lawmakers can help lead the way to a more vibrant, equitable economy rooted in multiracial democracy in Virginia, the South, and the nation.
Notes
1. If anything, our comparison likely minimizes the public-sector compensation gap in Virginia by comparing benefits for private-sector workers in the South Atlantic region to public-sector workers throughout the country because public-sector data for the South Atlantic region is not available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our comparison does account for the fact that Virginia pension benefits are less generous than public pensions in many parts of the country, though possibly not in two Northern Virginia counties with their own retirement systems. It does not fully account for other differences in benefits between Virginia public-sector workers and their counterparts in other states, though it does account for the fact that public-sector workers in Virginia are covered by Social Security (not true in some states) and adds 1% for public-sector retiree health benefits that are not included in BLS compensation statistics. Finally, it compares all public-sector workers with all private-sector workers, when arguably the better comparison would be between public-sector workers and private-sector workers employed by large employers, who tend to provide more generous benefits than small employers.
References
Biasi, Barbara, and Heather Sarsons. 2022. “Flexible Wages, Bargaining, and the Gender Gap.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 137, no. 1 (February): 215–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjab026.
Bivens, Josh, and Heidi Shierholz. 2018. What Labor Market Changes Have Generated Inequality and Wage Suppression? Employer Power Is Significant but Largely Constant, Whereas Workers’ Power Has Been Eroded by Policy Actions. Economic Policy Institute, December 2018.
Borja, Mel. 2022. “How Public-Sector Workers Are Building Power in Virginia.” Working Economics Blog (Economic Policy Institute), February 18, 2022.
Brannick, Priya. 2019. The Janus Impact and Grading of State Public Sector Labor Laws. Commonwealth Foundation, August 2019.
Brannick, Priya M., and Andrew Holman. 2022. The Battle for Worker Freedom in the States: Grading State Public Sector Labor Laws. Commonwealth Foundation, September 2022.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS-CES). 2020–2025. Current Employment Survey, State and Area Employment Data. Accessed January 2026.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS-ECEC). 2020–2024. Employer Costs for Employee Compensation data. Accessed January 2026.
Cantor, Dave. 2025. “Virginia Corrections Department has 2,400 Open Positions.” Virginia Public Radio, August 14, 2025.
Childers, Chandra. 2023. Rooted in Racism and Economic Exploitation: The Failed Southern Economic Development Model. Economic Policy Institute, October 2023.
Childers, Chandra. 2025. “Disinvestment in the Public Sector Undermines Opportunities for Black Women Across the South: Trump Cuts Further Threaten Key Services for Working People Across the Nation.” Working Economics Blog (Economic Policy Institute), July 7, 2025.
Commonwealth Foundation. 2021. “Public Sector Labor Law Database.” Accessed May 9, 2021.
Cooper, David, and Sebastian Martinez Hickey. 2022. Raising Pay in Public K–12 Schools Is Critical to Solving Staffing Shortages: Federal Relief Funds Can Provide a Down Payment on Long-Needed Investments in the Education Workforce. Economic Policy Institute, February 2022.
Cooper, Tracy. 2025. “Portsmouth Workers Frustrated by Private Collective Bargaining Talks.” 13 News Now, July 22, 2025.
Dippel, Christian, and Zachary Sauers. 2019. “Does Increased Union Power Cause Pension Under-Funding in the Public Sector?” (preliminary draft). September 23, 2019.
Economic Policy Institute. 2025a. Current Population Survey Extracts, Version 2025.12.18, https://microdata.epi.org.
Economic Policy Institute. 2025b. How Many Federal Employees Live in Your State? Accessed January 12, 2026.
Flood, Sarah, Miriam King, Renae Rodgers, Steven Ruggles, J. Robert Warren, Daniel Backman, Etienne Breton, Grace Cooper, Julia A. Rivera Drew, Stephanie Richards, David Van Riper, and Kari C.W. Williams. IPUMS CPS: Version 13.0 . Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, 2025. https://doi.org/10.18128/D030.V13.0.
Frandsen, Brigham R., and Michael Webb. 2017. “Public Employee Pensions and Collective Bargaining Rights: Evidence from State and Local Government Finances.” Hutchins Center Working Paper no. 35, The Brookings Institution, October 2017.
García, Emma, and Eunice Han. 2021. The Impact of Changes in Public-Sector Bargaining Laws on Districts’ Spending on Teacher Compensation. Economic Policy Institute, April 2021.
Gopalan, Maithreyi. 2025. “Why Does Teacher-Student Demographic Representation Matter for Student Success?” HEDCO Institute for Evidence-Based Educational Practice, October 15, 2025.
Han, Eunice S. 2019. “The Impact of Teachers Unions on Teachers’ Well-Being Under Various Legal Institutions: Evidence from District–Teacher Matched Data.” American Educational Research Association 5, no. 3 (August). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419867291.
H.B. 1263, 2026 H.D., Reg. Sess. (Va. 2026).
H.B. 2764, 2025 H. D., Reg. Sess. (Va. 2025).
H.B. 3005, 2025 Gen. Assemb. (Ill. 2025).
International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF). n.d. “Collective Bargaining” (web page). Accessed May 2024.
Khalil, Jahd. 2023. “Hundreds of Richmond City Employees Select Unions.” Virginia Public Media, June 23, 2023.
Lukert, Luke. 2024. “Fairfax Co. Teachers Vote Overwhelmingly for Collective Bargaining Rights.” WTOP, June 11, 2024.
Lytle, Derek. 2025. “Virginia Beach School Board Sits Divided on Collective Bargaining.” 13 News Now, November 11, 2025.
Manzanares, Keyris. 2025. “Virginia Juvenile Justice System Strained by Staffing Shortages.” Virginia Public Media, April 9, 2025.
Martinez Hickey, Sebastian. 2025. “The School Bus Driver Shortage Has Improved Slightly but Continues to Stress K–12 Public Education.” Working Economics Blog (Economic Policy Institute), November 3, 2025.
McGinley, Sophie. 2025. Building a More Equitable Commonwealth: The Case for Collective Bargaining Rights for Virginia State Employees. The Commonwealth Institute, August 2025.
McNicholas, Celine, Margaret Poydock, Heidi Shierholz, and Hilary Wething. 2025. Unions Aren’t Just Good for Workers—They Also Benefit Communities and Democracy. Economic Policy Institute, August 2025.
McNicholas, Celine, Lynn Rhinehart, Margaret Poydock, Heidi Shierholz, and Daniel Perez. 2020. Why Unions Are Good for Workers—Especially in a Crisis Like COVID-19: 12 Policies That Would Boost Worker Rights, Safety, and Wages. Economic Policy Institute, August 2020.
Mishel, Lawrence, and Josh Bivens. Identifying the Policy Levers Generating Wage Suppression and Wage Inequality. Economic Policy Institute, May 2021.
MissionSquare Research Institute. 2023. State and Local Government Employment Trends, 2023 (issue brief). May 17, 2023.
Morrissey, Monique, and Jennifer Sherer. 2024. The Public-Sector Pay Gap Is Widening. Unions Help Shrink It. Economic Policy Institute, August 2024.
Murphy, Ryan. 2024. “Virginia Beach Rejects Collective Bargaining for City Employees.” WHRO Public Media, April 30, 2024.
Nack, David, Michael Childers, Alexia Kulwiec, and Armando Ibarra. 2019. “The Recent Evolution of Wisconsin Public Worker Unionism Since Act 10.” Labor Studies Journal 45, no. 2: 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449X19860585.
National Conference of State Legislators (NCSL). n.d. “Collective Bargaining database.” Accessed May 2024.
National Council on Teacher Quality (NCTQ). 2019. “Collective Bargaining Laws database.” Updated January 2019.
National Education Association (NEA). 2020. “Collective Bargaining Laws for Public Sector Education Employees,” November 2020 (unpublished document used by permission).
New Mexico Public Employee Labor Relations Board. 2023. Public Sector Collective Bargaining by State.
Oakford, Patrick, and Margaret Poydock. 2025. “Trump Is the Biggest Union-Buster in U.S. History: More Than 1 Million Federal Workers’ Collective Bargaining Rights Are at Risk.” Working Economics Blog (Economic Policy Institute), September 2, 2025.
Overman, Stephenie. 2023. “In Virginia, ‘Patchwork’ of Ordinances Makes Public-Sector Organizing a Maze.” Virginia Mercury, January 16, 2023
Pierce, Michael. 2017. “The Origins of Right-to-Work: Vance Muse, Anti-Semitism, and the Maintenance of Jim Crow Labor Relations.” The Labor and Working-Class History Association, January 12, 2017.
Pierce, Michael. 2018. “Vance Muse and the Racist Origins of Right-to-Work.” Expert Forum (American Constitution Society), February 22, 2018.
Pope, Michael. 2025. “Fairfax County May Soon Be the Home of the Largest Collective Bargaining Agreement in Virginia.” WVTF, September 10, 2025.
Public Plans Data. 2001–2024. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, MissionSquare Research Institute, National Association of State Retirement Administrators, and the Government Finance Officers Association. Accessed January 5, 2026.
Rueben, Kim. 1996. “Extended NBER Public Sector Collective Bargaining Law Data Set” [Stata and Excel files]. Downloadable data available at www.nber.org/research/data/nber-public-sector-collective-bargaining-law-data-set (see last paragraph on this web page). Accessed January 12, 2026.
Ruggles, Steven, Sarah Flood, Matthew Sobek, Daniel Backman, Grace Cooper, Julia A. Rivera Drew, Stephanie Richards, Renae Rodgers, Jonathan Schroeder, and Kari C.W. Williams. IPUMS USA: Version 16.0 . Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, 2025. https://doi.org/10.18128/D010.V16.0
Sanes, Milla, and John Schmitt. 2014. Regulation of Public Sector Collective Bargaining in the States. Center for Economic and Policy Research, March 2014.
S.B. 378, 2026 S., Reg. Sess. (Va. 2026).
S.B. 917, 2025 S., Reg. Sess. (Va. 2025).
Sharma, Rahul Chowdry. 2022. “Where Can Public Sector Employees Collectively Bargain in Virginia? Increasingly, the Commonwealth’s Most Populous Cities and Counties.” Virginia Mercury, July 28, 2022.
Sherer, Jennifer, and Elise Gould. 2024. “Data Show Anti-Union ‘Right-to-Work’ Laws Damage State Economies: As Michigan’s Repeal Takes Effect, New Hampshire Should Continue to Reject ‘Right-to-Work’ Legislation.” Working Economics Blog (Economic Policy Institute), February 13, 2024.
Shimabukuro, Jon O., and Julie M. Whittaker. 2014. Federal Labor Relations Statutes: An Overview. Congressional Research Service (CRS) R42526. Updated September 5, 2014.
Steiner, Elizabeth D., Ashley Woo, and Sy Doan. 2024. Larger Pay Increases and Adequate Benefits Could Improve Teacher Retention: Findings from the 2024 State of the American Teacher Survey. RAND Institute, November 20, 2024.
The Commonwealth Institute. 2022. History of Labor in Virginia: An Interactive Timeline and Map. Accessed January 12, 2026.
Valletta, Robert G., and Richard B. Freeman. 1988. “The NBER Public Sector Collective Bargaining Law Data Set.” Appendix B in When Public Employees Unionize, edited by Richard B. Freeman and Casey Ichniowski. NBER and Univ. of Chicago Press.
Virginia Department of Human Resource Management (VDHRM). 2025. Biennial Compensation Report. November 2025.
Walter, Karla. 2026. Virginia Workers’ Biggest Win in Decades Could Come in 2026. Center for American Progress, January 12, 2026.
Walter, Karla, and David Madland. 2025. Union Trigger Laws 101 How States Can Protect Workers if Federal Labor Law Falls. Center for American Progress, November 19, 2025.
Watts, Parker. 2021. “Labor Day Reflections on Race, Power, and Organized Labor in Virginia.” The Commonwealth Institute, September 1, 2021.
Wething, Hilary. 2024a. “Today’s Teacher Shortage Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg: Part I.”“Today’s Teacher Shortage Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg: Part I.” Working Economics Blog (Economic Policy Institute), October 9, 2024.
Wething, Hilary. 2024b. “Today’s Teacher Shortage Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg: Part II.” Working Economics Blog (Economic Policy Institute), October 16, 2024.
Wilkinson, Nolan. 2025. “Proposal to Allow Frederick City Employees to Unionize Tabled.” The Frederick News-Post, September 25, 2025.