The Economic Policy Institute (EPI):
The real costs for families to live modest, economically secure lives are much higher than conventional estimates show for all cities across the country. For minimum-wage workers, it is nearly impossible to meet basic family needs.
Put another way, the number of people truly living “in poverty” may be much larger than the government’s figure of 16%.
The EPI adds:
Like most of the old Southern states from Louisiana to Alabama and north into Kentucky, poverty remains high, and income and education much lower than the national average.
Elise Gould, EPI director of health policy research said when commenting on the new “What Families Need to Get By: The 2013 Update of EPI’s Family Budget Calculator” that:
“The fact that hardworking families are struggling to afford their basic needs makes clear how critical government policies are to ensure that our families can afford such basic necessities like food, child care, housing, transportation, and health care.”
Wall St. 24/7
July 10, 2013
So it took a think tank study to determine that New York City is the most expensive place to live in America?
I could have saved the money spent on the Economic Policy Institute report by dragging along one accountant with a calculator from my home in Queens as I emptied my wallet and sizzled my credit card on a single weekend in New York.
New York Daily News
July 10, 2013
I’m biased, but it seems liberals have the better story on the growth of inequality. The Economic Policy Institute has a fantastic Web page, inequality.is, where they walk through a more sophisticated story about how inequality was created by tax, globalization, macroeconomic and regulatory decisions and policies, and it can be fixed through the same mechanisms.
The Washington Post
July 10, 2013
An Economic Policy Institute study shows that for every unemployment dollar invested, it returns an estimated $1.64 to the economy.
New Jersey Star-Ledger
July 10, 2013
So how are we doing? Labor economist Heidi Shierholz of the Economic Policy Institute says the country has made “surprisingly little progress” since the Great Recession battered the U.S. beginning in December 2007
AARP
July 10, 2013
“Those industries have lots of job openings all the time,” said Heidi Shierholz, a labor economist at the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute. “Where they might go unfilled in boom times, people have no options now,” she said.
LA Times
July 10, 2013
The trouble is that young college graduates working full-time earned, on average, $34,500 last year, according to the progressive Economic Policy Institute. Adjusting for inflation over the past dozen years, this translates into a shocking loss of $3,200.
Their predicament is similar to that of older workers also coping with unemployment and declining salaries, except that this young generation must ultimately shoulder the costs of entitlement programs such as Medicare as their parents retire.
“This is an unmitigated disaster,” said EPI economist Heidi Shierholz. “At a time like this, it’s the younger workers being screwed by the lack of broad-based demand for work to be done.”
The Fiscal Times
July 10, 2013
The reality is that the economy isn’t employing nearly as large a share of the potential workforce as it once did. Heidi Shierholz of theEconomic Policy Institute offered an analysis Friday that compared the percentage of the working-age population employed today with the levels before the recession. In early 2007, 63.3 percent of working-age Americans had a job. The latest report pegs that percentage at just 58.7 percent.
Shierholz also looked at the ratio for those of prime working age, a somewhat fairer measure of conditions then and now. The percentage of people ages 25 to 54 who were employed in early 2007 was 80 percent. It dropped to 74.8 percent in late 2009. Although it has risen since then, it is still just 75.9 percent.
The Washington Post
July 10, 2013
Friday’s employment report wasn’t bad. But given how depressed our economy remains, we really should be adding more than 300,000 jobs a month, not fewer than 200,000. As the Economic Policy Institute points out, we would need more than five years of job growth at this rate to get back to the level of unemployment that prevailed before the Great Recession. Full recovery still looks a very long way off. And I’m beginning to worry that it may never happen.
The New York Times
July 10, 2013
And yet, Baucus and Camp face significant obstacles, from President Barack Obama’s limited interest in tax changes, to the partisan divide in Congress, to their reluctance to repeat the 1986 model that shifted some of the tax burden from individuals to corporations.
“People were ready for it” in 1986, said Thomas Hungerford, director of tax and budget policy at the Economic Policy Institute in Washington, which advocates for low- and middle-income workers. “Congress was ready for it. The administration was ready for it. And I just don’t see that now.”
Bloomberg Businesweek
July 10, 2013