Table 1
Replication and robustness of employment effects from Clemens and Wither (2016): Estimated change in employment rate of select worker groups in bound states relative to unbound states under different models
| Clemens and Wither (CW) results | Author’s replication of CW | Testing robustness with additional control sets | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |||
| Low-wage workers (SIPP sample) | -0.066*** | -0.059*** | -0.038** | -0.022 | -0.035* | -0.024 | ||
| (0.020) | (0.018) | (0.018) | (0.020) | (0.021) | (0.016) | |||
| Workers age 16-21 (CPS) | -0.023*** | -0.023*** | -0.008 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.005 | ||
| (0.010) | (0.010) | (0.009) | (0.008) | (0.010) | (0.010) | |||
| Workers age 16-30 without a high school diploma (CPS) | -0.037*** | -0.037*** | -0.021 | -0.013 | -0.003 | 0.001 | ||
| (0.011) | (0.011) | (0.013) | (0.013) | (0.017) | (0.015) | |||
| Control sets | ||||||||
| Construction’s share of each state’s employment | Y | |||||||
| All industry shares of each state’s employment | Y | |||||||
| Common time fixed effects | Y | Y | Y | |||||
| Region X time fixed effects | Y | |||||||
| Division X time fixed effects | Y | |||||||

* p < 0.1, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01
Notes: The table reports the coefficient on the Period 2 X Bound term from the baseline regressions in Clemens and Wither (2016); see Zipperer (2016) for a complete discussion. Column 1 contains the Clemens and Wither’s published results, column 2 is this author’s replication, and the remaining columns include additional control sets. Columns 2 through 6 use monthly sampling weights. Industries are state-specific NAICS (North American Industry Classification System) supersector shares of total private-sector employment, where these shares are interacted with time fixed effects.
This chart appears in:
Next chart: The job-seekers ratio, 2000-2016 »