Commentary | Wages, Incomes, and Wealth

EPI’s The Pulse


Take the Pulse Go to the Issues Forage for Data

Given the media obsession with politics as a horse race rather than a battle of ideas, assumptions about public attitudes now play a critical role in defining the limits of political debate. Indeed, setting these assumptions is now part of political strategy. If a certain view is successfully branded as contrary to the public’s core values and beliefs, that view drops from the debate. For example, conservatives have convinced the press that Americans rejected the concept of national health insurance in mid-1994, and, therefore, such proposals are now off limits. In fact, the overwhelming majority of Americans continue to favor a government-guaranteed minimum level of health insurance coverage for all. It is Washington politics that has changed, not the public’s views.

Money, of course, contributes to the distortion of the public’s views. An aggressive media campaign can create an illusion of the public’s “true” view on an issue.

In response, we are debuting this “consumer’s guide” to public opinion data on a range of economic and related issues, such as education, trade, and Social Security. The guide has three components:

Take the Pulse
Alternative, credible analyses of polling on a single issue, such as Social Security, health care, trade, etc.

Go to the Issues
An annotated collection of links to sites with data on specific issues. Includes assessments of the relative accuracy and/or bias of the data.

Forage for Data
Links to other sites, such as newspapers and survey groups, with generally useful polling data.

See related work on Income and wages | Wages, Incomes, and Wealth