Media clips
-
Also in Herald Net
The median hourly wage paid to women is less than it is for men in all but one of the eleven jobs surveyed in a report by the Economic Policy Institute. In some cases, the gap is slight—for cashiers, dishwashers, food preparation workers, and hosts and hostesses, it’s a matter of cents. But in others, including supervisors and bartenders, the difference is well over a dollar. For managers, the highest earning occupation, the disparity was nearly three dollars per hour.“This is what we identify as pay discrimination,” said Valerie Wilson, an economist at the Economic Policy Institute. “The work women are doing is being valued at less than the work men do in the same job.”
Washington Post August 29, 2014 -
Real hourly wages are down for workers at all education levels in the first half of this year compared to the first half of 2013, according to the Economic Policy Institute paper. Pay fell by 1.1 percent for people with high school diplomas, by 1 percent for people with some college, 1.6 percent for people with college degrees and by 2.7 percent for people with advanced degrees. “The last year has been a poor one for American workers’ wages,” writes Elise Gould, an economist with the institute, in the report.
Gould notes the pay decreases seen over the last year are part of a longer trend: Wages have pretty much been flat or on the decline since the start of the recession. In fact, the only group that hasn’t seen a drop in real wages since 2007 is workers with advanced degrees, for which wages are basically flat.
Washington Post August 29, 2014 -
Giving overtime a healthy raise
A March presidential memorandum called for raising the threshold for salaried workers who can’t claim overtime pay, currently about $23,000. More than 6 million people would benefit from a roughly $50,000 cap, according to a recent report by the Economic Policy Institute.
Business groups and conservatives say that the action will increase costs for employers and force them to more closely track white-collar workers’ hours, which could curb telecommuting and other flexible work options. “My concern is that this overtime initiative will have the unintentional but quite destructive effect of making sure that anyone who makes less than the overtime threshold will be unable to work remotely,” says James Sherk, a senior policy analyst in labor economics for the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank.
Fortune August 29, 2014 -
From 1979 to 2007—we look to 2007 because it was the economic high point before the most recent downturn and the deep recession—median household income in the United States grew by a paltry 18 percent. Meanwhile, productivity grew by roughly 65 percent. Moreover, the 18 percent household income growth was not because workers were being paid more, a just reward for that increased productivity. Instead, that 18 percent gain happened almost entirely due to women in American households working more hours. Annual work hours for married women increased over that time period by more than 45 percent, according to an Economic Policy Institute analysis of federal labor data. For married women in the middle of the nation’s income scale , the increase was nearly 60 percent. (For comparison, married men’s hours grew by 1.7 percent in total, 2.6 percent for men in the middle of the income scale.)
A 2013 study by the Pew Research Center found that in 40 percent of U.S. households with children, women are the sole or primary earners of income. This share has grown fourfold since 1960. Yet despite their increasingly central role as breadwinners in U.S. families, too many women continue to be paid far too little. Women still make only 83 percent of what men earn at the median; women are disproportionately represented in low-wage occupations; and nearly one in every three working women earns a poverty-level wage—far too little to support a family, White House and Economic Policy Institute analyses of federal data have found.
National Journal August 29, 2014 -
The rich have gotten richer at the expense of the rest of us.
The rise in income inequality of the past few decades has taken money from the pockets of the lower and middle class and added it to the coffers of the rich, according to a new paper from the Economic Policy Institute, a think tank focused on worker issues.
There was income inequality 30 years ago, to be sure. But inequality has widened dramatically since then, not because the top 1 percent have suddenly gotten more talented or lucky, but because of economic policies designed to help the top 1 percent suck up more of the value being created in the economy by higher productivity. Meanwhile, the wages of average workers — the ones who keep producing more and generating much of that extra wealth — have stagnated.
Huffington Post August 28, 2014 -
Here’s a number to remember for those who feel that their financial prospects have hit a wall: $18,000.
That’s how much the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) says middle-class Americans are losing in annual wages because of rising income inequality.
The liberal-leaning think-tank estimates missing wages by considering real average annual household income, which rose by 53.4 percent from 1979 to 2007. While that might seem healthy, the increase was mostly due to huge gains by the country’s wealthiest earners. For 90 percent of American households, income growth was actually below that average rate.
If inequality hadn’t worsened during those years, middle-class households would have had annual incomes that were $18,000 higher by 2007, the study notes.
“This growing inequality of income has a real effect on everyday people,” said Elise Gould, author of a new study and director of health policy research at EPI. “The top 1 percent and top 1/10th of 1 percent have grown so much that it pulls up average wages” but that fails to reflect the reality for most Americans, who have suffered from stagnating wage growth.
CBS Moneywatch August 28, 2014 -
Wages for workers at every pay level except the bottom 10 percent declined from the second half of 2013 through the second half of 2014, according to a report from the Economic Policy Institute released Wednesday. Furthermore, there’s no sign of wage acceleration that might prompt the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates.
For 70 percent of the workforce, inflation-adjusted hourly wages are still lower than they were in 2007, and wages for all groups are lower than they were at the end of the recession in 2009.
This year’s trend isn’t new. Overall median hourly wages rose 6.1 percent over the entire 1979 and 2013 period, but for those in the bottom 10 percent of the income scale, hourly pay fell 5.3 percent over that time. Meanwhile, the richest 5 percent of Americans experienced hourly pay growth of 40.6 percent. The late 1990s were the only period when wage growth was broad-based, and even strongest for the lowest-income earners.
US News and World Report August 28, 2014 -
Inflation-adjusted wages have fallen for every income group in the past year except very low-paid workers, says an Economic Policy Institute study out Wednesday.
The report casts doubt on the perception that more educated, highly skilled employees are experiencing sharper-than-average pay increases and that low-paid workers are stuck in the deepest earnings rut.
Median U.S. hourly wages in the first half of 2014 were $16.59, down 0.9% the past year after figuring inflation, the study says.
But pay was also lower for other income groups, including a 0.7% drop for workers at the 95th wage percentile who earn $52.23 an hour — meaning they make more than 95% of workers and less than 5%.
USA Today August 28, 2014 -
Wage growth for most workers remains stagnant and will need to pick up pace for the economy to hit full recovery mode, a new report said on Wednesday.
During the first half of 2014 year inflation-adjusted hourly wages fell for the majority of workers, even for those with a bachelor’s or advanced degrees, compared with the same period in 2013, according to a new study from the Economic Policy Institute’s Raising America’s Pay initiative.
The wage stagnation is evidence that the economy is far from full employment and shows that the Federal Reserve should not consider raising interest rates, the report said.
“Despite a recovering economy and growing productivity, employers are not putting anything more in their employees’ paychecks,” said report author EPI economist Elise Gould.
The Hill August 28, 2014 -
By now, anyone following the debate over income inequality in the U.S. has likely seen the rise of income inequality charted over the years or over decades. But how about income inequality hour by hour?
A new study by the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank, breaks down Labor Department data on hourly earnings to show income disparity even at the level of hourly wages. Someone earning $8.38 an hour is in the 10th percentile, meaning they earn more than 10% of workers, but less than 90%. At the 50th percentile, workers have been earning $16.59. At the top of the distribution, workers at the 90th percentile earn $40 an hour and those at the 95th percentile earn $52.23.
And since the recession began, wages have only been growing (and even then only modestly) for those at the top, according to the analysis by EPI economist Elise Gould.
Wall Street Journal August 28, 2014