The vice president didn’t mention how the Trump administration’s 2017 tax cuts overwhelmingly benefited wealthy households and powerful corporations, with corporate income tax rates slashed from 35% to 21%, corporate tax revenues plummeting, and a surge in stock buybacks while workers saw “no discernible wage increase” according to a report released last year by the Economic Policy Institute and the Center for Popular Democracy.
Common Dreams
December 24, 2020
Card check was the major reform proposed by the failed Employee Free Choice Act, which died in the Senate during Barack Obama’s first term. Worker advocates argue it makes it easier to form a union by eliminating the period between workers showing interest in a union, and the actual election. During that waiting period, employers often wage highly effective and expensive campaigns to dissuade workers from unionizing using outside professional “union avoidance” consultants — something recently cited by the Economic Policy Institute as a major factor in the decline of unions.
In These Times
December 24, 2020
As an Economic Policy Institute study found, in the wake of the Great Recession, state and local spending on K-12 education “did not grow at all (adjusted for inflation) between 2008 and 2015.” Much of the sluggish nature of the Obama-era recovery, in fact, can be attributed to this state and local austerity.
New Republic
December 24, 2020
According to the Economic Policy Institute, the number of unemployed workers ages 55-64 rose by nearly 3 million from February to May of this year, far more than any other age bracket.
The Denver Channel
December 24, 2020
The penalty-free provision was an under-the-radar item within the CARES Act and will most likely be the same under the current stimulus bill, said Monique Morrissey, an economist with the Economic Policy Institute. The nation has seen “a ripple and not a wave” of 401(k) withdrawals because the most cash-strapped Americans who would need that money — namely service sector workers — had jobs that didn’t offer retirement plans to begin with, she said.
CBS Moneywatch
December 24, 2020
When the rule was first proposed in 2017, it was met with swift backlash from labor advocates who said it would allow unscrupulous managers to pocket tips instead of distributing them to employees, a form of wage theft. In 2018, the rule was revised to explicitly prohibit them from doing so, but even with the protective provision, it’s likely to ruffle feathers. In big cities, and in fine-dining establishments, it’s not unusual for servers to bring home six-figure earnings, largely due to tips. Under the new rule, they stand to lose at least $4 billion in earnings, according to analysis from the Economic Policy Institute.
The Counter
December 24, 2020
“The key thing from this morning is just how many people are still on those federal programs that will expire,” said Heidi Shierholz of the Economic Policy Institute. “All of those people are the ones who will get hit massively if Trump doesn’t sign the bill.”
Washington Post
December 24, 2020
This will allow employers to shift work from non-tipped to tipped workers,” said Heidi Shierholz, director of policy at the Economic Policy Institute and a Labor Department economist during the Obama administration.
Ms. Shierholz said that is likely to happen during the coronavirus pandemic when servers are frequently preparing takeout orders, among other tasks, rather than waiting tables, she said. The practice would, in effect, lower the amount of total wages a restaurant owner must pay out of pocket, she said.
She also disagreed with Ms. Stanton that the rule addresses wage inequality. “If the administration wanted to raise pay for back-of-the-house workers, they could have supported a minimum-wage increase,” Ms. Shierholz said. The federal minimum wage has been unchanged since 2009.
Wall Street Journal
December 24, 2020
Though the Department of Labor says this could raise take-home pay for many restaurant workers, especially back of the house workers, labor groups and activists aren’t so sure. The Economic Policy Institute says the new rule would take $700 million annually away from workers. “The new regulation from the Trump administration does away with [the 80/20] protection, replacing it with vague, much less protective language,” EPI said in a statement, arguing that the rule’s ambiguity will make it difficult to enforce, and likely inspire employers to shift work from non-tipped to tipped workers in order to save money. In a previous report, EPI estimated this rule could result in “243,000 jobs shifting from being non-tipped to being tipped.”
Eater
December 23, 2020
The move online has in many cases worsened existing socioeconomic achievement gaps as well, since online learning works only when students have consistent internet access and home support, according to research compiled by the Economic Policy Institute and others.
Politifact
December 23, 2020