The House version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act allocated $155 billion in new funding for immigration enforcement, which one analysis from the Economic Policy Institute estimates to be “more than five times the amount of current funding” – for a total of roughly $185 billion. The bill would triple funding for ICE operations, and calls for $45 billion to be spent on detention facilities – quadrupling current levels of spending. The Senate version of the bill appears to be very similar.
Counterpunch
June 30, 2025
The Economic Policy Institute also stands against the change in policy, saying that the concept will likely harm more workers than it helps.
In addition to concerns that this type of legislation could undermine pay increases for traditionally tipped workers, the group said that it could expand the use of tipped work, a system the institute said was “rife with discrimination and worker abuse.”
Additionally, the removal of tax on tips would “deplete state and federal budgets and create new avenues of tax avoidance, especially for high earners,” according to the group.
Epoch Times
June 30, 2025
If lawmakers were to act on this amount suggested by Rogan and Sanders and raise the minimum wage to $17, approximately 22,247,000 workers would get a big raise, according to the Economic Policy Institute, a progressive think tank. That’s 15% of the wage-earning U.S. workforce. The Economic Policy Institute’s 2023 research also found that a $17 minimum wage is the minimum amount needed for a single adult without children working full-time to achieve a “modest but adequate standard of living.”
TheStreet
June 30, 2025
A study by the Economic Policy Institute showed that between 1978 and 2023, executive compensation nationwide increased by 1,085% while average worker pay rose only 24%, according to the union.
Spectrum News NY 1
June 30, 2025
It takes a single parent with two children $106,000 to meet annual basic living expenses, according to the report, citing data from the Economic Policy Institute.
“Our findings reveal that many families — especially renters, single parents, and Black and Latino households — are earning far less than what is needed to afford many basic living expenses, even with full-time employment,” the report read.
LA Daily News
June 30, 2025
“Over the long term, there’s just been more educational upgrading,” said Elise Gould, a senior economist at the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute. She also noted that teen employment tends to be higher during stronger business cycles, when opportunities are more abundant and employers are willing to hire people with less experience and do more on-the-job training.
MarketWatch
June 30, 2025
The Republicans like to condemn lower-income people for accepting “handouts” or being dependent on the government. But according to a 2016 Economic Policy Institute study, if the federal minimum wage were raised from the current $7.25 an hour to $12, it would reduce people’s need for public assistance. It also would reduce spending on government assistance every year by $23 billion.
Huffington Post
June 30, 2025
Dave Kamper, Minnesota-based senior state policy strategist at the Economic Policy Institute, interacted with Hortman over the years and marveled at her ability to engage on a human level in the legislative world.
“How you make sure everyone’s feeling heard and everyone’s priorities are met, that’s a difficult thing to do,” Kamper acknowledged. “It requires time, it requires attention, it requires a genuine commitment to the well-being of the other folks. It can’t just be a transactional relationship.”
Public News Service
June 30, 2025
Taxes on tips have a big impact on underpaid workers. Nina Mast, an economic analyst with the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank, has even likened tips to a modern tool of racist oppression in the South. “Tipped workers are more likely to be people of color, women, women of color, or single parents, and are disproportionately born outside of the U.S.,” she wrote in a paper published last June.
MarketWatch
June 30, 2025
Removing the provider tax provision threatens the very survival of the bill, because it had been expected to contribute significantly to Republican’s goal of slashing costs to fund tax cuts for the rich.
“There’s a lot of really bad stuff in there, but I don’t know that I’ve seen a bigger sticker price on anything else Byrded out yet,” said Samantha Sanders, director of government affairs and advocacy at the Economic Policy Institute.
The American Prospect
June 30, 2025