Logistic regression analysis of odds of being employed among American Indians and whites, with interactions, ages 25–54, 2009–2011
| Odds ratios | Statistical significance | |
|---|---|---|
| Basic demographics | ||
| American Indiana | 0.422 | *** |
| Latino | 1.101 | *** |
| Male | 2.269 | *** |
| Age | 1.073 | *** |
| Age squared | 0.999 | *** |
| Personal characteristics | ||
| Marriedb | 1.121 | *** |
| Never marriedb | 0.780 | *** |
| Number of children | 0.879 | *** |
| Veteran | 1.103 | *** |
| Has a disability | 0.177 | *** |
| Human capital | ||
| Speaks only English at home | 1.051 | *** |
| GEDc | 1.497 | *** |
| High school diplomac | 2.426 | *** |
| Some collegec | 2.925 | *** |
| Associate degreec | 4.152 | *** |
| Bachelor’s degreec | 4.369 | *** |
| Advanced degreec | 7.066 | *** |
| Urbanicity and reservation status | ||
| Central cityd | 0.965 | *** |
| Suburband | 1.013 | ** |
| Lives on or close to a reservation | 0.988 | * |
| State of residence (reference: states without tribal lands) | ||
| Alabama | 0.904 | *** |
| Alaska | 1.063 | |
| Arizona | 0.882 | *** |
| California | 0.759 | *** |
| Colorado | 1.018 | |
| Connecticut | 1.058 | ** |
| Florida | 0.881 | *** |
| Idaho | 0.947 | * |
| Illinoise | 1.007 | |
| Iowa | 1.591 | *** |
| Kansas | 1.295 | *** |
| Louisiana | 1.030 | * |
| Maine | 1.037 | |
| Massachusetts | 1.021 | |
| Michigan | 0.838 | *** |
| Minnesota | 1.418 | *** |
| Mississippi | 0.943 | ** |
| Montana | 1.179 | *** |
| Nebraska | 1.638 | *** |
| Nevada | 0.856 | *** |
| New Mexico | 0.900 | *** |
| New York | 0.987 | |
| North Carolina | 0.914 | *** |
| North Dakota | 1.895 | *** |
| Oklahoma | 1.069 | *** |
| Oregon | 0.813 | *** |
| Rhode Island | 1.126 | *** |
| South Carolina | 0.907 | *** |
| South Dakota | 2.018 | *** |
| Texas | 1.036 | *** |
| Utah | 0.852 | *** |
| Washington | 0.871 | *** |
| Wisconsin | 1.377 | *** |
| Wyoming | 1.333 | *** |
Interactions |
||
| Basic demographics x American Indian | ||
| Latino | 1.159 | *** |
| Male | 0.654 | *** |
| Age | 1.020 | |
| Age squared | 1.000 | |
| Personal characteristics x American Indian | ||
| Marriedb | 1.062 | * |
| Never marriedb | 1.000 | |
| Number of children | 1.129 | *** |
| Veteran | 1.089 | * |
| Has a disability | 1.263 | *** |
| Human capital x American Indian | ||
| Speaks only English at home | 1.089 | ** |
| GEDc | 0.992 | |
| High school diplomac | 0.859 | *** |
| Some collegec | 0.952 | |
| Associate degreec | 0.888 | ** |
| Bachelor’s degreec | 1.207 | *** |
| Advanced degreec | 1.096 | |
| Urbanicity x American Indian and reservation status x American Indian | ||
| Central cityd | 1.071 | |
| Suburband | 1.124 | *** |
| Lives on or close to a reservation | 0.937 | * |
| State of residence x American Indian (reference: states without tribal lands) | ||
| Alabama | 1.186 | |
| Alaska | 0.879 | |
| Arizona | 0.809 | *** |
| California | 0.988 | |
| Colorado | 0.965 | |
| Connecticut | 0.994 | |
| Florida | 1.050 | |
| Idaho | 1.052 | |
| Illinoise | 0.947 | |
| Iowa | 0.627 | ** |
| Kansas | 0.863 | |
| Louisiana | 1.215 | |
| Maine | 0.985 | |
| Massachusetts | 0.864 | |
| Michigan | 1.065 | |
| Minnesota | 0.705 | *** |
| Mississippi | 1.590 | ** |
| Montana | 0.752 | ** |
| Nebraska | 0.763 | |
| Nevada | 1.071 | |
| New Mexico | 1.048 | |
| New York | 0.934 | |
| North Carolina | 1.055 | |
| North Dakota | 0.459 | *** |
| Oklahoma | 1.168 | ** |
| Oregon | 1.251 | ** |
| Rhode Island | 1.082 | |
| South Carolina | 1.147 | |
| South Dakota | 0.375 | *** |
| Texas | 1.100 | |
| Utah | 0.801 | * |
| Washington | 1.035 | |
| Wisconsin | 0.782 | ** |
| Wyoming | 0.941 | |
| Log pseudolikelihood = -1127592.1 Pseudo R2 = 0.1247 | ||
| Number of obs = 2,459,829 | ||
* p<.05; ** p<.01; *** p<.001; robust standard errors
a Includes multiracial individuals. The reference category is white.
b The reference category is separated, divorced, or widowed.
c The reference category is less than a high school diploma.
d The reference category is central city status unknown, not in a metropolitan area, and metropolitan status not identifiable.
e Illinois does not have tribal lands; however, because many American Indians were relocated to Chicago in the mid-20th century, we include it in this analysis.
Note: These data include American Indian multiracials and Hispanics of both races, but exclude the foreign born.
Source: Author's analysis of American Community Survey data from Ruggles et al. (2013)
This chart appears in:
Previous chart: « Logistic regression analysis of odds of being employed among American Indians and whites, ages 25–54, 2009–2011
Next chart: Number of jobs needed to make the American Indian rate equal the white rate among the 25- to 54-year-old population, 2009–2011 »