Cooper NECAP 1_16_2020 slides

The State of Poverty in New England and the U.S. (and how we got here)

David Cooper
Senior Economic Analyst

January 16, 2020

Economic Policy Institute

Key terms and concepts:

  • Income – the money a household, family, or person takes in over some period of time (usually annually) from all sources (earnings, investments, government transfers)
  • “Market income” – pre-tax income excluding all government transfers
  • Annual wages or “earnings”– the money a person receives from their employer as pay for their work over the course of a year
  • Hourly wages – the money a person receives from their employer as pay for each hour they work
  • Wealth – the stock of money or assets a household, family, or person has accumulated (such as the value of their home minus any debt)

State poverty rates, 2018

State ACS Poverty CPS Poverty SPM Poverty
USA 13.1% 11.8% 13.1%
Alabama 16.8% 15.9% 13.8%
Alaska 10.9% 13.1% 12.8%
Arizona 14.0% 12.8% 14.0%
Arkansas 17.2% 15.9% 12.9%
California 12.8% 11.9% 18.1%
Colorado 9.6% 9.1% 10.8%
Connecticut 10.4% 10.2% 11.6%
Delaware 12.5% 7.4% 11.9%
District of Columbia 16.2% 14.7% 18.2%
Florida 13.6% 13.6% 16.2%
Georgia 14.3% 14.9% 14.3%
Hawaii 8.8% 9.2% 13.7%
Idaho 11.8% 11.4% 9.0%
Illinois 12.1% 10.3% 12.3%
Indiana 13.1% 11.6% 11.1%
Iowa 11.2% 8.9% 6.7%
Kansas 12.0% 7.5% 7.8%
Kentucky 16.9% 15.7% 12.5%
Louisiana 18.6% 19.0% 16.5%
Maine 11.6% 11.6% 10.1%
Maryland 9.0% 8.0% 12.4%
Massachusetts 10.0% 8.7% 11.4%
Michigan 14.1% 10.5% 10.1%
Minnesota 9.6% 7.9% 7.0%
Mississippi 19.7% 19.5% 15.8%
Missouri 13.2% 12.4% 10.5%
Montana 13.0% 10.3% 9.4%
Nebraska 11.0% 10.5% 9.1%
Nevada 12.9% 13.0% 13.5%
New Hampshire 7.6% 6.1% 8.2%
New Jersey 9.5% 8.3% 14.0%
New Mexico 19.5% 16.6% 14.4%
New York 13.6% 11.1% 14.0%
North Carolina 14.0% 13.1% 13.4%
North Dakota 10.7% 9.7% 10.0%
Ohio 13.9% 11.9% 10.4%
Oklahoma 15.6% 13.4% 11.1%
Oregon 12.6% 9.7% 11.5%
Pennsylvania 12.2% 11.8% 10.8%
Rhode Island 12.9% 8.9% 8.0%
South Carolina 15.3% 12.8% 12.6%
South Dakota 13.1% 10.6% 9.8%
Tennessee 15.3% 12.0% 11.5%
Texas 14.9% 13.7% 14.2%
Utah 9.0% 6.9% 8.3%
Vermont 11.0% 9.7% 9.4%
Virginia 10.7% 9.8% 12.8%
Washington 10.3% 8.5% 10.5%
West Virginia 17.8% 15.8% 14.5%
Wisconsin 11.0% 8.6% 7.8%
Wyoming 11.1% 9.5% 10.1%
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau and EPI analysis of Current Population Survey (CPS) data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics

ACS, CPS, and SPM poverty rates in New England states and the U.S., averages 2016-2018

ACS CPS SPM
UNITED STATES 13.5% 12.3% 13.1%
Maine 11.7% 12.1% 10.1%
New Hampshire 7.5% 6.4% 8.2%
Vermont 11.4% 9.9% 9.4%
Massachusetts 10.3% 9.7% 11.4%
Rhode Island 12.4% 10.8% 8.0%
Connecticut 9.9% 10.3% 11.6%
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau data from the Current Population Survey, American Community Survey, and the Supplemental Poverty Measure, 2016-2018

Poverty and child poverty rates of New England and the United States, 1980-2018

U.S. Poverty U.S. Child poverty N.E. Poverty N.E. Child poverty
1980 13.0% 18.4% 9.6% 14.5%
1981 14.0% 20.0% 9.6% 15.1%
1982 15.0% 21.9% 10.4% 15.7%
1983 15.3% 22.4% 9.4% 14.7%
1984 14.4% 21.5% 9.1% 14.4%
1985 14.0% 20.7% 8.8% 13.9%
1986 13.6% 20.5% 8.1% 12.6%
1987 13.4% 20.3% 7.9% 12.2%
1988 13.0% 19.5% 7.8% 11.0%
1989 12.8% 19.6% 7.2% 10.8%
1990 13.5% 20.6% 9.2% 15.1%
1991 14.2% 21.8% 10.4% 17.3%
1992 14.5% 21.9% 10.2% 17.7%
1993 15.2% 22.8% 10.6% 17.5%
1994 14.5% 21.8% 9.7% 15.1%
1995 13.8% 20.8% 10.1% 15.9%
1996 13.7% 20.5% 10.5% 16.7%
1997 13.3% 19.9% 10.7% 16.3%
1998 12.7% 18.9% 9.4% 13.9%
1999 11.8% 16.9% 9.9% 14.7%
2000 11.3% 16.2% 8.9% 12.6%
2001 11.7% 16.3% 8.5% 10.8%
2002 12.1% 16.7% 9.6% 12.5%
2003 12.5% 17.7% 9.5% 11.7%
2004 12.7% 17.8% 9.5% 11.5%
2005 12.6% 17.6% 9.8% 11.9%
2006 12.3% 17.4% 9.9% 11.9%
2007 12.5% 18.0% 9.9% 14.7%
2008 13.2% 19.0% 10.2% 14.4%
2009 14.3% 20.7% 10.1% 14.7%
2010 15.1% 22.0% 10.1% 13.7%
2011 15.0% 21.9% 11.1% 14.4%
2012 15.0% 21.8% 10.7% 15.6%
2013 14.5% 19.9% 11.5% 16.0%
2014 14.8% 21.1% 11.5% 15.7%
2015 13.5% 19.7% 10.6% 14.7%
2016 12.7% 18.0% 9.8% 13.1%
2017 12.3% 17.5% 10.6% 15.2%
2018 11.8% 16.2% 9.1% 12.4%
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Source: EPI analysis of Current Population Survey microdata, 1980-2018

Source: Nolan, Laura; Garfinkel, Irwin; Kaushal, Neeraj; Nam, JaeHyun; Waldfogel, Jane; and Wimer, Christopher , “Trends in Child Poverty by Race/Ethnicity: New Evidence Using an Anchored Historical Supplemental Poverty Measure,” Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk: Vol. 7: Iss. 1, Article 3.
Available at: http://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/childrenatrisk/vol7/iss1/3

Source: Nolan, Laura; Garfinkel, Irwin; Kaushal, Neeraj; Nam, JaeHyun; Waldfogel, Jane; and Wimer, Christopher , “Trends in Child Poverty by Race/Ethnicity: New Evidence Using an Anchored Historical Supplemental Poverty Measure,” Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk: Vol. 7: Iss. 1, Article 3.
Available at: http://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/childrenatrisk/vol7/iss1/3

Source: Nolan, Laura; Garfinkel, Irwin; Kaushal, Neeraj; Nam, JaeHyun; Waldfogel, Jane; and Wimer, Christopher , “Trends in Child Poverty by Race/Ethnicity: New Evidence Using an Anchored Historical Supplemental Poverty Measure,” Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk: Vol. 7: Iss. 1, Article 3.
Available at: http://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/childrenatrisk/vol7/iss1/3

Black and Hispanic children now represent almost two-thirds of children in poverty: Share of poor children, by race/ethnicity, 1976 and 2016

Race/ethnicity White, non-Hispanic Black Hispanic
1976 46.7% 36.9 14.0
2016 30.6 25.8 36.9
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Notes: Values do not sum to 100%, because the data series for other races are not available in earlier years and Hispanic children can be of any race.

Source: EPI analysis of the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 2016

Without government programs, millions more would be in poverty: Number of people in poverty, as measured by the Supplemental Poverty Measure, and additional number that would be in poverty without specified government program, by age group, 2018

Under 18 years old 18 to 64 years old 65 years old and older
Number of people in poverty 10,674,000 24,637,000 7,189,000 0
0 0
Social Security 1,507,000 7,860,000 17,892,000 0
Refundable tax credits 4,157,000 3,612,000 101,000 0
SSI 515,000 1,908,000 525,000 0
SNAP 1,334,000 1,501,000 309,000 0
Housing subsidies 926,000 1,404,000 665,000 0
School lunch 702,000 564,000 21,000 0
TANF/general assistance 209,000 207,000 22,000 0
Unemployment insurance 97,000 280,000 38,000 0
Workers’ compensation 24,000 74,000 18,000 0
WIC 160,000 114,000 1,000 0
LIHEAP 57,000 140,000 28,000 0
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Notes: SSI refers to Supplemental Security Income, SNAP refers to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, TANF refers to Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, WIC refers to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, and LIHEAP refers to the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program.

Source: EPI analysis of Liana Fox, The Supplemental Poverty Measure: 2018, U.S. Census Bureau report #P60-268, September 2019.

Economic expansions are no longer lowering poverty: Poverty rates of New England states and the U.S. since 2000 (percent in poverty)

2000 2007 2018
UNITED STATES 12.2% 13.0% 13.1%
Maine 10.1 12.0 11.6
New Hampshire 5.3 7.1 7.6
Vermont 10.7 10.1 11.0
Massachusetts 9.6 9.9 10.0
Rhode Island 10.7 12.0 12.9
Connecticut 7.7 7.9 10.4
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau and EPI analysis of Current Population Survey microdata, 2000-2018

Income growth has been vastly unequal: Change in real annual household income, by income group, 1979–2015

Top 1% Bottom 90% Lowest quitile Lowest quintile (market income only) Bottom 90% (Market income only) 
1979 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
1980 -4% -3% -1% -4% -3%
1981 -5% -3% -2% -5% -3%
1982 1% -4% -3% -8% -4%
1983 10% -5% -6% -12% -5%
1984 21% 0% -4% -6% 0%
1985 31% 0% -3% -6% 0%
1986 70% 3% -2% -7% 3%
1987 37% 3% -3% -11% 2%
1988 73% 4% 0% -8% 3%
1989 60% 6% 5% -3% 4%
1990 54% 6% 9% 0% 5%
1991 38% 5% 13% 0% 4%
1992 56% 7% 17% 1% 4%
1993 49% 8% 20% 1% 4%
1994 53% 9% 21% 0% 5%
1995 71% 13% 26% 8% 9%
1996 90% 14% 26% 8% 11%
1997 118% 17% 27% 14% 14%
1998 147% 22% 34% 22% 18%
1999 170% 26% 36% 26% 22%
2000 198% 27% 36% 25% 23%
2001 137% 26% 38% 23% 22%
2002 110% 25% 40% 21% 19%
2003 125% 26% 42% 20% 19%
2004 169% 30% 44% 21% 23%
2005 226% 32% 47% 25% 25%
2006 252% 35% 51% 31% 27%
2007 271% 39% 57% 40% 31%
2008 201% 36% 62% 37% 27%
2009 135% 34% 67% 31% 24%
2010 172% 35% 68% 32% 24%
2011 171% 34% 65% 30% 23%
2012 235% 34% 62% 24% 23%
2013 180% 37% 65% 29% 25%
2014 217% 40% 70% 26% 27%
2015 229% 46% 79% 32% 32%
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Note: Data are for comprehensive income, except where indicated.  Shaded areas denote recessions.

Source: Authors' analysis of data from the Congressional Budget Office (2017)

Families are working more hours than decades ago: Change in average family annual work hours in New England and the U.S., by family type, 1978–2018

New England United States
All families 6.6% 7.5%
No children 7.4% 8.2%
One-parent families 1.2% 3.4%
Two-parent families 14.3% 12.6%
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Source: EPI analysis of Current Population Survey March supplement

go.epi.org/unequalstates/

The gap between productivity and a typical worker's compensation has increased dramatically since 1979: Productivity growth and hourly compensation growth, 1948–2019

Year Hourly compensation Net productivity
1948 0.0% 0.0%
1949 5.8% 1.6%
1950 9.9% 9.3%
1951 10.9% 12.2%
1952 14.4% 15.5%
1953 20.2% 19.4%
1954 22.5% 21.5%
1955 27.4% 26.4%
1956 32.3% 26.6%
1957 35.0% 30.0%
1958 35.8% 32.7%
1959 39.6% 37.6%
1960 42.0% 40.1%
1961 44.2% 44.4%
1962 48.2% 49.8%
1963 50.3% 55.0%
1964 65.0% 60.0%
1965 69.2% 64.9%
1966 71.1% 70.0%
1967 73.4% 72.0%
1968 77.7% 77.1%
1969 80.9% 77.9%
1970 83.3% 80.4%
1971 87.9% 87.1%
1972 97.2% 92.2%
1973 95.4% 97.0%
1974 90.8% 93.8%
1975 90.4% 98.1%
1976 92.2% 103.6%
1977 95.4% 106.1%
1978 97.7% 108.3%
1979  95.0% 108.1%
1980 89.8% 106.8%
1981 88.6% 110.5%
1982 89.1% 108.4%
1983 90.0% 114.5%
1984 88.5% 120.2%
1985 88.0% 123.7%
1986 89.6% 128.3%
1987 87.6% 128.8%
1988 86.9% 132.0%
1989 87.4% 134.1%
1990 86.2% 137.0%
1991 86.1% 138.5%
1992 87.8% 147.5%
1993 88.2% 148.5%
1994 88.8% 150.6%
1995 88.0% 151.6%
1996 88.4% 156.3%
1997 90.7% 160.8%
1998 95.5% 166.3%
1999 98.4% 173.5%
2000 99.6% 179.5%
2001 102.5% 183.8%
2002 106.6% 191.6%
2003 108.7% 201.3%
2004 107.8% 209.4%
2005 107.0% 215.4%
2006 107.3% 217.7%
2007 109.4% 219.8%
2008 109.4% 221.5%
2009 117.8% 228.8%
2010 119.7% 238.3%
2011 116.8% 238.3%
2012 114.7% 239.6%
2013 116.9% 241.0%
2014 117.5% 243.0%
2015 121.2% 246.5%
2016 123.3% 247.3%
2017 123.6% 250.6%
2018 125.2% 254.5%
2019 128.5% 258.4%
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Notes: Data are for compensation (wages and benefits) of production/nonsupervisory workers in the private sector and net productivity of the total economy. “Net productivity” is the growth of output of goods and services less depreciation per hour worked.

Source: EPI analysis of unpublished Total Economy Productivity data from Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Labor Productivity and Costs program, wage data from the BLS Current Employment Statistics, BLS Employment Cost Trends, BLS Consumer Price Index, and Bureau of Economic Analysis National Income and Product Accounts

Updated from Figure A in Raising America’s Pay: Why It’s Our Central Economic Policy Challenge (Bivens et al. 2014)

Top 0.1 percent earnings grew fifteen times faster than bottom 90 percent earnings: Cumulative percent change in real annual earnings, by earnings group, 1979–2017

Year Bottom 90% Top 1% Top 0.1%
1979 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
1980 -2.2% 3.4% 5.8%
1981 -2.6% 3.1% 7.3%
1982 -3.9% 9.5% 17.4%
1983 -3.7% 13.6% 28.7%
1984 -1.8% 20.7% 44.0%
1985 -1.0% 23.0% 45.8%
1986 1.1% 32.6% 60.9%
1987 2.1% 53.5% 106.6%
1988 2.2% 68.7% 140.2%
1989 1.8% 63.3% 123.9%
1990 1.1% 64.8% 129.8%
1991 0.0% 53.6% 104.6%
1992 1.5% 74.3% 156.0%
1993 0.9% 67.9% 140.2%
1994 2.0% 63.4% 126.9%
1995 2.8% 70.2% 137.0%
1996 4.1% 79.0% 157.3%
1997 7.0% 100.6% 225.6%
1998 11.0% 113.1% 254.9%
1999 13.2% 129.7% 300.5%
2000 15.3% 144.8% 337.6%
2001 15.7% 130.4% 300.5%
2002 15.6% 109.3% 239.5%
2003 15.7% 113.9% 250.1%
2004 15.6% 127.2% 287.6%
2005 15.0% 135.3% 306.9%
2006 15.7% 143.4% 324.9%
2007 16.7% 156.2% 362.5%
2008 16.0% 137.5% 309.0%
2009 16.0% 116.2% 241.6%
2010 15.2% 130.8% 278.0%
2011 14.5% 134.0% 279.0%
2012 14.6% 148.3% 327.9%
2013 15.1% 137.5% 289.3%
2014 16.6% 149.0% 323.7%
2015 20.5% 156.2% 337.9%
2016 21.0% 148.1% 310.3%
2017 22.2% 157.3% 343.2%
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Source: EPI analysis of Kopczuk, Saez, and Song (2010, Table A3) and Social Security Administration wage statistics

Top earners' wages grew four times faster than wages at the median: Cumulative change in real hourly wages of all workers, by wage percentile, 1979–2018

10th percentile 50th percentile 95th percentile
1979 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
1980 -6.7% -0.6% -1.8%
1981 -8.1% -1.7% -1.5%
1982 -11.8% -2.1% 0.5%
1983 -14.7% -1.9% 3.5%
1984 -16.4% -1.4% 3.9%
1985 -17.5% 0.1% 6.1%
1986 -17.2% 0.8% 8.6%
1987 -17.3% 1.9% 11.6%
1988 -16.5% 0.5% 14.3%
1989 -17.1% 0.3% 7.7%
1990 -16.5% 0.2% 9.1%
1991 -15.1% -0.6% 10.6%
1992 -14.4% 0.4% 8.8%
1993 -13.1% 1.9% 6.6%
1994 -13.8% 0.8% 12.4%
1995 -14.7% -0.6% 12.7%
1996 -15.7% -2.3% 13.4%
1997 -13.2% -0.3% 14.8%
1998 -7.8% 3.3% 18.3%
1999 -6.1% 5.9% 21.5%
2000 -6.7% 6.5% 24.9%
2001 -3.8% 8.2% 27.0%
2002 -0.8% 9.8% 31.6%
2003 -1.2% 9.9% 30.5%
2004 -3.0% 11.1% 31.7%
2005 -5.3% 9.5% 32.0%
2006 -5.9% 9.9% 33.2%
2007 -4.3% 10.1% 35.5%
2008 -3.2% 9.3% 36.3%
2009 -2.4% 11.7% 39.4%
2010 -3.2% 11.0% 38.6%
2011 -5.7% 8.2% 37.3%
2012 -7.3% 6.9% 39.0%
2013 -6.7% 7.4% 41.4%
2014 -5.9% 7.5% 39.4%
2015 -1.4% 9.3% 48.3%
2016 -0.6% 11.2% 49.8%
2017 3.5% 12.2% 52.0%
2018 4.1% 14.0%  56.1%

 

ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Notes: Shaded areas denote recessions. The xth-percentile wage is the wage at which x% of wage earners earn less and (100−x)% earn more.

Source: EPI analysis of Current Population Survey Outgoing Rotation Group microdata

Wage growth has been stronger in New England than the country as a whole: Cumulative change in real hourly wages of all workers, by wage percentile, 1979–2018

US – 10th NE – 10th US – Median NE – Median US – 90th NE – 90th
1979 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
1980 -6.70% -3.70% -0.60% -0.40% -1.20% -1.70%
1981 -8.10% -4.60% -1.70% -1.40% -0.90% -0.90%
1982 -11.80% -8.10% -2.10% 1.00% -0.10% -0.10%
1983 -14.70% -8.50% -1.90% 2.40% 1.00% 4.20%
1984 -16.40% -7.90% -1.40% 4.00% 3.10% 6.70%
1985 -17.50% -7.30% 0.10% 4.40% 1.80% 8.00%
1986 -17.20% -3.30% 0.80% 9.00% 5.40% 12.90%
1987 -17.30% 4.80% 1.90% 15.00% 7.10% 15.20%
1988 -16.50% 4.00% 0.50% 17.80% 7.50% 18.70%
1989 -17.10% 3.90% 0.30% 18.40% 6.10% 20.40%
1990 -16.50% 4.60% 0.20% 14.60% 7.00% 19.30%
1991 -15.10% 1.90% -0.60% 16.80% 7.60% 22.40%
1992 -14.40% -0.30% 0.40% 15.80% 5.60% 19.20%
1993 -13.10% -0.30% 1.90% 14.60% 7.50% 19.10%
1994 -13.80% -3.40% 0.80% 14.90% 9.90% 24.50%
1995 -14.70% -1.70% -0.60% 16.00% 9.70% 25.50%
1996 -15.70% -3.40% -2.30% 15.80% 10.00% 23.70%
1997 -13.20% -3.30% -0.30% 14.40% 11.90% 25.80%
1998 -7.80% 1.30% 3.30% 17.50% 15.20% 29.00%
1999 -6.10% 4.30% 5.90% 20.40% 17.50% 34.30%
2000 -6.70% 4.20% 6.50% 22.80% 19.00% 35.60%
2001 -3.80% 7.20% 8.20% 24.60% 22.20% 40.00%
2002 -0.80% 9.70% 9.80% 27.20% 25.00% 43.80%
2003 -1.20% 10.00% 9.90% 28.60% 25.10% 47.00%
2004 -3.00% 7.60% 11.10% 27.20% 24.90% 44.90%
2005 -5.30% 5.70% 9.50% 24.80% 24.90% 44.00%
2006 -5.90% 2.70% 9.90% 26.30% 26.40% 46.60%
2007 -4.30% 2.20% 10.10% 26.00% 27.20% 48.80%
2008 -3.20% 6.10% 9.30% 28.00% 27.70% 51.70%
2009 -2.40% 6.70% 11.70% 35.50% 31.40% 56.50%
2010 -3.20% 4.60% 11.00% 32.50% 31.70% 54.50%
2011 -5.70% 1.80% 8.20% 27.70% 28.80% 55.10%
2012 -7.30% -0.50% 6.90% 25.10% 29.60% 51.10%
2013 -6.70% -0.70% 7.40% 26.00% 30.50% 56.10%
2014 -5.90% -2.30% 7.50% 24.60% 29.20% 53.60%
2015 -1.40% 2.30% 9.30% 28.00% 34.20% 56.80%
2016 -0.60% 6.30% 11.20% 27.10% 37.20% 55.50%
2017 3.50% 7.30% 12.20% 29.50% 39.90% 58.40%
2018 4.10% 11.70% 14.00% 31.50% 40.90% 61.90%
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Notes: Shaded areas denote recessions. The xth-percentile wage is the wage at which x% of wage earners earn less and (100−x)% earn more.

Source: EPI analysis of Current Population Survey Outgoing Rotation Group microdata

Changes in real hourly wages in New England states and the U.S., 2000–2018

10th percentile Median 90th percentile
UNITED STATES 7.3% 6.4% 18.5%
Maine 9.5% 17.1% 21.0%
New Hampshire -0.7% 9.3% 16.8%
Vermont 7.3% 15.2% 22.4%
Massachusetts 8.0% 11.5% 27.4%
Rhode Island 2.9% 3.8% 16.8%
Connecticut 5.2% -0.2% 8.7%
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Note: Wages adjusted for inflation using the CPI-U.

Source: EPI analysis of Current Population Survey microdata

Wages are of critical (and growing) importance to low-income households: Sources of income for the non-elderly bottom fifth, 1979–2013

Cash transfers (e.g., Social Security, UI) In-kind benefits  (e.g., SNAP, Medicaid) Wage-related income (wages, benefits, and tax credits)
1979 18.8% 13.1% 58.1%
1980 19.2% 13.4% 57.3%
1981 19.4% 13.6% 57.2%
1982 20.4% 14.3% 56.2%
1983 19.9% 15.2% 55.7%
1984 17.2% 13.3% 57.9%
1985 17.9% 14.6% 57.0%
1986 17.1% 14.9% 56.9%
1987 17.6% 16.9% 55.0%
1988 17.1% 16.6% 55.4%
1989 15.2% 16.1% 57.9%
1990 14.5% 17.4% 58.3%
1991 14.6% 17.8% 58.5%
1992 14.3% 18.0% 60.0%
1993 14.1% 18.6% 58.5%
1994 13.7% 18.7% 60.1%
1995 12.0% 16.8% 63.9%
1996 11.6% 16.0% 65.7%
1997 10.7% 14.0% 68.0%
1998 9.6% 13.1% 70.5%
1999 9.3% 12.5% 69.8%
2000 9.1% 12.7% 69.6%
2001 8.6% 15.6% 70.6%
2002 9.4% 15.2% 70.0%
2003 9.0% 15.5% 70.6%
2004 8.6% 15.9% 70.8%
2005 7.5% 15.7% 72.6%
2006 6.8% 15.8% 72.8%
2007 6.6% 16.0% 72.1%
2008 7.8% 16.7% 74.7%
2009 10.2% 18.6% 70.7%
2010 10.6% 18.3% 70.3%
2011 9.3% 19.4% 68.4%
2012 8.5% 20.3% 67.8%
2013 7.8% 20.4% 68.1%
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Note: Data are derived from weighted average of non-elderly childless households and households with children. Wages and benefits, cash transfers, and in-kind income comprise 96.3% of all pre-tax income for the bottom fifth non-elderly population in 2013. The other 3.7% is made up of capital gains, proprietors' income, other business income, interest and dividends, and other income.

Source: EPI analysis of data from the Congressional Budget Office (2016)

Real median household income by race and ethnicity, 2000–2018

Year White  Black  Hispanic  Asian  White-imputed   Black-imputed  Hispanic-imputed  Asian-imputed  White  Black  Hispanic  Asian  White  Black  Hispanic  Asian 
2000 $66,712 $43,380 $48,500 $69,069  $44,614  $46,989 
2001 $65,835 $41,899 $47,721 $68,161 $43,091 $46,234
2002 $65,646 $40,839 $46,334 $73,660 $67,965 $42,001 $44,890 $79,501
2003 $65,388 $40,633 $45,160 $76,231 $67,698 $41,789 $43,753 $82,276
2004 $65,178 $40,292 $45,670 $76,631 $67,481 $41,438 $44,247 $82,708
2005 $65,458 $39,898  $46,360  $76,873 $67,771  $41,033 $43,846 $84,991 
2006 $65,449 $40,116 $47,169 $78,291 $67,762 $41,257 $45,699 $86,560
2007 $66,676 $41,388 $46,958 $78,343 $69,032 $42,565 $45,495 $86,616
2008 $64,923 $40,154 $44,326 $74,913 $67,217 $41,296 $42,945 $82,824
2009 $63,895 $38,423 $44,628 $74,982 $66,153 $39,516 $43,238 $82,901
2010 $62,857 $37,114 $43,433 $72,402 $65,078 $38,170 $42,080 $80,048
2011 $62,001 $36,215 $43,217 $71,139 $64,192 $37,245 $41,870 $78,653
2012 $62,465 $36,945 $42,738 $73,415 $64,672 $37,996 $41,406 $81,169
2013 $62,915 $37,547 $44,228 $70,687 $65,138 $38,615 $42,850 $78,153 $65,138 $38,615 $42,850 $78,153
2014 $63,976 $37,854 $45,114 $78,883 $63,976 $37,854 $45,114 $78,883
2015 $66,721 $39,440 $47,852 $81,788 $66,721 $39,440 $47,852 $81,788
2016 $68,059 $41,924 $49,887 $85,210 $68,059 $41,924 $49,887 $85,210
2017 $69,806 $41,584 $51,717 $83,314 $69,806 $41,584 $51,717 $83,314 $69,851 $40,963 $51,390 $83,376
2018 $70,642  $41,692  $51,450  $87,194 

 

ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Notes: Because of a redesign in the CPS ASEC income questions in 2013, we imputed the historical series using the ratio of the old and new method in 2013. Solid lines are actual CPS ASEC data; dashed lines denote historical values imputed by applying the new methodology to past income trends. The break in the series in 2017 represents data from both the legacy CPS ASEC processing system and the updated CPS ASEC processing system. White refers to non-Hispanic whites, Black refers to Blacks alone or in combination, Asian refers to Asians alone, and Hispanic refers to Hispanics of any race. Comparable data are not available prior to 2002 for Asians. Shaded areas denote recessions.

Source: EPI analysis of Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement Historical Poverty Tables (Tables H-5 and H-9).

A typical white family has 10x the wealth of a typical black family: Median household wealth (for families with wealth greater than zero) and share of households with zero or negative net wealth , by race and ethnicity, 2016 (2016 dollars)

Share of zero or negative net wealth in 2016 Median household wealth
White, non Hispanic 9%  $171,000
Black 19%  $17,600
Hispanic 13%  $20,700
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Source: EPI analysis of Survey of Consumer Finances Combined Extract Data

Receiving an inheritance helps white families more than black families: Median family wealth by race and whether the family received an inheritance

White Black
Families without an inheritance $183,050 $33,969 
Families with an inheritance $287,457 $38,174
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Source: Thompson, Jeffrey P. and Gustavo A. Suarez (2015). “Exploring the Racial Wealth Gap Using the Survey of Consumer Finances,” Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2015-076. Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, http://dx.doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2015.076.

What do we do about all this?

Failure to raise the federal minimum wage has taken thousands of dollars out of the pockets of minimum wage workers: The real value of the minimum wage (adjusted for inflation) is 17% less than 10 years ago and 31% less than in 1968

Failure to raise the federal minimum wage has taken thousands of dollars out of the pockets of minimum wage workers: The real value of the minimum wage (adjusted for inflation) is 17% less than 10 years ago and 31% less than in 1968

Note: All values are in June 2019 dollars, adjusted using the CPI-U-RS.

Source: Adapted from Figure C in David Cooper, Elise Gould, and Ben Zipperer, Low-Wage Workers Are Suffering from a Decline in the Real Value of the Federal Minimum Wage, Economic Policy Institute, August 2019).

Source: Adapted from Figure C in David Cooper, Elise Gould, and Ben Zipperer, Low-Wage Workers Are Suffering from a Decline in the Real Value of the Federal Minimum Wage, Economic Policy Institute, August 2019). The figure reflects EPI analysis of historical minimum wage data in the Fair Labor Standards Act and amendments.

States enacting meaningful minimum wage increases have raised pay for their low-wage workers overall: Change in the 10th percentile real wage between 2010 and 2018 in states with and without real minimum wage changes, overall and by gender

States without real increase States with real increase
Overall 5.7% 9.9%
Men 6.0% 8.6%
Women 2.8% 10.7%
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Note: The real minimum wage increased between 2010 and 2018 in Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington, and West Virginia.

Source: Adapted from Figure C in David Cooper, Elise Gould, and Ben Zipperer, Low-Wage Workers Are Suffering from a Decline in the Real Value of the Federal Minimum Wage, Economic Policy Institute, August 2019.

Source: Adapted from Figure C in David Cooper, Elise Gould, and Ben Zipperer, Low-Wage Workers Are Suffering from a Decline in the Real Value of the Federal Minimum Wage, Economic Policy Institute, August 2019. Data are from the authors’ analysis of Current Population Survey basic monthly microdata from the U.S. Census Bureau.

As union membership declines, income inequality increases: Union membership and share of income going to the top 10%, 1917–2017

Year Union membership Share of income going to the top 10%
1917 11.0% 40.3%
1918 12.1% 39.9%
1919 14.3% 39.5%
1920 17.5% 38.1%
1921 17.6% 42.9%
1922 14.0% 42.9%
1923 11.7% 40.6%
1924 11.3% 43.3%
1925 11.0% 44.2%
1926 10.7% 44.1%
1927 10.6% 44.7%
1928 10.4% 46.1%
1929 10.1% 43.8%
1930 10.7% 43.1%
1931 11.2% 44.4%
1932 11.3% 46.3%
1933 9.5% 45.0%
1934 9.8% 45.2%
1935 10.8% 43.4%
1936 11.1% 44.8%
1937 18.6% 43.3%
1938 23.9% 43.0%
1939 24.8% 44.6%
1940 23.5% 44.4%
1941 25.4% 41.0%
1942 24.2% 35.5%
1943 30.1% 32.7%
1944 32.5% 31.5%
1945 33.4% 32.6%
1946 31.9% 34.6%
1947 31.1% 33.0%
1948 30.5% 33.7%
1949 29.6% 33.8%
1950 30.0% 33.9%
1951 32.4% 32.8%
1952 31.5% 32.1%
1953 33.2% 31.4%
1954 32.7% 32.1%
1955 32.9% 31.8%
1956 33.2% 31.8%
1957 32.0% 31.7%
1958 31.1% 32.1%
1959 31.6% 32.0%
1960 30.7% 31.7%
1961 28.7% 31.9%
1962 29.1% 32.0%
1963 28.5% 32.0%
1964 28.5% 31.6%
1965 28.6% 31.5%
1966 28.7% 32.0%
1967 28.6% 32.0%
1968 28.7% 32.0%
1969 28.3% 31.8%
1970 27.9% 31.5%
1971 27.4% 31.8%
1972 27.5% 31.6%
1973 27.1% 31.9%
1974 26.5% 32.4%
1975 25.7% 32.6%
1976 25.7% 32.4%
1977 25.2% 32.4%
1978 24.7% 32.4%
1979 25.4% 32.3%
1980 23.6% 32.9%
1981 22.3% 32.7%
1982 21.6% 33.2%
1983 21.4% 33.7%
1984 20.5% 33.9%
1985 19.0% 34.3%
1986 18.5% 34.6%
1987 17.9% 36.5%
1988 17.6% 38.6%
1989 17.2% 38.5%
1990 16.7% 38.8%
1991 16.2% 38.4%
1992 16.2% 39.8%
1993 16.2% 39.5%
1994 16.1% 39.6%
1995 15.3% 40.5%
1996 14.9% 41.2%
1997 14.7% 41.7%
1998 14.2% 42.1%
1999 13.9% 42.7%
2000 13.5% 43.1%
2001 13.5% 42.2%
2002 13.3% 42.4%
2003 12.9% 42.8%
2004 12.5% 43.6%
2005 12.5% 44.9%
2006 12.0% 45.5%
2007 12.1% 45.7%
2008 12.4% 46.0%
2009 12.3% 45.5%
2010 11.9% 46.4%
2011 11.8% 46.6%
2012 11.2% 47.8%
2013 11.2% 46.7%
2014 11.1% 46.9%
2015 11.1% 47.2%
2016 10.7% 47.4%
2017 10.7% 47.9%

 

ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Source: Reproduced from Figure A in Heidi Shierholz, Working People Have Been Thwarted in Their Efforts to Bargain for Better Wages by Attacks on Unions, Economic Policy Institute, August 2019.

Source: Reproduced from Figure A in Heidi Shierholz, Working People Have Been Thwarted in Their Efforts to Bargain for Better Wages by Attacks on Unions, Economic Policy Institute, August 2019. Data on union density follows the composite series found in Historical Statistics of the United States; updated to 2017 from unionstats.com. Income inequality (share of income to top 10%) data are from Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, “Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, no. 1 (2003) and updated data from the Top Income Database, updated March 2019.

A large share of workers do not have the union representation they want and need: Share of workers who are either covered by a union contract or would vote for a union in their workplace, and share of workers who are covered by a union contract, 1977 and 2017

Year Share of workers either covered by a union contract or who would vote for a union Share of workers covered by a union contract
1977 50.8% 26.5%
2017 54.2% 11.9%
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Source: Reproduced from Figure A in Heidi Shierholz, Working People Have Been Thwarted in Their Efforts to Bargain for Better Wages by Attacks on Unions, Economic Policy Institute, August 2019.

Source: Reproduced from Figure A in Heidi Shierholz, Working People Have Been Thwarted in Their Efforts to Bargain for Better Wages, Economic Policy Institute, August 2019. Data are from the author’s analysis of Thomas A. Kochan et al., “Worker Voice in America: Is There a Gap Between What Workers Expect and What They Experience?ILR Review 72, no. 1 (2019), and Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Current Population Survey public data series.

Average annual family income growth, by income group, 1947–2017

1947-1979 1979-2007 2007-2017
Lowest fifth 2.52% 0.02% 0.12%
Second fifth 2.22% 0.37% 0.06%
Third fifth 2.39% 0.59% 0.13%
Fourth fifth 2.43% 0.89% 0.31%
80th-95th percentile 2.36% 1.17% 0.46%
Top 5 percent 1.87% 1.99% 0.71%

 

ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Note: Data are for money income. Because of a redesign in the CPS ASEC income questions in 2013, we imputed the historical series using the ratio of the old and new method in 2013.

Source: EPI analysis of Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement Historical Income Tables (Table F-3)

Updated from: Figure 2C in The State of Working America, 12th Edition (Mishel et al. 2012), an Economic Policy Institute book published by Cornell University Press in 2012