Figure B
Population concentrations of prime-age Asian and Pacific Islander workers, 2024
| Asian overall | Asian Indian | |
|---|---|---|
| California | 29.5% | 19.8% |
| Washington | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Texas | 8.8% | 11.8% |
| Nevada | 1.3% | 0.4% |
| Hawaii | 2.0% | 0.1% |
| Arizona | 1.4% | 1.5% |
| Oregon | 1.0% | 0.8% |
| Florida | 3.1% | 3.7% |
| Colorado | 1.0% | 0.9% |
| Virginia | 3.1% | 3.7% |
| Georgia | 2.5% | 3.8% |
| North Carolina | 1.9% | 3.0% |
| Oklahoma | 0.5% | 0.3% |
| Utah | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| Kansas | 0.4% | 0.5% |
| Maryland | 2.0% | 2.1% |
| Connecticut | 0.9% | 1.3% |
| South Carolina | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| New York | 8.5% | 6.7% |
| New Jersey | 4.9% | 9.0% |
| Massachusetts | 2.8% | 3.1% |
| Idaho | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Tennessee | 0.7% | 0.9% |
| Kentucky | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| Pennsylvania | 2.6% | 3.4% |
| Indiana | 0.9% | 1.1% |
| Ohio | 1.6% | 2.2% |
| Alaska | 0.2% | 3.4% |
| Minnesota | 1.7% | 1.1% |
| Maine | 0.1% | 3.4% |
| Alabama | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| Louisiana | 0.4% | 0.2% |
| New Mexico | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| Washington D.C. | 0.2% | 0.3% |
| Iowa | 0.4% | 0.4% |
| Michigan | 1.8% | 2.8% |
| Missouri | 0.7% | 0.8% |
| Illinois | 4.0% | 5.4% |
| Nebraska | 0.3% | 0.2% |
| Wyoming | 3.4% | |
| Arkansas | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| South Dakota | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mississippi | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Wisconsin | 1.0% | 0.8% |
| Rhode Island | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| New Hampshire | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| North Dakota | 0.1% | |
| Delaware | 0.2% | 0.4% |
| Montana | 3.4% | |
| Vermont | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| West Virginia | 0.1% | 0.1% |
Notes: Data are for single-race Asian or Pacific Islanders only. Prime-age refers to ages 25 to 54. Other Pacific Islander represents Fijian, Tongan, Marshallese, and Pacific Islanders who did not specify a detailed origin.
Source: Author's analysis of 2024 5-year ACS microdata accessed via IPUMS
Previous chart: « Law firms make millions of dollars on union avoidance: Estimated revenue of company-level labor practices and of U.S. labor practices