Figure J
Southern states are the most likely to utilize preemption to disempower workers: Map of labor standards preemption by state
| State | Preempts minimum wage | Preempts fair scheduling | Preempts project labor agreements | Preempts prevailing wage | Preempts paid leave | Preempts gig economy | Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 5 |
| Alaska | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | 1 |
| Arizona | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6 |
| Arkansas | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 5 |
| California | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | 1 |
| Colorado | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | 2 |
| Connecticut | No | No | No | No | No | No | 0 |
| Delaware | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | 1 |
| Washington D.C. | No | No | No | No | No | No | 0 |
| Florida | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5 |
| Georgia | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6 |
| Hawaii | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | 1 |
| Idaho | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 4 |
| Illinois | No | No | No | No | No | No | 0 |
| Indiana | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5 |
| Iowa | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 5 |
| Kansas | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 5 |
| Kentucky | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | 4 |
| Louisiana | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5 |
| Maine | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | 2 |
| Maryland | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | 2 |
| Massachusetts | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | 1 |
| Michigan | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6 |
| Minnesota | No | No | No | No | No | No | 0 |
| Mississippi | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 4 |
| Missouri | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 4 |
| Montana | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | 2 |
| Nebraska | No | No | No | No | No | No | 0 |
| Nevada | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | 2 |
| New Hampshire | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | 1 |
| New Jersey | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | 2 |
| New Mexico | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | 1 |
| New York | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | 1 |
| North Carolina | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 4 |
| North Dakota | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 4 |
| Ohio | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | 4 |
| Oklahoma | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 4 |
| Oregon | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | 2 |
| Pennsylvania | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | 2 |
| Rhode Island | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | 3 |
| South Carolina | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 4 |
| South Dakota | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | 2 | |
| Tennessee | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6 |
| Texas | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | 2 |
| Utah | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 4 |
| Vermont | No | No | No | No | No | No | 0 |
| Virginia | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | 1 |
| Washington | No | No | No | No | No | No | 0 |
| West Virginia | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | 2 |
| Wisconsin | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6 |
| Wyoming | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | 1 |

Source: EPI analysis of preemption laws in all 50 states.
This chart appears in:
- Child labor remains a key state legislative issue in 2024: State lawmakers must seize opportunities to strengthen standards, resist ongoing attacks on child labor laws
- Southern policymakers leave workers with lower wages and a fraying safety net: Rooted in Racism and Economic Exploitation: Part Three