Table 1
Fiscal impact on state budgets of 20% federal spending cap
Federal funds as a share of total expenditure | Fiscal impact on states of 20% cap | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Total state expenditure | Revenue from federal government | Dollars | Percentage of total expenditures | Percentage of general fund | |
Alabama | 26,422,115 | 7,177,288 | 27% | 2,296,732 | 8.7% | 31.5% |
Alaska | 11,337,809 | 2,386,407 | 21% | 763,650 | 6.7% | 10.6% |
Arizona | 31,516,818 | 10,141,747 | 32% | 3,245,359 | 10.3% | 35.1% |
Arkansas | 16,168,717 | 4,920,921 | 30% | 1,574,695 | 9.7% | 36.0% |
California | 254,334,062 | 57,647,315 | 23% | 18,447,141 | 7.3% | 20.3% |
Colorado | 24,886,401 | 5,490,899 | 22% | 1,757,088 | 7.1% | 22.8% |
Connecticut | 25,683,688 | 5,504,832 | 21% | 1,761,546 | 6.9% | 15.3% |
Delaware | 7,360,953 | 1,518,574 | 21% | 485,944 | 6.6% | 14.7% |
Florida | 75,468,564 | 20,645,860 | 27% | 6,606,675 | 8.8% | 27.9% |
Georgia | 41,452,427 | 12,571,429 | 30% | 4,022,857 | 9.7% | 24.4% |
Hawaii | 11,199,768 | 2,219,831 | 20% | 710,346 | 6.3% | 13.2% |
Idaho | 8,217,478 | 2,137,366 | 26% | 683,957 | 8.3% | 25.1% |
Illinois | 68,623,768 | 16,991,370 | 25% | 5,437,238 | 7.9% | 18.3% |
Indiana | 32,181,778 | 9,248,437 | 29% | 2,959,500 | 9.2% | 22.7% |
Iowa | 18,303,986 | 5,450,231 | 30% | 1,744,074 | 9.5% | 29.5% |
Kansas | 15,832,222 | 3,779,181 | 24% | 1,209,338 | 7.6% | 19.9% |
Kentucky | 26,853,131 | 7,463,529 | 28% | 2,388,329 | 8.9% | 26.4% |
Louisiana | 32,354,975 | 12,448,789 | 38% | 3,983,612 | 12.3% | 42.0% |
Maine | 8,775,249 | 3,084,903 | 35% | 987,169 | 11.2% | 32.7% |
Maryland | 36,023,284 | 8,437,353 | 23% | 2,699,953 | 7.5% | 18.8% |
Massachusetts | 47,910,538 | 12,043,616 | 25% | 3,853,957 | 8.0% | 13.0% |
Michigan | 58,754,468 | 16,072,141 | 27% | 5,143,085 | 8.8% | 60.5% |
Minnesota | 36,308,889 | 7,903,210 | 22% | 2,529,027 | 7.0% | 14.4% |
Mississippi | 19,246,076 | 7,993,969 | 42% | 2,558,070 | 13.3% | 53.3% |
Missouri | 28,650,820 | 9,252,249 | 32% | 2,960,720 | 10.3% | 35.2% |
Montana | 6,268,607 | 2,089,158 | 33% | 668,531 | 10.7% | 38.1% |
Nebraska | 9,034,186 | 2,717,648 | 30% | 869,647 | 9.6% | 26.1% |
Nevada | 12,056,208 | 2,357,013 | 20% | 754,244 | 6.3% | 20.0% |
New Hampshire | 6,956,174 | 1,715,443 | 25% | 548,942 | 7.9% | 38.2% |
New Jersey | 62,044,123 | 11,797,142 | 19% | 3,775,085 | 6.1% | 12.2% |
New Mexico | 17,111,701 | 4,940,092 | 29% | 1,580,829 | 9.2% | 26.0% |
New York | 163,706,192 | 42,146,116 | 26% | 13,486,757 | 8.2% | 24.7% |
North Carolina | 48,586,378 | 14,147,245 | 29% | 4,527,118 | 9.3% | 23.0% |
North Dakota | 4,486,613 | 1,303,719 | 29% | 417,190 | 9.3% | 33.6% |
Ohio | 71,600,146 | 18,674,608 | 26% | 5,975,875 | 8.3% | 21.2% |
Oklahoma | 21,382,513 | 6,413,876 | 30% | 2,052,440 | 9.6% | 30.1% |
Oregon | 24,381,062 | 5,849,212 | 24% | 1,871,748 | 7.7% | 31.8% |
Pennsylvania | 77,564,247 | 18,102,178 | 23% | 5,792,697 | 7.5% | 21.4% |
Rhode Island | 7,346,662 | 2,308,253 | 31% | 738,641 | 10.1% | 24.6% |
South Carolina | 28,663,666 | 7,718,470 | 27% | 2,469,910 | 8.6% | 42.5% |
South Dakota | 4,114,030 | 1,516,956 | 37% | 485,426 | 11.8% | 42.1% |
Tennessee | 27,815,474 | 8,420,749 | 30% | 2,694,640 | 9.7% | 22.6% |
Texas | 110,920,746 | 34,344,098 | 31% | 10,990,111 | 9.9% | 26.3% |
Utah | 15,568,462 | 3,849,281 | 25% | 1,231,770 | 7.9% | 25.6% |
Vermont | 5,449,237 | 1,572,776 | 29% | 503,288 | 9.2% | 65.1% |
Virginia | 42,052,695 | 7,497,291 | 18% | 2,399,133 | 5.7% | 16.0% |
Washington | 43,443,430 | 9,512,449 | 22% | 3,043,984 | 7.0% | 20.8% |
West Virginia | 11,481,561 | 3,707,941 | 32% | 1,186,541 | 10.3% | 30.4% |
Wisconsin | 35,646,272 | 8,619,099 | 24% | 2,758,112 | 7.7% | 21.6% |
Wyoming | 5,577,990 | 2,100,272 | 38% | 672,807 | 12.0% | 17.3% |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009 Annual Surveys of State and Local Government Finances
Previous chart: « Green intensity of an industry and its share of workers without a college degree
Next chart: Function categories of federal funds »