Supplemental Table 4

Net U.S. jobs created by eliminating currency manipulation, by congressional district, high-impact scenario, 2015 (in alphabetical order)*

Rank (in order of jobs created as a share of district employment) State District Jobs created (rounded) District employment in 2011 (rounded) Jobs created as a share of district employment
283 Alabama 1 10,700 283,000 3.78%
245 Alabama 2 10,900 276,900 3.94%
130 Alabama 3 12,200 274,600 4.44%
41 Alabama 4 13,700 262,900 5.21%
60 Alabama 5 15,600 311,900 5.00%
278 Alabama 6 12,100 318,400 3.80%
281 Alabama 7 9,600 253,500 3.79%
412 Alaska Statewide 10,300 344,300 2.99%
257 Arizona 1 10,300 264,900 3.89%
274 Arizona 2 11,400 299,200 3.81%
247 Arizona 3 10,300 262,200 3.93%
286 Arizona 4 8,800 233,500 3.77%
124 Arizona 5 14,200 317,900 4.47%
308 Arizona 6 13,300 366,000 3.63%
246 Arizona 7 11,100 282,300 3.93%
314 Arizona 8 10,900 301,700 3.61%
209 Arizona 9 14,700 360,300 4.08%
37 Arkansas 1 14,800 277,400 5.34%
364 Arkansas 2 11,300 336,300 3.36%
97 Arkansas 3 15,200 327,000 4.65%
50 Arkansas 4 15,000 295,100 5.08%
315 California 1 9,400 260,300 3.61%
300 California 2 11,900 323,100 3.68%
293 California 3 10,700 286,600 3.73%
327 California 4 10,400 294,200 3.54%
210 California 5 13,300 326,800 4.07%
401 California 6 8,900 288,300 3.09%
389 California 7 9,900 313,200 3.16%
377 California 8 7,600 235,500 3.23%
230 California 9 11,000 275,300 4.00%
147 California 10 12,200 277,200 4.40%
320 California 11 11,600 324,200 3.58%
370 California 12 13,200 399,400 3.30%
329 California 13 12,000 340,200 3.53%
280 California 14 13,800 364,000 3.79%
92 California 15 15,700 336,400 4.67%
10 California 16 14,700 244,900 6.00%
2 California 17 24,400 346,100 7.05%
22 California 18 19,900 344,500 5.78%
11 California 19 19,300 324,000 5.96%
15 California 20 17,700 302,500 5.85%
1 California 21 21,100 243,800 8.65%
76 California 22 14,100 289,600 4.87%
173 California 23 11,700 274,100 4.27%
68 California 24 16,000 323,500 4.95%
113 California 25 13,700 302,700 4.53%
31 California 26 17,900 325,900 5.49%
398 California 27 10,300 332,200 3.10%
408 California 28 10,900 359,900 3.03%
217 California 29 12,300 303,700 4.05%
348 California 30 12,300 358,200 3.43%
330 California 31 10,300 292,200 3.52%
216 California 32 11,900 293,800 4.05%
253 California 33 14,200 364,200 3.90%
436 California 34 6,300 309,400 2.04%
205 California 35 11,700 284,800 4.11%
266 California 36 9,700 251,900 3.85%
390 California 37 10,600 335,600 3.16%
264 California 38 12,100 313,300 3.86%
183 California 39 14,000 332,000 4.22%
424 California 40 7,900 280,500 2.82%
254 California 41 10,600 271,900 3.90%
191 California 42 12,800 307,000 4.17%
212 California 43 12,300 302,800 4.06%
201 California 44 11,200 270,600 4.14%
110 California 45 16,100 354,400 4.54%
98 California 46 14,600 314,400 4.64%
282 California 47 12,400 327,600 3.79%
111 California 48 16,000 352,600 4.54%
190 California 49 12,500 299,700 4.17%
88 California 50 14,000 296,200 4.73%
263 California 51 10,000 258,600 3.87%
136 California 52 15,500 350,100 4.43%
312 California 53 12,400 342,700 3.62%
322 Colorado 1 13,700 384,400 3.56%
202 Colorado 2 15,900 384,600 4.13%
277 Colorado 3 12,600 331,400 3.80%
96 Colorado 4 16,000 344,100 4.65%
302 Colorado 5 11,600 315,900 3.67%
337 Colorado 6 12,900 369,600 3.49%
324 Colorado 7 12,900 362,500 3.56%
169 Connecticut 1 15,000 349,800 4.29%
108 Connecticut 2 15,900 348,600 4.56%
128 Connecticut 3 15,700 352,700 4.45%
231 Connecticut 4 13,700 343,000 3.99%
80 Connecticut 5 16,800 348,300 4.82%
434 DC District-wide 8,200 310,600 2.64%
265 Delaware Statewide 16,200 420,400 3.85%
393 Florida 1 9,500 303,900 3.13%
423 Florida 2 8,600 301,500 2.85%
380 Florida 3 8,900 277,000 3.21%
333 Florida 4 11,600 329,900 3.52%
346 Florida 5 9,800 284,000 3.45%
307 Florida 6 10,300 283,200 3.64%
347 Florida 7 11,100 322,500 3.44%
207 Florida 8 11,600 283,400 4.09%
405 Florida 9 9,700 317,200 3.06%
335 Florida 10 11,600 331,500 3.50%
379 Florida 11 7,000 217,400 3.22%
365 Florida 12 9,500 283,200 3.35%
273 Florida 13 11,800 309,200 3.82%
367 Florida 14 10,700 320,700 3.34%
306 Florida 15 11,100 304,200 3.65%
361 Florida 16 9,300 276,100 3.37%
156 Florida 17 10,800 248,700 4.34%
375 Florida 18 9,200 284,000 3.24%
349 Florida 19 9,100 265,200 3.43%
373 Florida 20 9,900 302,100 3.28%
399 Florida 21 9,800 316,800 3.09%
369 Florida 22 11,000 332,000 3.31%
385 Florida 23 10,800 339,900 3.18%
419 Florida 24 8,500 293,400 2.90%
328 Florida 25 11,500 326,000 3.53%
366 Florida 26 11,200 335,600 3.34%
382 Florida 27 10,000 313,600 3.19%
268 Georgia 1 11,000 286,100 3.84%
200 Georgia 2 10,400 251,200 4.14%
172 Georgia 3 12,200 285,800 4.27%
305 Georgia 4 11,400 311,700 3.66%
350 Georgia 5 10,900 318,100 3.43%
261 Georgia 6 14,000 361,200 3.88%
223 Georgia 7 12,600 312,500 4.03%
258 Georgia 8 10,600 272,700 3.89%
137 Georgia 9 12,600 284,600 4.43%
255 Georgia 10 11,200 287,400 3.90%
218 Georgia 11 13,800 340,900 4.05%
234 Georgia 12 11,100 278,200 3.99%
339 Georgia 13 10,900 312,800 3.48%
49 Georgia 14 14,800 290,700 5.09%
435 Hawaii 1 8,700 330,100 2.64%
387 Hawaii 2 9,500 299,400 3.17%
121 Idaho 1 14,800 329,900 4.49%
54 Idaho 2 17,900 355,000 5.04%
354 Illinois 1 9,900 290,200 3.41%
235 Illinois 2 11,100 278,200 3.99%
220 Illinois 3 12,900 319,500 4.04%
93 Illinois 4 15,200 326,600 4.65%
229 Illinois 5 15,900 397,600 4.00%
59 Illinois 6 17,800 355,600 5.01%
313 Illinois 7 10,800 298,500 3.62%
71 Illinois 8 17,900 366,300 4.89%
299 Illinois 9 12,800 347,200 3.69%
57 Illinois 10 16,300 324,800 5.02%
151 Illinois 11 15,200 347,300 4.38%
249 Illinois 12 11,800 301,000 3.92%
250 Illinois 13 12,800 326,600 3.92%
53 Illinois 14 17,700 351,000 5.04%
90 Illinois 15 14,900 316,500 4.71%
32 Illinois 16 18,100 330,800 5.47%
13 Illinois 17 18,300 311,700 5.87%
55 Illinois 18 17,000 337,500 5.04%
39 Indiana 1 16,500 310,600 5.31%
6 Indiana 2 20,000 317,800 6.29%
4 Indiana 3 20,800 327,000 6.36%
36 Indiana 4 17,600 328,500 5.36%
208 Indiana 5 14,600 357,700 4.08%
23 Indiana 6 18,000 311,900 5.77%
222 Indiana 7 12,600 312,200 4.04%
67 Indiana 8 16,300 329,300 4.95%
86 Indiana 9 16,100 339,400 4.74%
20 Iowa 1 22,700 392,300 5.79%
35 Iowa 2 20,300 373,400 5.44%
211 Iowa 3 15,900 390,800 4.07%
34 Iowa 4 20,800 382,300 5.44%
43 Kansas 1 17,900 345,900 5.17%
203 Kansas 2 14,000 339,900 4.12%
275 Kansas 3 14,100 370,300 3.81%
5 Kansas 4 21,000 332,900 6.31%
82 Kentucky 1 13,700 284,800 4.81%
78 Kentucky 2 15,300 317,100 4.82%
123 Kentucky 3 14,900 333,300 4.47%
146 Kentucky 4 14,700 333,500 4.41%
303 Kentucky 5 8,600 234,300 3.67%
107 Kentucky 6 15,300 335,400 4.56%
358 Louisiana 1 12,000 354,000 3.39%
388 Louisiana 2 10,400 329,000 3.16%
232 Louisiana 3 13,100 328,100 3.99%
316 Louisiana 4 11,200 311,100 3.60%
292 Louisiana 5 10,600 283,900 3.73%
360 Louisiana 6 12,400 367,800 3.37%
260 Maine 1 13,200 340,400 3.88%
321 Maine 2 10,800 302,700 3.57%
287 Maryland 1 12,900 342,300 3.77%
410 Maryland 2 10,600 351,700 3.01%
407 Maryland 3 11,200 369,500 3.03%
420 Maryland 4 11,100 384,100 2.89%
429 Maryland 5 10,100 368,200 2.74%
378 Maryland 6 11,700 363,200 3.22%
396 Maryland 7 9,800 315,700 3.10%
406 Maryland 8 12,200 400,100 3.05%
237 Massachusetts 1 13,600 341,000 3.99%
197 Massachusetts 2 14,800 356,500 4.15%
45 Massachusetts 3 18,200 355,400 5.12%
225 Massachusetts 4 15,100 374,800 4.03%
272 Massachusetts 5 14,800 387,400 3.82%
243 Massachusetts 6 14,700 372,000 3.95%
395 Massachusetts 7 11,500 369,800 3.11%
311 Massachusetts 8 13,600 375,600 3.62%
344 Massachusetts 9 12,200 352,300 3.46%
157 Michigan 1 12,600 290,200 4.34%
25 Michigan 2 17,900 315,900 5.67%
44 Michigan 3 16,300 315,300 5.17%
66 Michigan 4 14,200 286,300 4.96%
162 Michigan 5 11,400 264,800 4.31%
12 Michigan 6 18,400 310,400 5.93%
42 Michigan 7 15,500 299,100 5.18%
112 Michigan 8 15,000 330,800 4.53%
65 Michigan 9 16,200 326,100 4.97%
14 Michigan 10 18,100 308,700 5.86%
61 Michigan 11 17,100 342,100 5.00%
166 Michigan 12 13,500 313,800 4.30%
125 Michigan 13 10,300 230,700 4.46%
196 Michigan 14 10,700 257,700 4.15%
38 Minnesota 1 18,500 348,200 5.31%
72 Minnesota 2 17,500 358,300 4.88%
33 Minnesota 3 19,300 353,800 5.46%
154 Minnesota 4 14,600 336,000 4.35%
126 Minnesota 5 15,700 352,000 4.46%
52 Minnesota 6 17,700 348,700 5.08%
17 Minnesota 7 19,100 328,700 5.81%
178 Minnesota 8 12,900 303,400 4.25%
152 Mississippi 1 13,300 305,600 4.35%
171 Mississippi 2 11,400 266,900 4.27%
267 Mississippi 3 11,700 303,900 3.85%
285 Mississippi 4 11,500 304,900 3.77%
318 Missouri 1 11,900 331,500 3.59%
115 Missouri 2 17,100 378,600 4.52%
134 Missouri 3 16,400 370,000 4.43%
227 Missouri 4 13,000 324,900 4.00%
259 Missouri 5 13,400 345,300 3.88%
145 Missouri 6 15,700 355,900 4.41%
142 Missouri 7 14,900 337,400 4.42%
79 Missouri 8 14,400 298,500 4.82%
228 Montana Statewide 19,200 480,000 4.00%
122 Nebraska 1 14,400 321,700 4.48%
341 Nebraska 2 11,000 316,300 3.48%
8 Nebraska 3 18,800 305,600 6.15%
381 Nevada 1 9,100 284,700 3.20%
239 Nevada 2 12,300 309,400 3.98%
413 Nevada 3 10,000 336,500 2.97%
404 Nevada 4 8,400 274,300 3.06%
138 New Hampshire 1 15,600 352,600 4.42%
89 New Hampshire 2 15,700 332,200 4.73%
334 New Jersey 1 11,900 339,200 3.51%
353 New Jersey 2 11,100 324,400 3.42%
338 New Jersey 3 12,000 344,200 3.49%
391 New Jersey 4 10,300 326,400 3.16%
206 New Jersey 5 14,600 356,100 4.10%
301 New Jersey 6 13,000 353,600 3.68%
184 New Jersey 7 15,900 377,100 4.22%
352 New Jersey 8 12,700 371,000 3.42%
304 New Jersey 9 12,400 338,500 3.66%
400 New Jersey 10 9,600 310,700 3.09%
262 New Jersey 11 13,900 358,800 3.87%
270 New Jersey 12 13,500 352,400 3.83%
357 New Mexico 1 10,600 311,900 3.40%
269 New Mexico 2 10,500 273,100 3.84%
355 New Mexico 3 9,700 284,800 3.41%
368 New York 1 11,400 343,300 3.32%
332 New York 2 12,600 357,800 3.52%
411 New York 3 10,100 336,700 3.00%
426 New York 4 9,600 342,500 2.80%
428 New York 5 9,300 336,200 2.77%
427 New York 6 9,100 327,000 2.78%
432 New York 7 8,600 322,200 2.67%
431 New York 8 8,000 292,700 2.73%
430 New York 9 8,900 324,900 2.74%
421 New York 10 10,300 360,300 2.86%
433 New York 11 8,400 317,500 2.65%
397 New York 12 13,000 418,800 3.10%
415 New York 13 9,400 317,200 2.96%
425 New York 14 9,600 341,800 2.81%
417 New York 15 7,500 255,900 2.93%
409 New York 16 9,800 323,600 3.03%
416 New York 17 10,100 341,400 2.96%
345 New York 18 11,500 332,100 3.46%
295 New York 19 12,200 327,300 3.73%
392 New York 20 11,200 357,600 3.13%
317 New York 21 11,100 309,200 3.59%
158 New York 22 13,900 320,200 4.34%
95 New York 23 15,100 324,600 4.65%
161 New York 24 14,100 327,300 4.31%
181 New York 25 14,200 335,400 4.23%
310 New York 26 11,900 327,700 3.63%
102 New York 27 15,500 337,800 4.59%
140 North Carolina 1 12,900 291,800 4.42%
198 North Carolina 2 12,600 303,800 4.15%
309 North Carolina 3 11,100 305,600 3.63%
363 North Carolina 4 11,800 350,900 3.36%
170 North Carolina 5 13,900 324,500 4.28%
284 North Carolina 6 12,900 341,800 3.77%
252 North Carolina 7 12,300 315,400 3.90%
204 North Carolina 8 12,400 301,700 4.11%
150 North Carolina 9 16,300 371,400 4.39%
105 North Carolina 10 14,800 324,000 4.57%
188 North Carolina 11 12,400 295,400 4.20%
298 North Carolina 12 11,800 319,800 3.69%
175 North Carolina 13 14,900 349,900 4.26%
103 North Dakota Statewide 17,000 370,800 4.58%
139 Ohio 1 14,700 332,300 4.42%
117 Ohio 2 14,600 323,600 4.51%
351 Ohio 3 11,400 333,000 3.42%
7 Ohio 4 19,700 317,900 6.20%
29 Ohio 5 18,700 334,200 5.60%
47 Ohio 6 14,900 292,300 5.10%
24 Ohio 7 18,800 326,800 5.75%
18 Ohio 8 19,100 328,800 5.81%
77 Ohio 9 15,200 315,000 4.83%
160 Ohio 10 13,500 312,800 4.32%
159 Ohio 11 11,900 275,200 4.32%
213 Ohio 12 14,600 359,500 4.06%
63 Ohio 13 16,000 320,400 4.99%
26 Ohio 14 19,800 349,700 5.66%
219 Ohio 15 13,600 336,400 4.04%
46 Ohio 16 18,200 355,600 5.12%
85 Oklahoma 1 17,200 361,900 4.75%
91 Oklahoma 2 13,600 290,300 4.68%
100 Oklahoma 3 15,200 329,900 4.61%
294 Oklahoma 4 13,100 350,900 3.73%
342 Oklahoma 5 12,100 348,800 3.47%
30 Oregon 1 20,800 377,200 5.51%
69 Oregon 2 15,500 314,200 4.93%
242 Oregon 3 15,200 383,300 3.97%
165 Oregon 4 13,300 309,000 4.30%
176 Oregon 5 13,900 326,700 4.25%
362 Pennsylvania 1 9,200 273,300 3.37%
394 Pennsylvania 2 8,500 273,100 3.11%
40 Pennsylvania 3 16,700 317,700 5.26%
133 Pennsylvania 4 15,200 342,900 4.43%
70 Pennsylvania 5 15,500 316,800 4.89%
109 Pennsylvania 6 16,500 362,300 4.55%
106 Pennsylvania 7 15,500 339,700 4.56%
179 Pennsylvania 8 15,200 357,800 4.25%
135 Pennsylvania 9 13,500 304,800 4.43%
143 Pennsylvania 10 13,800 312,500 4.42%
192 Pennsylvania 11 13,700 329,300 4.16%
119 Pennsylvania 12 14,900 331,900 4.49%
248 Pennsylvania 13 13,300 339,000 3.92%
325 Pennsylvania 14 11,500 323,200 3.56%
94 Pennsylvania 15 16,000 343,800 4.65%
81 Pennsylvania 16 15,800 327,700 4.82%
224 Pennsylvania 17 12,600 312,600 4.03%
104 Pennsylvania 18 15,800 345,000 4.58%
164 Rhode Island 1 10,800 250,900 4.30%
276 Rhode Island 2 9,900 260,300 3.80%
241 South Carolina 1 11,900 299,800 3.97%
226 South Carolina 2 12,300 305,600 4.02%
28 South Carolina 3 14,900 264,500 5.63%
73 South Carolina 4 14,700 301,000 4.88%
75 South Carolina 5 13,400 275,200 4.87%
174 South Carolina 6 10,800 253,500 4.26%
193 South Carolina 7 11,200 269,400 4.16%
51 South Dakota Statewide 21,100 415,600 5.08%
87 Tennessee 1 14,100 297,600 4.74%
289 Tennessee 2 12,300 327,200 3.76%
155 Tennessee 3 12,900 297,000 4.34%
141 Tennessee 4 13,900 314,500 4.42%
326 Tennessee 5 12,500 353,400 3.54%
148 Tennessee 6 13,400 304,500 4.40%
116 Tennessee 7 12,900 285,800 4.51%
74 Tennessee 8 14,600 299,200 4.88%
291 Tennessee 9 11,400 305,300 3.73%
187 Texas 1 12,500 297,700 4.20%
144 Texas 2 16,100 364,600 4.42%
114 Texas 3 16,800 371,200 4.53%
185 Texas 4 12,600 299,300 4.21%
236 Texas 5 12,000 300,800 3.99%
180 Texas 6 14,800 348,800 4.24%
163 Texas 7 16,200 376,300 4.31%
149 Texas 8 13,600 309,200 4.40%
319 Texas 9 11,700 326,400 3.58%
186 Texas 10 14,400 342,600 4.20%
199 Texas 11 12,800 308,800 4.15%
58 Texas 12 16,900 337,500 5.01%
132 Texas 13 13,700 309,000 4.43%
177 Texas 14 12,900 303,300 4.25%
374 Texas 15 9,200 280,900 3.28%
418 Texas 16 8,200 281,300 2.92%
288 Texas 17 12,400 329,300 3.77%
189 Texas 18 12,800 306,400 4.18%
256 Texas 19 12,100 310,700 3.89%
402 Texas 20 9,600 311,400 3.08%
376 Texas 21 11,700 361,200 3.24%
240 Texas 22 14,000 352,500 3.97%
359 Texas 23 9,800 289,700 3.38%
167 Texas 24 16,700 388,600 4.30%
221 Texas 25 12,200 302,200 4.04%
127 Texas 26 16,400 368,300 4.45%
194 Texas 27 12,700 305,600 4.16%
336 Texas 28 9,300 266,300 3.49%
131 Texas 29 13,000 292,900 4.44%
331 Texas 30 10,300 292,300 3.52%
251 Texas 31 12,600 323,000 3.90%
153 Texas 32 15,700 360,900 4.35%
168 Texas 33 12,200 283,900 4.30%
343 Texas 34 8,400 242,200 3.47%
386 Texas 35 10,100 318,200 3.17%
84 Texas 36 14,000 291,900 4.80%
129 Utah 1 13,900 312,400 4.45%
233 Utah 2 12,200 305,700 3.99%
296 Utah 3 11,500 311,200 3.70%
182 Utah 4 14,000 331,500 4.22%
195 Vermont Statewide 13,600 327,300 4.16%
403 Virginia 1 10,800 352,400 3.06%
384 Virginia 2 10,800 339,800 3.18%
383 Virginia 3 10,200 320,100 3.19%
297 Virginia 4 12,100 327,900 3.69%
279 Virginia 5 12,000 316,100 3.80%
271 Virginia 6 13,000 339,900 3.82%
372 Virginia 7 12,000 364,600 3.29%
422 Virginia 8 12,100 423,700 2.86%
118 Virginia 9 13,400 298,400 4.49%
356 Virginia 10 12,800 376,400 3.40%
414 Virginia 11 11,900 400,900 2.97%
62 Washington 1 16,600 332,300 5.00%
64 Washington 2 15,900 318,900 4.99%
101 Washington 3 13,100 284,500 4.60%
19 Washington 4 16,500 284,500 5.80%
238 Washington 5 11,600 291,500 3.98%
340 Washington 6 9,600 275,500 3.48%
215 Washington 7 15,400 380,000 4.05%
48 Washington 8 16,200 318,000 5.09%
99 Washington 9 15,800 341,400 4.63%
371 Washington 10 9,600 291,300 3.30%
214 West Virginia 1 10,500 258,700 4.06%
323 West Virginia 2 9,500 266,900 3.56%
244 West Virginia 3 8,800 223,000 3.95%
21 Wisconsin 1 19,800 342,500 5.78%
120 Wisconsin 2 17,500 390,000 4.49%
56 Wisconsin 3 17,800 353,500 5.04%
83 Wisconsin 4 14,800 308,000 4.81%
9 Wisconsin 5 22,500 370,600 6.07%
3 Wisconsin 6 23,800 353,600 6.73%
27 Wisconsin 7 19,100 338,400 5.64%
16 Wisconsin 8 21,200 362,800 5.84%
290 Wyoming Statewide 10,900 290,000 3.76%
Total** 5,800,000 140,399,600 4.13%
Economic Policy Institute

*The table estimates the effects of ending currency manipulation over three years, modeled as having begun in 2013. The high-impact scenario assumes ending currency manipulation would reduce the trade deficit by $500 billion in 2015 relative to the trade deficit in 2012.

**Totals may vary slightly due to rounding.

Source: Author's analysis of the American Community Survey (U.S. Census Bureau 2013), U.S. International Trade Commission (2013),  Congressional Budget Office (2013a and 2013b), Bivens (2011), Bivens and Edwards (2010), Kondo and Svec (2009, 10), Bureau of Labor Statistics (2013d), Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Projections program (BLS-EP 2011a and 2011b), and Zandi (2011). For a more detailed explanation of data sources and computations, see text and the appendix.

Copy the code below to embed this chart on your website.

Previous chart: «

Next chart: »