Table 3
Impact of decline in collective bargaining on wage inequality, 1973–2007
Change in wage inequality* | |||
---|---|---|---|
Between-group | Within-group | Total growth | |
A. Male wage inequality trends | |||
Change in wage inequality | 0.055 | 0.046 | 0.102 |
Direct collective bargaining (CB) effect | 0.002 | 0.018 | 0.021 |
CB impact on uncovered wages and standards | -0.017 | 0.031 | 0.014 |
Share of inequality growth explained** | |||
Direct CB effect | 3.2% | 40.3% | 20.2% |
CB impact on uncovered wages and standards | -30.1 | 66.0 | 13.7 |
Total CB effect | -26.9 | 106.3 | 33.9 |
B. Female wage inequality trends | |||
Change in wage inequality | 0.051 | 0.047 | 0.098 |
Direct CB effect | -0.003 | 0.004 | 0.001 |
CB impact on uncovered wages and standards | 0.036 | 0.024 | 0.019 |
Share of inequality growth explained** | |||
Direct CB effect | -5.2% | 9.2% | 1.7% |
CB impact on uncovered wages and standards | -10.9 | 50.6 | 18.7 |
Total CB effect | -16.1 | 59.8 | 20.4 |
* Change in variance of log wages
** From original source, which used nonrounded data
Source: Author's analysis of Western and Rosenfeld (2011, Table 2)
This chart appears in:
Previous chart: « Collective bargaining coverage, U.S. and Michigan, 1983–2011
Next chart: Collective bargaining advantage by demographic group, 2011 »