Outstanding Federal Unemployment Account loan value per covered worker, by state, March 2011
| State | Loan Per Worker |
|---|---|
| Alaska | $0.00 |
| District of Columbia | $0.00 |
| Iowa | $0.00 |
| Louisiana | $0.00 |
| Maine | $0.00 |
| Mississippi | $0.00 |
| Montana | $0.00 |
| Nebraska | $0.00 |
| New Mexico | $0.00 |
| North Dakota | $0.00 |
| Oklahoma | $0.00 |
| Oregon | $0.00 |
| Puerto Rico | $0.00 |
| Utah | $0.00 |
| Washington | $0.00 |
| West Virginia | $0.00 |
| Wyoming | $0.00 |
| Maryland | $0.00 |
| South Dakota | $0.00 |
| Tennessee | $0.00 |
| Texas | $9.81 |
| New Hampshire | $34.32 |
| Hawaii | $89.34 |
| Massachusetts | $109.27 |
| Kansas | $126.87 |
| Virginia | $139.92 |
| Arizona | $141.99 |
| Delaware | $150.99 |
| Alabama | $151.13 |
| Georgia | $190.65 |
| Vermont | $248.20 |
| Colorado | $273.51 |
| Minnesota | $293.98 |
| Florida | $318.67 |
| Arkansas | $319.73 |
| Missouri | $347.27 |
| Idaho | $351.39 |
| United States | $377.23 |
| Connecticut | $452.68 |
| New York | $462.68 |
| Ohio | $535.37 |
| New Jersey | $549.87 |
| Illinois | $551.38 |
| Kentucky | $560.26 |
| South Carolina | $570.43 |
| Rhode Island | $603.97 |
| Wisconsin | $648.02 |
| Pennsylvania | $675.73 |
| Nevada | $679.91 |
| North Carolina | $736.96 |
| California | $752.48 |
| Indiana | $817.30 |
| Michigan | $1,083.68 |
Note: Absence of bars denote states whose trust fund accounts never went insolvent following the recession that began in December 2007. Red bars denote states whose accounts went insolvent and that cut benefits duration. The black bar is all states' loans divided by all covered workers in the U.S.
Source: Authors' analysis of Department of Labor Unemployment Insurance Data Summary, 3rd quarter 2011 and data provided by Department of Labor staff
This chart appears in:
Previous chart: « Change in annual UI-dedicated state taxes per covered worker needed to achieve a comfortable level of solvency* for state UTF account, 4th quarter 2011
Next chart: Characteristics of states that cut UI benefit duration in the aftermath of the Great Recession »