Table 11
Testing for bias in demographic outcomes of construction investments
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable | Hispanic share of construction | Hispanic share of construction | Young Hispanic share of construction | Young Hispanic share of construction | Unionization rate of construction | Unionization rate of construction |
| Residential share | 0.69 | 0.084 | 0.72 | 0.19 | -0.84 | -0.73 |
| (3.18)* | (1.28) | (1.58) | (0.28) | (-4.50)* | (-2.84)* | |
| State dummies | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| State-specific time trend | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| National time trend | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Overall state share (either Hispanic or union) | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes |
| R2 | 0.917 | 0.918 | 0.956 | 0.957 | 0.89 | 0.891 |
| Observations | 588 | 588 | 119 | 119 | 607 | 607 |
| DOF | 484 | 474 | 97 | 87 | 503 | 493 |
* Denotes significance at 5% level.
Source: Author's analysis of data from the Quarterly Census on Employment and Wages (QCEW), as described in text
This chart appears in:
Previous chart: « Employment impact by demographic group: Scenario Three ($250 billion)