Table 2
Ratio of top 1% income to bottom 99% income, U.S. and by state and region, 2012
State/region | Top-to-bottom ratio |
---|---|
Connecticut | 51.0 |
New York | 48.4 |
Nevada | 44.1 |
Florida | 43.3 |
California | 34.9 |
Massachusetts | 34.5 |
Texas | 32.5 |
Illinois | 29.7 |
New Jersey | 27.0 |
Washington | 26.8 |
Colorado | 26.8 |
Oklahoma | 26.3 |
Arkansas | 26.2 |
North Dakota | 26.1 |
Michigan | 25.3 |
South Dakota | 24.9 |
Pennsylvania | 24.4 |
Utah | 24.0 |
Louisiana | 23.9 |
Tennessee | 23.8 |
Montana | 23.7 |
Missouri | 23.6 |
Minnesota | 23.5 |
Arizona | 23.2 |
Georgia | 22.8 |
Kansas | 22.6 |
New Hampshire | 22.3 |
Wisconsin | 22.1 |
Rhode Island | 21.7 |
Nebraska | 21.4 |
Idaho | 21.1 |
Ohio | 21.1 |
South Carolina | 20.6 |
Virginia | 20.5 |
Alabama | 20.5 |
North Carolina | 20.5 |
Oregon | 20.1 |
Maryland | 18.9 |
Indiana | 18.8 |
Delaware | 18.5 |
Kentucky | 18.5 |
New Mexico | 18.3 |
Mississippi | 18.2 |
Vermont | 18.1 |
Iowa | 17.6 |
Maine | 17.2 |
West Virginia | 16.2 |
Alaska | 15.3 |
Hawaii | 14.6 |
District of Columbia | 32.3 |
Wyoming | ŧ |
* Rank of the District of Columbia if it were ranked with the 50 states
ŧ The average income of the bottom 99% could not be estimated in 2012 in Wyoming.
Note: Data are for tax units.
Source: Authors’ analysis of state-level tax data from Sommeiller (2006) extended to 2012 using state-level data from the Internal Revenue Service SOI Tax Stats (various years), and Piketty and Saez (2012)
Previous chart: « Short-term recipiency rates* of states that cut maximum durations versus states that did not, January 2011–December 2014
Next chart: Share of all income held by the top 1%, United States and by region, 1917–2013 »