Wage target shouldn't be set too low: Cumulative growth in real wages, productivity, and 1.5% trend productivity growth, 2006Q1–2019Q2

year Nominal wage growth minus 2% Actual productivity growth 1.5% trend productivity
2006-Q1 0.0 0.0 0.0
2006-Q2 0.5 0.5 0.4
2006-Q3 1.0 0.9 0.7
2006-Q4 1.5 1.2 1.1
2007-Q1 2.0 1.5 1.5
2007-Q2 2.6 1.7 1.9
2007-Q3 3.1 2.0 2.3
2007-Q4 3.5 2.3 2.6
2008-Q1 4.0 2.4 3.0
2008-Q2 4.4 2.7 3.4
2008-Q3 4.9 2.9 3.8
2008-Q4 5.4 2.9 4.2
2009-Q1 5.8 3.0 4.6
2009-Q2 6.1 3.3 5.0
2009-Q3 6.3 3.6 5.3
2009-Q4 6.4 4.1 5.7
2010-Q1 6.6 4.6 6.1
2010-Q2 6.7 5.1 6.5
2010-Q3 6.8 5.6 6.9
2010-Q4 6.8 6.1 7.3
2011-Q1 6.9 6.6 7.7
2011-Q2 6.9 7.0 8.1
2011-Q3 6.9 7.4 8.5
2011-Q4 6.9 7.9 8.9
2012-Q1 6.7 8.4 9.3
2012-Q2 6.6 8.8 9.8
2012-Q3 6.5 9.0 10.2
2012-Q4 6.3 9.1 10.6
2013-Q1 6.3 9.2 11.0
2013-Q2 6.3 9.3 11.4
2013-Q3 6.3 9.3 11.8
2013-Q4 6.4 9.4 12.2
2014-Q1 6.5 9.4 12.6
2014-Q2 6.6 9.6 13.1
2014-Q3 6.7 9.8 13.5
2014-Q4 6.7 9.9 13.9
2015-Q1 6.7 10.0 14.3
2015-Q2 6.7 10.1 14.8
2015-Q3 6.7 10.4 15.2
2015-Q4 6.8 10.5 15.6
2016-Q1 6.9 10.7 16.1
2016-Q2 7.0 10.8 16.5
2016-Q3 7.2 11.0 16.9
2016-Q4 7.3 11.1 17.4
2017-Q1 7.4 11.3 17.8
2017-Q2 7.5 11.5 18.2
2017-Q3 7.6 11.7 18.7
2017-Q4 7.7 11.9 19.1
2018-Q1 7.8 12.0 19.6
2018-Q2 8.1 12.2 20.0
2018-Q3 8.3 12.4 20.5
2018-Q4 8.7 12.6 20.9
2019-Q1 9.1 13.0 21.4
2019-Q2 9.4 13.4 21.8

Note: The real wage measure is constructed by calculating growth in average hourly earnings from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Current Employment Statistics (CES) program and subtracting 2% annualized growth to reflect the Fed's inflation target. Productivity growth is the same measure as Figure A, and the trend line shows growth at a 1.5% annualized rate.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

View the underlying data on epi.org.