50 congressional districts that most intensively employ manufacturing workers, 2013 (ranked by manufacturing jobs as a share of district employment)
| Rank | State | District | Manufacturing employment | Total employment | Manufacturing employment as a share of total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Indiana | 3 | 76,200 | 327,000 | 23.3% |
| 2 | Indiana | 2 | 73,500 | 317,800 | 23.1% |
| 3 | Wisconsin | 6 | 80,000 | 353,700 | 22.6% |
| 4 | California | 17 | 63,400 | 319,300 | 19.9% |
| 5 | Indiana | 6 | 60,400 | 311,900 | 19.4% |
| 6 | Alabama | 4 | 48,500 | 252,600 | 19.2% |
| 7 | Wisconsin | 8 | 69,600 | 363,000 | 19.2% |
| 8 | Ohio | 4 | 61,000 | 320,300 | 19.0% |
| 9 | Michigan | 2 | 57,500 | 309,500 | 18.6% |
| 10 | Wisconsin | 5 | 66,200 | 370,800 | 17.9% |
| 11 | Wisconsin | 1 | 60,800 | 342,600 | 17.7% |
| 12 | Indiana | 8 | 58,400 | 329,300 | 17.7% |
| 13 | Kansas | 4 | 58,100 | 329,200 | 17.6% |
| 14 | Ohio | 7 | 57,400 | 329,300 | 17.4% |
| 15 | Michigan | 10 | 52,400 | 302,300 | 17.3% |
| 16 | South Carolina | 3 | 43,900 | 254,800 | 17.2% |
| 17 | Indiana | 4 | 56,100 | 328,500 | 17.1% |
| 18 | Georgia | 14 | 47,700 | 279,700 | 17.1% |
| 19 | Iowa | 2 | 63,200 | 371,400 | 17.0% |
| 20 | Ohio | 5 | 56,800 | 336,700 | 16.9% |
| 21 | Arkansas | 4 | 47,000 | 281,200 | 16.7% |
| 22 | Iowa | 1 | 64,600 | 390,100 | 16.6% |
| 23 | Michigan | 6 | 50,200 | 304,000 | 16.5% |
| 24 | Oregon | 1 | 60,700 | 369,300 | 16.4% |
| 25 | Wisconsin | 7 | 55,500 | 338,500 | 16.4% |
| 26 | Ohio | 8 | 53,700 | 331,300 | 16.2% |
| 27 | Alabama | 3 | 42,000 | 263,900 | 15.9% |
| 28 | North Carolina | 10 | 49,700 | 313,300 | 15.9% |
| 29 | Mississippi | 1 | 45,600 | 287,600 | 15.9% |
| 30 | Kentucky | 2 | 50,100 | 316,900 | 15.8% |
| 31 | Tennessee | 1 | 45,800 | 294,100 | 15.6% |
| 32 | Indiana | 1 | 48,000 | 310,500 | 15.5% |
| 33 | South Carolina | 4 | 44,600 | 290,000 | 15.4% |
| 34 | Kentucky | 1 | 43,300 | 284,600 | 15.2% |
| 35 | Iowa | 4 | 57,600 | 380,200 | 15.1% |
| 36 | Alabama | 5 | 44,800 | 299,700 | 14.9% |
| 37 | Indiana | 9 | 50,500 | 339,300 | 14.9% |
| 38 | Tennessee | 4 | 46,200 | 310,800 | 14.9% |
| 39 | Ohio | 14 | 52,300 | 352,400 | 14.8% |
| 40 | Michigan | 3 | 45,500 | 308,800 | 14.7% |
| 41 | Michigan | 7 | 43,000 | 293,000 | 14.7% |
| 42 | California | 19 | 43,500 | 298,900 | 14.6% |
| 43 | North Carolina | 8 | 42,200 | 291,700 | 14.5% |
| 44 | Michigan | 9 | 46,000 | 319,400 | 14.4% |
| 45 | Arkansas | 1 | 37,900 | 264,400 | 14.3% |
| 46 | Tennessee | 3 | 42,000 | 293,400 | 14.3% |
| 47 | Arkansas | 3 | 44,400 | 311,600 | 14.2% |
| 48 | Wisconsin | 3 | 49,900 | 353,700 | 14.1% |
| 49 | Michigan | 11 | 47,200 | 335,100 | 14.1% |
| 50 | California | 18 | 44,500 | 317,800 | 14.0% |
Source: Author's analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (2014c) and U.S. Census Bureau (2013)