Decomposing the growing wedges between productivity and median pay since 1973, selected years

1948⁠⁠–⁠⁠1973 1973⁠⁠⁠–⁠⁠1979 1979⁠⁠⁠–⁠⁠1995 1995⁠⁠⁠–⁠⁠2000 2000⁠⁠⁠–⁠⁠2007 2007⁠⁠⁠–⁠⁠2019 1979⁠⁠⁠–⁠⁠⁠2019
Basic trends (annual growth)
Gross productivity 2.80% 1.06% 1.38% 2.33% 2.19% 1.11% 1.56%
Net productivity 2.75% 0.92% 1.19% 2.13% 1.94% 0.94% 1.36%
Net productivity, effective 3.04% 0.53% 0.96% 1.65% 1.84% 0.89% 1.18%
Average hourly compensation, overall  3.00% 0.81% 0.82% 2.18% 1.19% 0.62% 0.99%
Average hourly compensation, production + nonsupervisory workers 2.91% 0.23% -0.32% 1.07% 0.63% 0.69% 0.32%
Gross productivity – nonsupervisory compensation gap (1–5) -0.11% 0.83% 1.70% 1.25% 1.56% 0.42% 1.24%
Net productivity – nonsupervisory compensation gap (2–5) -0.16% 0.09% -0.51% 0.88% 0.38% 0.53% 0.13%
Net effective productivity – nonsupervisory compensation gap (3–5) 0.14% 0.30% 1.28% 0.57% 1.21% 0.20% 0.86%
Contribution to gap between nonsupervisory compensation and gross productivity 
Depreciation (1–2) 0.05% 0.14% 0.19% 0.20% 0.25% 0.17% 0.19%
Divergent price deflators (2–3) -0.29% 0.39% 0.24% 0.48% 0.10% 0.05% 0.19%
Inequality of compensation (4–5) 0.10% 0.58% 1.14% 1.11% 0.56% -0.07% 0.67%
Loss in labor’s share of income (3–4) 0.04% -0.28% 0.14% -0.53% 0.65% 0.27% 0.19%
Contribution to gap between nonsupervisory compensation and net effective productivity 
Inequality of compensation  0.10% 0.58% 1.14% 1.11% 0.56% -0.07% 0.67%
Loss in labor’s share of income 0.04% -0.28% 0.14% -0.53% 0.65% 0.27% 0.19%
Share of gap between nonsupervisory compensation and net effective productivity 
Inequality of compensation  72.41% 192.47% 88.87% 193.31% 46.41% -36.97% 78.32%
Loss in labor’s share of income 27.59% -92.47% 11.13% -93.31% 53.59% 136.97% 21.68%

Note: The rows showing the contribution of each influence to the gap between median hourly compensation and gross productivity shows the average annual percentage-point change in this gap contributed by each influence. The rows displaying the share of the gap between median hourly compensation and net effective productivity divide this contribution by the total gap. Because the net effective productivity series already accounts for depreciation and divergent price deflators, only the influence of compensation inequality and the shift away from labor’s share of income are left.

Source: BEA NIPA tables and BLS CES.

View the underlying data on epi.org.