Salaried workers directly benefiting from the proposed increase in the overtime salary threshold, by major industry, 2014

Total salaried workers* Directly benefiting salaried workers** Share of industry’s salaried workers that are directly benefiting Industry’s share of directly benefiting workers Industry’s share of total salaried workforce
(A) (B) (C)=(B/A) (D)=(Bx/B1) (E)=(Ax/A1)
All (1) 52,522,000 13,463,000 25.6% 100.0% 100.0%
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting 335,000 117,000 34.9% 0.9% 0.6%
Mining 438,000 99,000 22.6% 0.7% 0.8%
Construction 2,272,000 797,000 35.1% 5.9% 4.3%
Manufacturing 5,240,000 1,230,000 23.5% 9.1% 10.0%
Wholesale and retail trade 5,349,000 1,808,000 33.8% 13.4% 10.2%
Transportation and utilities 2,006,000 637,000 31.8% 4.7% 3.8%
Information 1,557,000 366,000 23.5% 2.7% 3.0%
Financial activities 5,225,000 1,451,000 27.8% 10.8% 9.9%
Professional and business services 7,210,000 1,716,000 23.8% 12.7% 13.7%
Educational and health services 15,828,000 2,655,000 16.8% 19.7% 30.1%
Leisure and hospitality 2,496,000 966,000 38.7% 7.2% 4.8%
Other services 2,138,000 778,000 36.4% 5.8% 4.1%
Public administration 2,427,000 843,000 34.7% 6.3% 4.6%

* The sample reflects salaried (nonhourly) workers who are subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). This excludes certaingroups of workers such as the self-employed, most federal workers, religious workers, many agricultural workers, and many transportation workers.

** Directly benefiting salaried workers are those who would newly be guaranteed overtime protection by virtue of their salary alone under the proposed higher overtime threshold, i.e., they make at least $455 a week (the current threshold) but less than $933 a week (the new threshold in 2014 dollars). This includes workers who are newly eligible (they are currently excluded from automatic overtime protection because they are classified, in some cases incorrectly, as executive, administrative, and professional or "EAP" employees); and workers whose rights are strengthened (they are currently at risk of being classified as EAP employees).

Note: Subtotals may not add up to total due to rounding.

Source: EPI analysis of the U.S. Department of Labor's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (2015) and Current Population Survey Merged Outgoing Rotation Group microdata (CPS MORG)

View the underlying data on epi.org.