Change in states’ fiscal 2013 federal grant funding resulting from the March 1 sequestration
| State | Sequestration cuts to state grants as a share of continuing resolution funding in place March 1 (percent)* | Sequestration cuts as a share of 2007 gross state product** |
|---|---|---|
| Wyoming | -3.36% | -0.52% |
| Utah | -1.37% | -0.10% |
| North Dakota | -1.35% | -0.12% |
| Montana | -1.26% | -0.14% |
| South Dakota | -1.24% | -0.12% |
| Alaska | -1.18% | -0.16% |
| New Mexico | -1.15% | -0.17% |
| Colorado | -1.15% | -0.06% |
| New Hampshire | -1.15% | -0.06% |
| Nevada | -1.11% | -0.05% |
| Nebraska | -1.07% | -0.07% |
| Kansas | -1.04% | -0.06% |
| Illinois | -1.04% | -0.06% |
| Hawaii | -1.00% | -0.06% |
| Virginia | -0.98% | -0.04% |
| New Jersey | -0.94% | -0.05% |
| Washington | -0.93% | -0.06% |
| Georgia | -0.92% | -0.07% |
| Idaho | -0.92% | -0.09% |
| Alabama | -0.91% | -0.09% |
| Rhode Island | -0.90% | -0.09% |
| Texas | -0.90% | -0.07% |
| Delaware | -0.90% | -0.06% |
| Louisiana | -0.90% | -0.09% |
| Maryland | -0.90% | -0.05% |
| Vermont | -0.88% | -0.10% |
| California | -0.87% | -0.06% |
| Wisconsin | -0.86% | -0.06% |
| South Carolina | -0.86% | -0.08% |
| Maine | -0.85% | -0.09% |
| West Virginia | -0.85% | -0.12% |
| Indiana | -0.85% | -0.06% |
| Florida | -0.84% | -0.06% |
| Minnesota | -0.84% | -0.05% |
| Kentucky | -0.84% | -0.09% |
| Michigan | -0.83% | -0.07% |
| Pennsylvania | -0.83% | -0.07% |
| Connecticut | -0.82% | -0.04% |
| Oregon | -0.81% | -0.07% |
| North Carolina | -0.80% | -0.06% |
| Massachusetts | -0.79% | -0.05% |
| Mississippi | -0.79% | -0.12% |
| Oklahoma | -0.79% | -0.08% |
| Ohio | -0.78% | -0.07% |
| Arkansas | -0.77% | -0.09% |
| Iowa | -0.76% | -0.06% |
| Missouri | -0.76% | -0.06% |
| District of Columbia | -0.76% | -0.03% |
| Arizona | -0.73% | -0.07% |
| New York | -0.71% | -0.07% |
| Tennessee | -0.68% | -0.07% |
* The continuing resolution in place March 1 is the stopgap federal funding bill in effect when sequestration hit.
** Cuts are presented as a share of 2007 gross state product because states' economic situations were likely more volatile during and immediately after the recession.
Source: Author's analysis of Federal Funds Information for States and Bureau of Economic Analysis data