The immigrant wage penalty among Mexican Americans declined more for women between 1994 and 2017: Adjusted wage gaps between Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic white men in the U.S., by gender, with and without controls for immigration status, 1994–2017

Year Mexican American men Mexican American men, controlling for immigrant status Mexican American women Mexican American women, controlling for immigrant status 
1994 18.0% 10.2% 41.8% 28.2%
1995 20.1% 13.1% 40.7% 31.0%
1996 21.6% 15.4% 40.5% 29.3%
1997 19.3% 12.4% 39.4% 30.8%
1998 19.2% 12.7% 40.0% 30.9%
1999 18.4% 11.8% 39.2% 30.7%
2000 18.5% 12.3% 37.7% 31.1%
2001 19.2% 13.5% 31.6% 28.3%
2002 17.7% 11.4% 31.7% 28.8%
2003 17.6% 10.7% 30.5% 28.8%
2004 18.8% 12.6% 32.6% 28.7%
2005 17.3% 11.1% 31.1% 29.3%
2006 18.6% 13.6% 32.3% 30.8%
2007 18.6% 13.8% 32.1% 29.1%
2008 17.6% 12.3% 33.7% 29.1%
2009 19.2% 13.3% 33.1% 30.4%
2010 18.8% 12.7% 32.0% 29.5%
2011 16.9% 12.1% 29.8% 28.4%
2012 17.0% 12.1% 31.0% 29.1%
2013 15.6% 11.8% 30.6% 30.3%
2014 16.3% 12.3% 32.6% 29.7%
2015 14.7% 11.2% 33.6% 29.5%
2016 12.7% 9.6% 32.8% 30.6%
2017 14.8% 12.0% 34.2% 30.9%

Note: The wage gap is how much less, in percent terms, the average member of each identified subgroup makes than the average non-Hispanic white man. The wages compared are average hourly wages of full-time workers ages 18–64. The dotted “with immigrant status” lines show the wage gap adjusted for education, experience, region of residence, and immigrant status, while the solid lines show the wage gap adjusted only for education, experience, and region of residence. We control for immigrant status by including binary variables indicating whether the respondent is foreign-born or a naturalized citizen (versus a U.S.-born citizen) and whether the person had lived in the U.S. for less than five years at the time of the survey.

Source: EPI analysis of Current Population Survey Outgoing Rotation Group microdata from the U.S. Census Bureau

View the underlying data on epi.org.