Young adults are graduating into a more promising labor market

As young adults across the country graduate from high school and college, it’s an appropriate time to reexamine how the labor market is performing for young workers. Young workers, 16–24 years old, were among the hardest hit in the pandemic recession, given their vulnerability to labor market downturns in general and their specific exposure to economic weakness in the pandemic. For instance, a quarter of young workers had leisure and hospitality jobs, where employment declined 41% in the spring of 2020.

Fortunately, unlike the protracted recovery from the Great Recession, policymakers responded to the pandemic recession by enacting policies at the scale of the problem. As a result, the economy bounced back quickly, and employment is now within 1% of pre-recession levels. Mirroring the overall labor market recovery, young workers have also experienced a tremendous recovery from the depths of the pandemic recession.

In April 2020, the overall unemployment rate spiked to 14.7%. Over the last three months, the unemployment rate has leveled out at 3.6%—basically at pre-pandemic levels—while labor force participation continues to recover steadily. Figure A compares the unemployment rate of young adults, ages 16–24, with workers ages 25 and up through the last two recessions. There are two key factors to note from the figure. First, young workers tend to have much higher unemployment rates than older workers, on average about two and a half times higher. Second, both groups of workers saw a huge increase in unemployment in the spring of 2020 and both groups have experienced a tremendous bounce back, far faster than the recovery from the Great Recession.

Figure A

Young workers have consistently higher unemployment rates than older workers: Unemployment rate by age group, January 2007–May 2022

Date Unemployment rate, 16–24 Unemployment rate, 25+
Jan-2007 10.3 3.7
Feb-2007 9.9 3.6
Mar-2007 10.0 3.4
Apr-2007 10.3 3.5
May-2007 9.9 3.5
Jun-2007 10.6 3.5
Jul-2007 10.5 3.7
Aug-2007 10.7 3.6
Sep-2007 11.2 3.6
Oct-2007 10.7 3.7
Nov-2007 10.8 3.7
Dec-2007 11.7 3.8
Jan-2008 11.7 3.8
Feb-2008 11.4 3.8
Mar-2008 11.4 4.0
Apr-2008 11.0 4.0
May-2008 13.0 4.1
Jun-2008 12.9 4.3
Jul-2008 13.5 4.5
Aug-2008 13.1 4.9
Sep-2008 13.5 4.9
Oct-2008 13.6 5.3
Nov-2008 14.0 5.6
Dec-2008 14.8 6.1
Jan-2009 15.0 6.6
Feb-2009 16.0 7.1
Mar-2009 16.5 7.4
Apr-2009 16.7 7.7
May-2009 17.6 8.0
Jun-2009 18.0 8.1
Jul-2009 17.9 8.1
Aug-2009 18.1 8.3
Sep-2009 18.4 8.4
Oct-2009 19.1 8.6
Nov-2009 19.2 8.4
Dec-2009 18.8 8.4
Jan-2010 18.8 8.3
Feb-2010 18.7 8.4
Mar-2010 18.8 8.5
Apr-2010 19.5 8.4
May-2010 18.1 8.3
Jun-2010 18.2 8.1
Jul-2010 18.4 8.0
Aug-2010 17.7 8.2
Sep-2010 17.9 8.2
Oct-2010 18.7 8.1
Nov-2010 18.5 8.4
Dec-2010 17.9 8.0
Jan-2011 18.1 7.7
Feb-2011 17.7 7.6
Mar-2011 17.6 7.6
Apr-2011 17.6 7.7
May-2011 17.3 7.7
Jun-2011 17.1 7.9
Jul-2011 17.3 7.7
Aug-2011 17.4 7.7
Sep-2011 17.3 7.7
Oct-2011 16.7 7.6
Nov-2011 17.0 7.3
Dec-2011 16.7 7.2
Jan-2012 16.1 7.0
Feb-2012 16.5 7.0
Mar-2012 16.2 6.9
Apr-2012 16.6 6.8
May-2012 16.1 6.9
Jun-2012 16.2 7.0
Jul-2012 16.3 6.9
Aug-2012 16.7 6.7
Sep-2012 15.5 6.6
Oct-2012 16.0 6.5
Nov-2012 15.9 6.4
Dec-2012 16.5 6.5
Jan-2013 16.8 6.5
Feb-2013 16.3 6.3
Mar-2013 16.1 6.2
Apr-2013 16.3 6.2
May-2013 16.3 6.1
Jun-2013 16.0 6.2
Jul-2013 15.4 6.0
Aug-2013 15.7 5.9
Sep-2013 15.1 6.0
Oct-2013 14.8 6.0
Nov-2013 14.1 5.9
Dec-2013 13.4 5.6
Jan-2014 14.1 5.3
Feb-2014 14.5 5.4
Mar-2014 14.6 5.4
Apr-2014 13.0 5.2
May-2014 13.3 5.2
Jun-2014 13.1 5.0
Jul-2014 13.5 5.0
Aug-2014 13.2 5.0
Sep-2014 13.8 4.7
Oct-2014 12.6 4.7
Nov-2014 12.5 4.8
Dec-2014 12.2 4.5
Jan-2015 12.0 4.6
Feb-2015 11.8 4.5
Mar-2015 12.5 4.4
Apr-2015 11.8 4.5
May-2015 12.3 4.5
Jun-2015 11.9 4.2
Jul-2015 11.5 4.2
Aug-2015 11.1 4.1
Sep-2015 11.2 4.1
Oct-2015 11.0 4.1
Nov-2015 11.2 4.2
Dec-2015 11.1 4.0
Jan-2016 10.0 4.0
Feb-2016 10.5 4.0
Mar-2016 10.7 4.1
Apr-2016 11.0 4.1
May-2016 10.4 3.9
Jun-2016 10.5 4.0
Jul-2016 10.6 3.9
Aug-2016 10.2 4.1
Sep-2016 10.4 4.2
Oct-2016 10.6 4.0
Nov-2016 10.3 3.9
Dec-2016 10.0 3.9
Jan-2017 10.0 3.9
Feb-2017 9.8 3.9
Mar-2017 9.0 3.7
Apr-2017 9.3 3.6
May-2017 8.7 3.7
Jun-2017 9.1 3.6
Jul-2017 8.9 3.6
Aug-2017 8.9 3.7
Sep-2017 9.1 3.5
Oct-2017 9.2 3.4
Nov-2017 9.8 3.4
Dec-2017 9.1 3.4
Jan-2018 9.2 3.3
Feb-2018 9.0 3.4
Mar-2018 8.3 3.3
Apr-2018 8.3 3.3
May-2018 8.6 3.1
Jun-2018 8.8 3.2
Jul-2018 8.6 3.1
Aug-2018 8.2 3.1
Sep-2018 8.5 3.0
Oct-2018 8.5 3.1
Nov-2018 8.3 3.1
Dec-2018 8.9 3.2
Jan-2019 9.3 3.2
Feb-2019 9.1 3.1
Mar-2019 8.5 3.0
Apr-2019 8.1 2.9
May-2019 8.5 2.9
Jun-2019 7.9 3.0
Jul-2019 8.4 2.9
Aug-2019 8.4 2.9
Sep-2019 7.9 2.8
Oct-2019 8.0 3.0
Nov-2019 8.1 2.9
Dec-2019 8.3 2.9
Jan-2020 8.5 2.9
Feb-2020 7.8 2.9
Mar-2020 10.0 3.5
Apr-2020 27.4 13.0
May-2020 25.1 11.5
Jun-2020 20.4 9.7
Jul-2020 18.4 9.0
Aug-2020 14.7 7.5
Sep-2020 13.6 7.0
Oct-2020 11.8 6.2
Nov-2020 11.6 6.0
Dec-2020 12.6 5.9
Jan-2021 11.3 5.7
Feb-2021 10.9 5.6
Mar-2021 10.9 5.2
Apr-2021 10.8 5.3
May-2021 9.9 5.1
Jun-2021 9.7 5.4
Jul-2021 9.5 4.7
Aug-2021 9.8 4.5
Sep-2021 8.8 4.1
Oct-2021 8.5 4.0
Nov-2021 8.4 3.6
Dec-2021 8.2 3.3
Jan-2022 8.3 3.4
Feb-2022 8.3 3.3
Mar-2022 8.2 2.9
Apr-2022 7.9 3.0
May-2022 7.8 3.0
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Note: Shaded areas denote recessions.

Source: EPI analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics' Current Population Survey.

Copy the code below to embed this chart on your website.

In the pre-pandemic period, the unemployment rate for young workers was 7.8%, over two and a half times higher than the 2.9% unemployment rate for workers 25 and up. Young workers’ unemployment rate spiked at 27.4% in April 2020, while the unemployment rate for workers 25 and up hit 13.0%. Both groups have returned to their respective February 2020 unemployment rates in the last three months.

There’s some evidence that the unemployment rate may be overstating the strength of the economy since labor force participation is still below pre-pandemic levels. Figure B compares labor force participation and the employment-to-population ratio for workers in both age groups. So far, participation and employment among younger workers remains a bit further behind pre-pandemic levels than for workers 25 and up. While there has been a huge improvement in both measures over the last two years, the labor market needs to keep expanding to bring in more workers of all ages. As employment continues growing at its current pace—or even slows a bit in the coming months—I remain optimistic that more and more workers will return to the labor force and get jobs. Overall, the prospects for young workers in today’s labor market are vastly better than two years ago.

Figure B

Labor force participation is nearing pre-pandemic levels: Labor force participation rate and employment-to-population ratio, by age group, February 2020 and May 2022

May 2022 Difference between February 2020 and May 2022
LFPR, 16–24 55.3% 1.7%  0%
LFPR, 25+ 63.5% 1.0% 0%
EPOP, 16–24 51.0% 1.5% 0%
EPOP, 25+ 61.6% 1.0% 0%
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Note: EPOP is employment-to-population ratio and LFPR is labor force participation rate.

Source: EPI analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics' Current Population Survey.

Copy the code below to embed this chart on your website.

As with workers overall, the unemployment rate varies significantly among young workers by race and ethnicity. Young white unemployment peaked in April 2020 with about one-quarter unemployed, but it kept rising for Black and Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) workers, with close to one-third of each of their workforces unemployed in May 2020. While the data (not shown here) exhibits volatility because of seasonality and smaller sample sizes in a single month comparison, the difference is stark.

Figure C shows the average unemployment rate among young adults, 16–24 years old, and other workers, 25 years and up, over the last year by race and ethnicity. The 2:1 ratio of Black unemployment to white unemployment among workers in the overall labor market persists among young workers as well. While labor market opportunities for young adults now are much better than during the recession or the recovery’s first year, they are far scarcer for young Black workers than they are for young white workers.

Figure C

Young Black workers face far higher unemployment rates than other groups: Unemployment rate, by age groups and race/ethnicity, average for May 2021–April 2022

Young adults, 16–24 Adults, 25+
White 7.2% 3.3%
Black 14.6% 6.7%
Hispanic 9.7% 5.1%
AAPI 9.3% 4.0%
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Note: AAPI refers to Asian American and Pacific Islander. Race/ethnicity categories are mutually exclusive (i.e., white non-Hispanic, Black non-Hispanic, AAPI non-Hispanic, and Hispanic any race). 

Source: Authors' analysis of Current Population Survey basic monthly microdata, EPI Current Population Survey Extracts, https://microdata.epi.org.

Copy the code below to embed this chart on your website.

Another key indicator of labor market strength for young workers is wages and prospects for wage growth. Some evidence indicates that lower-wage workers have experienced faster wage growth in the last year than their middle- and higher-wage counterparts. For some, wage growth has been fast enough to exceed price inflation. Workers in lower-wage industries, such as leisure and hospitality, have also experienced faster nominal wage growth (along with faster employment growth) as employers work harder to attract and retain the workers they want.

It should come as no surprise then that young workers—more likely found in lower-wage jobs—have experienced stronger (i.e., less negative) real wage changes than older workers. Figure D illustrates the inflation-adjusted change in wages by age group and gender between the average wage in the 12 months ending in April 2021 with the average wage in the 12 months ending in April 2022. Wages fell much further, on average, among older workers than younger workers. To be clear, the wages of younger workers, on average, are about half that of other workers ($16.60 versus $33.61). Wages fell less for men than for women in both age groups. And women, on average, continue to be paid less than men. Among young workers, women are paid almost 10% less than men, $15.79 versus $17.41. That gap grows as workers age; among workers 25 and older, women are paid about 20% less than men, $29.53 versus $37.34.

Young workers are among the most vulnerable in the labor market. While they tend to have a tougher time in weak labor markets, they also have the potential to see enormous benefits when the overall unemployment rate is very low and remains that way for a sustained period of time. Fortunately, policymakers acted quickly at the scale of the crisis and young workers benefited. While a return to pre-pandemic labor market conditions is on the horizon, more can be done to shore up young workers’ experience in the labor market—from prioritizing full employment to raising the federal minimum wage to making it easier for young workers to exercise their right to form unions.

Figure D

Young workers experienced more mild wage losses over the last year than older workers: Wage changes, by age group and gender, between April 2021 and April 2022

Workers, 16–24 Workers, 25+
Overall -0.8% -3.0%
Men -0.6% -2.9%
Women -1.1% -3.3%
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Notes: April 2021 is the 12-month average wage for May 2020–April 2021; April 2022 is the 12-month average wage for May 2021–April 2022.

Source: Authors' analysis of Current Population Survey basic monthly microdata, EPI Current Population Survey Extracts, https://microdata.epi.org.

Copy the code below to embed this chart on your website.