Congress Must Do More to Support Mothers—Viewpoints | EPI
By Heather Boushey
March 4, 2002
Opinion pieces and speeches by EPI staff
and associates.
THIS PIECE APPEARED IN THE
PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER ON AUGUST 22, 2001.
Congress Must Do More to Support Mothers
by Heather Boushey
This month marks the fifth anniversary of welfare reform,
inaugurated when President Bill Clinton signed the Personal
Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act on August
22, 1996. Next year, Congress must decide whether to reauthorize
this legislation or to change the conditions for receiving
welfare.
Most former welfare recipients, having been pushed off the roles by time limits set in the 1996 reforms, are now working. But they're having serious trouble earning wages sufficient for supporting a family. The main culprit is the gender pay gap, the difference in wages between men and women, that affects the 90 percent of former welfare recipients who are mothers.
Lucky for many mothers forced off welfare, its reform was passed in the middle of the longest economic boom in the past 40 years. Sustained low unemployment allowed 50 to 60 percent of former welfare recipients to find at least some employment. This is the good news.
The bad news is that not all of these people work full time or have worked consistently since leaving welfare, and that most earn a scant $6 to $8 per hour, leaving the average welfare family -- a mother and two children -- with an income that is below the federal poverty line, even with full-time work.
Instead of ignoring one of the most fundamental causes of child poverty, Congress should do what it can to ensure that work pays enough to enable all families to afford a safe and decent standard of living. One of the most important steps toward achieving this goal is eliminating the gender pay gap.
Welfare reform was an epoch in the history of U.S. social policy. For the first time in nearly a century, our government stepped back from an obligation to provide financial support to single mothers and instead demanded that they take financial responsibility for their families. To evaluate the success of welfare reform, we must consider whether single mothers are able to accomplish this on their wages alone.
Women's wages, and especially mother's
wages, still lag far behind men's. Right now, the gender wage ratio
(that is, women's wages as a percentage of men's) among full-time
workers is 81 percent. This is one economic indicator that did not
benefit from the long economic boom. The ratio is even lower for
parents: mothers' earnings amount to less than two-thirds of
fathers' earnings.
The pay gap persists partly because of the high degree of
segregation of women and men into different types of jobs. Women,
particularly those who have recently left welfare, are concentrated
in the "caring professions" that offer low wages and limited upward
mobility.
Jobs that have historically been designated
as "female," such as child care, nursing, or secretarial work,
often require the same degree of skill as historically male jobs,
but they are grossly underpaid.
Legislation has been introduced in 14 states to prohibit wage
discrimination for jobs that require comparable skills and
responsibilities. There's great potential for this legislation, and
for similar bills pending in other state legislatures around the
country, to reduce the wage gap and help low-wage workers without
placing an excessive burden on employers.
Millions of former stay-at-home moms have become working moms. Yet
this has happened without the necessary policy changes that help
families adapt to their new arrangements. Not only are wages too
low, but many jobs held by women do not provide the important work
supports they need, like employer-provided health insurance, to
balance work and family.
With wages too low and benefits too scarce, the reauthorization of welfare reform is an opportunity to enact policies that could help millions of mothers begin to do what we've been stubbornly demanding of them for five years: support their families by working.
Heather Boushey is an economist at the
Economic Policy Institute.
[ POSTED TO VIEWPOINTS
ON SEPTEMBER 5, 2001 ]
Sign Up to Stay Informed
Search EPI.org
RELATED PUBLICATIONS
- Fact sheet: Double-digit unemployment
- At 10.2%, October’s unemployment is a wake-up call
- Mishel on double-digit unemployment
- Segregation and the Subprime Lending Crisis
- Minorities, less-educated workers see staggering rates of underemployment
- EPI launches Economy Track
- Policies to create jobs
- The plan to end the jobs crisis—The economy requires a comprehensive response for a full recovery
- The job creation tax credit
- Complementing recovery policies with a jobs creation tax credit
- See more publications about: Wages and Living Standards Income and Wages

