EPI Comparison of the Daschle and Bush Economic Stimulus Plans
By Lawrence Mishel
04-07-03
January 28, 2003 | EPI Policy
Memorandum
POLICY MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: EPI comparison of the Daschle and Bush economic stimulus plans
FROM: Larry Mishel, EPI president
DATE: January 28, 2003
In a December 2002 Briefing Paper, Generating Jobs and Growth: An Economic Stimulus Plan for 2003, EPI identified five criteria for an effective stimulus plan. A comparison shows that the stimulus plan released by Senator Tom Daschle last week meets all five of these criteria, while President Bush’s plan fails on every count.
Criteria #1: A stimulus package should generate jobs and
growth.
The Daschle plan would create more than a million
jobs in the next year, three times as many as President Bush’s
plan. It will also help the states protect jobs in education,
police and fire protection, and other vital services. Unlike the
Bush plan, which according to top econometric forecaster
Economy.com will cost an estimated 750,000 jobs over 10
years, the Daschle plan will have no negative long-term
effects.
Criteria #2: A stimulus package should be fiscally
responsible.
The Daschle plan does not rob from future
generations to provide large tax cuts for those who need them the
least. It puts money into the economy now, when it’s needed most.
In addition, the plan will take action against corporations that
avoid paying their due in taxes by setting up special tax havens.
By contrast, the Bush plan will cost $670 billion over 10
years.
Criteria #3: A stimulus plan should take effect
quickly.
The Daschle plan puts $141 billion into the economy
in 2003, compared to $50 billion in the Bush plan.
Criteria #4: A stimulus plan should be fair.
The
Daschle plan puts money into the hands of middle-income working
families who need it most and are most likely to spend it. Through
$300 rebates for each adult in a family and $300 for each of the
first two children, the plan would return $71 billion to families
in 2003. In addition, the plan would extend federal unemployment
insurance benefits for the one million individuals who exhausted
their benefits in 2002. Given the increasingly unequal distribution
of income in the United States, a stimulus plan that exacerbates
this inequality is not acceptable. The Bush plan’s benefits
disproportionately go to wealthy Americans who do not need extra
cash and are more likely to save the money than to put it back into
the economy.
Criteria #5: A stimulus package should target unmet
needs.
The Daschle plan provides $40 billion to preserve
vital state services, including $6 billion to ensure that every
classroom has a qualified teacher and that vital services like
after-school care and summer enrichment programs are available for
the nation’s children. It also provides $4 billion for mass
transit, highway, and airport infrastructure. The Bush plan adds no
new funding for these purposes.
###
Sign Up to Stay Informed
Search EPI.org
RELATED PUBLICATIONS
- Stimulus is working, but may not be enough
- For America’s workers, recession is not the only problem
- Not “unemployed” but not working
- Bailouts helping big banks get bigger
- Too complex to regulate?
- Setting the record straight on GM
- Community banks: Small enough to fail
- A Stealthy Stimulus: How boosting the minimum wage is helping to stimulate the economy
- Increases in minimum wage boost consumer spending
- Sounding the Alarm: Update on the Economic Downturn
- See more publications about: Economic Performance Recession/Stimulus
