U.S. NAFTA trade deficit surging again
Snapshot for November 5, 2003.
U.S. NAFTA trade deficit
surging again
Since the U.S. entered into the North
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with Mexico and Canada, the
trade deficit with these countries has grown rapidly (see chart
below). U.S. firms moved plants to Mexico and Canada to take
advantage of lower wages and new rules providing unheard of levels
of protection for foreign investors. The combined U.S. trade
balance with the other two NAFTA countries (the difference between
U.S. exports and imports) was a small, stable deficit prior to
NAFTA. Since NAFTA that combined deficit has grown rapidly. U.S.
imports have been growing more rapidly than exports, so the trade
deficit has expanded. When the growth of this deficit eased in
2002, some claimed that U.S. trade with China and other lower-wage
countries was displacing NAFTA trade. Contrary to this view, the
U.S. NAFTA deficit has increased 12.2% so far this year, evidence
that deficits with Mexico and Canada are a continuing drag on U.S.
growth and job creation.
Exports, which expand domestic production, increase the number of U.S. industrial jobs, while imports, which replace goods that could have been produced in the United States, eliminate jobs. The rise in the U.S. deficit with Canada and Mexico from 1993 to 2000 displaced production supported by 766,000 U.S. jobs. Most of those jobs would have been high-wage positions in manufacturing industries. The sustained growth of this deficit suggests that NAFTA continues to eliminate more jobs in the United States, which worsens the current economic downturn.
Further study of NAFTA by researchers in Canada and Mexico has shown that workers in all three countries have been hurt, but for different reasons. In Mexico, real wages have fallen sharply and there has been a sharp drop in the number of people holding regular jobs in paid positions. Many workers have been shifted into subsistence-level work in the "informal sector," frequently unpaid work in family retail trade or restaurant businesses. In Canada, a decade of heightened competition with the U.S. is eroding social investment in public spending on education, health care, unemployment compensation, and a wide range of other public services. This experience suggests that workers have good reasons to be concerned as we enter NAFTA's second decade.
This week's Snapshot was written by EPI Economist Robert E. Scott.
Check out the archive for past Economic Snapshots.
Sign Up to Stay Informed
Search EPI.org
More Snapshots
- Mass layoffs at highest level since at least 1995
- Germany protects jobs
- Honor thy father
- Commencing unemployment
- Community banks: Small enough to fail
- Increases in minimum wage boost consumer spending
- Employers can stall first union contract for years
- The myth of private-sector performance pay
- No paid leave for new moms
- Unusually bad and getting worse
- Among college-educated, African Americans hardest hit by unemployment
- It’s not academic: Why charter schools close
- Housing collapse drives up consumer bankruptcies
- Transportation investments reduce income inequality
- Obama’s Budget Would Push U.S. into Socialism
- While economy burns, Europe fiddles
- Growing share of Big-Three vehicles assembled in Mexico
- Caution: When Used as Directed, 401(k)s are Hazardous to Your Financial Health
- Recovery package eases but does not eliminate job woes
- Unions do not undermine international competitiveness
- More...
