Racial discrimination continues to play a part in hiring decisions
Snapshot for September 17, 2003.
Racial discrimination
continues to play a part in hiring decisions
A new study
on the effects of race on hiring decisions has relevance for
current policy debates. Just this past summer, the Supreme Court
found that race could be taken into account in the admissions
process for higher education, but only within strict limits. Next
month, California voters will decide whether to ban almost all
collection of data on race. Contrary to the contention of those
seeking to end racial consideration in public policy, this new
study indicates that racial discrimination is alive and well.
Devah Pager, a sociologist at Northwestern University, studied employers' treatment of job applicants in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, by dividing job applicants into four groups. White applicants and black applicants were further grouped into those who presented themselves as having a prior criminal conviction and those who did not present themselves as having a criminal record. (None of the applicants actually had a criminal record of any sort). Except for the differences in race and in criminal record, applicants were given comparable resumes, sent to the same set of employers, and trained to behave similarly in the application process.
The study focused on the likelihood that an applicant would be called back for a job interview. Not surprisingly, whites without a criminal record were most likely to be invited back (34%) and blacks with a criminal record were the least likely (5%). Perhaps most striking, the study found that only 14% of blacks without a criminal record were called back for an interview—less than the 17% of whites that did have a criminal record.
Some might object that, because this study was done in just one city, it cannot represent the nation as a whole. There is no reason to believe, however, that employers in Milwaukee are more likely to discriminate than employers in the rest of the country.
Proponents of ending affirmative action and data collection on race argue that we are fast approaching a time when race is no longer a factor in decision making and public policy should become colorblind. This study shows that employers do, in fact, consider race when hiring. It remains premature for public policy to stop taking race into account.
Source: Pager, Devah. 2002. "The mark of a criminal record." Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Today's Snapshot was written by EPI Research Director Lee Price.
Check out the archive for past Economic Snapshots.
Sign Up to Stay Informed
Search EPI.org
More Snapshots
- State and local budget shortfalls will cause heavy drag on growth
- Jobs creation effort needs to focus on good jobs
- Minorities, less-educated workers see staggering rates of underemployment
- Money to spare for health care
- Highest earners get biggest tax breaks for saving for retirement
- Public health insurance offsets large losses in private coverage
- Most black children grow up in neighborhoods with significant poverty
- Lost investment during a recession can prolong pain
- Trade agreement favors pharmaceutical companies over sick
- Americans agree on how to fix Social Security
- Big banks getting bigger
- This Labor Day, wage erosion continues to hurt employed workers
- Economic downturn largest contributor to deficit woes
- No coercion in card check
- Unions guarantee more vacation
- Clunkers program drives economic, environmental gains
- Costly COBRA: For the jobless, health care costs may exceed unemployment benefits
- Minimum wage workers: better educated, worse compensated
- The Federal Reserve’s exploding balance sheet
- African Americans see weekly wage decline
- More...

