Fair Labor Standards Act revisions don’t pay
Snapshot for April 2, 2003.
Fair Labor Standards Act revisions don't
pay
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is the premier
legislation protecting workers' earnings. Currently, the FLSA
requires overtime pay for more than 40 hours per week of work, sets
minimum wages, and prohibits child labor. The Department of Labor
has recently proposed regulations that, by changing the overtime
rules, will reduce the pay of hundreds of thousands, if not
millions, of workers who earn above $425 a week (or $22,100 a
year).
The new regulations propose to raise the wages above which a worker is exempt from overtime pay. Setting a higher salary cap should increase the number of employees who are covered by the FSLA's protections, but because of other changes, the proposed regulations will reduce the number covered.
The proposed changes that will make many more workers exempt from overtime pay involve the revision and oversimplification of what is known as the "duties test." The duties test is used to determine how much of an individual worker's time is spent performing managerial and "professional" tasks. By oversimplifying this test, the government will effectively throw many more workers into exempt status, thereby reducing their overtime pay.
The proof that these changes are a bad deal for workers is in the Department of Labor's preliminary cost-benefit analysis of the proposal (see the chart above for sample costs to employers and employees by industry). The Department of Labor estimates that the costs of the new legislation to businesses will be between $870.3 million and $1.576 billion. These costs represent estimated one-time implementation costs as well as the costs of covering some new workers. The proposal's supposed benefits result from eliminating a business' "potential legal liability from...misclassifying...salaried workers." In other words, the proposal's benefits come from making legal a currently illegal practice of misclassifying workers and denying them overtime pay. In essence, the government recognizes that workers are not being paid what they are owed and has decided that the easiest remedy is to change the law to let employers off the hook. The benefits that should accrue to workers—between $1.110 and $1.973 billion—will end up instead in the pockets of their employers. So much for fair labor standards.
This week's Snapshot by EPI economist Jeffrey Wenger.
Check out the archive for past Economic Snapshots.
Sign Up to Stay Informed
Search EPI.org
More Snapshots
- Minorities, less-educated workers see staggering rates of underemployment
- Money to spare for health care
- Highest earners get biggest tax breaks for saving for retirement
- Public health insurance offsets large losses in private coverage
- Most black children grow up in neighborhoods with significant poverty
- Lost investment during a recession can prolong pain
- Trade agreement favors pharmaceutical companies over sick
- Americans agree on how to fix Social Security
- Big banks getting bigger
- This Labor Day, wage erosion continues to hurt employed workers
- Economic downturn largest contributor to deficit woes
- No coercion in card check
- Unions guarantee more vacation
- Clunkers program drives economic, environmental gains
- Costly COBRA: For the jobless, health care costs may exceed unemployment benefits
- Minimum wage workers: better educated, worse compensated
- The Federal Reserve’s exploding balance sheet
- African Americans see weekly wage decline
- Mass layoffs at highest level since at least 1995
- Germany protects jobs
- More...

