Unemployment extension may be too little, too late
A weekly presentation of downloadable charts and short analyses designed to graphically illustrate important economic issues. Updated every Wednesday.
Snapshot for March 13, 2002.
Unemployment extension may be too little, too late
A
common misconception about unemployment insurance (UI) programs is
that all workers are eligible for 26 weeks of benefits. As
demonstrated by the chart below, only eight states have a
guaranteed 26 weeks of eligibility regardless of earnings; the rest
of the states calculate the duration based upon either the total
amount of wages earned or the distribution of earnings in the
qualifying year. In fact, in 13 states, a UI recipient might be
eligible for less than three months of benefits.
[Click here to view or download a full-size version of this figure in Acrobat / PDF format]
Approximately 43% of all UI recipients exhaust their benefits before 26 weeks. These recipients are most likely to be unemployed low-wage earners, new labor force entrants, or eligible part-time workers. In five states, even a full-time, full-year minimum wage earner fails to qualify for 26 weeks.
The new stimulus bill just signed into law by President Bush takes a number of positive steps toward mitigating the effects of the recession on the unemployed. One of those steps is to extend the duration of benefits by half. For the handful of states with uniform 26-week eligibility periods, this extension works out to an extra 13 weeks of coverage. Most UI recipients, however, will see far shorter extensions. In 32 states, those UI recipients who only qualify for the minimum number of weeks in their state will receive less than eight weeks of extended benefits; in five states the federal extension will only provide a month or less of extra benefits. Unemployed workers in 35 states, even after the extensions, will still receive less than 26 weeks of benefits. Although some extension may be better than none, it is simply not enough to tide these unemployed workers over during a recession.
This week's Snapshot by EPI economist Jeffrey Wenger and research assistant Matthew Walters.
Check out the archive for past Economic Snapshots.
Sign Up to Stay Informed
Search EPI.org
More Snapshots
- State and local budget shortfalls will cause heavy drag on growth
- Jobs creation effort needs to focus on good jobs
- Minorities, less-educated workers see staggering rates of underemployment
- Money to spare for health care
- Highest earners get biggest tax breaks for saving for retirement
- Public health insurance offsets large losses in private coverage
- Most black children grow up in neighborhoods with significant poverty
- Lost investment during a recession can prolong pain
- Trade agreement favors pharmaceutical companies over sick
- Americans agree on how to fix Social Security
- Big banks getting bigger
- This Labor Day, wage erosion continues to hurt employed workers
- Economic downturn largest contributor to deficit woes
- No coercion in card check
- Unions guarantee more vacation
- Clunkers program drives economic, environmental gains
- Costly COBRA: For the jobless, health care costs may exceed unemployment benefits
- Minimum wage workers: better educated, worse compensated
- The Federal Reserve’s exploding balance sheet
- African Americans see weekly wage decline
- More...


