Official poverty measure undercounts the nation’s poor
See Snapshots archive.
Snapshot for July 2, 2008.
Official poverty measure undercounts the
nation's poor
In a few weeks, the U.S. Census Bureau will report on the 2007
poverty rate in America. Most likely, poverty as officially
measured will have fallen slightly. But whatever the outcome, one
thing is for sure: the official measure will represent a
significant undercount of the nation's poor. A more accurate
measure would reveal that millions more persons face material
deprivation.
The chart shows the official measure
alongside a more accurate, alternative poverty measure taken from
recent research that incorporates the recommendations of the
National Academy of Sciences (see note). This alternative measure
provides a much more detailed accounting of who is poor.
In both 2000 and 2006, the alternative measure is higher than
the official measure. In 2006, 12.3% of the population—36.5 million
people—were officially poor. But under the more comprehensive,
alternative measure, 17.7% were poor—16 million more poor persons
than under the official measure.
The trend in both measures is also revealing. Despite the fact that
this was a productivity-rich recovery, the growth of income
inequality over these years meant that income gains from the
economy's expansion failed to reach the lowest income families, and
poverty rose under both measures. This lack of progress against the
scourge of poverty amidst plenty stands as a stark reminder of the
costs of inequality.
Note: The source for the alternative
measure is Creating a Consistent Poverty Measure over Time Using NAS
Methods, 1996-2005 by Thesia Garner and Kathleen Short
(2008), The alternative measure for 2006 was kindly provided by the
authors. Their alternative measure incorporates the recommendations
of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) from their extensive
study of updating the official measure of poverty in America. The
new measure counts many more income sources, including tax credits
and the market value of food stamps. It also updates the poverty
thresholds—the income levels used to determine poverty status—using
up-to-date information on consumer spending, including housing and
out-of-pocket medical costs. The official poverty measure can be
found here.
Sign Up to Stay Informed
Search EPI.org
More Snapshots
- Minorities, less-educated workers see staggering rates of underemployment
- Money to spare for health care
- Highest earners get biggest tax breaks for saving for retirement
- Public health insurance offsets large losses in private coverage
- Most black children grow up in neighborhoods with significant poverty
- Lost investment during a recession can prolong pain
- Trade agreement favors pharmaceutical companies over sick
- Americans agree on how to fix Social Security
- Big banks getting bigger
- This Labor Day, wage erosion continues to hurt employed workers
- Economic downturn largest contributor to deficit woes
- No coercion in card check
- Unions guarantee more vacation
- Clunkers program drives economic, environmental gains
- Costly COBRA: For the jobless, health care costs may exceed unemployment benefits
- Minimum wage workers: better educated, worse compensated
- The Federal Reserve’s exploding balance sheet
- African Americans see weekly wage decline
- Mass layoffs at highest level since at least 1995
- Germany protects jobs
- More...


