Corporate tax declines and U.S. inequality
See
Snapshots archive.
Snapshot for April 9, 2008.
Corporate tax declines and U.S.
inequality
by John
Irons
Over the last 60 years, the U.S. tax code has dramatically
shifted away from corporate taxes and toward taxes on individuals,
especially through the payroll tax, the financing backbone of
Social Security and Medicare. In the 1950s, the corporate income
tax brought in, on average, one of every four dollars in federal
tax revenues. By the 2000s, however, it raised just one of every 10
tax dollars.
The shrinking share of corporate taxes was made up by an increase
in payroll taxes to fund social insurance and retirement programs.
Excise and other taxes—such as fuel taxes, phone taxes, etc.—shrank
as well over the last 60 years, while the individual federal income
tax rose slightly, from an average of 43% of total federal revenue
in the 1950s to 46% in the 2000s (see chart).
This shift is important because of who pays these different
taxes. The corporate income tax is significantly more progressive
than other taxes. Those with incomes in the top 20% of the income
distribution (those making more than about $86,000 a year in 2007)
pay four times the average tax rate on corporate income than the
middle 20% (those making between $27,000 and $48,000); while, for
the payroll tax, those in the top 20% actually pay less than those in the middle as a share of their
income.1
This shift has been one of the factors leading to the drop in
average federal tax rates for the very highest earners. Between
1960 and 2004, the average tax rate has fallen by about 14
percentage points (from 44.4% to 30.4%) for the top 1% of earners
(those making more than $435,000 in 2007), while it has increased
slightly (from 15.9% to 16.1%) for those in the middle 20%. 2
Without offsets, further erosion of corporate tax revenues—either
through lower statutory tax rates or through special
preferences—would expand the already wide and growing income
inequality in the United States.
Notes
1. See Tax Policy Center, Table T06-0308, "Current-Law Distribution
of Federal Taxes By Cash Income Percentiles, 2007," November 30,
2006.
2. See Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, "How progressive is the
U.S. federal tax system? A historical and international
perspective." Journal of Economic
Perspectives, Winter 2007; data at http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/jep-results-standalone.xls
.
Sign Up to Stay Informed
Search EPI sites
More Snapshots
- Immigration helps boost relative wages of U.S.-born workers at all levels of education
- Worst economic crisis since the Great Depression? By a long shot.
- The Corrosive Effects of Inequality on Health
- Private sources of spending cannot sustain job growth
- Layoffs moderating, but hiring not yet picking up
- Many children left behind
- High unemployment: A fact of life for American Indians
- Calling in sick not an option for most low-paid workers
- State and local budget shortfalls will cause heavy drag on growth
- Jobs creation effort needs to focus on good jobs
- Minorities, less-educated workers see staggering rates of underemployment
- Money to spare for health care
- Highest earners get biggest tax breaks for saving for retirement
- Public health insurance offsets large losses in private coverage
- Most black children grow up in neighborhoods with significant poverty
- Lost investment during a recession can prolong pain
- Trade agreement favors pharmaceutical companies over sick
- Americans agree on how to fix Social Security
- Big banks getting bigger
- This Labor Day, wage erosion continues to hurt employed workers
- More...

