U.S. Government Does Little to Lessen Child Poverty Rates
See
Snapshots Archive.
This week's Snapshot previews data to be presented as part of the forthcoming The State of Working America 2006/07.
Snapshot for July 19, 2006.
U.S. government does
relatively little to
lessen child poverty rates
By Sylvia A. Allegretto with research assistance from Rob Gray
Government policies, such as tax policy and transfers, have the potential to greatly reduce high child poverty rates that would otherwise prevail if left solely to the market incomes families receive from work and other sources. The anti-poverty effectiveness of such policies varies considerably across countries. Compared to other industrialized nations, the United States is woefully lagging: even after government intervention over one-fifth of all U.S. children were living in poverty in 2000.
The Figure below shows child poverty rates both before and after government intervention for 16 developed countries. Excluding the United States, the average rate of child poverty without governmental assistance was 21.1%. That is, the distribution of income based solely on market outcomes left about a fifth of children in poverty.1 Before taxes and transfers, the United States had one of the highest market-based rates of child poverty in 2000: 26.6%. Four other countries—New Zealand, France, the United Kingdom, and Ireland—had comparably high market rates of child poverty.
The figure also shows that U.S. policies were relatively
ineffective in supplementing poverty-level incomes to keep children
out of poverty. After taking into account the taxes (including
refundable taxes) and transfers, the U.S. still led the 16
developed countries in child poverty. On average, government taxes
and transfers in the other 15 countries reduced child poverty
significantly—by about half—dropping 10.4 percentage points to 10.7%.
France had the largest redistributive decline of 20.2 percentage
points to a child poverty rate of 7.5%. By contrast, the U.S. rate
was reduced by just 4.7 percentage points to 21.9%—by far the
highest child poverty rate of all 16 developed countries, even
after government assistance.
The contrast between the great wealth in the United States and such
appallingly high child poverty rates is quite stark. The United
States needs to make a strong commitment to reduce child
poverty.
[1] Poverty is defined as families with incomes below one-half the median income for that country, which is a traditional poverty measure for international comparisons.
Sign Up to Stay Informed
Search EPI.org
More Snapshots
- Mass layoffs at highest level since at least 1995
- Germany protects jobs
- Honor thy father
- Commencing unemployment
- Community banks: Small enough to fail
- Increases in minimum wage boost consumer spending
- Employers can stall first union contract for years
- The myth of private-sector performance pay
- No paid leave for new moms
- Unusually bad and getting worse
- Among college-educated, African Americans hardest hit by unemployment
- It’s not academic: Why charter schools close
- Housing collapse drives up consumer bankruptcies
- Transportation investments reduce income inequality
- Obama’s Budget Would Push U.S. into Socialism
- While economy burns, Europe fiddles
- Growing share of Big-Three vehicles assembled in Mexico
- Caution: When Used as Directed, 401(k)s are Hazardous to Your Financial Health
- Recovery package eases but does not eliminate job woes
- Unions do not undermine international competitiveness
- More...
