State minimum wages on the move
Jeff Chapman
December 1, 2004
See Snapshots Archive.
Snapshot for December 1, 2004.
State minimum wages on the
move
The president and Congress are poised to beat a
disgraceful record currently held by their predecessors of the
1980s—eight years without raising the minimum wage. Each year the
federal government fails to act, workers pay the price, as the
rising cost of living erodes the value of their paycheck.
In response, states are stepping in to make sure that workers in their states don't suffer from federal neglect. Since 1997, when the federal minimum was raised to $5.15, the number of states with higher rates than the federal has gone from five to 13.1 On November 2nd, voters in Florida and Nevada overwhelmingly (71% in Florida and 68% in Nevada) approved ballot measures to join these states in setting minimum wages above the federal level. They also joined two states—Washington and Oregon—in requiring moderate annual adjustments to the state minimum wage to account for changes in the cost of living.
The last time the federal government failed so badly to meet its responsibility to low-wage workers was in the 1980s, and states stepped in then as well. Between 1979 and 1989, the value of the federal minimum wage fell 29.5% (in inflation-adjusted dollars). In 1979 only Alaska had a higher minimum wage than the federal level. However, by 1989, 15 states had responded to this federal inaction by raising their minimum wages.
The New York legislature is soon expected to override Governor Pataki's veto of a state minimum wage increase, and Governor Doyle is expected to raise the Wisconsin minimum wage by 2006. The Nevada process requires another vote in 2006 before the change in enacted. If it passes again, as is anticipated, one-third of the states will have minimum wages above the federal rate by 2007 (see figure below). Other states, including Minnesota and New Jersey, are considering action as well. In the absence of a federal minimum wage increase, states are leading the way in providing a fair minimum wage for workers.
1. The District of Columbia is counted here as a state. In some years, Connecticut had a minimum wage set at two to three cents above the federal rate. This is not included here as a higher rate.
This Snapshot was written by EPI economist Jeff Chapman and Deputy Director of Policy Amy Chasanov.
 
More Snapshots
- Jobs ... but low pay
- Another challenge for the unemployed: Public library budget cuts
- State and local job losses threaten recovery
- Without federal intervention, unemployment would be near 16%
- Another consequence of the recession: Rising federal budget deficits
- Corporate profits have recovered, but job market still depressed
- Running out of steam
- Free Trade Agreement with Korea will cost U.S. jobs
- Another day, one less dollar
- Older men face longer job searches
- Recession takes a slice out of retirement savings
- Unemployment spells in Michigan and South Carolina are the longest in the nation
- Many jobless can not collect unemployment benefits
- Trading test anxiety for job market jitters
- Women now hold close to half of all jobs
- Americans work longer
- Small group takes large slice of capital income
- At the top: Soaring incomes, falling tax rates
- Counting the jobs lost to China
- Health insurance for more Americans
- Archive


Sign up to stay informed