Insourced investments lead to imbalanced trade
See Snapshots Archive.
Snapshot for April 7, 2004.
This Snapshot is the second of a two-part series; part one appeared on April 6, 2004.
Insourced investments lead to imbalanced
trade
The issue of outsourcing has become one of the most
fiercely debated topics in the current political climate.
Rather than address in any substantive way the anxiety of American
workers over this issue, a growing group of politicians and pundits
have begun using the term "insourcing" to refer to foreign
companies' investments in the United States, suggesting that
insourcing has the opposite effect on U.S. jobs and trade as
offshore outsourcing. The April 6 snapshot showed that this
so-called insourcing has not boosted U.S. jobs. In addition
to its failure to promote job growth, insourcing has also worsened
the U.S. trade balance.
The figure below shows imports, exports, and trade balances across 1991 to 2001 for U.S. firms owned by foreign companies. Total U.S. exports from these foreign-owned firms, gradually rose from $97 billion in 1991 to $164 billion in 2001, an increase of 69%. Since all other U.S. exports rose by an even faster rate of 74.2%, insourcing does appear to be a boon to U.S. exports. At the same time, total imports of foreign-owned companies in the United States more than doubled, climbing from $179 billion in 1991 to $369 billion in 2001. As a result, the U.S. trade deficits of foreign-owned firms rose from $82 billion to $206 billion in this period, an increase of 152%.
Often these foreign companies are investing in the United States in order to obtain access to U.S. marketing and distribution systems (including U.S. brand names) for their imported products—a process that does not create production jobs in the United States or lead to more balanced trade. The surging trade deficits of foreign-owned companies in the United States are evidence that insourcing is actually worsening the U.S. trade deficit. Thus, both the job and trade statistics refute the argument that insourcing represents a counterweight to the negative effect of offshoring on U.S. jobs and trade.
Source: Zeile, William J. 2003. "U.S. affiliates of foreign companies: Operations in 2001." Survey of Current Business. August, pp. 38-56. Table 8.
Today's snapshot was written by EPI senior economist Robert Scott with research assistance by Adam Hersh.
Sign Up to Stay Informed
Search EPI.org
More Snapshots
- Mass layoffs at highest level since at least 1995
- Germany protects jobs
- Honor thy father
- Commencing unemployment
- Community banks: Small enough to fail
- Increases in minimum wage boost consumer spending
- Employers can stall first union contract for years
- The myth of private-sector performance pay
- No paid leave for new moms
- Unusually bad and getting worse
- Among college-educated, African Americans hardest hit by unemployment
- It’s not academic: Why charter schools close
- Housing collapse drives up consumer bankruptcies
- Transportation investments reduce income inequality
- Obama’s Budget Would Push U.S. into Socialism
- While economy burns, Europe fiddles
- Growing share of Big-Three vehicles assembled in Mexico
- Caution: When Used as Directed, 401(k)s are Hazardous to Your Financial Health
- Recovery package eases but does not eliminate job woes
- Unions do not undermine international competitiveness
- More...
