‘Insourcing’ myths: Jobs and insourcing
See Snapshots Archive.
Snapshot for April 6, 2004.
This Snapshot is the first of a two-part series; part two appeared on April 7, 2004.
'Insourcing' myths: Jobs and
insourcing
Outsourcing, the process of U.S. firms
shifting work abroad, has become one of the hottest topics in
current trade debates. Some people, however, have also raised
questions about “insourcing,” the phenomenon by which foreign
companies increase their investments and employment in the United
States. Some have suggested that the jobs lost to outsourcing are
offset by the millions of American workers hired by foreign
companies to produce new goods and services. However, the vast
majority of employment associated with new investments by foreign
companies has taken the form of acquisitions of ongoing U.S.
companies, such as Daimler's takeover of Chrysler. As a result of
insourcing, 2.78 million U.S. jobs were lost in foreign-owned firms
between 1991 and 2001.
The Bush Administration has credited insourcing with bringing jobs into the United States. On March 10, President Bush stated, “when politicians in Washington attack trade for political reasons, they don't mention these workers [at the new Honda plants in Ohio], or the 6.4 million other American workers who draw their paychecks from foreign companies.” The logic of the argument in support of insourcing was crystallized recently by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who said that “insourcing works when the next company, the next entrepreneur, the next investor decides that America is the place to create the best high-value jobs….If America has a powerful engine of insourcing, it will create so many good jobs that—as in the past—few will even notice the jobs that are moving to foreign lands.” But just how important is new foreign investment in the U.S. economy, and is it really contributing to job growth?
Most U.S. jobs associated with new foreign investment consist of foreign purchases of U.S. companies, as shown in the figure below. The blue bars represent jobs in firms acquired while the green bars represent jobs in newly established U.S. companies owned by foreign firms.
The red bars represent employment changes in foreign-owned companies. While some investments led to increased employment (e.g., Honda in Ohio), in the aggregate, other foreign businesses were shedding jobs each year.
Between 1991 and 2001, foreign multinationals acquired firms employing 4.1 million workers. However, only 274,000 workers were employed in the newly established U.S. companies owned by foreign firms, for an average of 25,000 jobs per year over this period. Thus, only 6.2% of job growth in foreign companies represented actual new jobs in the United States.
At the start of 1991, employment at foreign-owned companies in the United States stood at 4.74 million. If no jobs had been lost, the addition of 4.14 million jobs in acquired firms and 274,000 jobs in new start-up firms should have brought the 2001 total to 9.15 million jobs. But instead, 2001 employment at foreign-owned companies stood at only 6.37 million. Thus, 2.78 million U.S. jobs disappeared in foreign-owned firms because of import displacement, sales losses, productivity, or divestiture. Foreign-owned companies are indeed employing millions of Americans, but the evidence suggests that they have destroyed more jobs than they created in recent years.
Sources:
Baker, Dean, and Mark Rosnick. 2004. “Bad Sources on ‘Insourcing.’”
Public Misconception No. 103. Washington, D.C.: Center for Economic
Policy Research. March 29.
http://www.cepr.net/publications/PublicMisconceptions3.29.04b.pdf.
Bush, President George W. 2004. “ President talks jobs/trade at Women's Entrepreneurship Forum.” Remarks by the president at the Women's Entrepreneurship in the 21st Century Forum, Cleveland, Ohio. As cited by the Organization for International Investment, “Facts about Insourcing,” http://www.ofii.org/facts_figures/#statements .
Gingrich, Newt. 2004. A GOP strategy on jobs. Washington Post. March 25.
Today's snapshot was written by EPI senior economist Robert Scott with research assistance by Adam Hersh.
Sign Up to Stay Informed
Search EPI.org
More Snapshots
- State and local budget shortfalls will cause heavy drag on growth
- Jobs creation effort needs to focus on good jobs
- Minorities, less-educated workers see staggering rates of underemployment
- Money to spare for health care
- Highest earners get biggest tax breaks for saving for retirement
- Public health insurance offsets large losses in private coverage
- Most black children grow up in neighborhoods with significant poverty
- Lost investment during a recession can prolong pain
- Trade agreement favors pharmaceutical companies over sick
- Americans agree on how to fix Social Security
- Big banks getting bigger
- This Labor Day, wage erosion continues to hurt employed workers
- Economic downturn largest contributor to deficit woes
- No coercion in card check
- Unions guarantee more vacation
- Clunkers program drives economic, environmental gains
- Costly COBRA: For the jobless, health care costs may exceed unemployment benefits
- Minimum wage workers: better educated, worse compensated
- The Federal Reserve’s exploding balance sheet
- African Americans see weekly wage decline
- More...

