Economic Policy Institute
EPI home
EPI home
Search
Navigation tips
Bookstore
Publications archive
Newsroom
Calendar
About EPI
Economists
Contact EPI
Web features
Job postings
Sign up
Support EPI
WEB FEATURES
Datazone
Economic Indicators
Issue Guides
Online calculators
Snapshots
Viewpoints
Audio/video archive

BROWSE OTHER ARTICLES BY
Ross Eisenbrey


RELATED PUBLICATIONS
Dismal employment trends characterize 2000 business cycle

Understanding the black jobs crisis

Jobs Picture, August 1, 2008

Labor's 'guests' are anything but

Fairness shortage: Instead of importing workers


Email this pageEmail this page

Print this pagePrint this page    Email this pageEmail this page



EPI Viewpoints
Opinion pieces and speeches by EPI staff and associates.

[ THIS PIECE FIRST APPEARED IN MIAMI HERALD ON OCTOBER 26, 2003 ]

Extend unemployment benefits

By Ross Eisenbrey

Don't be fooled by the latest report on employment and unemployment. The job market has not turned around. The good news that employment increased by 57,000 jobs was more than offset by the addition of 68,000 to the ranks of the unemployed. And 2.1 million people - one of every four unemployed - have been out of work for 27 weeks or more.

These trends carry one clear message: The 9 million unemployed Americans need a much stronger safety net than the ordinary 26 weeks of unemployment benefits. Before it adjourns, Congress should again extend the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation (TEUC) program.

In March, Congress passed the TEUC to keep unemployment checks flowing to jobless workers who had exhausted their benefits without finding work.

But that extension will expire in December. Allowing it to do so would mean real hardship for millions of people.

Extending unemployment benefits again won't only help avert these hardships, it would also help stimulate the entire economy.

Mark Zandi, an economic forecaster who runs Economy.Com, estimates that, compared to the administration's dividend tax cuts, extending unemployment benefits would produce about 20 times greater bang for the buck in terms of a positive effect on the U.S. gross domestic product.

For millions of the unemployed, it is literally impossible to find a job. The government's most recent report on job openings and labor turnover showed that there were fewer than three million available jobs in July at a time when 9.3 million unemployed Americans were looking for work - in other words, three job seekers for every job.

In March 2002, Congress recognized that the job market had not recovered from the 2001 recession and enacted TEUC. The program provides 13 weeks of additional benefits for those who exhaust their regular state unemployment insurance benefits before they find a job, plus seven more weeks in states with the worst unemployment.

The original TEUC expired in December 2002, and Congress only renewed it after a public outcry when benefits were terminated during the Christmas holiday.

TEUC will expire once again, in December, unless Congress acts before it adjourns. The stage seems to have been set to let it die. No money was included in the budget to renew TEUC, no hearings have been held on the need to extend benefits, and Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao has kept a stony silence.

The TEUC program paid out $11 billion in the 2003 fiscal year that ended Sept. 30 and currently costs $900 million a month.

By every measure, jobless workers need the program now even more than in March 2002 when TEUC was enacted. The unemployment rate was 5.7 percent then and is 6.1 percent now. Then, 1.3 million people had been jobless for at least 27 weeks, now it's 2.1 million. And the number of people jobless for more than 39 weeks but still searching for work has doubled.

The employment situation isn't likely to improve in any meaningful way in the months ahead. The Congressional Budget Office predicts that unemployment will average 6.2 percent during 2004, a half percentage point higher than the rate in March 2002 when TEUC was first enacted.


Ross Eisenbrey is vice president of the Economic Policy Institute.

[ POSTED TO VIEWPOINTS ON OCTOBER 28, 2003 ]



Did you find this publication helpful? Support EPI's work today!

Copyright © 2008 by The Economic Policy Institute. All rights reserved.

Readers may redistribute this material to other individuals for noncommercial use, provided that the text, data, and all HTML code remain intact and unaltered in any way. This article may not be resold, reprinted, or redistributed for compensation of any kind without prior written permission. If you have any questions about permissions, please contact EPI at publications@epi.org. Other questions or concerns about this Web site can be directed to webmaster@epi.org.

EPI home