Economic Policy Institute
EPI home
EPI home
Search
Navigation tips
Bookstore
Publications archive
Newsroom
Calendar
About EPI
Economists
Contact EPI
Web features
Job postings
Sign up
Support EPI
WEB FEATURES
Datazone
Economic Indicators
Issue Guides
Online calculators
Snapshots
Viewpoints
Audio/video archive

BROWSE OTHER ARTICLES BY
Ethan Pollack


RELATED PUBLICATIONS
A rescue plan for Main Street

When giants fall: Shutdown of one or more U.S. automakers could eliminate up to 3.3 million U.S. jobs

The offshoring of innovation

Bringing us from bad to better: Next stimulus plan must be adequate in scale and implemented quickly

Take a Walk on the Supply Side: Tax Cuts on Profits, Savings, and the Wealthy Fail to Spur Economic Growth


Email this pageEmail this page

Print this pagePrint this page    Email this pageEmail this page



Economic Snapshots

See Snapshots archive.


Snapshot for October 22, 2008.

A meaningful stimulus for Main Street

By Ethan Pollack

Recent news that retail sales dropped 1.2% in September—on top of analysts’ predictions of negative gross domestic product growth in the third quarter—leave little room for doubt that a new serving of stimulus is certainly needed. While Congress may be tempted to model the next round after the last one—that is, emphasizing large tax rebates—the current economy demands a final stimulus package that will provide maximum economic bang for the buck.

enlarge image(figure)

As money is spent, it creates beneficial ripples through the entire economy. The evidence is that most of the money from the recent tax rebate was saved rather than spent, thus blunting its stimulative benefit.1 By comparison, other options—such as infrastructure spending, aid to states, food stamps, and unemployment insurance (UI) benefits—are much more cost-effective because they target the needs most likely to channel money back into the economy. Mark Zandi from Moody’s Economy.com estimates that each dollar of refundable tax rebates only boosts GDP by about $1.26, while each dollar of infrastructure spending could provide a $1.59 boost. Not only are many of these stimulus options more effective, but they also have the added benefit of assisting those hardest hit by the downturn and tackling long-standing infrastructure needs that would lower transportation costs, decrease traffic, and increase business productivity.

Zandi’s analysis also shows what doesn’t work as stimulus: a variety of tax breaks for corporations and wealthy individuals, which cost over twice as much as they return to the economy.

Endnote
1. According to a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll, just 21% of individuals polled intended to spend their rebate, while 41% intended to pay off bills and 32% intended to put their rebate into savings.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/24/news/economy/rebates_poll/index.htm?postversion=2008032412

Check out the archive for past Economic Snapshots.

Sign up to receive announcements of new Economic Snapshots by email:

A weekly presentation of downloadable charts and short analyses designed to graphically illustrate important economic issues, Snapshots are updated every Wednesday.


 



Did you find this publication helpful? Support EPI's work today!

Copyright © 2008 by The Economic Policy Institute. All rights reserved.

Readers may redistribute this material to other individuals for noncommercial use, provided that the text, data, and all HTML code remain intact and unaltered in any way. This article may not be resold, reprinted, or redistributed for compensation of any kind without prior written permission. If you have any questions about permissions, please contact EPI at publications@epi.org. Other questions or concerns about this Web site can be directed to webmaster@epi.org.

EPI home