Economic Policy Institute
EPI home
EPI home
Search
Navigation tips
Bookstore
Publications archive
Newsroom
Calendar
About EPI
Economists
Contact EPI
Web features
Job postings
Sign up
Support EPI
WEB FEATURES
Datazone
Economic Indicators
Issue Guides
Online calculators
Snapshots
Viewpoints
Audio/video archive

BROWSE OTHER ARTICLES BY
Robert E. Scott
Emily Garr


RELATED PUBLICATIONS
Congress should not pass the flawed Colombia trade pact

The burden of outsourcing

The China trade toll: Widespread wage suppression, 2 million jobs lost in the U.S.

International Picture, June 18, 2008

Bailing out on America: Air Force tanker decision will ground at least 14,000 U.S. jobs


Email this pageEmail this page

Print this pagePrint this page    Email this pageEmail this page



Economic Snapshots

See Snapshots archive.


Snapshot for October 2, 2008.

Non-oil trade deficit costs jobs in every state

By Robert E. Scott with research assistance by Emily Garr

In 2007, 5.6 million jobs were lost or displaced by the U.S. non-oil trade deficit (Scott 2008). Despite strong export growth over the past few years, that deficit still totaled $473 billion in 2007, only $48 billion less than its record peak in 2006. More than 4 million (70%) of the jobs displaced by this trade in 2007 were in the manufacturing sector. 

U.S. non-oil trade deficits represent reduced domestic demand for goods produced in every region of the United States and have displaced jobs in all 50 states and the District of Columbia (see Map). More than 400,000 jobs or job opportunities were lost in each of California and Texas, and more than 300,000 each in New York, Michigan, and Ohio. Jobs displaced by this deficit exceeded 5.0% of total employment in 2007 in Michigan, South Carolina, Alabama, Tennessee, Ohio, Maine, Indiana, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Kentucky, Arkansas, Rhode Island, and Mississippi. While traditional manufacturing states such as Michigan, Ohio, and the Carolinas were certainly hard hit, so too were states in the tech sector such California, Texas, Oregon, and Minnesota. Many states in the South, such as Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, and Mississippi were hard hit by the loss of textile and apparel industries. Michigan, hard hit by the loss of jobs in the auto industry, lost more than 300,000 jobs or job opportunities overall and was the hardest hit state in the country as a share of total state employment (7.5%).

 

enlarge imageNon-oil trade deficit costs jobs in every state*, 2007


Printable version of this map [PDF]
  
Currency manipulation and other unfair trade policies are important causes of U.S. non-oil trade deficits. Elimination of these practices could support widespread growth of U.S. exports and the creation of millions of jobs in export industries such as aerospace products, fabricated metal products, motor vehicles and parts, and chemicals.


For a more detailed look at the U.S. non-oil trade deficit, read the full report.

Check out the archive for past Economic Snapshots.
Sign up to receive announcements of new Economic Snapshots by email:


A weekly presentation of downloadable charts and short analyses designed to graphically illustrate important economic issues, Snapshots are updated every Wednesday.


 



Did you find this publication helpful? Support EPI's work today!

Copyright © 2008 by The Economic Policy Institute. All rights reserved.

Readers may redistribute this material to other individuals for noncommercial use, provided that the text, data, and all HTML code remain intact and unaltered in any way. This article may not be resold, reprinted, or redistributed for compensation of any kind without prior written permission. If you have any questions about permissions, please contact EPI at publications@epi.org. Other questions or concerns about this Web site can be directed to webmaster@epi.org.

EPI home