Economic Policy Institute
EPI home
EPI home
Search
Navigation tips
Bookstore
Publications archive
Newsroom
Calendar
About EPI
Economists
Contact EPI
Web features
Job postings
Sign up
Support EPI
WEB FEATURES
Datazone
Economic Indicators
Issue Guides
Online calculators
Snapshots
Viewpoints
Audio/video archive

BROWSE OTHER ARTICLES BY
Denice Velez


RELATED PUBLICATIONS
The work that remains: A forty-year update of the Kerner Commission report

Hispanics and the economy: Economic stagnation for Hispanic American workers, throughout the 2000s

The Economy in Numbers

Incorporating Labor and Human Rights Risk Into Investment Decisions

The unemployment trend by state


Email this pageEmail this page

Print this pagePrint this page    Email this pageEmail this page



Economic Snapshots

See
Snapshots archive.


Snapshot for August 13, 2008.

Wages for H-2B workers set lower than the prevailing wage

By Denice Velez

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) sets the wage that must be offered to U.S. workers before employers can request temporary immigrant workers under the H-2B visa program. By law, the H-2B wage must be high enough so as not to adversely affect the wages of similarly employed U.S. workers, and so DOL regulations require employers to pay these immigrants the area's prevailing wage.

However, examination of seven of the occupations most commonly filled by H-2B workers, including construction and grounds maintenance, in 15* states in 2007 shows that in almost every case, H-2B certified wages were lower than the prevailing wage reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In 64% of cases, the DOL-certified wage fell below 75% of the mean hourly wage.

enlarge imageFigure. Wages for H-2B workers set lower than the prevailing wage

Allowing employers to pay H-2B wages below the prevailing wage discourages American workers from applying for those jobs, thus creating the false impression of a labor shortage. These wages also harm H-2B workers because they receive lower wages than they are entitled to by law. Furthermore, qualified U.S. workers are denied jobs, and workers’ wages in the area of employment are undermined.

* The 15 states—Calif., Wash., Ariz., Nev., Ill., Mich., Minn. Fla., Miss., Va., Texas, Mass., Maryland, N.Y., Pa.—were chosen because they are a nationally representative sample from every region of the country.


Check out the
archive for past Economic Snapshots.

Sign up to receive announcements of new Economic Snapshots by email:


A weekly presentation of downloadable charts and short analyses designed to graphically illustrate important economic issues, Snapshots are updated every Wednesday.




Did you find this publication helpful? Support EPI's work today!

Copyright © 2008 by The Economic Policy Institute. All rights reserved.

Readers may redistribute this material to other individuals for noncommercial use, provided that the text, data, and all HTML code remain intact and unaltered in any way. This article may not be resold, reprinted, or redistributed for compensation of any kind without prior written permission. If you have any questions about permissions, please contact EPI at publications@epi.org. Other questions or concerns about this Web site can be directed to webmaster@epi.org.

EPI home