Economic Policy Institute
EPI home
EPI home
Search
Navigation tips
Bookstore
Publications archive
Newsroom
Calendar
About EPI
Economists
Contact EPI
Web features
Job postings
Sign up
Support EPI
WEB FEATURES
Datazone
Economic Indicators
Issue Guides
Online calculators
Snapshots
Viewpoints
Audio/video archive

BROWSE OTHER ARTICLES BY
Tony Avirgan


RELATED PUBLICATIONS
The Crunchian Take on Globalization

NewsFlash: Is globalization to blame for US workers’ troubles?

Trade, jobs, and wages

Citi's Mexican cronies

Offsets and the lack of a comprehensive U.S. policy: What do other countries know that we don't?


Email this pageEmail this page

Print this pagePrint this page    Email this pageEmail this page



Economic Snapshots
See Snapshots archive.


Snapshot for January 9, 2008.

Coming up short on jobs in Africa

by Tony Avirgan

The Clinton administration claimed the Africa Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), which Congress passed in 2000, would provide jobs and lift the economies of sub-Saharan African countries. AGOA provides unrestricted, duty-free access to the U.S. market for textiles and garments manufactured or processed in the poorest African countries.

While AGOA has led to some increased foreign investment and additional jobs in Africa, these jobs are in the apparel sector, which tend to be low-wage and unstable when compared with other jobs in manufacturing that require higher capital investment in machinery and infrastructure.

According to a report by the Dutch group, Center for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO), the passage of AGOA resulted in competition among African countries to attract foreign investment in apparel. These inducements included eliminating taxes, providing factory shells, and often turning a blind eye to labor abuses. Multinational corporations were required to invest little or nothing in local economies and often pulled out of a country, leaving behind debts and workers when incentives became more attractive in a neighboring country.

These job losses are significant in small African economies. For instance, Lesotho lost 13,000 of the 26,000 jobs created by AGOA. Kenya lost 13,500 of the 30,000 jobs created (see Chart).  

enlarge image
Total AGOA-created jobs lost as of May 2005, as reported by unions

Congress is now considering a new preference program for Africa, the New Partnership for Development Act (NPDA). In doing so, it should take into account the negative consequences of AGOA and require private capital investment—where manufacturers invest their own money—and strong labor protections.

The record of AGOA and the development of the NPDA were examined at a forum at EPI on Thursday, January 10. For details of this event, please visit http://www.gpn.org/research/agoa/


Check out the archive for past Economic Snapshots.


Sign up to receive announcements of new Economic Snapshots by email:
A value is required.

A weekly presentation of downloadable charts and short analyses designed to graphically illustrate important economic issues, Snapshots are updated every Wednesday.




Did you find this publication helpful? Support EPI's work today!

Copyright © 2008 by The Economic Policy Institute. All rights reserved.

Readers may redistribute this material to other individuals for noncommercial use, provided that the text, data, and all HTML code remain intact and unaltered in any way. This article may not be resold, reprinted, or redistributed for compensation of any kind without prior written permission. If you have any questions about permissions, please contact EPI at publications@epi.org. Other questions or concerns about this Web site can be directed to webmaster@epi.org.

EPI home