Economic Policy Institute
EPI home
EPI home
Search
Navigation tips
Bookstore
Publications archive
Newsroom
Calendar
About EPI
Economists
Contact EPI
Web features
Job postings
Sign up
Support EPI
WEB FEATURES
Datazone
Economic Indicators
Issue Guides
Online calculators
Snapshots
Viewpoints
Audio/video archive

BROWSE OTHER ARTICLES BY
Jared Bernstein
L. Josh Bivens


RELATED PUBLICATIONS
Social Security -- government report shows that program is healthy for decades to come

A Plan to Revive the American Economy

The Not-So-Great Energy Debate

The Shampoo Economy

Uprisings: Bottom Up and Top Down


Email this pageEmail this page

Print this pagePrint this page    Email this pageEmail this page



Economic Snapshots
See Snapshots archive.


Snapshot for August 22, 2007.

Tax cuts, investment, and employment: The evidence contradicts supply-siders

by Josh Bivens and Jared Bernstein 

One of the most frequently heard phrases in certain Washington policy circles is "the tax cuts are working."  As President Bush put it just last week, "Since the tax cuts took full effect in 2003, our economy has added more than 8.3 million new jobs."

The logic behind this claim falls under the rubric of "supply-side economics."  The basic idea is that taxes constrain investment and employment growth.  So if taxes are cut, by this logic one expects investment and employment would grow more quickly. This mobilization of investment and labor in turn would generate faster overall growth. Extreme forms of supply-side arguments assert that the extra growth results in a surge of government revenue large enough to allow the tax cuts to "pay for themselves."

The changes to the tax code in the 1990s and 2000s provide a good opportunity to see if these broad predictions hold up to the evidence.  The figure below examines investment, employment, and tax changes (cuts in 2000s and increases in 1990s) over the first six years of these two recoveries. 

Cumulative changes in taxes, employment, and investment: 1990s vs. current recovery*

Contrary to supply-side arguments, both investment and employment grew considerably faster in the 1990s, when tax increases raised revenue, compared to the 2000s, when the tax cuts lowered revenue.  Investment grew 35% more quickly in the 1990s, and employment grew 6% faster.  Of course, there are always many different factors driving investment and employment, none of which are controlled for in this analysis.  But the data clearly refute the simplistic notion that the tax cuts of the 2000s boosted investment or job growth.

Data Note: Data from first 26 quarters of each recovery. Data on tax changes from Citizens for Tax Justice; data on investment from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA); data on employment from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Tax changes are expressed as shares of gross domestic product (GDP); investment and employment changes are expressed as percentage changes. All variables are measured from the previous business-cycle peak.


Check out the archive for past Economic Snapshots.


Sign up to receive announcements of new Economic Snapshots by email:
A value is required.


A weekly presentation of downloadable charts and short analyses designed to graphically illustrate important economic issues, Snapshots are updated every Wednesday.




Did you find this publication helpful? Support EPI's work today!

Copyright © 2008 by The Economic Policy Institute. All rights reserved.

Readers may redistribute this material to other individuals for noncommercial use, provided that the text, data, and all HTML code remain intact and unaltered in any way. This article may not be resold, reprinted, or redistributed for compensation of any kind without prior written permission. If you have any questions about permissions, please contact EPI at publications@epi.org. Other questions or concerns about this Web site can be directed to webmaster@epi.org.

EPI home