Economic Policy Institute
EPI home
EPI home
Search
Navigation tips
Bookstore
Publications archive
Newsroom
Calendar
About EPI
Economists
Contact EPI
Web features
Job postings
Sign up
Support EPI
WEB FEATURES
Datazone
Economic Indicators
Issue Guides
Online calculators
Snapshots
Viewpoints
Audio/video archive

BROWSE OTHER ARTICLES BY
Jared Bernstein
L. Josh Bivens


RELATED PUBLICATIONS
Compared to 1990s, middle-class working families lose ground in the 2000s

Overall health insurance coverage rises, but masks decline in private coverage

Median income rose as did poverty in 2007; 2000s have been extremely weak for living standards of most households

Dismal employment trends characterize 2000 business cycle

Understanding the black jobs crisis


Email this pageEmail this page

Print this pagePrint this page    Email this pageEmail this page



Snapshots


Sign up for our Economic Snapshots mailing list to receive an alert whenever a new Snapshot is posted.
See Snapshots Archive.

Snapshot for August 30, 2006.

The wide impact of the housing slump on the economy

by Jared Bernstein and L. Josh Bivens  

A wide range of indicators reveal a sharp slowdown in the residential housing market. Sales of existing homes fell 11% over the past year after growing 9.8% in 2004 and 4.4% in 2005. New home sales are also well below last year's level, and inventories (homes for sale on the market) are at record highs. With the increase in inventories along with diminished demand, prices are softening, especially in the hottest regional markets.

What impact might this slowdown have on the overall economy? In this Snapshot, we examine the relationship between a housing bust, jobs, and real GDP growth. 
 
Housing is a "mid-stream" sector of the economy, meaning that many other industries, both upstream and downstream, are affected by the health of the housing market. For example, the demand for building materials increases in a booming housing market, as does the demand for appliances and furnishings. Even more important in terms of dollars pumped into the economy, is appreciated home values, which have been an important source of stimulus over the past few years.

Figure A shows the contribution of jobs generated by the housing sector to overall job growth.  We include jobs in residential construction, but also real estate and credit intermediaries, like mortgage brokers (but not jobs related to demand for household goods). In 2004-05, these sectors—which represent about 6% of total jobs—contributed 14 and 15% of the growth in employment, respectively. Thus far in 2006, their contribution has been less than 5%.

Figure A

Figure B looks at the contribution of the housing sector to the overall growth in real gross domestic product. Growth in the housing sector has contributed significantly to GDP growth over the course of the current recovery. Between the last business cycle peak (the first quarter of 2001) and the third quarter of 2005, residential investment contributed almost 0.4 percentage points each quarter to GDP growth on average, accounting for over 15% of the growth over this period.  For the past three quarters, however, diminished activity in the sector has actually subtracted from growth. In the most recent quarter this subtraction was significant—knocking about 0.4% off that quarter's growth.

Figure B
 
Both figures reveal that the housing boom was a key contributor to the growth in both jobs and GDP over this recovery. It thus comes as little surprise that a slowing housing market creates a significant drag on the rest of the economy. Absent a considerable boost in demand from other sources (personal consumption, a lower trade deficit, or accelerated business investment), we can expect slower growth in coming quarters.

Check out the archive for past Economic Snapshots.

A weekly presentation of downloadable charts and short analyses designed to graphically illustrate important economic issues, Snapshots are updated every Wednesday.



Did you find this publication helpful? Support EPI's work today!

Copyright © 2008 by The Economic Policy Institute. All rights reserved.

Readers may redistribute this material to other individuals for noncommercial use, provided that the text, data, and all HTML code remain intact and unaltered in any way. This article may not be resold, reprinted, or redistributed for compensation of any kind without prior written permission. If you have any questions about permissions, please contact EPI at publications@epi.org. Other questions or concerns about this Web site can be directed to webmaster@epi.org.

EPI home