Economic Policy Institute
EPI home
EPI home
Search
Navigation tips
Bookstore
Publications archive
Newsroom
Calendar
About EPI
Economists
Contact EPI
Web features
Job postings
Sign up
Support EPI
WEB FEATURES
Datazone
Economic Indicators
Issue Guides
Online calculators
Snapshots
Viewpoints
Audio/video archive

BROWSE OTHER ARTICLES BY
Josh Bivens


RELATED PUBLICATIONS
Building an Economic Recovery Package: Creating and Preserving Jobs in America

The false fiscal dilemma: History shows that the economy is big enough to stabilize financial markets and address the economy's other pressing needs

A meaningful stimulus for Main Street

Stimulus now! Underemployment at 14-year high

Bailout plan must help the middle class and grow the economy


Adobe Acrobat / PDFDownload a PDF version of this paper
Email this pageEmail this page

Print PDFPrint PDF    Email this pageEmail this page



Snapshots


A weekly presentation of downloadable charts and short analyses designed to graphically illustrate important economic issues. Updated every Wednesday.
[Sign up for our Economic Snapshots mailing list to receive an alert whenever a new Snapshot is posted.]
[See Snapshots Archive.]

This Snapshot is part of a series; see also part 1, part 2 and part 4 of the series, or print the entire series.Adobe Acrobat (PDF) 

Snapshot for May 10, 2006.

Critiquing misleading White House statements about the economy, part 3
International comparisons of economic growth

A recent White House news release contains this claim regarding economic growth:

Last year, the economy grew at a healthy 3.5 % rate—faster than any other major industrialized country.
(http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/04/20060411-9.html)

This sort of comparison is hard because nations do not have synchronous business cycles and countries tend to grow faster coming out of a deep trough than at the top of a cycle. Further, a more relevant statistic than Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth for comparing economic outcomes is growth in GDP per capita. A good chunk of the U.S. GDP advantage over many industrial countries stems only from faster population growth. Growth in living standards is better captured by per capita growth rates.

The White House selects a small number of countries they define as peers with the United States. Among countries classified as "advanced" by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), six had per capita growth rates higher than the United States (see Figure A ). 

Figure

In 2005, per capita GDP grew at 2.56 % for the United States. Japan's per capita growth in 2005 was charted by the IMF as higher, at 2.70 %, while five other countries saw per capita growth rates above that of the United States.

Coming next: EPI critiques claims about the U.S. unemployment rate.

This Snapshot was written by EPI Economist L. Josh Bivens.

This Snapshot is part of a series; see also part 1, part 2 and part 4 of the series, or print the entire series.Adobe Acrobat (PDF) 

Check out the archive for past Economic Snapshots.


For a printer-friendly version of this report, click here.Adobe Acrobat / PDF



Did you find this publication helpful? Support EPI's work today!

Copyright © 2008 by The Economic Policy Institute. All rights reserved.

Readers may redistribute this material to other individuals for noncommercial use, provided that the text, data, and all HTML code remain intact and unaltered in any way. This article may not be resold, reprinted, or redistributed for compensation of any kind without prior written permission. If you have any questions about permissions, please contact EPI at publications@epi.org. Other questions or concerns about this Web site can be directed to webmaster@epi.org.

EPI home