Economic Policy Institute
EPI home
EPI home
Search
Navigation tips
Bookstore
Publications archive
Newsroom
Calendar
About EPI
Economists
Contact EPI
Web features
Job postings
Sign up
Support EPI
WEB FEATURES
Datazone
Economic Indicators
Issue Guides
Online calculators
Snapshots
Viewpoints
Audio/video archive

BROWSE OTHER ARTICLES BY
Jared Bernstein


RELATED PUBLICATIONS
Jobs Picture, September 5, 2008

Jobs Picture, September 5, 2008 - Special Issue

Compared to 1990s, middle-class working families lose ground in the 2000s

Overall health insurance coverage rises, but masks decline in private coverage

Median income rose as did poverty in 2007; 2000s have been extremely weak for living standards of most households


Email this pageEmail this page

Print this pagePrint this page    Email this pageEmail this page



Jobs Picture

June 6, 2008

Mounting recessionary signs as unemployment rate spikes

by Jared Bernstein with research assistance from James Lin

The nation's job market showed clear signs of recessionary conditions as the jobless rate leapt up a half percent in May, from 5.0% to 5.5%, according to today's report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This monthly increase was the largest since the mid-1980s, pushing unemployment to its highest rate since late 2004.

Payrolls contracted for the fifth month in a row, down 49,000 with most of the net job losses occurring in the construction industry, factories, offices, and retailers. Since total payrolls (public and private sector) peaked last December, they are down by 324,000 jobs. Since the government sector tends to be less cyclically affected by downturns, looking at just private-sector job loss can provide a more accurate gauge of the lagging economy's impact on job growth; private-sector employment has fallen over the past six months by 411,000.

Although single month jumps in unemployment data should be judged cautiously, various factors suggest the spike in unemployment is not likely to be a statistical aberration and instead accurately reflects the weakening job market. First, it is consistent with the steady loss of jobs in the more accurate payroll survey. Second, as noted by the commissioner of the BLS, "The over-the-month jump in unemployment reflected additional workers who had lost their jobs as well as an upsurge in new and returning jobseekers."

This latter point is important. The labor market expanded sharply last month—up over 500,000—and, in a very typical recessionary scenario, when jobseekers enter a labor market that is contracting, unemployment rises. This dynamic also contributed to a jump in the share of long-term unemployed, from 17.8% last month to 18.3% in May.

An increase in the youth labor force played a role in May's unemployment spike. However, even if we take teenagers out of the data, unemployment still rises from 4.5% to 4.8%, a considerable 0.3% increase, and well above the 4.0% adult rate of one-year ago.

The BLS reports that the number of unemployed grew by over 800,000 last month, but such monthly data can be too "noisy" to give a clear signal of the growth in the number of jobless. Averaging over the past three months, and comparing this to an average over the same three-month period a year ago, shows that number of unemployed is up by 1.2 million.

The unemployed are but a subset of workers who are unable to find the type of jobs they seek, especially when the job market is weakening. As a result, the BLS also publishes an underemployment measure that captures the officially jobless plus a variety of other underutilized workers, most notably those part-timers who would prefer full-time work, a group that is up 760,000 over the past year. The underemployment rate hit 9.7% last month, up from 8.3% one year ago.

Most industries shed jobs last month, with losses continuing in manufacturing (-26,000), construction (-34,000, both residential and non-residential), retail trade (-27,000), and professional services (office jobs, down 39,000). The loss in professional services was dominated by a loss of 30,000 jobs in temp work last month, and 150,000 over the past year. The loss of temp jobs is often a bellwether in a recession as employers shed these workers first.

Health care continues to be the one solidly reliable sector, bucking the cycle and adding 34,000 jobs last month. The public sector, typically counter-cyclical, added 17,000 jobs in May, all at the local level.

Hourly earnings were up 3.5% over the past year, the same annual growth rate as last month, and the slowest since February 2006. Given stagnant growth in hours worked, weekly earnings grew less, up 3.2% over the year. Since inflation is running at around 4.0%, this implies continued losses in the buying power for most workers.

Whether or not we are in the midst of an official recession, the nation's economy has been growing well below its potential for the past six months. Even with the stimulative boosts from Federal Reserve interest rate cuts and fiscal stimulus (rebate checks, which are yet to be felt in the job market), this weak growth period has led to a protracted loss of jobs, and as of last month, a sharp spike in joblessness. Almost 10% of the workforce is unemployed or underemployed. Long-term unemployment is high, as job losses make it particularly tough for the jobless to leave the unemployment rolls. Weekly earnings, reflecting both slower hourly wage growth and diminished weekly hours, are falling well behind inflation.

These recessionary conditions in the job market are hurting the living standards of working families and call for a renewed response from policy makers. The first order of business must be to ensure a durable safety net to catch the rising number of persons stuck in unemployment by extending unemployment insurance benefits.

 

 


To view archived editions of JOBS PICTURE, click here.


The Economic Policy Institute JOBS PICTURE is published each month upon release of the Bureau of Labor Statistics' employment report.

EPI offers same-day analysis of income, price, employment, and other economic data released by U.S. government agencies. For more information, contact EPI at 202-775-8810, or visit us on the Web at www.EPI.org.

 



Did you find this publication helpful? Support EPI's work today!

Copyright © 2008 by The Economic Policy Institute. All rights reserved.

Readers may redistribute this material to other individuals for noncommercial use, provided that the text, data, and all HTML code remain intact and unaltered in any way. This article may not be resold, reprinted, or redistributed for compensation of any kind without prior written permission. If you have any questions about permissions, please contact EPI at publications@epi.org. Other questions or concerns about this Web site can be directed to webmaster@epi.org.

EPI home