Economic Policy Institute
EPI home
EPI home
Search
Navigation tips
Bookstore
Publications archive
Newsroom
Calendar
About EPI
Economists
Contact EPI
Web features
Job postings
Sign up
Support EPI
Purchase this publicationPurchase More unemployed workers, fewer job openings

BROWSE OTHER ARTICLES BY
Heidi Shierholz


RELATED PUBLICATIONS
The work that remains: A forty-year update of the Kerner Commission report

An investment, not a bailout

Jobs Picture, November 7, 2008

Hispanics and the economy: Economic stagnation for Hispanic American workers, throughout the 2000s

The Economy in Numbers


Adobe Acrobat / PDFDownload a PDF version of this paper
Email this pageEmail this page

Print PDFPrint PDF    Email this pageEmail this page



September 17, 2008 | EPI Issue Brief #247

More unemployed workers, fewer job openings

by Heidi Shierholz

Each month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) publishes unemployment statistics, including the number of unemployed workers and the unemployment rate. Unemployment is a key concept in assessing the tightness of the labor market, but it is far from the only important measure. Another measure, published by the BLS since late 2000, looks at labor market tightness from a different direction—the availability of unfilled jobs. This measure, the number of job openings, is an important counterpart to the more commonly cited measures of unemployment.

Figure A presents the number of job openings from January 2001 to July 2008 (the latest data available). The number of job openings is clearly cyclical, decreasing sharply during the recession of 2001, leveling off as the jobless recovery took hold, and then gradually increasing (though never reaching its pre-recession high). Early in 2007 it reached its peak, at 4.3 million workers in January, and began declining again, falling over 20% to 3.4 million in July of 2008. The decline in available jobs currently shows no signs of leveling off.

Figure A

Figure A also shows the number of unemployed—the familiar counter-cyclical measure, displaying the opposite trend of the job openings series. Late in 2006, unemployment reached its low point of the 2000s expansion—at 6.7 million workers—and then began increasing, rising 30% to 8.8 million unemployed workers in July of 2008.

Taking the ratio of these two measures gives the number of unemployed workers per job opening. This measure— the number of job seekers per job opening—is shown in Figure B.1 It is a dramatically counter-cyclical measure, increasing sharply during the recession of 2001 and into the jobless recovery, then gradually decreasing (though never reaching its pre-recession low). In December of 2006 it reached its low point of the 2000s expansion, at 1.6 job seekers per job opening, and then began increasing again, rising over 60% to 2.6 job seekers per job opening in July of 2008.

Figure B

The number of job seekers per job openings is now firmly in recessionary territory—at a higher level than during any month of the official 2001 recession—and it shows no signs of leveling off. There are now 5.4 million more job seekers than job openings in the United States, and that number is expected to increase as the downturn deepens. Millions of dedicated, productive American workers are experiencing the hardship and insecurity of unemployment with little hope of finding a job. The job openings data represent one more strong indicator of the need for a second stimulus package that is targeted directly at job creation.

See also this companion Economic Snapshot from Heidi Shierholz.

Notes
1. Job openings data are collected for nonfarm industries only, while unemployment data include unemployed agricultural workers. However, since unemployed agricultural workers make up less than 1.5% of unemployed workers in recent years, this discrepancy does not affect our results.

 


For a printer-friendly version of this report, click here.Adobe Acrobat / PDF



Did you find this publication helpful? Support EPI's work today!

Copyright © 2008 by The Economic Policy Institute. All rights reserved.

Readers may redistribute this material to other individuals for noncommercial use, provided that the text, data, and all HTML code remain intact and unaltered in any way. This article may not be resold, reprinted, or redistributed for compensation of any kind without prior written permission. If you have any questions about permissions, please contact EPI at publications@epi.org. Other questions or concerns about this Web site can be directed to webmaster@epi.org.

EPI home